To answer that question, if I don't vote for Trump, what's the alternative? Fournmore years of Biden? And if that be true, and America is pissed off right now at old Joe, do you really think, now use critical thinking, that old Joe would resort to using force to eliminate his political enemies?

Thus, the prediction of Donald Trump is correct, and it is an observation......hate to point out the obvious but James Buchanan had Fort Sumner, as Lincoln took office. What would Joe have?

Really, that is an interesting defense, coming from you, hmm someone else said the same thing in different words but same meaning, it went,

"If I don't defend myself, who will?" ---- Donald J Trump

Are you a liberal idiot who got left behind?

What a stupid post!!!

...and here's why.....

The first amendment specifically protects the free practice of religion, by saying, "Congress shall make no law, respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise of religion"

Since this is the law of the land, it applies to both religion and non religion as the premise as read straight, and in reverse.

Due to this reason, the constitution, the first amendment, prohibits the practice of writing laws to decide the morality of the people. To do do would mimic the monarchy the federalist were so against.

It is here that Jefferson wrote his famous letter of "separation of church and state". Jeffersons push was to eliminate the the mystic superstition from matters of law. This is what came out of the enlightenment age.

However, for a law to be just, the superstition must be removed as well as the hypocrisy. The former is true but the latter is not. For the latter to be true, then the two tiered justice system would not exist, nor would accusations be considered automatic guilt.

However, the principle, as set forth, according to Jefferson about the superstitious nature of religion holds true, and do does the converse, hypocrisy. Thus since both should be omitted by law, therefore, both should not be practiced in law. Which brings forth the sodomy laws as enacted by congress backed by Abraham Lincoln.

Therefore if we are to refrain from hypocrisy, and recognize honest Abe for "Freeing the slaves" we must also recognize him for instituting the morality of the anti sodomy laws. These laws were invoked due to the.livestyle.of the Moromons or the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, which practiced the act of polygamy. Honest Abe was against that.

But here, like in the case of the homosexual, the government tried to dictate the morals of the person or group. Now, in the end, Lincoln was right because the Mormons no longer practice polygamy. But it was still a legal moral issue.

Now, in any case, if no one complains and there is no harm, then why change the law. Clinton reversed all the sodomy laws which would then hurt the community it was protecting.

So the whole premise of your thread falls apart.

Governments of man, have no right to warrant the morality of man. Since man is equal to another, then what right does one man have to judge another man. Thus we've come full circle, "Ye with no sin, cast the first stone."

Nice try. You are assuming that the 200 million are distributed equally, if the population is distributed equally then your theory makes sense, 1/3 to win. However that is flawed based upon. The distribution. Of the 200 million.

So say, three states, California, Texas, and New York, have greater than 1/4 of the population, leaving the other states combined the other 1/4 of the population. These three states would decide the election based upon your premise, this describes the popular vote.

Now if we look at how the amount electors is distributed amongst the states, thats where the balance comes into play.

Better explanation would be if you read the federalist papers, I believe it was by Hamilton or Madison, where they define the system of the electoral college and the balance mechanism.

The locals have the most power, for it is through the local system, where the winner is drawn from. This removes in theory any political machine. For it is the counties, that make up the electoral college, but these counties are bound by thier perspective state. Whosoever wins the majority of the counties wins the state, and its from the counties that the electors are drawn from.

Also, the people trust the elector to vote for the will of the county they represent. If the elector flips, at time to cast the vote, it is the right and duty of the county to take action against the elector, who is bound according to local law to do his duty. If he is found derelict, then as the local law provides he hid thus held to account.

Local laws and states laws govern electors.

Thus, your thesis is flawed considering that the math assumes equality of population as compared to reality of the unequal distribution of population.

I

Mostly I agree with your post. Biden successfully passed off half the nation with his state of the union speech, and well Trump pisses off the other half each time he talks.

However, the truth be told through action and not words, Trump helped the country, where Biden hurt the country.

But Mr Congeniality, Mr Trump, like Sandra Bullock in the movie of the same name, had a lot of parallels. The heart is there in Trump, but the mouth is not.

We have in this country, have gotten use to political correctness, or looking out for another's feelings. Well we found in the 90s that doesn't work, nor does throwing money at a problem work. For if it did work, Bush Sr, Clinton, Bush Jr, and Obama, would have been great presidrnts, but that in hindsight is not true, they were average, but they got the job done.

Trump comes along and does what they couldn't do, in four years....he should be given credit for that, but wasn't because of his mouth. Now we look at Joe Biden.

Three years in office, and not only has he pissed off republicans, Maga, and what's left of the tea party, but old Joe pissed off independents, libertarians, and his fellow democrats. Therefore he pissed off a great majority of America.

Now dies it really matter his mental acuity? Not really, since if push came to shove, he wouldn't fight. That's what's playing out right now.

America saw years ago, when trump was accusing Biden in a debate, during the 2020 election, how Joe Biden seemed to cry.

Well, that's what it appeared to be in that one debate. Now, in poetic justice, America saw that, and instead of listening to the quantity of Trump's statements and the treatment he received thereafter, America only reacted to the fact that Trump made Biden cry.

That's why he lost the election, due to the sympathy of Americans. But that's true only.on the surface. If you dig deeper, the results of 2020 election were and still are inconclusive. Therefore Trump's statement, 'They stole the election" is just as true as Biden’s statement, "I won with the most votes in American history." Both statements are true as proved above.

Do we need fresh new candidates? Yes I believe as you do. However, in this junction of time, we need a man who has the fortitude to withstand the evil that will occur in the next four years.

That being said, who would you choose to save your life, "Trump, Biden, RFK Jr. Or the others on the ballot" we will know in November.

Yeah, I agree with you on half your statement, he is a New Yorker who grew up in Queens. A lot of those people are bullies.

But here's the thing, I would rather have a bully in the oval office, than a coward whose too old to piss.

FACT CHECK: there is no conclusive evidence to support that claim. Again False post

Damn sounds like you are talking about Biden?

FACT CHECK: Donald Trump was never accused for insurrection. The house of representatives voted to impeach, which means they accused the president. Then the senate tried the president and he was acquitted of all charges.

Thus, according to the constitution. He can't be tried again, in any court, for the same crime. That is called double jeopardy which is prohibited by the bill of rights.

Therefore, the beginning of your thesis fails. Then moving on, do you realize by calling Donald Trump an insurectionist, and not proving it in a court of law, you hereby are guilty of two things: 1. Slander, and 2. Bearing false witness against your neighbor.

This fact thus, destroys your entire post. GAME OVER deposit 25 cents and try again. Your entire post is false.

Sounds like a republican Ross Pero

Well is it Rocky VS Apollo Creed in Rocky II or is it Grumpier old men?

Donald Trump won the Republican nomination.

Joe Biden won the Democrat nomination.

The rematch is on.

What horse is yours?

That may be true

I can see, old Joe being a stoner.

Most likely, cocaine, meth, speed, or Crack. The meth, coke, or speed was so he could deliver the state of the union speech. As far as the downer, most likely, Mary Jane, or perhaps, alcohol. But there is definitely cocaine because he likes singing women hair....lol

That's a half truth.