Alicia wrote:
**************************
Now that's a stupid retort to someone who was being helpful. Why have you not commented on the many times this advice was given -- only to Singularity. It seems as though your "lather" is a bit sudsier when directed toward a liberal-minded member of this forum.
At the time of my 1st post on this subject, THESE were the ONLY posts
****Kevyn (a regular here) Joined: Jan 27, 2014 Posts: 8437
After your wife gave birth it is reasonable that your sex life was on the back burner for a while while she recovered and with a new baby in the house. That being said if given the opportunity would you go for a roll in the sack with an attractive pornographic actress like Stormy Danials to bridge over the dry spell? Do you feel it is morally acceptable for a married man to fulfill his desires in this way?
*****no propaganda please (a regular here) Joined: Feb 11, 2014 Posts: 21290 Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
Kevyn wrote:
After your wife gave birth it is reasonable that your sex life was on the back burner for a while while she recovered and with a new baby in the house. That being said if given the opportunity would you go for a roll in the sack with an attractive pornographic actress like Stormy Danials to bridge over the dry spell? Do you feel it is morally acceptable for a married man to fulfill his desires in this way?
It is no more appropriate than stealing food from the grocery store or going to a fancy restaurant and not paying for the meal because you want it and you want it now and nothing else matters in your self centered world.
****Kevyn (a regular here) Joined: Jan 27, 2014 Posts: 8437
no propaganda please wrote:
It is no more appropriate than stealing food from the grocery store or going to a fancy restaurant and not paying for the meal because you want it and you want it now and nothing else matters in your self centered world.
I am willing to bet that if you asked most of the women on OPP what they would be more upset about, their husband pinching an apple from the grocery store or getting his pipes cleaned by a porn star while out of town on a junket you would get a pretty consistent answer.
****PeterS (a regular here) (online) Joined: Jul 2, 2014 Posts: 21658
Kevyn wrote:
After your wife gave birth it is reasonable that your sex life was on the back burner for a while while she recovered and with a new baby in the house. That being said if given the opportunity would you go for a roll in the sack with an attractive pornographic actress like Stormy Danials to bridge over the dry spell? Do you feel it is morally acceptable for a married man to fulfill his desires in this way?
You have to understand. With Trump, whether his wife was pregnant or not made no difference to his willingness to chase pussy so it's really not a fair question. The real question is why would Christians support a man who had absolutely no regard for his wife or family? After all, if selling a wedding cake to a same sex couple is against your moral values then it would seem that voting for an unrepentant adulterer would be an equal sin--would it not???
++++MY response was….++++
1ProudAmerican (new user) (online) Joined: Jan 31, 2018 Posts: 53
WOW, when I first joined I only SUSPECTED that some of you are 12yo ...now I KNOW ....good thing you wear diapers to catch "it"....
What a bunch of gullible gonads you "boys" are.
+++++It was directed at ALL the previous posts+++++
****Singularity (a regular here) (online) Joined: Mar 21, 2014 Posts: 7554
1ProudAmerican wrote:
WOW, when I first joined I only SUSPECTED that some of you are 12yo ...now I KNOW ....good thing you wear diapers to catch "it"....
What a bunch of gullible gonads you "boys" are.
Unless you use quote reply to indicate where your remarks are directed in relation to the conversation, it appears you are just crashing in to scream invective at unclear targets.
When you use quote reply, it is clear to whom your screaming invective was intended.
+++++THREE people had posted, my reply was to ALL of them since their posts were all of the same ilk.+++++
+++++1ProudAmerican (new user) (online) Joined: Jan 31, 2018 Posts: 53
Singularity wrote:
Unless you use quote reply to indicate where your remarks are directed in relation to the conversation, it appears you are just crashing in to scream invective at unclear targets.
When you use quote reply, it is clear to whom your screaming invective was intended.
Considering you had not posted prior to MY response to the "boys", what are you in a lather about? If you'd like to be included, let me know.....
+++++THREE people posted, I responded to ALL 3….difficult to follow??+++++
Should I have posted ALL of the 3 responses as I did just NOW or perhaps:
Kevyn (a regular here) Joined: Jan 27, 2014 Posts: 8437
no propaganda please (a regular here) Joined: Feb 11, 2014 Posts: 21290 Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
Kevyn (a regular here) Joined: Jan 27, 2014 Posts: 8437
PeterS (a regular here) (online) Joined: Jul 2, 2014 Posts: 21658