Trump and the right wants to impeach Muslim unless you can afford to stay at one of his Hotels!---Cool Breeze.

I expect that something is coming for common Muslims in the near future. Only diplomatic representation and tourist are going to need the use of a hotel and they can afford to stay at one of them.
The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by "force, violence, or other unconstitutional means." This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House.

The laws prohibits entry of "Aliens who the consular officer or the Attorney General knows or has reason to believe seek to enter the United States solely, principally, or incidentally to engage in activities which would be prejudicial to the public interest, or endanger the welfare, safety, or security of the United States." It also prohibits the entry of Aliens who are members of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches, the overthrow by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means of the US or of all forms of law, and Aliens who publish, circulate and distribute materials teaching or advocating the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the US Government or of all forms of law.

Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life's guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any "organization" that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited. It also prohibits those who distribute literature that advocates the overthrow of our country, which would include the Koran.

In fact, there are many verses in the Koran that command Islamists to kill those who do not submit to allah and the prophet. If Congress so desired to hold the White House accountable to the current immigration of refugees (which also must comply with the law), it has the Immigration and Nationality Act to cite. The Administration is breaking that law. The question is "does Congress have the political will to do something about it?" Or shall we be a nation like that in Isaiah 59:14 where, "justice is turned back, and righteousness stands afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter." I think you know the answer, at least for now. But there are a handful of Congressmen who are studying this. Pray.

The results of an investigation of presidencial elections in the states of California, Illinois and New York would be very interesting. Sure it will demonstrate that Hillary Clinton did not won the popular vote.

I think that the first act of Trump's goverment should be to order an investigation over the presidential election in California, Illinois and New York, besides other states with problems as Nevada. It is important to demonstrate that Hillary Clinton did not win the popular vote and if something wrong is found, such as illegal votes counted as good, make it known. If it is not done, the left is going to be repeating that she won the popular vote, as a Tibetan mantra, for the next four years, asking to eliminate the Electorar College.

Obama retired the troops from Iraq and made easy the situation for the ISIS that obtained the weapons left in the place to soldiers without a proper training. Such behavior (using the words of Dr. Dross) <will simply label as reckless and not treasonous, though putting ideology before country come close>. It is known that obama sympathize with the Islam since the time when his name was Barry Suetoro and he prayed at the mosque accompaning his step-father Lolo Suetoro, so retiring the troops from Iraq comes very close to putting ideology first.
If the word witten by Dr. Dross are analysed (Even if Trump did not know or collude with Putin, his ignorance of what Putin is and does should be enough to render him unfit to hold office), then Obama is unfit to hold office when he tries to ignore who is and does Castro or the King of Saudi Arabia.
When the campaing started I thougth that Trump did not know anything about politics and was being used by Clinton as he used Rus Perod years ago. Now I know better, he used psychology and pragmatism at each step and he won.
Trump is an intelligent man and is demonstrating he knows what he is doing. He has no compromise with any politician, his cabinet will have as Secretary of State a man well known in China and in Russia, as is well known the Secretary of Defence, this men are complementary, besides his behavior implies that no one is indispensable. Trump is sending mensagges to the allies and to antagonists. The Chinese will not dare to try him as they tried Obama not receiving him properly. They have the measure of respect that he pretends for the president of USA when he had a conversation with the woman that is the president of Taiwam congratulating him on his victory.
Having good relations with Russia is a way to help Europe. Putin is better as a friend than as a foe and Russia is a country with a little population in relation with a great territory, meanwhile China needs more territory for his huge population. Thus Russia needs the friendship of Europe and the USA. Moreover: Europe, Russia an the USA have a common enemy: The Islam, that is not a religion and pretends to conquer the world, having dominion over 57 countries. Delaying the Electoral College Vote is against the law and the supporters of Hillary Clinton must understand that in accordance with the law Trump is the winner twice, taking in account that in the state were there was a recount he increased his victory and it was detected irregularities favourable to Hillary Clinton as were in Nevada. It is provable that if and investigation is done about the presidential election in California, New York and Illinois there will be tree millions invalid votes that Trump is speaking about.

Cool Breeze. You say: I had an interresting conversation with a toady about the legacy of Fidel Castro! -------I think that the toady in question was a Castro adherent and that toady convinced you that Castro was a great guy and you believed him. ------You say: If the west likes you, you are good and if they don’t you are bad. ....To those who are willfully ignorant to the truth.----- I do not want to believe that you sympathize with Hitler and Stalin because if it is so, you are a bad person and Fidel Castro was as Hitler or Stalin, no more no less. I think you are, as you say, ignorant to the truth. I do not want to offend you, but take care with your opinions specially when you speak with some Cuban who has been a prisoner in Castro's prisons or with those who have a relative killed by a Castro's firing squad and generally with any Cuban that is a decent person that has scaped from the Cuban paradise. I remember that during the II WW, uncle Joe (Stalin) became a great person because he was in our side no taking in account that he had killed millions of Soviets before the war and during the war half of the 22 miilions of dead Soviets were due to his politics. Maybe Fidel Castro is in proportion as great as uncle Joe and Hitler were in their moment.

Cool Breeze. You say: I had an interresting conversation with a toady about the legacy of Fidel Castro! -------I think that the toady in question was a Castro adherent and that toady convinced you that Castro was a great guy and you believed him. ------You say: If the west likes you, you are good and if they don’t you are bad. ....To those who are willfully ignorant to the truth.----- I do not want to believe that you sympathize with Hitler and Stalin because if it is so, you are a bad person and Fidel Castro was as Hitler or Stalin, no more no less. I think you are, as you say, ignorant to the truth. I do not want to offend you, but take care with your opinions specially when you speak with some Cuban who has been a prisoner in Castro's prisons or with those who have a relative killed by a Castro's firing squad and generally with any Cuban that is a decent person that has scaped from the Cuban paradise. I remember that during the II WW, uncle Joe (Stalin) became a great person because he was in our side no taking in account that he had killed millions of Soviets before the war and during the war half of the 22 miilions of dead Soviets were due to his politics. Maybe Fidel Castro is in proportion as great as uncle Joe and Hitler were in their moment.

When I was in the Army in 1960 in California at a signal corps depot in Sacramento, I came to Florida by bus along the border, I stayed in several places, because I wanted to see that part of the country. I went to Mexico going from El Paso to Juarez. Mexico City, Acapulco and returned by the same way. So, I saw a little bit of those places. Most of the people who work in the agriculture in USA come from Mexico, they have the jobs that the Americans do not want. Donald Trumps knows that and he is speaking of legal inmigration with doors for those inmigrants to come and return. In Europe, as example, in Spain when there were no open borders, the Spanish farmers used to go to France for the harvest of the grapes with special visas to work and when they finished the work they returned to Spain. The same procedure could be used with the Mexicans workers. For that movement of workers a good transportation is necesary.

Instead of the bullet train it could be the Hyperloop that would go at 800 mph. and would be a revolution of transportation.

This would be something like the Chinese Wall to stop the Mongols, being used besides for transportation and the control of the border will be stronger, because this constrution will have a great security.

I have read about the idea of building a bullet train over the wall that Trump wants in the border with Mexico. I think it will be convenient for both countries a joint enterprise to do this. Mexico builds the wall and the USA puts the train to be used in its north border by that country and in its south border by USA. This idea will be a great solution to ilegal inmigration in the area and goes in accordance with the improvement of infrastucture in both countries. In Mexico it will go from the Gulf to the Pacific. In USA it can go from the Atlantic to the Pacific, if the bullet train go from South Florida accros Alabama, Mississipi, Luisiana and Texas to continue over the wall. There would be stations in both sides in every stop of the train and there would be the doors that Trump says he would open in the border. With this the Mexican will not lose face and the wall will be built. What is the opinion of the members of OPP?

Nov. 21, 2016 Islam is not here to integrate is here to dominate. So said Haitham Ibn Thabait - American Chapter of Hizb Ut-Tharir.

Nazism, fascism and communism are totalitarian doctrines, which are contrary to the "American Way of Life"; so, when someone asks to reside in the United States of America, in the application forms, that person is asked if he or she has had any relation with these ideologies. However, there is no mention of the Islam, which is concealed under the cloak of religion, the wolf in the sheep skin; not taking into account that it is a real danger to this country because this religion, which is in full force, aims to conquer the world with its political, economic, social, cultural, military and customs program, amalgamated by religion, as established in the Koran; being the Islam more dangerous than the union of the three totalitarian political ideologies above mentioned,

We have to show solidarity with European women that are being raped by Muslin refugees because they do not wear a hijad but we have to show solidarity also with all the muslim women that live under the rule of Islam and have to obey Sharia Law. These women and girls most of them suffer from the Stockholm syndrome, as they defend their kidnappers, molesters and rapists; or they have the fear that has been instilled in them for centuries, passed down from mothers to daughters and grandmothers to granddaughters; being very few that reaching in the West freed themselves from the slavery imposed upon them in sharia law by order of the Koran; although, the defenders of the Islam, including some women, praise the rights, which they say, the woman has in this religion, forgetting that there are established standards of how women should be punished; the pedophilia, involving marriage of girls being children of 6 years old without having age to consent (imposed marriage) and consummating the marriage at the age of 9 years (because so did the noble prophet Muhammad with the daughter of Abu Bark), causing frequently the death of the girl, for lacerations sustained in the sexual intercourse, due to the lack of development of their private parts. There is also the ablation or genital mutilation, which is practiced so that the woman does not feel sexual pleasure; which also will be a lifelong suffering, because they feel pain urinating, and when they have their menstrual period or when they have sex. Then there is stoning to death, that can be submitted by an accusation of adultery (which may apply to be a false accusation); or rape, which is very usual in Muslims countries (as if they had committed a crime when they have been the subject of a criminal act), without punishment for the violators. Often they are raped but may not make any accusation, because they have to present four male witnesses never available, and if the matter becomes public, she will be sentenced to death, being alleged matter of honor or adultery, by assuming that there was consent, contrary to what state the victim, even if she was physically battered for having resisted. A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s). The burka is used to cover the whole body of the woman with only a wire rack to see and breathe, as imposed by the Talibans, without mentioning other terrible prescriptions that these fanatics impose upon their women. In the radical Islam women are prohibited many activities normal in any Western country, such as working outside the home, study, playing sports, driving a car, fixing their hair, painting their nails, etc. The Criminal Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Article 435 states: "Man has twice as much value as the woman. The woman is worth less than the left testicle of a man.."
All of the above intend the Muslims to continue doing in the West, with the introduction of Sharia law, without considering that many of their customs, produce a great reluctance in the countries that receive them as refugees. In the United States, the man who has sex with a woman under 18 years of age (in other Western countries 16 years) commits a serious offense, regardless of whether there was consent or not; and if the girl is only 9 years old, the seriousness of the case is even greater. Pedophiles and pederast are monitored closely after they have served the jail sentence imposed on them by their acts against minors; and the age for a girl to marry and the conditions for it are determined by the law. In any Western country, the marriage of a 9 year old girl is not allowed, because it is presumed that she is not prepared mentally or physically developed to consent to it.
The east of the British capital has become a kind of caliphate, which has its own laws, its own schools, its own leaders and its own temples. A Muslim woman complains; and she tells to the Baroness Caroline Cox, a member of the House of Lords and an activist for the aid to humanitarian causes: "I feel betrayed by this country I came to escape this (sharia law) and the situation is worse here than in the country from which I escaped." The aforementioned activist said that a Muslim has up to twenty children with different women, as he has several wives, although according to the law, he recognizes only one, so the children of those unrecognized are children of single mothers and the state aids in the maintenance of those children; so, the British are tricked and beaten, because they are maintaining the children of Muslims, raising crows which tomorrow will peck their eyes.

CharlesRabb wrote:
CNN anchor Alisyn Camerota suggested on Monday that Americans should sport hijabs to show solidarity with Muslim women.
Ricko wrote:
Isn't it ironic that neither Camerota nor Cuomo suggested that it is up to these Muslim women to assimilate into our culture instead of us submitting to theirs.
Nov. 21, 2016 Islam is not here to integrate is here to dominate. So said Haitham Ibn Thabait - American Chapter of Hizb Ut-Tharir.
Alisyn Camerota sure is on the pay list of the Muslims. There are many of this kind. Bill Clinton received several millions of an entity for the implementation of Sharia law.
Nazism, fascism and communism are totalitarian doctrines, which are contrary to the "American Way of Life"; so, when someone asks to reside in the United States of America, in the application forms, that person is asked if he or she has had any relation with these ideologies. However, there is no mention of the Islam, which is concealed under the cloak of religion, the wolf in the sheep skin; not taking into account that it is a real danger to this country because this religion, which is in full force, aims to conquer the world with its political, economic, social, cultural, military and customs program, amalgamated by religion, as established in the Koran; being the Islam more dangerous than the union of the three totalitarian political ideologies above mentioned,

Donald Trump said what many people wanted to say but did not dared to say, because they were afraid of not being politicaly correct. The media ignored what was the way o thinking of the mayority of the people, so the media was not doing what it is suppose to do. What Trump said was in the mind of many people but the media did not know it or did not want to let it be known. The pundits of the media wanted to be in good terms with the goverment and they created a big lie, so big that they themselves started to believe it. Trump used a crude language and it is sure that a politician would not use that language but that is the language of the common people and they understood him very clearly. Now let's see what he is able to accomplish. The media owes an apology to the American people.

Donald Trump said what many people wanted to say but did not dared to say, because they were afraid of not being politicaly correct. The media ignored what was the way o thinking of the mayority of the people, so the media was not doing what it is suppose to do. What Trump said was in the mind of many people but the media did not know it or did not want to let it be known. The pundits of the media wanted to be in good terms with the goverment and they created a big lie, so big that they themselves started to believe it. Trump used a crude language and it is sure that a politician would not use that language but that is the language of the common people and they understood him very clearly. Now let's see what he is able to accomplish. The media owes an apology to the American people.