I have posted these stats more than once. A larger percentage of blacks than whites are murdered. About 90% of them are murdered by other blacks, about 6% by whites.
By contrast, about 14% of white murders are committed by blacks. Blacks are 13% of the population. In every state, the percentage of black murderers is far higher than white.
The ratio of assaults is off the charts. In all violent crimes, (murder, rape, assault, armed robbery, home invasion, etc. ), Blacks commit more than half of these crimes, in some cases more than 70%. They are, once more, 13% of the population. The movie shooting in Colorado received national attention. Receiving considerably less attention was the fact that the theater death toll was about average for a week's worth of murders committed by blacks in Chicago alone. The same week Trayvon Martin was shot, something like 14 black teens were shot in Chicago by other blacks. This is one city only.

I can not answer your question, just add to it a bit. The Tea Party is only asking for less wasteful Government, and better focus on the true problems of our present society. At the moment it is too far in debt, too critical of enterprise, too easily let to adopt scam science, and takes too long to solve any problems, but too eager to create new ones that no one can understand (Obama care for instance), and too slow to fix mistakes. What we do not have at the moment is fairness in the country, There is too much emphasis on Social Justice and not enough on Equal Justice. We do not need to bring special favors into play because we think some claim to be mistreated. We just need to make the playing field of equal opportunity, If you have the skill, you get the position, if you do not, you have to measure up first. It seems that most of the bureaucrats in place are incompetent and crooked. This groups need to be cleaned out and skilled and honest people put in their place. The IRS should be the first outfit purged. I pray for common sense in this area.

What the hell is happening to this country and what are we becoming. The left is so concerned that someone might be offended. Well, I gotta tell you; I am offended. I am offended by having my principles turned into prejudices. I am offended by those who scream racist, trying to shut me up. I am offended by those who would block my clear thinking and plain speaking. I am offended by those who would impose mind control on me; limiting and controlling my free speech. I've am offended by those who deem not offending someone to be more important than the truth. I am offended by those that are unwilling to let me feel what I feel and express it.

I just saw that poor 80-year-old man on theTV; Mr. Sterling I believe his name is, crying, moaning and begging for forgiveness. It was pathetic the way he was apologizing and sniveling to the leftist bastard thought police. What kind of totalitarian bull shit is this. The left, who claims to have the moral high ground because they are so welcoming of diversity and so tolerant are sitting here in judgment trying to absolutely destroy this man. Here he is sitting in the privacy of his own home with someone that he loves and trusted while she is trying to lure him into saying something that can be used against him. The poor old man in his groveling was saying that it was because he was jealous. I don't believe that was the main reason at all. He also spoke of how his friends had been telling him about all these good-looking black men that she was always hanging around with. I think that he thought that that made him look like a fool, and he was likely imagining what racist perspective people that knew him might have and what they might be thinking when they're presuming that she is also more than likely having sex with his men. I really don't think he was particularly racist or that what he said came from a racist perspective but rather I think he was a little embarrassed for himself and wondering what people were thinking of him. I think he was embarrassed at being perceived as a fool & being used. That's a pretty uncomfortable way to feel and situation to be in. He was just asking her to have some consideration for him and not put herself on display in his territory like that. It's totally reasonable and to be expected under such a situation. Go ahead tell me the progressives aren't all about groupthink, compliance and tyranny. Where is their consideration to not offend the conservative, the capotolist and the Christian. Are we willing to stand up for liberty & freedom & against this leftist tyranny and call it what it is or are we just gonna stand meekly by until it gets so bad they start executing the Christians and the capitalists. Think it can't happen here ? ?? ??? It has in other countries that have gone down the same path. The Progressives are doing exactly what the American Communists Workers Party says in their constituion "Anyone who strays from the party line MUST be Crushed" Do you think 100 years or so before the inquisitions, that the good Christians of those days ever thought that could happen ? ?? ???

When I see a cross, I see Jesus dying in agony for my sins. I'm white & from the north.

Sat beside a black girl one evening, many years ago, waiting for our college class to start. We were talking along, told her my maiden name and she asked, "Oh, I know some H's, maybe you're related." She looked at me and continued, "Oh no, you wouldn't be." We laughed, & I thought that was a compliment, we were so comfortable with each other. That's the way things should be. We're all children of the One God.

On the subject of slavery, George Fitzhugh wrote a book "Cannibals All or Slavery Without Masters" in 1857. In it he compares the slaves of the south to the wage slaves of the industrializing north. He came to the conclusion that slaves of the south were better off than the wage slaves of the north, what he called the "free slave". The slaves of the south were considered as "their property, as they do of their horses, and their hounds, their cattle and their sheep and thus cared for even in sickness. The wage slaves of the north have not a thousandth part of the rights and liberties of the negro slaves. Indeed they have not a single liberty, unless it be the right or liberty to die." That was because the capitalist had no investment in the laborer. If he fell ill and could not work he could be easily replaced. So, the employer of the wage slave had no incentive to ensure the care and health because of the fetid conditions of the northern factories of the wage slave or his family as the southern slave owner did.

Just some food for thought.

What does race have to do with a corrupt and tyrannical government deliberately driving ranchers out of business anyway? You probably know the answer. Anyone the authorities want to destroy, they portray as a “racist” — i.e., as a thought criminal. If Bundy is a racist, he is wrong in all matters, as is anyone who agrees with him about anything; therefore the federal government was right to send in 200 heavily armed agents to terrorize his family.

Imagine a medieval king encountering resistance while trying to steal someone’s land, then denouncing him as a witch to erode his public support. This is the exact equivalent.

The New York Times decided to do a hit piece on Cliven Bundy and in doing so they used the usual tricks: They edited Bundy's comments. Now the Nevada rancher is being smeared in the media as a racist due to the dishonorable coverage by the New York Times and others. So, in the spirit of fairness and truthfulness in media, here's the complete unedited video remarks of Cliven Bundy, which don't contain racist comments at all, but rather very pro-black and pro-Mexican comments. See for yourself.

http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/04/cliven-bundys-pro-black-pro-mexican-anti-government-statements-completely-discredits-new-york-times/#xehToMm0rfyqldGh.99