Thank you all for your comments!
Mann
Multiple Cultures and Factions Prevail.
Our culture is sliced up into many pieces or factions; so much so that the common elements are very few. Consider the following slices and dices among many:
Rich Man/ Poor Man
Democrat/Republican
Democrat/Conservative
Democrat/Progressive
Liberal/Conservative
Liberal/Progressive
Republican/Conservative
Republican/Progressive
Democratic/Libertarian
Republican/Libertarian
Radical Right/Radical Left
Educated/Uneducated
White collar/Blue Collar
Religion I/Religion II/Etc.
Religious/Non-Religious
Christian/Atheist
Christian/Non-Christian
Truth Teller/Habitual Liar
Patriot/Non-Patriot
Elite/Non-Elite
Givers/Takers
Ethical/Unethical
Moral/Immoral
Cultural Snob/Cultural Boor
Pro-America/Anti-America
Intelligent/Unintelligent
Strong/Weak
Military Experience/No Military Experience
Pride in Birth Area 1/Pride in Area 2,3...n
Ordinary Citizen/ Elite Citizen
Ordinary Citizen/Politician
Ordinary Citizen/Congressman
Ordinary Citizen/ Entrepreneurial
Leader/Follower
Statist/Federalist
Federated Republican/Collectivist, or Humanist, or Socialist or Communist (who adopted the term "Progressive" to disguise their affiliation, which is becoming more and more obvious every day!)
Management/Workers
Business Man/Others
Citizen Today/Citizen Past/Citizen Tomorrow
Lawyer/Citizen
Fluent in English/Not Fluent in English
Born American/Immigrant/Illegal Immigrant
Upstanding Citizen/Criminal
And all shades in between, with many gradations and combinations!
It is little wonder that we continuously have serious conflicts, clashes in beliefs, and ultimately nasty invective between opposing views, particularly when beliefs run so strongly, often challenging deeply held religious, emotional, inherited or reasoned beliefs! Many times the opposition uses unfair tactics to shut the citizen up and denigrate him, hoping to send him away.
We are a multicultural hodge-podge living our separate very uniquely human lives, and many, many different lifestyles, but held together socially by at least eight or so very strong beliefs and common goals:
The value of strength in numbers;
the rule of law;
the joys of our freedoms;
The economic system;
the best place to raise our children;
the opportunities for betterment,
a compelling work ethic, and in,
the love of this country. (There are more reasons, of course…)
All of our diverse cultural components contribute to a peculiar synthesis one might call an “American Culture,” but if examined closely, it quickly dissolves into some or even all of its constituent or factional parts, and even harkens back to quite different historical origins and allegiances. I suppose that if there must be such factions, it is a real blessing to have so many factions that their opinions and strengths tend to cancel each other out!
How many discussions or arguments between two people have been completely biased by their opposing factional belief systems, preventing any mutual understandings? For that matter, do we know all of the factions and ideologies our adversaries hold close? Most likely not!
The remarkable thing is that this federated, democratic, republican form of national government, with its written Constitution as the Law of the Land, has successfully held together for nearly 240 years, despite many sweeping ideological differences along the way. The differences have persisted to this day and have again become a serious divisive force in the nation.
It is time for those who believe in America, its Constitution, its common laws and its founding principles to stand up and fight for them!
Rose42 wrote:
They won’t try and change it but they will keep squeezing.
In my opinion, the focus should be on the people not the guns. Were we to have a better society, a better education system and better surveillance of growing youngsters by medically trained observers, doctors and teachers, as well as parents of course, many of the shooting disasters could have been avoided altogether. After all the gun does not point itself or pull its own trigger. That takes a person. Tend to the people and the gun problem would be tremendously reduced.
I do not know the exact numbers, but there are upwards of 80 million or more gun owners in the US, and they own about 200 million weapons, who are not a threat to society. That tells me that it is the criminal element, the deranged and mentally overstressed that need help or incarceration. It is a total misfocus to carp about gun control while leaving these crazies loose to find just any old weapon, say using their bare hands, knives from the kitchen, or from fertilizer and ammonia or some other type of explosive mix, or even poisonous gas, for instance. to carry out their murderous deeds.
I like to keep it simple. The 2nd Amendment allows me to keep and use my weapons and ammo. I support that Amendment, and so do millions of our citizens. Article V of the Constitution sets forth what is necessary to amend itself: 2/3rds of both houses to begin, and approval of 3/4th of the states to ratify. Good luck with trying to change the 2nd Amendment!
rumitoid wrote:
I will make it one-sided. It naturally invites comments.
One of the enduring traditions in public education is the recitation of the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance before the start of class, often while standing with one hand on the heart. But given both the protections of individuals and restraints on the government (public schools are government entities) required by the First Amendment to the Constitution, do students or school staff have to participate in the Pledge? And can students be reprimanded or retaliated against for refusing (sitting or "taking a knee"), in protest or for other personal reasons? The short answer is "no," but there's a long history of jurisprudence leading to that conclusion.
In West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943), the Supreme Court ruled that requiring the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The case grew out of West Virginia's passage of legislation requiring the pledge and flag-saluting. Lawmakers had intended them to be part of instruction on civics, history, and the Constitution, and they defined noncompliance as insubordination that was punishable by expulsion from school. Parents of expelled students were also subject to fines. After Jehovah's Witnesses students were expelled, their parents brought suit contending that the law infringed upon their religious beliefs, which they said required them not to engage in these secular practices.
I will make it one-sided. It naturally invites com... (
show quote)
So the Pledge is not "required", but it must be offered to all who wish to honor the nation and its heritage IMHO.
vernon wrote:
VERY PRO! Some anti-death protesters fear that the medications won't work or the convicted killer will be in pain during execution. I have a solution to this crap.The guillotine is painless and instantaneous. Aren't we tiring of hearing these lawyers crying for their killers and making a fortune for 20 to 25 years With nit picking appeals. This is just a scheme to make lawyers money.
By the way, do these softhearted individuals consider the terror and pain the killers victims experienced.
VERY PRO! Some anti-death protesters fear that the... (
show quote)
I am pro death penalty. For one situation, a serial killer once convicted should himself be killed.
teabag09 wrote:
Where have you been? Good to see you again. Nice to have a cool head back on the circuit. Mike
Well, I had a fall, and a crazy blood pressure that took a while to conquer, and was just not up to a lot of repartee. Good to see you Mike!
I Believe In: (Revision 1) March 12, 2019
God the Trinity
Man's Fallen Nature
Salvation through Jesus Christ
Moral Absolutes
Natural Law
Right Reason; Truth; Facts; and Objectivity
The Constitution, Read Plainly and in Conformance to Natural Law
The Rule of Law
Freedom and Liberty for All
Specifically, Freedom of Speech, Religion, Association, and Movement
The Right to Property
Family Responsibility
Strong Defense of the Nation
Limited Government
Fair Taxation <===
Equal Justice Under the Law
Trial by Jury
Capitalism and Fair Markets
Freedom of Enterprise
Equal Opportunity for All
Fiscal and Social Conservatism
Effective and Proper Education <===
International Cooperation, Mutual Defense, and Trade
Aid to Those in Need: Especially Veterans; the Disabled; Old; and Ill
rumitoid wrote:
So true, we never are. Ageless, in my brain. Mirrors lie, obviously.
I see the aging in my wife of 62 years once in a while when I focus closely, and the shock sends me to the mirror, and yes, there it is for me too!
We seem to have quite a few old geezers here in OPP! I wish them all health and longevity!
Richard Rowland wrote:
Has anyone else had the depressing experience, where you've been watching or reading about an action-packed situation and thought how you would handle it, if finding yourself in a similar situation, only to remind yourself that you're eighty years old, and wouldn't be able to do shit?
At 88, I can still shoot a good group at 75 feet with an automatic: ten rounds you could cover with your hand. The problem is, I seldom have a weapon on my person, which reminds me I should obtain a concealed carry permit! I would indeed be helpless without an equalizer!
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Voting is one of the fundamental rights and privileges of any democratic nation...
In the past months there have been numerous threads concerning voter fraud and illegal practices...
Yet one wonders about the wisdom of allowing individuals with split allegiances to vote in elections that effect the entire nation...
Numerous citizens from Canada and Mexico (as well as a host of other nations) have achieved dual citizenship and are legally allowed to vote in American elections...
Given the recent tensions between these respective nations is it truly wise to allow these individuals to vote.... Can their allegiance to the States be considered impartial... Will they exercise their democratic rights in an unbiased manner...
To all of the OPP members...
What is your perspective?
Voting is one of the fundamental rights and privil... (
show quote)
As many have said, you cannot serve two masters easily, much less three, including God! Dual citizenship should be illegal. If you pledge allegiance to the US, then you should drop your other citizenship yourself, or be made to legally.
Liberty Tree wrote:
Right to life?
You will find your answer under Social Conservatism and belief in God and the Ten Commandments.
March 9, 2019
I Believe In:
God the Trinity
Man's Fallen Nature
Salvation through Jesus Christ
Moral Absolutes
Natural Law
Right Reason; Truth; Facts; and Objectivity
The Constitution, Read Plainly and in Conformance to Natural Law
The Rule of Law
Freedom and Liberty for All
Specifically, Freedom of Speech, Religion, Association, and Movement
The Right to Property
Family Responsibility
Strong Defense of the Nation
Limited Government
Equal Justice Under the Law
Trial by Jury
Capitalism and Fair Markets
Freedom of Enterprise
Equal Opportunity for All
Fiscal and Social Conservatism
International Cooperation, Mutual Defense, and Trade
Aid to Those in Need: Especially Veterans; the Disabled; Old; and Ill