Posts for: arapaho
Jan 11, 2018 01:01:57 #
(Main)
lindajoy wrote:
You really aren’t very good at twisting your posts later, arp...
As I’ve told you before our posts speak for themself... But I’m going to give you a 🌟for being Consistent anyway...
As I’ve told you before our posts speak for themself... But I’m going to give you a 🌟for being Consistent anyway...
Your posts do speak for you: they again and again without fail are an excessive amount of techno babble glued together with superficial and superfluous blather. It is all just poorly understood sophistry repeated mostly from less than credible sources in your effort to sound like you actually know something or understand it when neither are true. Blah blah blah...
Skin deep, shallow, and with no concept of any substance.
What a perfect example of a real hoot you are.
Jan 11, 2018 00:06:17 #
(Main)
lindajoy wrote:
Michael Moore?? And you bought into it~~ br br Li... (show quote)
Looks like you got snookered and confused again fool. Fracking is not offshore drilling. You didn't understand a word that was said and one more time you are regurgitating techno babble hoping to impress idiots.
One more hoot.
Jan 10, 2018 12:05:22 #
(Main)
Kevyn wrote:
Here is a source, as he posted it is common knowledge for anyone who opens their eyes in places other than the inside of their colon.
https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Florida-Gets-An-Oil-Drilling-Pass.html
https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Florida-Gets-An-Oil-Drilling-Pass.html
I restricted Google to the past 24 hours and counted 50 different news outlets. From Reuters to Breitbart, not to mention CNN, MSNBC, ABC, FOX and all the well known ones.
Jan 10, 2018 11:19:28 #
(Main)
Super Dave wrote:
So, your souce is Kevvy's post.
Got it.
Got it.
Your source for that idea is your ass. Like much of what you post.
Troll.
Jan 10, 2018 09:36:58 #
(Main)
Super Dave wrote:
The search engine doesn't tell me your source.
You don't have a credible source, and you know it... I get it.
You don't have a credible source, and you know it... I get it.
Trolling is your only recourse, eh?
Every news outlet in the country has the story, but you need a specific source because you aren't smart enough to locate any of the ten sources that I read! That is just troll nonsense kid.
Jan 10, 2018 08:09:22 #
(Main)
PeterS wrote:
One was a bank with the wrong name and a meeting in the wrong city. Otherwise everything else is proving to be correct.
Those might be so. But I can't find anything that is listing those as verified errors.
Jan 10, 2018 08:04:35 #
(Main)
Super Dave wrote:
I wanted your source.
If you don't have one credible enough to share, just say so.
If you don't have one credible enough to share, just say so.
Ah, you aren't even bright enough to use a search engine. No wonder the total ignorance of what every major news outlet is currently reporting.
Go troll somewhere else.
Jan 10, 2018 07:37:05 #
(Main)
Gatsby wrote:
Great, now we will all see why Steele has been refered to the justice department, for criminal investigation of his lies!
The truth bothers you that much?
There or course is no criminal investigation of Steele, and not likely that there ever could be. He nailed it.
Trump is the one being investigated!
Jan 10, 2018 07:21:26 #
(Main)
Super Dave wrote:
Says who?
Source or Trolling?
Source or Trolling?
You are the troll!
Do a Google search and discover what the rest of the world knows. Stop denying the news reported by every major news source.
Jan 10, 2018 03:43:26 #
(Main)
PeterS wrote:
After Republicans backed off their promise to rele... (show quote)
What "minor points" have been proven wrong? So far I have heard of nothing shown to be wrong and that a high percentage has been verified to be accurate.
The most significant point though is that the FBI was interested in the dossier because it was not new informatiom but rather it corroborated what they already knew about collusion. And that the Republicans on the Senate Intelligence Committee have known that and been hiding it since last August.
Jan 10, 2018 01:28:08 #
(Main)
lindajoy wrote:
Thank You Blade... Kevyn frequently gets things confused... ...
As usual you are the one confused. Not to mention ignorant. And also trying to hide behind obfuscation and massive blubber about what you hope will avoid the nasty truth.
The fact is that Trump is not going to allow oil exploration along the Florida coast off of Palm Beach and his Mar-Lago resort. He even got Florida's Governor Rick Scott, who has always wanted drilling, to buy into it with a flip flop aimed at a future Senate race.
Could it be the threats by Michael Moore to buy leases and start both drilling and fracking close to Mar-Lago?
Jan 9, 2018 00:32:45 #
(Main)
cold iron wrote:
The US Navie Dive Team says the average CO2 is .03 %. I would believe them over any left-wing scientist. ...
This bit of nonsense is even worse than what Morgan pointed out. It is techno babble similar to a lindajoy post.
What the above "average CO2 is .03%" refers to is hard to guess. I can't find anything where the US Navy "dive team" says anything averages .03%.
And it gets worse:
"On top of that CO2 is very soluble in water, rain takes down most of what is in the air every time it rains."At best a VERY intense rain might be able to leach 3 percent of the atmospheric CO2. Actually 6 percent might initially be absorbed but half of that would immediately be released into the atmosphere.
"One more thing, CO2 is heavy, it sinks low places like mine shafts, it can not get into the upper atmosphere as the nut jobs claim."In fact scientist have been measuring the CO2 in the upper troposphere since the 1960's. CO2 is slightly heavier than air but it clearly is distributed throughout the earth's atmosphere. If that did not happen it wouldn't be just settling in mine shafts, but every valley on earth.
Jan 8, 2018 11:46:52 #
(Main)
lindajoy wrote:
Read carefully, supercomputer equals supermodel an... (show quote)
Unlike you, I did initially go back and look to see if I had made such a typo. I did not. It was your fabricated word entirely.
I looked because your "supercomputer equals supermodel analysis" phrase is pure nonsense with no logical meaning. It is technobable, using big words that mean nothing in an attempt to sound sophisticated.
You aren't gaining any traction with that sort of sophistry.
Jan 8, 2018 04:05:42 #
(Main)
Blade_Runner wrote:
You never opened a single link, did you? Just a typical leftist knee jerk reaction.
One link--a US Congressman who is also an M.D.
One link to the prestigious Heritage Foundation
One link to the Washington Times
One link to the Center for Immigration Studies.
And others.
Hardly what you'd call "wacky wingnuts."
One link--a US Congressman who is also an M.D.
One link to the prestigious Heritage Foundation
One link to the Washington Times
One link to the Center for Immigration Studies.
And others.
Hardly what you'd call "wacky wingnuts."
The Washington Times? Phil Roe? The Heritage Foundation? The Center for Immigration Studies?
Those and "others" are all well known as partisan wingnuts!
Jan 8, 2018 03:09:19 #
(Main)
lindajoy wrote:
I see you've set aside this special time to humiliate yourself in public once again.....
So sorry that I can't read your mind. You used that term and have been asked multiple times what you meant by it. No answer.
Who does that humiliate???
You still claim I used that word, but the only quote that can be found is when I ask you what you meant.
I certainly know of nothing called a "supermodel". It is just something you manufactured because you were unable to comprehend what you were reading (about modeling weather and/or climate with a supercomputer).
A lapse of cognition on your part. Only humiliating because you won't even look to see if it really was your doing. That lack of care really should humiliate you!