Are you guys talking of another, "Iran contra-affair?". In Benghazi?
Which goes well beyond dereliction of duty! It becomes a worse crime then.

That just ups the ante in favor of impeachment.

Wait a minute you have a good point. Maybe the best point I heard yet! If they did know, that is contrary to the article I read from yahoo, that you all posted in the beginning of this discussion. Then maybe the course changes to cover up and I am still right. Lack of Leadership! Leadership is the issue. Lack of leadership goes back to the default charge, dereliction of duty!

propaganda and politics not truth. Say have that representative from South Carolina question the participants of Benghazi and see what he comes up with. Huh?

Oh yeah, I forgot, the democrats don't want the truth to come out. Why? I don't know.... I really don't know.

So Jack Nicholson was right in a few good men, when he said to Tom Cruise, "You have no idea of how to defend a nation."

Look, the work the military does to defend this nation will turn a civilians stomach, and be grateful you don't have to see it. However, the arrogance of Jack in the same scene must be checked. This same arrogance has been shown by president Obama.

So, in the case of Benghazi, Obama and his administration was too inexperienced in handling this situation. Same was true with George Bush Jr. when 9/11 2001 occurred. Can we agree on that at least?

You know the funny part about it, is when I said, I would have the Carrier group on full alert, according to military procedure this is the SOP! So the full alert would have been business as usually when in foreign waters. Hmmm. I think I am right.

Surely you jest, because of three issues. Look at how close to the Mediterranean Sea, Benghazi is! Really? We always have at least one or two Carriers in the Mediterranean. Check your statistics. You can't tell me that our Naval Station in Sigonella Sicily, does not have US Navy battle group ships that are not monitoring the European and North African area? Really. The USS George Washington, was on a Med, Cruise in 1994-5 and we on board this ship were able to monitor everything from Iraq to the Iranian boarder from the Indian Ocean! And you are telling me they could not monitor Benghazi really? I know for a fact we could! and I also know for a fact we do! I was on board the Washington. And that was nearly 20 years ago! You have the nerve to tell me that our technology has not improved. Really. Okay now this is getting frustrating.

Now, I will pose a question to you, starting with Carter. Here are the Presidents from 1979. Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush(part II), and Obama. Of these presidents, why is it that the presidents who served as members of the military, Reagan, Bush, Bush(part II), had successful military operations. And the following presidents have failed in their operations, Carter, Clinton, and Obama? Incidentally, Reagan and the Bushes, were Republican, and Carter, Clinton and Obama have been democrats. Also to be noted, is the fact that the republicans were successful in their missions and had some form of leadership while in the military, where as the democrats had no position in the military, in fact one ran away from the military, that was Clinton.

Look at this also, the last Democrat President to have any military experience was John F. Kennedy, Johnston did not. Of the Republicans, Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford all had military experience. In short President Obama does not have the experience to command the Armed Forces of the United States and it shows. He is guilty of dereliction of duty! Just like the command would come down on an E1-E8 if they made the same mistakes that caused the death of one of their brothers let alone an American civilian.

Come on, I cannot believe that we "were helpless" during the attacks. That is unacceptable. It is also unacceptable that a carrier was not patrolling the Med at the time. This is the failure of the Leadership, it is a failure of inexperience, and dereliction of duty. Why can't you all see that?

'The Armed Services Committee's interim report released earlier this year said the military's response "was severely degraded because of the location and readiness posture of U.S. forces, and because of lack of clarity about how the terrorist action was unfolding. However, given the uncertainty about the prospective length and scope of the attack, military commanders did not take all possible steps to prepare for a more extended operation."' straight from your article you posted, Lack of leadership and command from Washington. It is up to Washington to keep up on the readiness of out military force overseas, it goes back to leadership!

Was it asinine for the Canadians to rescue some people from our embassy in Iran in 1979? Resulting in a big sign in Detroit saying, "Thank you Canada"

No, if I had been commander I would have had a carrier group in the Med. on full alert and communications between the carrier and Ambassador Stevens and the Navy Seals on going. So that if there was any trouble, I would launch our fighters and attack aircraft as well as search and rescue aircraft to free our ambassador. This was not done.

And you can't tell me this isn't possible, when I worked as an Avionics technician on the E-2C hawkeye, that extends the radio communication to more than 1000 miles. So the SEALs and the Ambassador would have been saved. Oh by the way, 600 miles is no excuse because the range of the Carrier is thousands of miles, in bad weather. Don't give me the excuse of what was posted above. I know that our military is better than that. Obama just didn't order the protection. He failed to Order the proper solution to the problem and worried more about getting elected than our Ambassador. Plain and simple. This is dereliction of duty. No other word for it.

You really didn't understand the report did you. Focus on this the four that could have saved the ambassador was redirected. This is where the ball was dropped. Again you are thinking like a post Vietnam era, Civilian and not like a member of the military where we were all expendable. Therefore, you view life as very precious and because your life is on the line you are motivated to go above and beyond the call of duty even if you are injured. But when you are given a lawful order from a superior you must follow it or you put yourself and the lives of those around you in danger. See what I mean.

The ball was dropped by the superiors not the foot soldiers. This is where the problem was. Not the fact that there was a "Stand Down Order", the "Stand Down Order" was an excuse to do the investigation. Get it.

The problem with Benghazi is not the fact, that the situation went down. It is how the situation went down and Why the ambassador was there in the first place. Okay here's the questions I want the Obama administration to answer they are simple questions.

1) What was the ambassador doing there?
2) If the CIA had intelligence that militants or terrorists were on the rise and a possible attack is imminent, why was security not doubled or more forces dispatched.
3) When the incident was going down why were there no orders for military presence to assist in the evacuation whether from Tripoli or the Mediterranean?

No, Obama handled Benghazi like Carter handled the Iranian Hostage Crisis. This is the failure of leadership. I remember Gaddafi, drawing a line of death in the sand and Reagan calling his bluff. Obama did no such thing. Instead he accepted the casualties and did nothing. That's the problem.

He is commander-in-chief and did nothing. If you have an opportunity to act you have a responsibility to act--for it is your duty to act. According to the UCMJ, if you are on watch and you fail to act(there for dereliction of duty) and people die, you can and will be held responsible for treasonous activity. Do you understand now?

I understand Civilians are a bit more lax on this, but us former military are trying to save our own lives and that takes precedence. Sorry Patti but you are wrong.

I can agree with you on that. However do you want to hear the newest thing he said in Texas of all places. We really need to impeach and imprison Obama. Go to http://www.politico.com/story/2014/07/obama-impeachment-react-oh-really-108771.html and find out why! Arrogant pompous traitor SOB!

The first thing a single person must do is pray to God for guidance and reassurance. For me, God is the power that inspires me to speak and act to support the Constitution. Know that in the days of our founding even up to this day, Congress has prayed.

Remember however prayer not said by the heart and in full emotion is an empty prayer. This type of prayer is like what St. Paul said, "Faith without works is dead.", this saying also says, "God helps those who help themselves." We need works.

Now the best way to get started is by persuading your friends and family to re-examine the Constitution and the Bible. In the past few days, a friend of mine and myself have started with Genesis and are working to Revelations by hearing the Bible read. There are many websites that you can download the Bible for free in audio version. This is how the bible was intended to be passed on anyways.

Now, you don't have to be a devout Churchgoer or a religious zealot or a Christian nut case, to hear and be inspired by the Word of God. You can be inspired by the Word of God through the failures of history. Take for example, the Israelite people, a most stubborn people. They cling to God during times of calamity and turmoil, yet in good times they turn away from God. They become Fat and Lazy so to speak. This is what I believe happened to the United States.

It is true that the Bible speaks against the rich man, however, God's Word also speaks for the rich man, when we read, "If you keep my commandments, your prosperity shall increase."

Now this is religious terminology written a book called Proverbs. It would not be a proverb if it only applied to faith. Wisdom dictates that people before us have had to handle situations of this nature before. Knowing this would it not be prudent to see the successes and mistakes they made? This is what our founding fathers did when they created the Constitution. They looked at Israel. From the freedom of slavery by Moses, until the people cried out for a King, the people of Israel lived in the world's first democracy. This democracy worked! The people were united in faith, which encouraged the brotherhood of man to work together willingly.

Other ancient societies like Rome before the empire, and Athens and Sparta, Ephesians, and Corinth, practiced Democracy. And in every case there were reasons why Democracy failed one of the reasons was factions. However the main reason Democracy fails is because of human Greed and the Lust for power as was seen with Ceasar. We are not a lynch mob of people, we are a Republic with Democratic tendencies. Or better put a Democratic Republic.

By making the people subject to the written law, Democracy flourishes. By ignoring the written law, well just ask Israel what happens.

Now since the stubborn people of this nation are the ones we elected, we must convince the public of their crimes. We have to get the word out. Obama is the leader of the Democratic Party and the President of the United States, so whatever happens on his watch is his fault and God is watching. God grants every human being time to change and steer away from their wicked and evil ways to find Him. However, there is a tolerance level that will kindle the Anger of God. There is acts of wickedness that will also kindle the Anger of God.

The ransom of sin, can be solved one of two ways, but ultimately God is the final Judge. If Obama seeks forgiveness God will grant him forgiveness, but charge him with repairing the damage he caused. This is only just with a just God. However, if in his hardness of heart, he refuses and exercises stubbornness against God, the Anger of the Lord shall fall upon him and incidentally, not only will he pay but the ones he leads will also pay for this wickedness.

At this point God will look for a worthy person, to overthrow him. God will call him out and make him stand before Obama and destroy him. This is way one.

The other way is the people rise up in one voice and demand him to either change and come back to earth out of his wickedness, or resign.

Now I'm kinda going backwards with this but if you follow it from the end to the beginning you will see how it is done.

For the people's anger to be kindled against Obama, a great percentage of the people must act. Samuel Adams, and Ben Franklin, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson took their resources and influence to convince the people to stand together by logical citing the reasons for separation.

That is what we must do, we must not forget the mistakes of Obama and charge Obama, like Nixon was charged. Make Congress we are not going to bury this. Take to the streets and hold an honorable demonstration, that is peaceful.

If it is an honorable demonstration, and a peaceful one, and if the police, or national guard, are brought in under the excuse to control the crowd, then the tyranny is exposed. Lyndon Johnston had to face that in the 60s. Violence is not needed. The threat of violence however may be needed. It depends upon how stubborn our elected officials are.

Take this in consideration: there are 100 senators, and there are 435 Representatives in the Legislative Branch. There are I think 13 Justices on the supreme court and of the President's cabinet there are about 10 or 13, I can't remember the exact number, but it is below 50. Now if I take 100+435+13+50(say the max) this equals, 535 Legislature, 13 Justice, 50 Executives, or a total of 598 members of the Government. How many people are their in the population of the United States?

So it stands to reason that the Government is outnumbered by the people. Yes, we can sue the government for not doing their job it is part of the Bill of Rights in the redress of grievances. However, this right is used to gain money and not gain true change. We need change not money. For if true change is done, then the prosperity will reap more money if the money was not accepted.

Now we can refuse to pay taxes but if an individual does he is punished but if everyone does the law changes. So therefore, it is true that one person does not have enough power to overthrow the tyrant. But there is an old saying in Government, the "squeaky wheel gets the oil", the longer we speak out against this tyranny in peaceful protest, the quicker change will come. But the first step is to speak out and have a redress of Grievances to start the process. We need backing. We need backing of the media, of our friends, neighbors, employers, workers, we need backing.

If the government sees one man on a march to the white house, there will be no change. But Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., went to Washington with a crowd of thousands. John and Robert Kennedy listened and acted.

This is what we need. We are not raising a leader up to become a martyr, however depending upon the stubbornness of the president, that may happen. Be prepared for that. Make sure that whosoever becomes our leader in this cause, is replaceable by another who can take his place should anything happen to the chosen leader.

At this point the Government cannot stop us. They, just like us, don't know what to do in this crisis. There is a right way, a wrong way and an apathetic way of solving this crisis. Obama has done it the wrong way and we, the people need to hold him responsible.

Do not be discouraged because it will be a rocky road but exercise diligence and belief in the cause. I wish Anonymous, would jump on this band wagon and join us, because most of them know how to get the information out and can be a thorn in the side of the Government.

I hope corporations, that see the evil that president Obama is doing, come to their senses and join our cause. At this point, when we come to the point of no return, words of Benjamin Franklin will come back to haunt us, "We will either (re)start this nation, or we will be hanged as traitors."

Sorry Ben, we would not be considered traitors because we are fighting against a traitor. But we may be hanged for trumped up illegal reasons anyway. But if you are like me, a patriot and God-fearing man, you cannot just sit by and watch this wickedness continue. You must pray and speak. Talk your head off. Use and abuse the first amendment until Obama is so tired of hearing about it he resigns.

If the situations merits acts of extremism, as in the civil rights fight, use this weapon as a last resort. Provide the least amount of casualties possible. We do not want to destroy the man, we want to remove him from office. But if the situation merits an act of violence, I recommend taking over by force a media outlet station and using off grid power and speaking until their armies haul you away. The longer you speak on this subject, the more people will listen. Hold no one hostage and harm no one. The point is not violence. Show that Arvy guy that supposedly helped Obama get into office and was his mentor, that violence solves nothing. Make sure it is a peaceful exercise of our first amendment rights we just needed the equipment to be broadcast to the people. This would not be considered an act of terrorism nor would it be considered a revolutionary act against the Government, especially when the people learn we are protected the Constitution not destroying it.

I prefer however using the internet to voice my concerns. From the luxury of my computer I can voice my concerns and hopefully it would go viral for all to see. Just on this site alone, I am finding that people are like me and have the same concerns. We do not want our country to fall because of Obamas. We will not let this happen. That is why I continue to speak. And the beauty of the internet is if I get shunned or kicked off of one site I can go to another. Facebook and twitter have not done that to me yet but it may come. I don't care, for what is right is right and I'm am not going to let 200 years of freedom be destroyed by an idiot in the white house.

Make my words go viral. Let it be known. I am charging the President of the United States with Serious offenses and I will not let up. And the most scary part of the whole ordeal is I am not alone, but I think I am the most peaceful speaker. For I will not raise arms against the country I love, when I am trying to persuade them. But I will raise up arms against terrorists, foreign or domestic.

We are Americans. And in a sense we are a family, we do care for each other, look at the aftermath of 911, the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and the Alamo, and Gettysburg if you need examples. We may fight amongst ourselves but when it comes down to it, it is because we care. We care for one another. We support, 'Love Thy Neighbor' so I ask my Neighbor 'speak out' make your concerns known. and realize there are many among us that believe in the same thing.

The art of Persuasion not the Gun is needed here. I would be the first to condemn the man, who uses violence to persuade our elected officials. Yes stop the money, and the votes by all means but do not harm the American Citizen!

Look at the Christian Slater movie, "Pump Up the Volume" and watch how Christian Slater convinces the Young to speak up! That is what I am doing you you all today. Speak up. Be responsible and speak up. Do not be rude, do not be crude. Condemn what is wrong and speak up! That is what we all must do. On an intellectual and common level speak up!

Follow the example of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. minister of Christ. Speak up. Dr. King never showed violence toward the white man. And Dr. King fought for all people, not only for the black man. He was a Child and student of Christ! He spoke up and protested peacefully. Using his example, this is what we must do.

If we are sucessful, we will show, the government and the world five things. 1. that terrorism is not the way to bring about change. Violence is never the answer. 2. that the people have the power in these United States. 3. That a government of the people, by the people, and for the people shall not perish from the earth. 4. that it is healthy for a country founded with God given principles, need the people to speak out against them to ensure justice, freedom and liberty to all. And 5. that America is not full of infidels and greedy money grubbing men, seeking to destroy nations overseas!'

So you ask me, "What am I to do?", I say pray, speak, persuade, and be diligent. This will not happen overnight but if enough of us speak, then we will be heard. Dr.King was given a deaf ear from the government for years until he stood on the capitol steps that day in 1962. And it took 20 years after his death, until true change came. Be diligent, and persevere, May the Grace and Peace of Our Lord Jesus be with you in these trying times and Comfort you during the frustration of this cause. Thank you.

Start with the family then branch out. Free the conscience and the rest follows like dominoes.

I finally had an opportunity to research and view the 99% declaration and the Continental Congress 2.0 for the reboot of American Democracy.

The heart and conscience were in the right place but the procedure lacked effectiveness because of how it was administered.

If we are to reboot, so to speak our Democracy, we must do it in an orderly fashion and in a way everyone could participate. Now we do not have to organize a physical march so to speak. But how about an electronic march on Washington DC?

Now follow me on this idea. If we can get the word out for 90 days, to the public about redressing Congress and the Government on issues that are most important to the people. Then have the people vote from their homes on these issues via the internet with a password and user name.

Then the Continental Congress would have been more effective in 2012. However there would also be problems. So to address these problems we would have to implement the rule of law, in a parliamentary procedure. We would need a committee to address the issues and prioritize the issues.

I suggest we should start with the individual, and branch out to the family, then the community, then the State, and finally the country. What I mean is the issues must start with the individual and his or her family.

We know through every ounce of science whether it be physical, medical, or social, that all problems and issues that affect a person personally and cause a burden on that family starts in the home. How we treat our brothers and sisters in the home is how we treat our neighbors outside the home. So the first issue category should address these issues.

I wrote a petition back in 2012, against Obamacare, to address the fundamental protection of conscience. http://www.petition2congress.com/6149/a-proposal-to-protect-human-dignity-free-good-conscience/

This petition was intended to add to the protections already imposed in the first amendment with added emphasis on conscience and to bring up a fundamental principle concerning religion or lack thereof.

This principle is "Governments established by men have no business in dictating, writing or abolishing moral laws. Nor can said governments judge either way on a moral issue. They can however, judge the people on legal and ethical issues."

This is how this petition was written. This is the first issue that should be addressed by a reboot of the Constitution by the rule of law in parliamentary procedure.

Now this redress is only one of many that I personally have against the Government and should be addressed in open forum for the pretext of civil justice and civil agreement.

The first issue is about family and the individual giving liberty and dignity to the American Citizen.

The next issue to be redressed should be on immigration. Immigration is a two fold issue. The first part is securing the border for the American Citizen where the next part is allowing the immigrant to become an American Citizen.

We must for our common security and well being. The American citizen should be granted a level of privilege just being a citizen of this great nation. This privilege shall entitle the citizen certain benefits that the foreigner is not entitled to. This makes being American desirable.

Next, we must protect that citizen. Local Law enforcement along with Federal Law enforcement must work together and where the Federal government cannot or will not enforce the law, the State should back the Feds up and enforce the law themselves. This ensures the security of the citizen.

If the citizen is unemployed, and the foreigner has a job, the foreigner should give up that job to the citizen, unless the foreigner is becoming a citizen. The country must take care of their own first! If I am called a racist because of this statement and because I exercise nationalism, then I'm going to hit somebody! This argument is so irresponsible it makes me sick. I fought to defend the constitution for the American Citizen not for the rest of the world. Come on man! lets be reasonable and just.

Immigrants should learn our language, culture and way of life. I welcome all immigrants that are here legally. I encourage immigration. But if you come into my country and break my laws I want you to leave. That simple.

The next issue is foreign relations. Should an American Citizen be held hostage or killed by an Islamic Terrorist, then we must be strong enough to stand against that terrorist. If I were president there would be missions against the terrorists like Israel does. I would attack the terrorists until they stop attacking Americans overseas and abroad in the same manner Israel does. Also I would assist our ally Israel in their endeavor to protect themselves against terrorists.

Being part Italian, I have the nerve enough to say to the Islamic Terrorists, "You want a Jihadi, well here you go!" I would start a bombing run and turn that desert into a sheet of glass. I would route every Terrorist hiding spot in such a manner that even the world would ask me for mercy on those rebel Muslims. And in reply to the rest of the world, I would say, "They called down the thunder, well let's let it rain!"

After they suffered enough, hopefully it would not be that long, I respect and cherish life so this type of destruction which would be horrible and I do not have the stomach for, I would then bring them to the table and see if we could iron out our differences.

I would not leave any man behind and would not release any prisoner of war. Instead I would try the prisoners of war in a war tribune and seek justice for their crimes.

Now these are just a few issues plaguing the country. I do like removing the money as property issue in the redress of the Continental Congress of 2012, however, it was not properly organized.

Also to both Canada and Mexico, as well as all countries in the North American Continent, I would offer statehood to them. By providing an opportunity to becoming a state and joining the union, I would reduce the national debt and reduce the cost of foreign aid and gain people and more taxes incidentally and by default.

I would try to fulfill Teddy Roosevelts dream of making the American Borders to include the entire continent. I've always said it is easier to defend 150 miles of border on the Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras border and border than 1100 miles of border from Texas to California.

If my "new reboot" is successful, then Every Mexican, Guatemalan, and Belizean would become citizens of the United States and be free from Mexican, Guatemalan and Belizean control. This would reunite families on both sides of the current border. However, the Mexican people, the Guatemalan people, and the Belizean people would have to vote on it. And the states within their countries would have an opportunity of becoming a member of the United States of America.

What I also bring to the table is the fact that once and for all I would end the stranglehold the drug cartels have on our brothers and sister countries to the south. This is more aggressive then amnesty and allows americans to travel to our vacation spots south of the border by dropping the border completely and annexing Mexico into the United States. Our immigration issue would shrink and American Business would thrive. Thus, Mexican, Guatemala and Belize business would thrive as well. However, there will also be problems that need to be addressed before I render total control of Mexico, Guatemala, and Belize.

I would also disband the mexican police, and implement the officers into the United States Law enforcement. I do not want the rest of the world but I believe as Teddy Roosevelt believed, that America should include the entire continent. In time I would work on Central and South America too. But the rule will always be, if the citizens of the country want to be a state of this Union then I would grant the road to statehood to the local governments.

So the solutions I present to our modern problems of the economy, drugs, terrorists, medical and family issues can be solved with land expansion. Plus, with my confidence in the established laws of Civil Rights, I am sure that the Mexican, Guatemala and Belize cultures would be preserved. I would also entice Puerto Rico, and Cuba, to push for statehood too.

In our history, Cuba and the United States were always friends, however due to a botched Democrat job, Cuba felt abandoned and Castro went with Russia. John Kennedy always felt bad about that. Now, the sons and grandsons of the president, could fulfill his mission of peace with Cuba and reinstate Cuba with the United States and make them a state. We should also include all of the Caribbean, including St. Thomas, Jamaica, Bermuda, and all the islands under one flag. The United States of America flag. This would promote Americanism and reboot freedom in a way never before done.

I do not believe in the bias media, that countries on this continent are against us. No way! We are the biggest consumer of goods and services and have given so much wealth to our neighbors why not include them into our union? However this is a personal dream of mine, and I know this would solve the southern border crisis and immigration crisis from the south.

This is just the beginning however, it would take over a hundred plus years to complete however, our prosperity would increase if we do it. This is not imperial empiricism, for the people would have to be willing. I would not admit a state into the union if they did not agree by unanimous vote. I would not take possession of their territory either. However, I would try to persuade them by all honorable means necessary.

We must first however, work on our family unit. Then branch out to expansion. That is my idea. What are you guy's thoughts on this?

To answer your question, I must revise your question a little bit. Not only must we defend the Bill of Rights but we must defend the Constitution in its entirety. Any threat against the Constitution is a threat against our homeland and yes both are under attack.

Well, do you think Nero thought of any of this when he burned Rome, or Hitler when he killed the Jews? Did Saddam Hussein think of any of this when he murdered thousands? Did the rebellious Jews think of this when their temple was destroyed in 70 A.D. by the Romans? Or did the Emperor of Japan think of this when he bombed Pearl Harbor? Or were each of these leaders so stubborn that they paid for their transgressions by an overwhelming act of righteousness?

These times are escalating the issues to a biblical standard! Did Louis the 16th think of this when the Inquisition was occurring? Did Europe think of this when they punished Germany for World War II? Does it really matter if the IRS, the Banksters, 8Fed, IMF, CFR care?

The people care and that is what is important. The philosophy that I have stated, the history in which I have stated is proof enough to charge not only the President, Vice President, Secretary of State, Defense Secretary, and the IRS and various other Executive Departments including the Department of Health and Human Services with dereliction of Duty and failure to do their job, but I have also pointed out what the result may be if they are allowed to continue with this sort of Tyranny.

Now a question was asked "what does one do about it?" and the answer is to do what you can do, when you have the opportunity to do so. Petition Congress, vote the responsible out of office, pray for our Country, these are just three of a million things that can be done by "We the people."

Be creative if need be. But get the message out. This is what I have been saying. If enough people stand together for the cause of holding our elected officials responsible for their actions Congress will act in our favor. History has shown this.

Did Congress not act against Nixon when he overstepped his authority? Did Truman not act when he felt Roosevelt stayed in the oval office for sixteen years and after he died he instituted and backed the Amendment limiting the term of president to two consecutive terms? It may have taken ten years but didn't the public push Congress, to push the president to get us out of Vietnam, (which would have happened sooner if Robert Kennedy was not killed)?

The unjust will always lust after power, so we the just must limit that power. The founders knew this for they set up in the Constitution not only the separation of powers but a system of checks and balances which the people are included in.

The founders feared factions that would tear the Constitution to shreds. They feared that small groups of people, would bribe our Representatives, Congressmen, Senators, and even the President into doing their bidding. Watch Mr. Smith goes to washington, how a political machine was so stubborn and arrogant, that the machine told leaders what to do? Is this true freedom? Having a political machine tell a person of power what to do?

Historically speaking the people can take abuse. It was true in the events leading to the Civil War, and events leading to the Civil Rights movement and events leading to the Cold War and the end of the Cold War. When the people speak the government must listen, or the government will lose not only their jobs but their lives. The people will not care what the IRS, for example thinks, when the people demand justice.

Hitler wrote a book on how he would take over the world. The people did not care and thought he was just blowing smoke, that tune changed, when he damn near did it.

Learn from the past. The saying goes, "Those who fail to study history are condemned to repeat it." This is what is going on today. I do not advocate violence to achieve the goals of the people. However, violence tends to be the only thing these stubborn people react to. And now it seems that Obama in lieu of Benghazi and the deaths of Americans all over the globe along with other injustices done to Americans, are being ignored. So my question to you is, How long will America stand for such violence?

Obamacare was an immoral act of Congress, and it threatened life, but it was nothing compared to the deaths of hundreds in the events that followed.

Are you afraid of another Vietnam? It was amazing to me that during Desert Storm, John Q Public was afraid of another Vietnam in 1991, yet today the same political party that led us to Vietnam is in office. And millions have died. Why hasn't anyone tallied up the deaths due to terror victims as compared to the deaths of those who lost their lives in World War I, World War II, Korea, and Vietnam?

And it would be shocking to John Q Public if the Media did such a study. Would the deaths of which terrorists , that is Islamic terrorists, are responsible for, totalled more than these wars and drunk drivers be exceeded? How then would Obama's actions of releasing these prisoners of war be, viewed by the Public?

We must act now to take back our country. We cannot wait. I showed the general conscience of most Americans I deal with and have surrounded me in my statements here. I have shown the lessons of both history and religious faith. I have shown the articles in which the government is guilty of. And yet we remain apathetic?

Call upon your family, friends, and neighbors to assist the cause of freedom. Are we a lynch mob country or a country of laws? Bring back the rule of Law, Mr. President by resigning. Then to the public I say, give me a candidate that is worth a darn to vote for, instead of having, we, the people, try to decide between two tyrants.

Show me an American Son or Daughter, that acts upon their conscience and I will show you a true leader and a patriotic American. Show me a person whose character is based in humility and justice. One who believes in true freedom not freedom trumped up by lawyers and lobbyists.

Show me an American who has the fortitude to do what it takes even if it is unpopular. Show me a true American who is ethical and moral, who is fair and true, who supports freedom like our founding fathers. The liberals put emphasis on the defects of our founding father's character without showing what truth and justice can do.

Obama has turned the office of the presidency into an imperial office. Has Emperor Palpatine entered into the United States Government? Did George Lucas in 1977, happen to write a prophecy on what might happen to the United States in his Star Wars saga? Many in the saga lost their lives dethroning the Emperor. Is Obama's goal to disband Congress?God Forbid!

oops, look at me I replied too much. Sorry. but it really gets under my skin, when people become so apathetic that they allow idiots like Obama, take their freedom away with thunderous applause.