One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Larry the Legend
Page: <<prev 1 ... 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 ... 667 next>>
Nov 2, 2017 10:18:46   #
moldyoldy wrote:
There is another offering 10 million for trumps head.
These billionaires know an idiot when they see one.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/13/larry-flint-offers-10m-in-quest-to-impeach-trump/

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/20/politics/tom-steyer-ad-impeach-trump/index.html


All this money being tossed around. All these billionaires screaming for impeachment. The result? (Crickets). There is nothing to impeach! When will these people learn? In order to prosecute a crime, there must be the prior commission of a crime.

In any case, impeachment is simply a statement from the House of Representatives that they believe sufficient evidence exists to prosecute an office holder for a criminal act; a 'high crime or misdemeanor'. Similar to a Grand Jury indictment. Once impeachment proceedings are successfully completed, the case is then transferred to the Senate, where the actual trial is held under rules loosely similar to any other criminal proceeding in the United States. Teams for prosecution and defense are appointed. Evidence is proffered, guilt or innocence is weighed, the jury votes (in this case, the entire Senate is the jury) and a verdict is announced.

Upon reaching a 'guilty' verdict, the only sanction the Senate is authorized to impose is removal from office and disqualification from future official appointment. Once removed from office, the (now ex-) officeholder may then be criminally prosecuted in a regular court of law, just like everybody else. No crime, no punishment. Period.

Here's the official Senate procedural handbook:

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CDOC-99sdoc33/pdf/CDOC-99sdoc33.pdf


Go to
Nov 2, 2017 09:50:46   #
son of witless wrote:
This sure sounds like racial and sex discrimination to me.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/01/dnc-white-men-shouldnt-apply-for-tech-jobs.html


This is too easy. In order to file suit, you must first have what is referred to as 'standing'. You must be directly effected by the action or inaction you are taking exception to. So first, you must establish 'standing'. Find a cisgender straight white male who is qualified for the position you are targeting, and have him apply for he job. When he is refused, then he has standing, and a lawsuit is in order. If you personally qualify for one of the jobs listed, all the better, provided, of course, that you are a cisgender straight white male.

Of course, this will be a difficult and expensive undertaking, the outcome of which will be assured long before the actual case is heard in court, and it is likely that you will never find an employer willing to give you a job again. Apart from those few minor considerations, you should be just fine. Have fun!
Go to
Nov 2, 2017 09:25:45   #
S. Maturin wrote:
Our borders are as open as Weinstein's Robe..

No one dares 'profile' even the most poisonous of reptiles.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5036717/Multiple-injured-shooting-downtown-Manhattan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6eqNBrMY9s


Check this out. People are screaming about this, yet it just doesn't seem to be getting any attention. In wonder how many will die before the message finally sinks in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILV7_wn3FQk
Go to
Nov 2, 2017 09:14:37   #
DJRich wrote:
Fake news from facebook and rightwing fantasy site


And I suppose all these other sites are 'in on it'?

https://www.bing.com/search?q=Dolores+Shaw%2C+61%3B+Calvin+Mattox%2C+52%3B+Thurman+George%2C+57%3B+and+Wallace+Hill%2C+60.+&pc=MOZI&form=MOZSBR
Go to
Nov 2, 2017 09:07:39   #
Wolf counselor wrote:
Are you planning on getting pregnant ?

Muslim men in America are impregnating four wives simultaneously.

We need to stop aborting and using birth control.


Simultaneously? How is that even possible? Muslim men have 4 sets of sex organs? I'm impressed! (Or should I say, my 'im' is 'pressed'!)
Go to
Nov 2, 2017 08:40:47   #
cold iron wrote:
........These are possibly the 5 best sentences you'll ever read...and all applicable to this experiment:
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for...that is the beginning of the end of any nation.
........These are possibly the 5 best sentences yo... (show quote)


I'd like to add one more:
"The problem with Socialism is that sooner or later, you run out of other peoples' money". Baroness Thatcher, LG, OM, PC, FRS, FRIC, 'The Iron Lady', Prime Minister of Great Britain from 1979 to 1990, leader of the British Conservative Party from 1975 to 1990 and a very smart woman.
Go to
Nov 2, 2017 08:24:53   #
Bad Bob wrote:
Damn that covers more than half the country.


Bingo! Now you're getting it!
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 15:31:28   #
Bad Bob wrote:
Did ya get your "wish list" from one of your meetings back in the 30s or 40s?


Those were rank amateurs compared to what we see now. Wakey-wakey! Coffee time....
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 15:21:52   #
mwdegutis wrote:
You know Bob, I've grown quite tired of your inane BS. You're only the second person I've blocked and Rayloon was blocked for the same reason as you. You're in good company and good riddance!


My, you are a hard one. Remind me to try and stay on your good side....
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 15:10:36   #
Bad Bob wrote:
Yes Larry we remember what happened in the 8 years of Obama and they still passed the ACA.


No kidding. I was thinking of compiling a list of legislation that is not only against the well-being of the country, but fulfills one or more of the Communist Party USA's ten 'wish list' accomplishments. At the top was government control of the healthcare system. And education. And the food supply. Those were the 'big 3'. Tell me, grown any food for yourself lately? Yeah, think about it....
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 15:05:57   #
Noraa wrote:
I'm a capitalist. I bought a whole house water purifier years ago.


Congratulations. In my universe, that would not have been necessary because the water you got in your tap would be as pure as is humanly possible to make it. If you wanted fluoridated water, you'd buy a unit to add the fluoride in after delivery at your end. Instead, you were forced into an expense for 'opting out', instead of being charged for 'opting in'. The decision was made for you, so you were forced to unmake it at your end. That's Communism.
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 14:53:53   #
mwdegutis wrote:
Ben Shapiro ~ The Daily Wire
On Tuesday, just in time for Halloween, the Planned Parenthood 501(c)4 “Black Community” account tweeted out this delightful thought:

If you’re a Black woman in America, it’s statistically safer to have an abortion than to carry a pregnancy to term or give birth.

In other words, that baby might kill you, so go ahead and kill it pre-emptively. Abortion advocates say that abortion is less likely to kill you than going through pregnancy and childbirth. These statistics are dicey at best — the Centers for Disease Control has stated that such statistics aren’t actually comparable, because we measure deaths per live birth, not deaths per pregnancy not terminated via abortion. Furthermore, those statistics don’t take into account other damage via abortion, from physical to psychological.

But even by their statistics, it’s extraordinarily rare to die from pregnancy in the United States overall: the mortality rate among women “who delivered live neonates was 8.8 deaths per 100,000 live births” from 1998-2005. The mortality rate among women who induced abortion was 0.6 deaths per 100,000. But as Dr. Anne Davis, scholar of obstetrics and gynecology at the Columbia University Medical Center in New York stated, “We wouldn’t tell people, ‘Don’t have a baby because it’s safer to have an abortion’ — that’s ridiculous.”

But that’s exactly what Planned Parenthood is selling: kill your baby if you want to live. And they’re doing it specifically for minority women. Which is egregious, given the fact that there are more black babies aborted in New York City every year than born.

But at least Planned Parenthood can sleep well at night knowing that more minority babies will be thrown in waste bins.
i Ben Shapiro ~ The Daily Wire /i br On Tuesday,... (show quote)


Given the plethora of contraceptive measures available to women (and men) in this modern age, I never cease to be amazed that any woman, no matter how mentally retarded or otherwise incapable of managing her life decisions she may be, could possibly have a pregnancy that is 'unwanted'. The fact that the pregnancy is initiated in the first place is what confounds me. Are they really that unbelievably moronic that they cannot swallow a pill on a daily basis, or see a doctor for a monthly injection; or in the case of many women who should never be allowed to reproduce in the first place, get their tubes tied? Is it really that bad? And further, why does it seem to be only black women who are so lopsidedly affected by this problem? Are Caucasian and Latino women that much smarter? I doubt it. Here's a thought, make them pay for their own abortions and see how quickly the incidence of 'unwanted' pregnancies is significantly reduced.
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 14:41:13   #
tdsrnest wrote:
He said it again Democrats are obstructionist. How can that be republicans have 100% control over the House and Senate a moron in the White House and democrats are obstructionist.

(GIVE ME A BREAK)


You have no clue how the Washington political machine operates, do you? It is easy for a minority Congressman to oppose and effectively stifle legislation in either house, though the Senate is more vulnerable to minority actions. To describe someone as 'obstructionist' is to say they do not care to address a given issue, they are in opposition because of the person or party proposing it. Whatever it is, the answer is 'no'. That's the meaning of obstructionism. Now, tell me about that 'moron' in the White House...
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 13:56:04   #
MtnMamma wrote:
With no political affiliation, agenda, or party intent, millions upon millions of Americans wake early for their jobs to feed and spend some time with their kids. Love does that. It has no partisan affiliation. I feel this is the majority of Americans, day-to-day decent people loving their families and providing, as best they can, for their future and well-being. What political pundits Right and Left claim to divide our nation only confuses them. Their response is just be there for family and community. Is that unsophisticated and worthy of judgment? Left and Right say it is. What do you think?
With no political affiliation, agenda, or party in... (show quote)


Interesting how, if you were to ask, the vast majority of American adults would have no idea that there were more than two (or maybe 3) candidates for President of the United States in 2016. When I say 'vast majority', I mean probably better than 90%. Then there's this:

"As of November 1, 2016, a total of 1,780 candidates had filed a Statement of Candidacy with the Federal Election Commission."

One thousand, seven hundred and eighty people put themselves forward as possible occupants of the Oval Office in 2016, yet only two or three were even seen or recognized. How sad is that? The average American has no inkling about his political situation or the people who are manipulating him or her by the information they provide or fail to provide. It hurts to see these millions of honest, hardworking people made fools of such a cavalier manner.

Here's the list:

https://ballotpedia.org/Presidential_candidates,_2016#Full_list_of_declared_candidates

Interesting to note that Dog Eating Maniacal Fish Brained Ugly Commandant Be Electe Moose Lookalike Fool That Will is a Republican. Things that make you go 'hmmm'...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNiie_zmSr8
Go to
Nov 1, 2017 13:40:12   #
Oldsailor65 wrote:
Do you remember PAUL HARVEY!!!

This was 52 years ago. April 3, 1965. An amazing prediction. Do you remember the famous ABC radio commentator Paul Harvey?

Millions of Americans listened to his programs which were broadcast over 1,200 radio stations nationwide.

When you listen to this, remember the commentary was broadcast 52 years ago on April 3, 1965.

It's short...less than three minutes. You will be amazed.


http://stg.do/9LDc
b Do you remember PAUL HARVEY!!! /b br br Thi... (show quote)


And that's, the rest of the story....
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 ... 667 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.