One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Weaver
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14 next>>
Apr 10, 2017 23:36:24   #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
The Answer To The Question Is Hiding, They Only Come Out To Protest The GOP, Because They Are Hypocrites... Don D.

ALL THE EX-PRESIDENT'S SCANDALS

OBAMA USED SUSAN RICE -- WHERE ARE THE FEMINISTS?

Mychal Massie Calls BHO 'Craven Sissy-Boy' Hiding Behind Women's Skirts

World Net Daily ~ April 10, 2017

Susan Rice is an interesting study in contrast – not only because she is a fall guy, i.e., patsy for Obama, but also because of the way liberals, skin-color mongers and man-hating feminists who glory in pretending to be victims view things.

Rice is the woman trotted out to lie and attempt to cover up for the misdeeds of Obama. We witnessed this after he allowed Ambassador Stevens, Tyrone Woods, Glen Dougherty and Sean Smith to be murdered in Benghazi as he, after watching godless Muslims attack the compound, had dinner and then flew to Hollywood to do fundraising. Now in response to his latest incident, the so-called “unmasking” of those surrounding President Trump and their personal communications, Rice is sent to assume blame again.

Even more humiliating for Rice, as she was attempting to lie her way around the “unmasking,” it was revealed that under Obama, the so-called intelligence community conducted sweeps and unmasked sitting lawmakers at least once a month. (See: “Circa: Intelligence Community Unmasks Members of Congress And Their Staff As Often As Once A Month”; Matt Vespa; Townhall.com; April 6, 2017.)

Add to that factoid that while a few congressional leaders are aware of this, the sitting members of Congress remain clueless that they’re appearing in redacted reports, having had their identities “unmasked” pursuant to routine communication with foreign representatives.

Specific to the aforementioned, the reason Rice was sent out to lie was to protect Obama from what could and certainly should be prosecution for abusing intelligence data. This is precisely why, when she stopped lying long enough to admit that she had attempted to “unmask” those surrounding Trump, she then spun new lies, claiming the “unmasking” wasn’t for political reasons.

But as the old saying goes, this is where the rubber meets the road with respect to what I want to emphasize: Rice at best is an unmitigated liar and at worst, like Hillary Clinton, has sold her soul and suffered repeated public humiliation for men who aren’t worth the air they breathe.

Sending Rice out to lie and suffer the public insults because Obama isn’t man enough to admit his misdeeds is the very kind of treatment radical feminists love to wear as a vestige of victimhood.

Why aren’t the radical, liberal women’s groups that are in a constant state of angst claiming they’re being abused my men, apoplectic that a spineless Obama uses a woman to suffer public indignities for what he wanted done. And make no mistake; there is no way Rice’s actions were taking place without White House approval.

Why aren’t these women’s groups caterwauling about the public abuse and mental anguish Rice is made to suffer by a man in the ultimate position of power who instead hides behind her dress?

It is the same thing with Hillary Clinton. Bill Clinton has publicly humiliated Hillary to the point of making her a joke and a laughingstock. Why do the media that are quick to label all discussion of the criminality of Rice as racist and sexist not condemn the emotional abuse of Rice by Obama?

Why didn’t Obama send a man out to publicly lie about Benghazi since he didn’t have the guts to do it himself? Why did he send a “po little African-American” woman to suffer shame, public humiliation and face prosecution?

Liberals like Obama talk big, but at the end of the day they are craven sissy-boys who hide behind the skirts of women – while so-called women’s rights groups remain silent, blaming instead those who expose law breaking and claiming they do so only because they’re sexist and/or racist.

These feminists’ complicity in protecting the most cravenly debaucherous man ever to occupy the Oval Office is empirical proof of the absence of credibility of these so-called women’s rights groups. They willingly ignore the fact laws were broken at the insistence and instruction of a man in the quintessential seat of power and that the same man throws a poor woman to the wolves of public scrutiny.

Let me point out another fact others are unwilling to address. I am an unapologetic Christian conservative. As such, the accusation that I’m used by white Republicans to parrot their lies is inculcated into the minds of blacks. That inculcated accusation is then repeatedly expressed by the malleable-minded ignoramuses who call me and those like myself “house negroes” (but in the vernacular) and Uncle Tom. With that thought in mind, what can be reasonably said of Susan Rice, who at the drop of a hat runs to a camera and takes the blame for a man?

http://www.wnd.com/2017/04/obama-used-susan-rice-where-are-the-feminists/
The Answer To The Question Is Hiding, They Only Co... (show quote)


Well said Don
Go to
Apr 4, 2017 16:51:01   #
Thanks Auntie I loved it very much. I'm near that point in my life and it's time to put my money where my mouth has been.
Go to
Apr 3, 2017 22:34:29   #
So true Carol. All you have to do is to look a population statistics to understand which groups numbers are falling and whose numbers are rising. God have mercy on America.
Go to
Apr 3, 2017 22:26:12   #
EN Submarine Qualified wrote:
I often wonder how people with any pride can claim to be a Democrat. This is not a generic complaint against Democrats but pointing out how anyone can ignore what people like Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and a boatload of others represent and the laws broken and the failure of DOJ and FBI to address it.
I often wonder if that collectively is that the best they can do. How can they look in the mirror or even stand each other.
I do have an understanding of what the D party used to claim what they stood for. Working class success, anti-business and the like. But of course not true anymore.
Today it seems like power, power and getting re-elected is the only things important. I am inclined to believe they are for the most part traitors. A patriot would not engage our FBI, NSA and such in what looks to me like an overthrow of the government that we citizens elected.
I was raised to basically evaluate people by their actions. I find these people sorely lacking in integrity and I am really disappointed.
I still can't get my head around what these people think is in store for them if we end up a borderless banana republic.
What am I missing?
I often wonder how people with any pride can claim... (show quote)


I was a single lever pulling democrat. Then they were take over by all the immoral, God hating perverts. They claim in women's health issues and yet they call it progress to take the life of a baby. Some are aborted alive so they can harvest their body parts. They call that a chance to advance science. The made slaves of the black people. Some would say that is untrue but look at what they have done. Not true of all of them but many receive a place to stay, food stamps, medical care, free education and unlike a slave they would not require them to work while a slave would. But they are still trapped. Like Solinski stated (not blacks only but everyone) " the poor are easier to control if you are feeding them". When one fellow ask a lady what she was doing since she quit her job she stated "having babies for the government". They also made trade bills that literally cost the American worker their jobs and yet the worker still voted Democratic because they were told to vote Democratic. So sad, so we get what we vote for. America come back to God and we can still let Him turn our country around.
Go to
Mar 31, 2017 00:52:07   #
oldroy wrote:
You say that just as I have always thought of amnesty. Just remember that amnesty is one of the favorite topics of the leaders among the RINOs, McCain and Graham. It is this topic that set me off against those two men and made me call them RINOs. It was this topic that they sided with Bush about in 2006 when the House had already told them they would not accept any kind of amnesty.

I always think of Graham as Grahamnesty which some called him back then.


Oldroy when my great grandfather arrived in America he got off the ship in Texas ( The port does not exist today) west of the Colorado River mouth, he had a box ( about 14 X 18 x 6 ). It had everything that he owned in it except what he had on him. The government did not give him anything. He later married and had three children. He was a farmer. When each child got married he gave each one a payed for farm. My grandmother received a 440 acre farm. They say that we are a country of immigrants and that is true but no one gave them anything. They had to earn, by working, for what they had. Many signed on as slaves and had to work for six or seven years as slaves to pay for their trip to America. Why do these demented thinkers thing that we tax payers owe them anything. If they think that the immigrates need help let them take them into their homes instead of burdening the States, counties and communities that cannot afford them. How many school districts are maxed out because of this or the school age children of America are not receiving a good education because the schools are catering to the illegals. Check it out, the school district will not hire anything by a bilingual speaking teachers.some of the instructions are in a language the American children don't understand. I know of parents that have moved their children to another school in a different district because of this. Do this demented thinkers hate Americans and America. They must think that Americans must make the sacrifice so their political will can be accomplished. That is not freedom, that is government telling folk what they must do( Communism). Samuel Adams states something like this " If I do not want to help someone there shouldn't be anyone that could force me to help and if I want to help someone there shouldn't be anyone that could keep me from helping."
Go to
Mar 28, 2017 23:52:06   #
oldroy wrote:
I have heard that term over and over and back 10 or 11 years ago when the Senate RINOs were trying so hard to get it passed it meant primarily, amnesty to me. Back then McCain and Grahamnesty were working so hard to pass it in the Senate. George Bush wanted it and most Democrats seemed to want it, also. Actually amnesty was a very important part of that crap and not many of us wanted it, but for the RINOs and Democrats along with illegal aliens.

Well the term came back up tonight when Tucker Carlson was interviewing a really sad liberal professor. The man said that term at least twice in two or three minutes and all of a sudden it seemed to me that he was talking about amnesty, or at least a path to amnesty for illegal aliens. My problem is that I see no reason to allow criminals to stay here and all illegals are criminals in that they have broken the immigration laws of the
United States. Does comprehensive immigration reform have a different meaning than it did back in 2006?
I have heard that term over and over and back 10 o... (show quote)


It means open borders for all comers and granting citizenship to all who are here. And the American tax payer is suppose to support them until they get settled. Oh yes they will then have the ability to import mother, father, grandmother and other family members who would then be able to sign up for all the gov. free hand outs. Sounds pretty comprehensive to me.
Go to
Mar 19, 2017 22:57:07   #
That's a good one Arch.
Go to
Mar 19, 2017 18:33:26   #
DJRich wrote:
All weekend long the fools at fox have been sucking up to ryan and price, and allowing their lies and misinformation to permeate the tiny, under-developed little brains of trump and his supporters.

At this time, it looks like trump and ryan will get a beating in the house, and are sure to get a damn good whipping in the senate.

All depends what "favors" trumprick will dole out.

Anybody that would believe Obama's lying has no room to talk about anyone else.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/obamacare-repeal-premiums_us_58cc4cc0e4b0be71dcf4dba4?qj9&
All weekend long the fools at fox have been suckin... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 12, 2017 23:26:39   #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
The truth about Christianity!


I want call you names but there is a Bible verse that seems to fit. " the fool has said in his heart, there is no God". Psalms 14:1
Go to
Mar 12, 2017 23:13:24   #
Glaucon wrote:
All politicians and we wouldn't vote for them if they didn't lie to them. However, trump has been the most prolific of political liars so far in our history. Which of Trump's lies do you find most difficult to believe? Which of Trump's lies do you find easiest to believe? Trump said his mindless followers will believe anything he tells them to believe. Do you think he is right about that?

I think you have lost your mind. Obama was in office for 8 years, tell me One thing that he said that was not a lie.
Go to
Mar 9, 2017 17:11:19   #
You fit right in for this special day started by the socialist, communist organization between 1900 and 1910. There desire was to destroy the capitalism system. It still is.
Happy socialist day.
Go to
Mar 9, 2017 17:01:32   #
I think your talking about Obama.
Go to
Mar 7, 2017 15:36:55   #
Obama's hope was the hope that he would succeed in destroying our constitution and be able to enslave us in a communist type country. Of course he would be the leader for life.
Anyway thanks for the quotes. My hope is in my Lord Jesus Christ, the only hope.
Go to
Mar 6, 2017 16:13:41   #
When he stops all the illegals from coming over the border he will just use all the money the USA have been giving to them to build the wall and have money left over.
Go to
Mar 6, 2017 14:29:21   #
Spot on!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.