Loki wrote:
I would not be very tolerant of constant attacks either.
I wouldn't either but I wouldn't be stupid enough to continue supporting the mistreatment of people while expecting them not to fight back.
Loki wrote:
While Israelis have killed a lot of Palestinian civilians, they usually try and avoid civilian casualties,
apparently, not doing such a good job...
Loki wrote:
not easy to do when the terrorists hide in the civilian population.
No, Loki - it's not an easy job. But it might be a wee bit easier if you understood that those terrorists ARE civilians. These terrorists are not roaming around the countryside like the Taliban or ISIS. They are contained in an occupied territory where all resources are entirely controlled by Israel. These terrorists are the desperately oppressed civilians themselves... not all of them, but the ones that that can't take it anymore. Some of them are kids, some of them are mothers or fathers who lost their kids. They make weapons the way inmates in our prisons make weapons, with whatever materials and innovation they can get in a lock down environment, which is exactly what Gaza is. They look dirty because they live in squalor because Israel keeps shutting off their water. Some of them die because Israel limits their medicine. They are humiliated as a people and when one or two of them figure out a way to take revenge with their improvised weapons, Israel calls in an air strike to send a message.
Think about this for a minute, thousands of civilians fanned out along the fence some of them had improvised weapons, mostly slings and rocks. Most of them were completely unarmed and they all fanned out along the fence KNOWING the IDF was ready AND willing to shoot them. As much as you try to deny it, they ARE human beings and NO WHERE in human history do we see entire communities doing that kind of thing unless there is something terribly wrong.
Loki wrote:
The Palestinians, on the other hand, deliberately target civilians.
Then why do so many of the incidents involve attacks on Israeli soldiers? There haven't been any incidents in Israel proper for a long time, almost all the violence is in the occupied territories where Palestinians aren't even allowed in Jewish settlements except to work and even then they are monitored. The only Israelis the Palestinians in occupied territories really ever come in contact with are the police or the military and that how most of the attacks (that I've read about) happen.
Loki wrote:
You conveniently forget that Israel has been amenable to a two-state solution for a long time and the Palestinians are the ones who want to annihilate the Jews.
The Palestinians don't want to annihilate the Jews. Lordy, it's like talking to you about Mexicans.
And I haven't forgotten that the Zionists were amenable to the original two-state solution and that the Arabs were not. But that was in 1948, when the Arabs were still blown away by the audacity of the British to even suggest giving a half of Palestine to a bunch of "wetbacks" from Europe to create their own country with. I have to say, I totally understand the hesitation.
"OK Loki, make some room, we're going to give Georgia to all the LGBT outcasts around the world so they can come here and establish a socialist country of their own... What? You don't like that idea? OK, well let's be fair then... let's give them half of Georgia and you can keep the other half, OK?"
Since 1967 when Israel took what would have been the other state by force, I don't think Israel has had the slightest interest in a two-state solution. They put on the act, but they always include stipulations that they know the Palestinians won't agree to, then they play it off like they "tried" but the Arabs just don't want to cooperate. The show is important because it's the show that encourages millions of Americans to send money.
Loki wrote:
You are also forgetting that had the Arab countries surrounding Israel not declared war on Israel on the heels of the UN mandate, there would probably not be any Palestinian refugees;
I'm sure there would have been because the whole situation was a powder keg anyway. The Arabs and Jews were already engaged in a civil war when they were still under the British mandate. I remember by dad telling me how everyone in Britain was expecting a bloodbath in Palestine the moment the British troops left and that's pretty much what happened. All the Arab League really did in the end was speed up the process.
Loki wrote:
and had the Palestinian Arabs not constantly rejected peaceful solutions there would not have been nearly as much blood shed.
Again, YOU are forgetting that every "peaceful solution" demands that they surrender control of their land to European immigrants.
Loki wrote:
Israel is not blameless, but the Palestinians must shoulder most of the responsibility for the mess, since it is largely of their own making.
The way I see it 100% of the blame goes to the Zionists. Had they not migrated to Palestine in the first place NONE of this would have happened at all. They had no right to just come down there and take the land. The Zionists made the first move, period. Every action since then has been a reaction.