I guess even Republican Judges have an end they won't go past. Mike Lindell may have ruined himself with his mouth. He just couldn't find the fraud, because it wasn't there. What is next his insanity plea?


Democrats Supreme Court turns back effort by MyPillow CEO Lindell to toss $1.3 billion defamation suit :
John Fritze, USA TODAY - 1h ago

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal from a prominent supporter of former President Donald Trump who is trying to fend off a defamation suit from a voting company he falsely accused of rigging the 2020 election.

Michael Lindell, the founder of MyPillow and a regular presence at Trump's rallies, is fighting a $1.3 billion defamation suit filed in federal court by US Dominion, the company that manufacturers voting machines used in several battleground states.

Lindell's effort was denied by a Trump-appointed U.S. District judge last year. When Lindell appealed, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said the case was not ready for review. Lindell asked the Supreme Court to rule that he could immediately appeal in order to avoid "long and expensive" court proceedings.

Preview: Supreme Court to grapple with race, elections in new term as battle over abortion lingers


Lindell argues that US Dominion hasn't met the standard governing defamation claims set out in the court's landmark 1964 decision in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. Specifically, he asserted that the company had not proved that he knew his comments were false or that they were spoken with a reckless disregard for truth or falsity.

The lower federal court disagreed.

"As a preliminary matter, a reasonable juror could conclude that the existence of a vast international conspiracy that is ignored by the government but proven by a spreadsheet on an internet blog is so inherently improbable that only a reckless man would believe it," U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols wrote in his opinion.

The company, Nichols wrote, "has adequately alleged that Lindell made his claims knowing that they were false or with reckless disregard for the truth."

My layman's reason why life begins at conception and abortion is murder…

Regarding ‘murder’, it is precise to say that under U.S. federal law, murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought – the "premeditation" or "predetermination" (with malice) that can be expressed (intent to kill) or implied. Implied malice is proven by acts that involve reckless indifference to human life or in a death that occurs during the commission of certain felonies (the felony murder rule).

To expound on this, as I just stated, it is unlawful to kill a human being by acts that involve reckless indifference to human life. How do I know that the embryo, fetus (baby), etc. is a human being whose life begins at conception? Simple logic…

Amoebas are single-celled organisms. Cells are the building blocks for all life forms. "Single-celled" means that amoebas have only one cell for their entire body. Amoebas, like humans, are considered life forms: KINGDOM: Protist – PHYLUM: Protozoa – CLASS: Rhizopoda – ORDER: Amoebida – FAMILY: Amoebidae – GENUS: Amoeba – SPECIES: Amoeba (Many species).

Every human being begins life as a single cell (like the amoeba), formed when the father's sperm fertilizes the mother's egg. When fertilization is completed and the nuclei of egg and sperm have combined, a new being – as in human – comes into existence. So therefore, a new life begins, whether it’s human or amoeba, when the father's sperm fertilizes the mother's egg or in the case of an amoeba, it splits in two. In the case of a human being, the conclusion can therefore be made that a human being’s life begins at conception.

Tying these two concepts together, any reasonable person can conclude that abortion is murder, with murder being the unlawful killing of a human being – whose life was just proven to begin at conception – with implied malice being proven by acts that involve reckless indifference to human life.

Lastly, the Lord’s commandment in proper wording is "Thou shall not murder.” The transliteration of the word murder or kill in the original text (Strong’s H7523) is rāṣaḥ, which literally means to dash in pieces (sounds like an abortion to me); kill (a human being), especially to murder; put to death.

There are those that would argue about the 'forced insemination/zero tolerance' comment.

Does that still justify killing the innocent unborn child?

Raped women who had their babies defy pro-choice stereotypes
https://www.liveaction.org/news/raped-women-who-had-their-babies-defy-pro-choice-stereotypes/

For those of us who were conceived in rape, are mothers from rape, birth mothers from rape, or post-abortive from rape, his statements are extremely disconcerting. It presumes that a child “prolongs the suffering” of rape survivors and that the child is actually jeopardizing her health and well-being, when this simply is not the case.
https://www.lifenews.com/2014/09/09/rape-survivors-keeping-the-baby-doesnt-prolong-the-suffering/

What Do Rape Victims Say About Their Pregnancies?
https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/22/rape-victims-say-pregnancies/

I'll start.
Abortion kills a living creature. Is it a human being? I absolutely believe YES, he/she is a child and a human being. My reason for believing this is science and common sense. Others feel strongly that it is not. But can they give any REASONS for their belief other than the simple statement that it is NOT?
Maybe we'll see.
Here is a brief article about the subject, and the Protecting Unborn Children from Painful Late-Term Abortions Act.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/lindsey-graham-abortion-bill-sensible-despite-false-attacks

Before you respond, please bear in mind that this has nothing to do with religion, nor any attempt to 'force' religious convictions upon people. The need to end all abortions not seriously threatening the mother's life is based solely on the conviction that abortion is murdering an innocent child, and is based on exactly the same logic that murdering a wife, a friend, a stranger, or anyone else is and should be illegal throughout our country. Religious convictions AGREE with this, but is not the reason behind it.
Comments?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59njPVe0Q0Q

Jailerman

There once was a nit wit in DC
The lame ol’ dip was the former VP
Prices blew up, the market dipped down
Oh blow, Joey Biden you blow (huh)

Soon may the Jailerman come
To lock him up and his crackhead son
One day, when justice is done
We'll see the Democrats go

He'd not be there fore ballots stole
When late that night they rigged the polls
In battleground states, the lying assholes
They tipped the scales for Joe (huh).

Soon may the Jailerman come
To lock him up and his crackhead son
One day, when justice is done
We'll see the Democrats go

Da-da-da-da-da
Da-da-da-da-da-da-da
Da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da

The cost of fuel has gone sky high
They’re F’n with the food supply
The southern border’s open wide
Let’s Go Brandon, Go! (huh).

Soon may the Jailerman come
To lock him up and his crackhead son
One day, when justice is done
We'll see the Democrats go

While runaway inflation soars
He’s bleeding billions funding wars
He’s lost his mind, he crapped his drawers
Oh blow, Joey Biden you blow

Soon may the Jailerman come
To lock him up and his crackhead son
One day, when justice is done
We'll see the Democrats go

Good evening, TexaCan,

It's a balmy 68 degrees here this evening, there have been red fox squirrels running along the deck handrail. Fall is upon us, and they should be frantically putting away acorns...

"When the Roll is called up Yonder" is a beautiful song. It was sung at both my parents funerals.

I don't remember the color of the songbook covers from which I sang - They changed weekly, as Dad was a missionary with the nondenominational national American Sunday School Union, founded in 1824 to develop rural church congregations. (In 1974, it became the American Missionary Fellowship).

He had a circuit covering thirty or so churches, so each week, a different songbook cover!

The body of Christ singing those beautiful hymns together was one of the most important parts of the service, IMHO.

Now, most contemporary churches have a piano, a guitar and a set of snare drums, with a vocalist singing songs they composed the previous evening... Many times, they sound and look like hungover local bar performers who haven't been to bed yet! - while the congregation sits in silence...That's all I have to say about that.

I'm sure there will be congregational singing up there, on that beautiful shore.