One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Morgan
Page: <<prev 1 ... 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 ... 732 next>>
Jan 9, 2018 08:30:50   #
eagleye13 wrote:
"It's called blind party loyalty, no matter what they do or say, the pot calling the kettle black when they accuse the left of being sheeples. At least our cause is for the people and not the pockets of controlling corporate America." - Morgan

Oh Really, morg?
Have you bothered to study the Left?
Not many liberals have a grasp of what Communism delivers. The masses fell for the Bolshevik BS. The Chinese never knew what hit them. The ruthlessness is beyond most peoples comprehension, largely due to lack if studying it. It sure isn't taught in the government school system. Over 200 Million people starved and slaughtered by those regimes.
It is important to differentiate the different brands/sects of "Jew". The term "Jew" is misused a lot, fraudulently, and confusingly.
Judah is one of the 12 tribes of Israel. A Race (Hebrew)
Judaism is a religion (Torah/Old Testament and Talmudic/Babylonian Rabinism)
Jews are also a nationality (Nation of Israeli)
All categories attempt to claim they are the chosen people. The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Many hide behind that claim. Most fundamentalist Christian churches don't teach the differences, and fall for that misrepresentation.
Hence, we have impotent churches, and ignorant Christians, that are not aware of the enemies of God/Yahweh within our nation.
Think about who has been trying to drive God out of public education and the public square?
Atheists? Who do you think these atheists are?
The ACLU and the anti-Defamation League (ADL) for starters.

Behind Communism
Here is a link to the PDF downloadable version
http://jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/Behind%20Communism.pdf
https://archive.org/details/BehindCommunism_201502
by Frank L Britton. Probably published in 1952.
(free down load from the internet)
This document is well documented from many sources.

Behind Communism is a short book which explains the connection between Communism, Communist activities, and Communist history and the Jews and Jewish history. Many events in American history related to Communists and Jews are also explained.

It is important to differentiate the different brands of "Jew". The term "Jew" is misused a lot; fraudulently, and confusingly. It goes all the way back to Cain, the slayer of Abel, and Esau/Edom and Jacob/Israel. Hebrew blood vs NonHebrew blood lines. The Bible tracked those Blood lines for a reason.


All the finger pointing at the Kochs, with varied ideas on who they support. Too much mistruth as usual. The Kochs are the counterpart to Soros and his comrades.
They are parasitic elements working the “Left” and “Right”.
( next will come the anti-Semite Smear, but that is expected)
'Behind Communism'
circa 1953
By Frank L. Britton
(down loaded from the internet)
When Behind Communism was first published, the official position of the U.S.S.R. was that Lenin was a Slavic Russian, not a Jew. However, subsequent to the book's publication, following the fall of the Iron Curtain in the mid- 80's, it was finally admitted that, indeed, the monstrous criminal, Vladimir Lenin, was a Jew! (Ashkenazim atheist)
"It's called blind party loyalty, no matter w... (show quote)


So, it's the old argument...it's the Jews fault...I see where you're coming from, clear as a bell now.
Go to
Jan 9, 2018 08:19:09   #
S. Maturin wrote:
Excellent link.

On that site were two scientists- REAL SCIENTISTS- with the documentation to support the debunking of the hysteria surrounding the *stronger together* Henny Penny "scientists". Most of whom are recent graduates of modern 'group-think' institutions.

The unfortunate part of all of this is that the minds of the MMGW screechers who spend each night barking at the moon have cemented into place and real science cannot break into their preconceived conclusions.
I think that because people they like, people who they wish to be associated with- Hollywood, etc., - have taken a stance and no matter how bizarre and outlandish, that's the beliefs to which they have become inextricably glued. It's a pity, but those kinds of fashion-before-fact people have always been with us as witches, medicine men, etc. Today they have BIG voices because of modern media and computers.
Excellent link. br br On that site were two scien... (show quote)



Oh YEAH, they are the REAL SCIENTISTS...you Baffoons, hey I hear the dinner bell ringing, time to chow down more BS, I got news for you, the people barking at the moon are you! I'll still go with the 97-99% of the climate scientists and researchers around the WORLD! You must be another stable genius like Trump.
Go to
Jan 9, 2018 07:56:37   #
PeterS wrote:
Because I was a Fox listener in the past. As for people wanting to make an informed decision--you guys can't even read two sentences written by a liberal without exploding. As such, I find it especially dubious that anyone of you could make it through the likes of Morning Joe, who is a conservative, much less someone like Maddow without becoming a complete mental zombie by the end. No, more likely you guys are repeating what others are telling you to say other than anything you are gaining from your own diverse listening habits--which I doubt ever ventures to the left.

Myself, I like what I watch. If you guys don't like it then don't watch it. Problem solved...
Because I was a Fox listener in the past. As for p... (show quote)


You're correct Peter, Joe is a conservative, but when it comes to Trump I've seen him slide more to the left and for good reason, shows he is a man from the right who can reason and not go blindly with his party, and thankfully as many others from the right, I think and hoping we'll see this at the elections this year.
Go to
Jan 9, 2018 07:43:06   #
proud republican wrote:
I did give the reason: ugly and sick!! If you dont like it start your own thread ....On the other hand.....dont!!! You have already started waaay to many hateful threads...Get off of mine This is supposed to be fun thread.Dont ruin it!!!


I see, your ugly attack is for funnnn, Ohhh gotcha...
Go to
Jan 9, 2018 07:39:07   #
rumitoid wrote:
Typical: no reasons given, just the usual ad hominem.


Yep, this is all they can do to talk about, attack ,attak,attack. Guess MSN doesn't have the Barbie dolls they like so much.
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 23:21:56   #
S. Maturin wrote:
Ever think that maybe you might just bring a real fact, a real truth to the discussion?
"Yep, every time a fact or truth hits you front and center you simply deny,"


Another original thought from the rrrrrrright, yea!!!
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 23:17:06   #
cold iron wrote:
The US Navie Dive Team says the average CO2 is .03 %. I would believe them over any left-wing scientist. On top of that CO2 is very soluble in water, rain takes down most of what is in the air every time it rains. One more thing, CO2 is heavy, it sinks low places like mine shafts, it can not get into the upper atmosphere as the nut jobs claim. Nitrogen is an inert gas, the only natural place CO comes from is a volcano. Without CO2 everything on the earth will die.




First, you can't even spell Navy, come on man, really?...second, nitrogen isn't CO, that would be carbon monoxide, deadly stuff also in fossil fuel, nitrogen symbol is N. Third... Carbon is heavy, not Co2, and lastly, no one has EVER argued the point of getting rid of Co2 completely, that's insane but then again we are talking about the comprehension of the xtr right. No logic or reason. That's why Trump is your man, at least once you also add moral depravity.
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 23:00:28   #
archie bunker wrote:
You must be pretty young. We have had bad weather for all of my 54 years. I remember waking up, covered in glass, and being thrown into a bathtub before I was even 4 years old.
Here in tornado ally, it's been pretty calm lately.
Let me simplify it some for you.

Spring, we have thunderstorms.
Summer, we have heat.
Fall, we have calm with the odd snow/ice storm.
Winter, we have cold, snow, ice, and everything in between.
Some years we have a lot of some.
Some years we have a lot of nothing. Like this year.

Of course, Winter is young yet, so cyclone AR-15 may be looming in our future. Who knows?
You must be pretty young. We have had bad weather ... (show quote)




Great you comprehend the weather
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 14:11:25   #
JFlorio wrote:
Took the quiz myself. I'm on the line between Libertarian and right Conservative. Had my wife take it. Damn she landed square in right conservative.
Have to find another reason to get rid of her. LOL.



Nice comment, I don't expect anything more from you...
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 14:00:54   #
Happishark wrote:
Really? Your rebuttal to that post is to insult the writer because he made some typos? Nothing to say about the content?


That's his only out, he can't take you on topic.
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 13:58:42   #
Airforceone wrote:
I just don’t believe right wing stupidity do you have any idea the difference between weather Change and climate change. Due you understand summer and winter and what creates summer and winter. Do you understand Arctic ice melting causing sea levels to rise, due you understand the greenhouse effect and how it warms the ocean. Due you understand warming of the Oceans causes more severe storms. Do yo you understand Polar Vortex, Why not educate yourself. A simple google search (polar Votex) arctic Air is escaping because artic ice is melting, that’s why we are having cold weather. Do a little reseach before you make such a stupid statement.

Just a couple of simple google searches can even educate you.

Polar Vortex
Difference between Climate Change and Weather Change
What is the greenhouse effect
Why is artic ice melting
Why are the oceans rising
Why are the oceans warming.
Why is the Northeast getting colder

If you knew 1/10 of what Al Gore knows about climate change you would not be making such a fool of yourself
I just don’t believe right wing stupidity do you h... (show quote)


It's called blind party loyalty, no matter what they do or say, the pot calling the kettle black when they accuse the left of being sheeples. At least our cause is for the people and not the pockets of controlling corporate America.
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 13:46:42   #
S. Maturin wrote:
"Did you read this part...been reported by the weather bureau(where I live) we have not experienced this lengthy stent of freezing weather since 1718."

"WEATHER BUREAU"? Do you know that every "bureau" is made up of individual humans beings, some stupider than even you, me, or anyone here?

You blindly accept a 'weather bureau' statement as fact... FACT. That is astounding after all we have seen since 2008 and even before with that AlGore freak.


Yep, every time a fact or truth hits you front and center you simply deny, if it were up to you we'd all still believe the world was flat and the moon is made out of cheese.

The people at the time thought Einstein to be a freak also. and if it weren't for scientists and inventors we'd all still be living in caves.
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 13:39:35   #
archie bunker wrote:
"Been reported by." Interesting.

I guess you bought into the whole "bomb cyclone" thing too?


Holy cow just a little paranoid, the report had nothing to do with global warming, it was just stating how long it's been since here in the south we have had such an extension of a prolonged cold spell. What I'm saying and this is only my opinion, is that these changing weather conditions, just as the numerous strong 4-5 rated hurricanes we had last summer are signs of our changing climate due to the effects of global warming.
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 11:58:23   #
archie bunker wrote:
Do you have documentation from 1718? And how did they measure the temperature then? How accurate were their thermometers? What did their computer models predict, and how accurate were they?
Too many unanswered questions Morgan.
I know some folks don't like questions, but other folks have them.


Did you read this part...been reported by the weather bureau(where I live) we have not experienced this lengthy stent of freezing weather since 1718. I'm fine with them, when I have questions I do my own research, if you have question I suggest you do the same. You have question their statement, go take it up with them( the NC Weather Bureau) on your questions, personally, I believe them and their records so I'm good.
Go to
Jan 7, 2018 17:28:46   #
cold iron wrote:
Al Gore is starting to look less like an “expert” and more like a radical zealot.
Scientists look at the real world and work carefully to reach a conclusion that fits. Fanatics work backwards: They take an assumption that they want desperately to be true, and force it on top of reality like hammering a square peg into a round hole.
That’s exactly what the failed presidential candidate seems to be doing, after he bent over backwards to explain that freezing temperatures (https://conservativetribune.com/climate-change-experts-silent/) in the U.S. are proof that, er, the world is overheating.

As much of the country battle's bitterly cold weather and temperatures in the negative range, Al Gore used Twitter to spread his twisted brand of circular reasoning.
“It’s bitter cold in parts of the US, but climate scientist Dr. Michael Mann explains that’s exactly what we should expect from the climate crisis,” the politician-turned-guru declared.

A case of the earth getting warmer.
Back about 100 million to 65 million years the earth was a good 10 degrees warmer than today. The earth was covered with trees, ferns, which grow to 100 tall, life flourish the land was covered with big creature, the land was covered with huge lakes. This one place is today called the badland of South Dakota. Now that it's colder, this land is very bad indeed, weeds don't even grow here now. Don't buy the story we are all going to die if it gets warmer. It's bull.
Al Gore is starting to look less like an “expert” ... (show quote)





If you're going back more than 30 million years, you'll probably need to bring an atmosphere suit.

As you've probably heard, the Earth's atmosphere can change a lot in a pretty short period of time. Since the mid-eighteenth century, levels of carbon dioxide have risen substantially in the Earth's atmosphere, from 280 parts per million (ppm) to 395 — the result of industrial processes that have released tons of carbon into the environment.

If your going back that far please tell us what the nitrogen, 02,CO, Co2 levels were
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 ... 732 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.