Like Trump has been putting Putin ahead of the FBI,

As I said,I and the Democrats had no objections to what Trump did ,it is the way he did it.Clinton did the correct thing concerning Kosovo and Milosovich,Obamas strategy toward the apprehension and execution of Osama Bin Laden,and stopping the pirates was politically and strategically sound;he did not risk alienation of Pakistan by totally disavowing their sovereignty, and Clinton did not put the world on the brink of non secular world wars

How does that happen, your post being altered.I meant to use the word failure in the line I wrote in the above post,I spelled it failiar.The computerize device called it self correcting my error,It thought I wanted to use the word familiar,which is totally out of context from what I was talking about.so much for spell check, and believeing in machines replacing man.I guess that is that function that the device features as predictive text. whew !
I hope the machines aren't taking over

We don't have anti Americans in Congress "proud'Incurry"."What we have here is a familiar to communicate"".because you can't handle the truth"We have a lot of "Amaricans" ("`my felluhs`")in Congress, as oppose to Americans.This is in the respect that the Amaricans don't understand Americans objections don't lie in the fact that the Iranian General was executed.Their objections are in the way they carried it out.It was done in manner that it puts the American military in grave danger,and also puts and escalates the country to the brink of potential declarations of war.
At a time when the American military is not prepared.It took a matter of months to have a potent military presence to conduct and win a full scale conventional war with Iraq.If Iran launched a full scale war at this point and time it would be a massacre of the micro presence they have over there at this point and time.Iran has the advantage of having their full army which might be in excess of a million personal,while Trump's sends an impotent three thousand troops that may have to face off the Million man Iran army,not to mention the wrath of the entire middle east because of the unpopularity that the killing of The Iranian General has evoked.

Please ;I am not trying to sell a rehab line ,you spoke of vengeance, an eye for an eye,a tooth for a tooth.Why you spoke of tools that are mortals tools to exact vengeance after I sought to remind of what God said of vengeance.... (It was to be left to it)....would you tell me of mankind ignoring his mandate of vengeance being left for him to exact, I'll never know.It does not confirm, ,substaniate,or sustain the correctness of your argument that it is okay for mortalness to exact a vengeance by quoting that there a man made penalties,such as prisons,fines,and legal entities as oppose to absolution,or immortality. it is because man chooses to ignore the concept of vengeance being left to God[ I being an agnostic ]do not nesscesarily believe in that concept; God is still perceived as a myth,myths as of yet do not present a physical enough presence to implement such processes.

I would say to this so called Christian Right nation of people."VENGEANCE IS MINE SAYETH THE LORD". but they are so confused as to the fact that they are secular.It wouldn't fall on ears like these>

That is essentially correct,but as per "YOU PEOPLES"quintessentialness,you are generally over in some one else's land
(un-welcomely so,) claiming self defense,when the primary reasons are so far from imminent personal bodily harm,or your sovereignty,or freedom being threatened it can measured with the scale one would use to measure this >

In the terrorist minds, they are themselves freedom fighters,fighting for their sovereignty rights, sovereignty which is independence. In those on the other side that also call themselves freedom fighters,but are viewed as terrorist by those they have Identified the other side as terrorist.The party whom sovereignty and independence whom incurr imminent direct suppression and oppression are and should be construed as more or less true freedom fighters.
When deciding whether or not to engage in war, the criteria and rules of engagement decrees that those that perceive themselves as or in danger, generally ask themselves one profound question -and that is - IS THERE ANY IMMENENT DANGER ?
In other words-one man's freedom fighter, is another man's terrorist.

I'm always okay with the prospect of people that "`WULD `AVE`" been killed...
as opposed to people that would have been killed, because I don't have an understanding of what is going to happen to people whom ,"`WULD `AVE` been killed".

No,this is not a situation that could potentially escalate into a world war as WW 1 , because it was committed against the Greatest Blusterering Bravadoseier of all time.If they were going to declare War ,they would have done it by now.This does not mean that allied secular forces should not stay on their guard.They probably will continue with business as usual,random terrorist terrorists acts here and there.
Even though it was reported that Russia, Iran,N Korea,and China were holding coordinated joint military excercises-theres has been no reaction from these parties, evidently this is not a crucial enough incident to warrant even their remotes of responses from Iranian allies.
So far as it being ethically, morally,and strategically the right thing to do,my question is this-if this man was so antagonististic and such a threat,toward Americans and Amaricans alike why is it for the most part,he was relatively unknown-first I've heard of him.

Alright !87cents, that's my final offer.
I waaannnt !! that time, though.you,you,you radiant thing you.

forgive,me his highness,if I have offended thee,tit `t`was not my intention.Oh my Lord,if thoust would grant but a mere smidgent of thoust time,me'st thinks my days would be complete,forever and beyond.
Ahh gi `you sevny` five cents fuh` it.

"DID HE ORDER THE CODE RED !! -did he make the phone call !!.sound familiar ?Did he try to impede the congresses efforts toward finding out if he with held military aid to the Ukraine,(which implys he knew he had did something wrong that had to be covered up)with an implied stipulation that something reciprocal was expected,a favor for the" DON"an offer the Ukraine dare not refuse.
You got nothing but time,have a lousy night.

I was watching Sean (I pass for all white,not part Latino) Hannitys show,and he just ranted in Trump's defense,about, Clarence Page, Adam Schiff,Hilary Clinton, and Steele,and Comey.He ranted that they were congenital liars,and that they forged documents and omitted facts pertaining to FISA laws to fail Trump,etc,etc,etc, .
The point was the dumb ass ranted on and on defending Trump as if he was Trumps defense lawyer in a criminal case
All that was fine and good,if Trump was under criminal jurorist prudence scrutiny,-but he wasn't.The Congress merely are in the midst of ascertaining whether Trump's conduct is befitting that of the Chief Executive of the United States- and if it is found that he is guilty of mal -conduct or mis- conduct as the founders
stated then it is their sworn duty to see to it that he is discharged from the office,So Hannity rants on and on, about what Hilary did, and what Steele,did,citing what he thought was fact, after fact, after fact, and the lies Schiff told that violated FISA regulations.It dawned me once again,this is not about Clinton,nor is it about what Schiff did ,or Steele,or C Paige.it was about Trump talking to Zenlensky and with holding Military Aid which contradict s the U.S.s 244 years policy of those Ideologies and philosophies that defines whom the United States are.and support/ assistance are not a prerequisite to those that are in lock step with U S ideologies,neither are reciprocating favors for U. S .support.Also,the misconduct of trying to obstruct the fact that he did it -not criminally liable - but conduct not becoming a president.

When it comes to the economy ! Republicans ain't nothing but vultures.They took credit for the Clinton economic accomplishments,and they are also taking credit for Obama's economic accomplishments.They merely expound on good economys,they don't create them

Attached file:
(Download)

Attached file:
(Download)