That’s a true statement you make... I do not know anyone who works in DC..

But I have a client that does a lot of government business and I have had occasion to speaek with any number of people within a couple departments that have to ask you three times what your name is and what company is this?? That’s a sure sign they aren’t paying attention... I could go on and explain incomplete bidding contracts or failure to submit signature pages or for them to return signed contracts etc.. Or how they have their own “ buddy system” on contractor they want you “ to consider” and how their blue prints to a job are often modified even after jobs have started etc.. and return a call??? Ha that’s the biggest joke..

And where did I say they are lazy or incompetent or both??? Please don’t add comments to my posts that were not said to begin with..

Very disingenuous of you to do so..

Do I have evidence? Yes, math. I know math is hard but try to follow here. For over 30 years the government has been prioritizing identity over job qualifications in hiring. The average government worker retires after about 20 years due to, let's say 'generous' (because that sounds better than 'brazenly corrupt'), retirement benefits. That means that by now over 99% of government workers are performing (literally) jobs for which their major qualification is their identity, or minority status. So, while nothing is impossible and I could be wrong, the odds are overwhelmingly in my favor. It's unfortunate that this basic common sense needs to be explained to you. Unthinkingly parroting your leftist professors' lunatic ravings doesn't substitute for intelligence, despite what they taught you.

So, obviously, it was the word 'minority' that triggered you. Are you too uninformed to know that race is just one of many diverse qualifications for minority status? Or are you so obsessed with race that you view everything through a racial lens, because you foolishly believe that makes you a 'not-a-racist', somehow?

This morning the Hawaiian Civil Defense issued an alert to the entire state warning of incoming ballistic missiles. It read, 'Ballistic missile threat inbound to Hawaii. Seek immediate shelter. This is not a drill.'

Turns out some government drone "pushed the wrong button". After sending every resident in the state into panic mode, they waited over half an hour to issue a retraction.

This is what happens when hiring is based on minority status rather than qualifications. Typical government incompetence.

Right you are and even with that demonstrable need the court will follow its original ruling adding perhaps a modification to the previous ruling.. They have only done this 10 times in their entire existence.. Never abrogating the original decision but adding to it as the need required..

Further, once precendent has been achieved in their ruling cases of similar context are rejected out of hand as the parties can read the ruling knowing the court is not going to change it..

I’m still waiting for a reply though so I can read the case...

Why The Electoral College Makes Sense


The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on the Internet. It should finally put an end to the argument as to why the Electoral College makes sense.

There are 3,141 counties in the United States.
Trump won 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.
There are 62 counties in New York State.
Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.
Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond)
Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country.
These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.
The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles.
When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election.
Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, LA, etc) DO NOT and SHOULD NOT speak for the rest of our country


Do share this.
It needs to be widely known and understood.

In their infinite wisdom, the United States founders created the Electoral College to ensure the STATES were fairly represented. Why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation?