GORP is the Grand Old Tape Party.
All you have to do is Rape a women Deny it, and hope Trump is behind you so he can control the investigation. That’s why he needs to remove Sessions put Lindsey Wagner as AG Fire Rosenstein, Wagner will Fire Muellar and the investigation into Russian hacking into our election gets buried. Welcome to the New Russian way of governing. (THE MUELLAR REPORT WILL NEVER GO PUBLIC THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL NEVER GET TO SEE IT AS LONG AS TRUMP HAS CONTROL OVER THE HOUSE AND SENATE)

The Republican Party is officially the party of rape and they just get out there and Shame the victim. It’s working and the republicans are wearing it as a badge of honor.

Brett or alias Bart is the Crowne Jewel Of achievement with the Grand Old Rapist Party which has been building up for years. We all remember republicans running for Office on ( LIGITIMATE RAPE) (DONALD Trump in his own words) another crowne jewel for Republicans was trying to get Roy Moore the (PEDAPHILE) elected and now Brett Kavanaugh. I believe Kavanaugh when he said he did not do these things because a five minute incident with Dr. Ford and a two minute incident with Debbie Ramariz he was so Damm drunk he doesn’t remember doing it. So Dr. Ford is lying because she doesn’t remember how she got home and only had one beer. (AS TRUMP MOCKED HER) But she sure did remember what Brett or Bart did to her. That’s something a women would never forget.

So now the Grand Old Rape Party ( GORP) becomes the Party where sexual predators don’t just feel right at home, sexual predators are liked And admired and promoted.

Republicans have proved to be no better than a bunch of drunken college students at Yale that find it except-able to gang rape, binge drink, and assault women. Then use a Known sexual predator like Trump who had an affair with a porn star while his wife was at home with a 5 week old baby, accused of sexual assault by 19 women and denied it. Then becomes the man in charge of investigating the assault.

We all drink in HS and college we were 18, 19, 20, 21 years old but we did not rape or assault women. It was very clear to me when I read that hand written letter by Brett or Bart, his HS year book and corrborating evidence from his College room and other people that knew him in HS and College he was drunk all the time. Stumbling around and was very loud and biligerant but Trump would not allow the FBI to investigate any corrborating evidence. Now the GORP controls the narrative of just deny because there’s no evidence that Brett or Bart did these things because they already floated the narrative that Dr. Ford was a creditable witness and they believe she was assaulted they just deny the fact that it was Brett Kavanaugh.

“I desire you would Remember the Ladies, and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors. Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the Husbands. Remember all Men would be tyrants if they could. If particular care and attention is not paid to the Ladies we are determined to foment a Rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any Laws in which we have no voice, or Representation”

Abigail Adams wrote that in 1776. Her words have never seemed more prescient than they do today.

Surely, this is a time where many ladies wish to foment a rebellion. So many of us, today, want to burn a system to the ground that could put a man like Brett Kavanaugh, a man accused of multiple accounts of sexual assault, on the Supreme Court. Especially when there is such a strong sense that justice has not been done. The FBI’s investigation was limited. Mark Judge, an alleged witness, was never subpoenaed and made to testify. Ford’s nuanced, precise testimony seemingly could not hold up to a man shouting about how much he enjoyed beer.

Some (male) people might be concerned that women will foment the rebellion. To them I can say with certainty that the rebellion is already underway.

Like Ford, women “are used to being collegial.” So the rebellion might look more polite and orderly than some people expected.

That does not mean we are not furious.

“Women are so angry,” Trump declared in a rather garbled press conference about Kavanaugh on Tuesday night: “Women are very angry.”

It may be the first time I’ve agreed with Trump. God, are we angry. If we had calendars, like Kavanaugh, for many of us, this week would just be represented by the word “fury” scrawled in all caps.

For years, women’s anger has been dismissed. We have been taught to subsume anything even resembling anger at all costs. Watch a woman speak in a tone that does not convey deference and watch her be called "strident". Watch a woman speaking firmly be accused of "yelling". If she is not smiling, she seems "angry". If woman are openly upset, they will be called "hysterical," a term which implies that the root of their anger is a form of madness.

Mercifully, for the first time in a long time-perhaps the first time ever-women’s rage is being seen as valuable and useful. Soraya Chemaly’s book Rage Becomes Her and Rebecca Traister’s Good and Mad are both recent books delving into the way women’s fury have created a more just world. In Chemaly’s book, she remarks that, “Anger has a bad rap, but it’s actually one of the most hopeful and forward thinking of our emotions. It begets transformation, manifesting our passion and keeping us invested in the world. It is a rational and emotional response trespass, violation and moral disorder.”

And women’s anger does create change, even here, even in this age. In an excerpt from Good and Mad published in New York Magazine, Traister cites not only my personal favorite angry American woman, Abigail Adams, but the many times American women’s anger has been the impetus for social movements. Those range from the women at textile mills in Lowell Massachusetts staging walk-outs in the 19th century, in one of the first iterations of a labor movement, to Emmett Till’s mother cracking open her son’s coffin in order to reveal the damage done to him to the world. Doing so, in Traister’s words, “lit a match under a burgeoning social struggle that would help to partially remake the United States and lessen (though hardly obliterate) the legal and political obstacles to racial parity.”

We’ve been angry before. We’ve channeled our anger to remake society, before. We’re good at this.

“Why aren’t women out in the streets then?” Some people are wondering.

Those people are remarkably unobservant. We are. Seventy percent of the membership and almost all of the leadership of local resistance groups are women. We are outside The Hart Senate Office Building chanting “We Care” and “Abolish I.C.E.” We are organizing walk-outs to protest Kavanaugh. We have been out there, in the streets, numbering in the millions since Trump was elected.

And yet, each year, when we march, Republican men wonder why women are even marching.


That is easy to answer this week. When we march, we are marching against your blithe dismissal of the fact that women’s lives have value. We are marching to inform you that we are people, not objects for male pleasure. We are marching to show that our lived experiences of pain will no longer be something you can dismiss with a laugh and a shrug.

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, when asked what she remembered most about her assault, replied, “Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter, the uproarious laughter between the two.”

It’s telling how little Republicans have evolved in 50 years that, during this trial, as a woman described her sexual assault, republicans like Kurt Schlichter were tweeting, “I’m laughing.”

Women are not.

Women aren’t going to keep politely laughing along with you. Even Republican women, who will tie themselves into knots trying to justify bad male behavior, have seemingly reached the end of their rope.

They are fleeing the Republican party in droves. In 2002, 36 percent of young women identified as Republican. In 2018, 23 percent do. Steve Bannon (has said “The Republican college-educated woman is done. They’re gone. They were going anyway at some point in time. Trump triggers them.” I would suggest that it’s the entire GOP’s dismissal and mockery of issues like the #MeToo movement that “triggers” them, but okay. This, all by itself should be a message to men on the Right to stop laughing, and start taking women seriously.

But they’re refusing to. If anything, they’re leaning in to misogyny.

In Kavanaugh’s confirmation they have revealed their true colors completely.

The GOP has made it clear that confirming a man accused by multiple people of sexual assault, who responded to accusations by bemoaning what a hard time he’d had as a result, was not only tolerable to them, it was desirable. Many onlookers saw Kavanaugh presenting as angry and entitled - he alternated between crying, yelling, lashing out at Senator Amy Klobuchar and expressing his fondness for beer.

Christina Cauterucci at Slatewrote an article called, “Brett Kavanaugh’s Testimony Made It Easier Than Ever to Picture Him as an Aggressive, Entitled Teen.” New York Times writer Mara Gay said on MSNBC “You hear a lot of entitlement coming from him.” Alexandra Petri of the Washington Post quipped on Twitter, “is this how people get to talk if they don't spend their entire lives being scrutinized for tone?”
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/kavanaugh-confirmed-time-burn-down-201700261.html

At this point its all about humor... you must admit Trump does some funny sh*t without trying … my problem with Trump is very basic... Honesty & transparency … Trump chose Kavanaugh because Kavanaugh is of the opinion that you can't touch a sitting president at a point in time where Trumps past maybe catching up with him... in my opinion everything else is BS... I like beer too This entire issue was handled poorly from the start but it was entertaining ...

A Canadian on Quora responds to a trumpster bragging for the orange fool..

what a deal he forced on them.. right? I can hear him as i type..

But for get what he tells you and look at what the deal is about and why


Spoken like a true Trump supporter without actually looking at the issues. Either that or you're trolling.

Okay, I'll bite.

in the case of Canada we held out to the last minute because we knew Trump was under the gun for time and needed to be able to tell his supporters something. Consequently, we gave him three things:

A 2. 6% increase in the amount of dairy the United States can ship into Canada before the 270% tariffs kick in. Note that the 270% tariffs are still there. Canada did not give anything to Trump that we weren't prepared to offer in the TPP anyway. This is not a victory for Trump, but he will spin it as though it were. And apparently you will believe him.
We gave him a sunset clause, not for five years as that would be irresponsible, but for 16 years, which gives Canada enough time to separate its economy from the United States. This is especially true considering the amount of free trade agreements we've just signed. Which brings us to our third point.
The ability for other countries in the three country agreement to veto any free trade deal with a fourth party. This hardly matters to Canada. As I said we have already signed a number of free trade agreements and do not depend on the United States for free trade. In fact, the USMCA was the last major agreement we needed to sign.
So what did Trump get? Bragging rights to his base. What did the United States get? A little more milk which amounts to about half of the dairy genetics we sell to you guys.

What did Canada get?

1 million more Autos sold into the United States without tariffs.
30 billion dollars in auto parts sold into the United States without tariffs.
The arbitration process was kept intact.
Canadian media & Airwaves stays exclusively Canadian.
By waiting down to the wire to do this, because we really didn't have to sign and it was Trump that needed a victory before the elections, we effectively smacked Trump down. He lost face on an international stage to everyone except his supporters. And it was Canada who did it.
I hope this helps.

Adrian Lee Magill

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fbi-says-lacks-white-house-232635492.html

The FBI hasn’t interviewed Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh or Christine Blasey Ford because it doesn’t have clear authority from the White House to do so, according to two people with knowledge of the matter.
Instead, the White House has indicated to the FBI that testimony from Kavanaugh and Ford, who has accused him of attempting to rape her when they were in high school, before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week is sufficient, said the people, who asked to not be identified discussing the sensitive matter.
The new evidence of constraints on the FBI probe came as Republican Senator Bob Corker told reporters the FBI is likely to give senators a stack of interview reports, probably later on Wednesday. He said senators were told in a GOP meeting that a vote on cutting off debate is likely on Friday to move toward a confirmation vote on Kavanaugh.
A tentative plan for viewing the report is that a single copy will be available in a secure room for senators to view starting Thursday morning, at one-hour intervals alternating between Republicans and Democrats, according to a person briefed on the matter.
It wasn’t immediately clear whether the Federal Bureau of Investigation was trying to force the issue and seek explicit approval from the White House to interview Ford and Kavanaugh. And it wasn’t clear why the FBI hasn’t yet talked to other people who have been recommended by lawyers or who have voluntarily come forward — or if the bureau would need explicit approval to talk with them as well.
Confusion beset the investigation, fed by conflicting signals over what constraints have been placed on the bureau despite President Donald Trump’s comment Monday that “the FBI should interview anybody that they want, within reason.”
Senator Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, said in a statement Wednesday that the lack of interviews with Ford, Kavanaugh and others “raises serious concerns that this is not a credible investigation and begs the question: What other restrictions has the White House placed on the FBI?”-----MORE------

computer models are made constantly.. It is not make one and use it for years.. made every day, even for local weather forecasts. which are more difficult the long term trends.

again, a major difference in age old changes and what we hare doing now is time.. in the past change was over millions or 100,000s of years.

Now the change is over decades. and man is having to deal with that rapid change..

Food wars may start in you life time. If not soon after..

20 years from now other problems will be manifest on the nation and world..

So refusing to fight and not even willing to accept facts is beyond my comprehension..

good luck with your future..

Oh come on vett,

first what is this always cursing gore about?

do you think he invented CC

He was late to the party. He did write a book and made a movie.

Because they were both very good, they made him a lot of money.

but they are not where he made most of his money. Beside what he was born with, he has done very well in the business world..

I stick with the idea that a few seasons will have fewer storms/hurricanes.. for the reason, the melting of the arctic ice..

when that ice burgs are no longer a factor, the storms and hurricanes will blow the remainder of the US east coast clear to Canada..

As far as the size of hurricanes, the last years have shown much more powerful storms. the Pacific has seen multiple record storms even reaching the arctic circle..

disturbing the arctic vortex. remember that?

The season has not been less active for the past decade.. this is a global situation..

Look at the Pacific storms. record setting, both by length and power..

this is not confined to our back yard.. global warming is what it says, world wide..

So many of you right wingers seem to think that CC is only an event in the United States..

But it is called Global warming for a reason..

Over 190 nations joined the Paris accord to fight the problem.

Only nations such a Syria, the United States and a couple other 3rd world nation are not joining..

We see record heat all over the world just in this summer.. storms are causing floods world wide, droughts cutting into the world food supply..

But you want some good to come this?/

How about this,,

The hurricane season should be less then average this year..

Why?? With the melting of the arctic, ice burgs are far more numerous then average..

They are moving in the Atlantic off the coast of Africa, cooling that part of the ocean.

This is the birth place of tropical storms and hurricanes..

With the cooling water, we should see fewer of both those events..

Do you like to trade a future ice shortage in the Arctic for fewer storms over a few seasons?