Judgement is not the issue, but fairness is. Is it fair to you to have to maintain tolerance for a condition you deem disrespectful of your liberty and equality? Why should other people gain advantage that you do not have just because they want to be different. The price of difference should be born by those that want the difference, not every one else.

I do not care if Gay people exist, nor do I care what they do privately, but I do care when they want to disrupt good order with disorderly behavior. There is no good can come from evil practices. Good being defined only as compatible with good and right thinking. Whenever a private practice becomes the dominant theme of a society, it is evident that we have lost both our mind and our character. There are many examples in History that show the fallacy of putting evil practices into law. It is the beginning of social destruction and often if not always leads to the demise of the society in which it exists.

Look at the reason for all civilization extinctions, and you will find that the primary cause of it is deliberate adoption of dishonorable and unright order. Regardless of where the idea comes from, it is evident, that a cohesive and growing society exits when the Government uses advisory or suggestions of good behavior for the citizens, and compulsory laws and punishment for infractions of good order.

Of course, there are unnatural conditions that must be considered, but unnatural should not dictate social morality. Benevolence maybe, but that would be an exception, and agreeable to and supported by all citizens not just a select few. examples are physical handicaps, blindness, etc. Now if you wish to classify GAYS as handicapped people, a definitive listing of the reason for such a condition must be defined, and established, otherwise it is "unwarranted special treatment"
Which could be also directed at foreigners that do not have the capacity to speak and understand the designated language of a society. Special considerations are warranted for temporary assistance until someone no longer needs it, but not as a defined social dictate.

Now you will question the source of GOOD ORDER, and I have only to suggest that Good order is recognized by its intent. If a suggestion or direction is conducive to harmony and peace, it is of Good Order status. If any law give give a social advantage to a particular group of persons. it may or not be good order, because it disrupts the EQUAL JUSTICE of the environment.

And to say that homosexuality is normal based on nothing is NOT BOGUS? You have to have some foundation for critic if you are to take a position. The only viable and enduring standard of social behavior, is the Word of God. Since there are so many adulterated versions of the writings, it must be a writing of common agreement that can be used as a standard for both moral and social behavior. Most of the civilized world has accepted the rendition scrutinized and agreed to be authentic as the standard . The King James version. This version has also been modified and distorted depending upon the denomination utilizing it. It is probably the least adulterated version at the moment. so it has become somewhat of a standard.

If that is their attitude, they are not Christians. They are deluded pagans. If you do not believe in God, your whole life is a meaningless exercise in futility. Life is meaningless, and you are irrelevant.

people have not stopped looking for work, they have just discovered that the government does not care if they live or die. they work without records. They take cash only, no records, not receipts, no hassle. The government is not concerned with the people, just with publishing meaningless statistics to appear that they are doing something other than harassing those tossed on the scrap heap of indifference.

If there is no God, the whole thing is meaningless. Life is meaningless. Love is meaningless. crime and death are meaningless. There is no purpose and no destination for life at all. We are arguing about nothing. Mankind cannot invent morality, because there is no basis for it. If there is no supreme law and morality standard, there is nothing to life. Life is meaningless. What reason do we have for existance? Are we here just as decoration for our own pleasure? If so then laws are just irritants and mean nothing. If everyone can establish their own version of morality, that too becomes meaningless.

The government was put in place to limit the actions of the people. People do not know how to control themselves sensibly. Since government is run by people, the whole thing is senseless. Unless a standard is established and recognized it is an open field of disparity. Society is supposedly a system of sensible laws and controls on the exercise of liberty. We have seen the senselessness of our law system. It should be gutted and rethought.

Maybe not, but that is not an unnatural combination. It may be unusual and unlawful, but man and woman in marriage is the preferred arrangement. That dual spousal arrangement may exist because of lustful stupidity, or scarcity of desirable companions or, or but it is not normal or desired. It is an adulterous situation, and accordingly comes under the banner of sin. It is also not condoned in normal society. Because it is lawful, or should it be lawful? Seems that you believe that anything we want to makes the rules. The next event will probably by marriage to a jackass, oops. that is already legal

Well when I say that your viewpoint is crap, is that metaphorical or does it have some truth to it. It is the essence of the term, and not the physical similitude of it. If you cannot see that in it and insist on actuality, you are demeaning your so called liberal education.

You have to use your common sense, there is no dictate for cannibalism in any culture except in history. I doubt if it is still practiced any where today. Cannibalism is and always has been a pagan concept.

Yet, if you believe that this life has no future value, than what difference does it make what any one does. We have no obligation to each other,and can make our own stupid rules. How society can exist under those rules is a mystery.

The Pope is the head of the delusioned Church. No one believes that crap.

Surely you do not take this literally, Jesus was the "bread of life" and his words the life blood of knowledge. It was and is the essence of these elements that is compared, not actual physical duplicates.

There is only one true God, The Creator of all things. It is not just my God, it is the only God. All those that deny the true God makes the rules for life are deluded.

Society makes rules that are only shadows of truth. If you do not follow truth, your follow fallacy. It is not up to created beings to establish the environment they are placed in, They must conform to where they find themselves.

If you believe that human beings created and established this world, you are fooling yourself. If you believe that the world came about from nothing and the actions of nothing but circumstance, you are seriously deluded. The conditions of the world we live in were created, designed, established, and are controlled by laws and conditions beyond our capability to modify. Because of our impotence in controlling disparaging trends, we force ourselves to live with them rather than doing what is right and true.

Same sex marriage does not directly affect me or you,it indirectly affects all human existance. It primarily affects those that adopt that position and the conditions of Society in general. Writing laws that condone disparate conditions is merely and truly deleting the nature of life. The future of same sex marriage is only relative to that element of society. In reality it is a dead end, and a foolish extension of vanity. The true future of civilization is not doomed by same sex marriage, it is doomed by accepting a false premise that it is of any value to a good and peaceful society.

If you can truthfully say and show the benefit of same sex marriage to society as a whole, I would like you to do so. It is without a doubt a selfish pursuit of false happiness. There is no social good in same sex marriage. If so, list it for me?

To adopt useless expressions of selfish desire is not a way to improve the environment we live in, it is a self destructive path of delusion. Give me just one good development of society as a whole by recognizing this disparate enigma. Do we recognize murder, theft, adultery, as GOOD things? It is the absence of these offensive issues that improves our life, not the acceptance. Homosexuality has no redeeming value to society in general. It is a disruptive anomaly that is being adopted by weak willed politicians to minimize the effort of taking a stance against its disgusting presence. Those that adopt evil will realize that no good can ever come from acceptance of evil. Next, we will have special privileges being enacted for all people that do not wish to conform to good order. Bald people will want special recognition and privileges. Prostitutes will want special status, gamblers the same. The camel has thrust its nose into the tent.

Homosexual relations are only prolonged suicide. With no progeny to carry on the essential good parts of procreation, it will essentially disappear like the dinosaurs of old. No children, no future.

Seems like time to become a vegan. If you can find any non gmo examples.

Well when He condemned the whole city because He could not find anyone expressing themselves in the fashion and definition of NOT SIN, He certainly said by action a lot about the kind of relationships that were prevalent at that time. And still exist today in spite of the clear declaration against such practices. All sinners at this time have no excuse for continuing to do things that Gad hates. There is an escape from sin, and the associated penalty. If the relationship is not as God desires, it is sin, and the punishment for continuing in sin, in spite of the opportunity to do right, is death.