buffalo wrote:
Really? Bullshit! You apparently did not read the article. Read carefully and slowly and maybe you can understand the difference in methodologies, or not....
"The overwhelming majority of the polls showing Hillary leading Trump used a registered voter screen.
Only three polls, including Rasmussen, employed a likely-voter screen.
The polls that used the tighter likely-voter screen produced results showing a much different race.
The GW/Battleground poll found Clinton ahead of Trump by a slim 3 point margin.
That result was more in line with Rasmussen’s poll which showed a tight race with a narrow Trump lead, unlike the Hillary blowout polls using the registered voter screen.
A looser voting screen has historically favored Democrats in the polls since there are more registered Democrats than Republicans.
A tighter voting screen showing a tight race is bad news for Hillary.
During her quest for the Democrat Party nomination, her only challenger refuses to attack her greatest vulnerability – the criminal investigation of classified information sent through her private email server.
Trump, on the other hand, has faced an unprecedented attack-ad campaign."
God, y
Really? Bullshit! You apparently did not read the ... (
show quote)
Thank-you that was informative .