"You're not comprehending what I wrote and that's something I really can't help you with, go take a climatology class to give you some basics and then come talk to me." - Morgan

Comprehending what you wrote was the whole point.
FUNNY how you do not understand what you learned in class, and what you wrote.
So here it is again:
Now pay attention!!!

"No, Gore is correct which I was taught decades ago in a climatology class years ago before global warming was ever in the media or even the forefront of an important issue. *****There are still many things in nature that are a mystery, one being the climate of the earth and it's natural attempt to rebalance itself, ***** . This law rings true once again and not crazy." - Morgan

Now really try to quit putting the cart before the horse.
Did your "teacher" some how twist what you just said you learned?
"There are still many things in nature that are a mystery, one being the climate of the earth and it's natural attempt to rebalance itself,..." - Morgan

"and we were taught that when the earth is very hot in summer it will be equally as extreme in the winter and visa -versa, hence the 3rd law of motion by Newton, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction... " - Morgan

It is the man made part you just refuse to get.
"hence the 3rd law of motion by Newton, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." - Morgan

It is the "equal" you just don't, won't, or can't comprehend.
The counter forces you refer to?
Try this one out;
Your breath is not going to cause a storm.

It seems you and the Democrats will never do anything about it. You are throwing a sissy fit over an estimated 4% of the debt. The last sweeping tax changes from Kennedy and Reagan did result in more revenue. Congress spent more. Clinton balanced the budget kicking and screaming the whole way. He actually worked with the Gingrich Congress to get things done. See that happening in Washington anymore? Why is it you libs only bitch about debt when it involves tax cuts. Your faux outrage shows exactly where you stand. The government spends our money better than we can. In this case speak for yourself.

Morgan; you just proved the point, that Man Made Global Warming/Climate Change is BS.
You haven't figured that out yet????

I quote you. Now pay attension!!!

"No, Gore is correct which I was taught decades ago in a climatology class years ago before global warming was ever in the media or even the forefront of an important issue. There are still many things in nature that are a mystery, one being the climate of the earth and it's natural attempt to rebalance itself, and we were taught that when the earth is very hot in summer it will be equally as extreme in the winter and visa -versa, hence the 3rd law of motion by Newton, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. This law rings true once again and not crazy." - Morgan

-58jh.,b58
On Monday, The New York Times went full-out in its attempt to finally stick President Trump with the “racist” label. That comes in the aftermath of Trump's reported comments stating that America doesn't need more immigrants from "s***holes" — a statement that could be read as clear racism, or alternatively, as a critique of the diversity visa lottery's reliance on place of origin as sole determining factor. Rep. Mia Love (R-UT) had the most honest take on those comments: "I can't defend the indefensible. You have to understand that there are countries that struggle out there. But their people, their people are good people and they're part of us. We're Americans."
But the definition of a racist — the textbook definition, as Paul Ryan might say — is someone who treats some people better than others because of their race. But the goal of labeling Trump a “racist” overall isn’t to shed light on the motivation for his particular policies — it’s specifically to obfuscate the distinction between statements and activities where explanations other than race hold sway, and statements and activities where the only explanation is racism. Labeling Trump a racist isn’t an exercise in clarification for the media, but an excuse for painting with the broadest possible brush in order to avoid responsibility for case-by-case reporting and evaluation.
But then Leonhardt and his co-author name a bunch of instances they call racist where there is no evidence that race is the motivating factor: Trump pointing at a rally attendee and calling him “my African-American over here,” which was Trump being a moron, not a racist; Trump calling Elizabeth Warren “Pocahontas,” which was designed to slap her for her misappropriation of Native American heritage for her own political purposes; Trump’s support for Roy Moore in Alabama; Trump’s support for Joe Arpaio.
They even name instances in which Trump was obviously not being racist as racist incidents: Trump criticizing crime rates in inner city communities and suggesting that he wants to make life better for minorities who live there; Trump complaining about the growing threat of radical Islamic terrorism abroad; Trump ripping MS-13; Trump calling President Obama lazy — a critique that had little to do with Obama’s race, and more to do with Obama’s perceived work habits.
Herein lies the problem for the Left. There are three reasons to point out Trump’s alleged racism: first, for purposes of simple truth; second, to drive Trump’s approval ratings down; third, to alleviate the burdens of the media in assessing actual reasons behind various policies.
The problem with the first rationale is that the media rarely actually hit politicians with this label; they’ve never used the “racist” description for obvious racists like Al Sharpton, for example. Perhaps Trump is a racist — he’s certainly made racist comments. But “objective” media outlets either have to apply the same standard to everyone, or they have to stop using the epithet outright.
The second rationale seems more likely: the media despise Trump, and they’re willing to call him any name in the book to drive down his approval ratings. “Racist” is the strongest charge in the political book, and throwing it has real consequences. And if the public doesn’t reject Trump, the Times can have the added pleasure of pointing to institutional white privilege and racism, which bolsters their desired narrative anyway.
Finally, there’s the third rationale: the media don’t want to bother actually analyzing what Trump is doing. It’s easier to simply call people racists, then labeling anyone who disagrees a co-conspirator in racism. That’s what the Times does by lumping all these instances in together: they’re suggesting that anyone who agrees with Trump on MS-13, for example, must be a racist.
Trump may well harbor racial animus. And that’s worth pointing out, particularly in the instances where such animus is clear. But the media’s desire to paint every instance with the brush of racial animus is an obvious political ploy, not honest journalism.
source-nyt- Leonhardt’s and Philbrick’s-

Care for them in their own country. We have no business bringing them here until we care for our own poor. Why would I care about some foreigner when there are homeless and hungry veterans, disabled and elderly right here? Charity begins at home. Send these people a few trainloads of condoms so they will stop breeding beyond their ability for feeding.
Let us not forget the huge amount of drugs that come over our sieve-like border. A number of Middle Easterners with ties to terrorist organizations have also been apprehended sneaking into this country. National security demands we tighten up our border security. It's not just about wetbacks anymore. "The wall" is about half boondoggle. In places it is a great idea and in other places it's a joke. We need more surveillance capability, more Border Patrol, and more rapid response capability. We also need the death sentence for drug smugglers.

OK, true, he said it. Why was it leaked? Of course it was a democrat leak. Leaks are killing us. And why is it taken as racist? Haitian is not a race. Mexican is not a race.

But who knows, I'd like to see more Voodoo in our country. Let's letem all in, no questions asked. Then we too can be a shithole country and we too, can claim race when someone refers to us dirty, grimy, sleazy Americans.

However, as a trump supporter, I accept and admire the honesty of the word choice.