One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Ricktloml
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 986 next>>
Apr 13, 2024 21:40:01   #
fullspinzoo wrote:
Appreciate the info!!! I might try some romaine wrapped around some ham and provolone, and a big dollop of "Dukes". I can't even eat "klondike bars, Heath", but I cheat once in awhile...don't tell anybody.


I don't know how you feel about milk in general...drinking/cooking but the Fairlife brand has half the sugar regular milk does
Go to
Apr 13, 2024 20:41:52   #
AuntiE wrote:
As with everything prediction Al Gore has ever uttered he was, yet again, wrong!

The numbers are astronomical. Rare is nowhere in evidence. Democrats always move the goal posts!

Previous Governor of Virginia refusing to sign a bill to provide medical care for babies living through a botched abortion is your idea of safe. Safe for whom?


Do you remember when the Democrat-Communist NY State Legislators gave a standing ovation to passing regulations allowing an abortion up until the time the BABY was coming down the birth canal? Democrat-Communists/American-Left...there is something that they just LOVE about the power to murder innocent babies. It seems to thrill them...they cannot get enough
Go to
Apr 13, 2024 20:29:50   #
Lily wrote:
Pro-choice = infantcide.


Bingo! Leftists/Democrat-Communists (D-Cs) LUST after power/control. And what illustrates power/control like the power to decide who lives/dies...granted these are innocent/defenseless/helpless babies, but cowards like Leftists/D-Cs really don't like any fighting back (even if it's only a 6lb-12lb baby...and they know they can easily butcher the baby)...so, poisoning them/ripping them limb/limb...much more their style...and then insisting that they're morally superior.
Go to
Apr 13, 2024 20:12:16   #
Lily wrote:
If you consider over 980,000 in one year rare, you are beyond any definition.
Go to
Apr 13, 2024 20:05:27   #
padremike wrote:
To say abortion and lgbtq perversions are not the exclusive domain of religion is compromising God and sin in favor of political expediency which promotes the Godless as being equal to the faithful. We are a nation in great peril and we are failing. Why are we failing?

John Adams said, “Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Morality and virtue are the foundation of our republic and necessary for a society to be free.

If I were betting today whether our Republic will succeed or fail I'd be all in that it will fail deservedly. Democrats have exposed and taken advantage of the weakness of our Constitution. I expect our failure will eventually drive people of faith underground and that is where hope remains. The faith will grow stronger under persecution, it always does.
To say abortion and lgbtq perversions are not the ... (show quote)


Morality/virtue used to be stressed as the most acceptable to live your life...it wasn't the unusual way to live, but what was expected.
Go to
Apr 13, 2024 19:57:49   #
Ronald Hatt wrote:
Ricktlom: You are to be applauded, & recognized, for posting 100% truth...[Embarrassing as it is, for recurrent, & politically incorrect Demo'rats!]

One must have a conscience, & morality, to feel shame at their very bad, Anti-American behavior! They have not

those Qualities. "&", they do not care! More's the pity....These people have family, that must carry, on after they

are gone.....& the damage has been done....Can it be repaired? this next election will Tell if we are to continue as

a respectable Republic, or a BANANA, REPUBLIC! [ With a demented Dictator-Bidet!]
Ricktlom: You are to be applauded, & recogniz... (show quote)


Thanks RH. And sadly, a corrupt/banana republic/with a treasonous/ineffectual frontman dictator like Gestapo Joe, (who is OWNED by Communist China) is just about the closest apt description of our current regime
Go to
Apr 12, 2024 21:03:39   #
Ronald Hatt wrote:
Shazzzzzzammmm! here's another brain-dead, Trump-hating mentally deranged "Idiot"!

Find a shrink "post haste", or join the millions of your brothers, & sisters, in the "land of *La, la*, & Willie Wonkan-oids"...

.You idiots, never have had the ability to think for yourselves, hence, you "lemmingize" your political party, & the

up-coming election, will prove my point, by America, attempting to rid itself of your lamphrey existence!

Get a life, & find a "shrink"! [ You "STINK"!] , ,
Shazzzzzzammmm! here's another brain-dead, Trump-... (show quote)


Wow? In 2016 the Obama administration/Democrat-Communist Party/American-Left/tried to FRAME a sitting president/OVERTURN the results of the 2016 election/UNSEAT a duly elected president...in other words insurrection. Apparently when you're a Democrat-Communist/American-Leftist who can't honestly win an election, cheating/lying/insurrection is the next best choice...and it gives these deceitful/backstabbing Leftists a chance to do one of their favorite things. Falsely accuse others of doing what they themselves are actually doing.
Go to
Apr 12, 2024 20:45:22   #
martsiva wrote:
What`s even more disgusting that the liars in the MSM media keep saying how great Zelenski is and that Ukraine is a democracy!!


No kidding. They also studiously avoid mentioning Zelensky's close ties to the neo-Nazi Azov Party
Go to
Apr 8, 2024 18:48:07   #
Darling Mary wrote:
FDA Settles Ivermectin Case, Agrees to Remove Controversial ‘Stop It’ Post
Doctors score win, forcing FDA to remove statements about ivermectin.

The FDA has already removed a page that said: “Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? No.”

Within 21 days, the FDA will remove another page titled, “why you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19,” according to the settlement announcement, which was filed with federal court in southern Texas.
“The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals,” the page currently states. It also says that data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19, despite how some studies it cites show ivermectin is effective against the illness.
The FDA in the settlement is also agreeing to delete multiple social media posts that came out strongly against ivermectin, including one that stated: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”

In exchange, doctors who sued the agency are dismissing their claims, the filing states.

“FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history,” Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, one of the doctors, said in a statement. “This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.”

“We are extremely pleased with the outcome of the settlement as it is a victory for every doctor and patient in the United States,” added Dr. Paul Marik, chief scientific officer of the FLCCC Alliance and another plaintiff. “The FDA interfered in the practice of medicine with their irresponsible language and posts about ivermectin. We will never know how many lives were affected because patients were denied access to a lifesaving treatment because their doctor was ‘just following the FDA.’”

An FDA spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email that the agency “has chosen to resolve this lawsuit rather than continuing to litigate over statements that are between two and nearly four years old.”

“FDA has not admitted any violation of law or any wrongdoing, disagrees with the plaintiffs’ allegation that the agency exceeded its authority in issuing the statements challenged in the lawsuit, and stands by its authority to communicate with the public regarding the products it regulates,” the spokesperson said. “FDA has not changed its position that currently available clinical trial data do not demonstrate that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. The agency has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19.”

Ivermectin was approved by the FDA in 1996 to treat several conditions, including onchocerciasis, a tropical disease caused by a parasitic worm.

In the United States, it’s common for doctors to prescribe medicine off-label, or for a different purpose than the one for which the medicine is approved.

After some doctors began prescribing ivermectin for COVID-19, the FDA ramped up its campaign, including the Aug. 21, 2021, post on Twitter, now known as X.

Dr. Bowden and two other doctors sued the FDA, arguing the agency’s actions went beyond its authority, as conferred on it by Congress.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown dismissed the case in 2022, ruling that the FDA did not act outside the authority. But an appeals court in 2023 ruled in favor of the doctors, finding that the agency “has identified no authority allowing it to recommend consumers ‘stop’ taking medicine.”
Between the time of the ruling and the settlement, the FDA refused to change any of its statements on ivermectin, and asked for a fresh dismissal of the suit.
The Case

Drs. Robert Apter, Bowden, and Marik brought the case in 2022. They said they suffered repercussions after prescribing ivermectin to patients with COVID-19, and that the FDA was to blame.
Dr. Apter, for instance, said that pharmacists refused to fill the prescriptions, citing the FDA.

“This refusal delays his patients in obtaining their prescribed treatment—when early intervention is paramount—while they look for a pharmacy to fill their prescription, if they can find one at all,” the suit states.

He also said that insurance companies were refusing to pay for ivermectin to treat COVID-19.

The suit said the FDA illegally interfered with the relationships between the doctors and patients. The doctors said with regard to ivermectin, the FDA overstepped the authority conferred on it in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

Government lawyers argued that the FDA was acting within the confines of the law, and succeeded in getting the dismissal.

Judge Brown, appointed under President Donald Trump, said the FDA’s powers were only limited with regard to medical devices.

“As there is no statute limiting the FDA’s actions here, it cannot have acted outside of any statutory limitations,” he wrote in his ruling. “Further, it cannot be said that the FDA had no colorable basis of authority. The FDA is charged by Congress with protecting public health and ensuring that regulated medical products are safe and effective, among other things.”

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit disagreed, finding that the law did not authorize the FDA to give medical advice.

“FDA can inform, but it has identified no authority allowing it to recommend consumers ‘stop’ taking medicine,” U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett, appointed under President Trump, wrote for the court. The appeals court remanded the case back to the district court.
FDA Settles Ivermectin Case, Agrees to Remove Cont... (show quote)


Well of course they're not going to admit any wrong doing. Gee what a concept
Go to
Apr 8, 2024 18:32:02   #
Bruce123 wrote:
As a libertarian I want the states to decide.


Ah, the lust by the Left for butchering babies. Decent people protect babies...Leftists love to see them dismembered...it's empowering
Go to
Apr 8, 2024 18:09:48   #
brian honors wrote:
what I worry about is hezbollah or another group of lunatics will fire their new longer range missiles they got from Iran from damascus hiding themselves among civilians . I heard they could shoot up to 6000 a day at Israel, whose only response would be to destroy damascus. That fulfills Isaiah 17 of the old testament [ check it out ] word for word and then here comes armageddon. The euphrates river is drying up too for invasion of Israel from the east. Time to go to confession, repent, and pray that I am wrong.
what I worry about is hezbollah or another group o... (show quote)


Welcome brian. I agree that is time to go to confession, repent and pray...whether you're wrong or not.
Go to
Apr 8, 2024 18:04:12   #
The Democrat Party, (which I was a member of for 19 years), morphed into the Democrat-Communist Party a long time ago. I will continue to call them what their policies mirror.
Go to
Apr 8, 2024 17:58:58   #
NotMAGA wrote:
What were the numbers during the Bush and Obama years?

Continuing to call Democrats the Communist party is unnecessary and untrue.
Go to
Apr 7, 2024 12:54:06   #
XXX wrote:
https://redstateofminddaily.com/rfk-jr-says-there-is-little-evidence-of-insurrection-on-j6/

Does anyone have evidence of an insurrection?


It was never in insurrection. One was created to hang on Trump/supporters, (it isn't just Trump the Left wants to crush...it's all of Trump's supporters as well). And the vile leftists who turned a blind eye to their pals murdering people/burning down cities/looting have gleefully made their fellow Americans political prisoners for exorcising their free speech rights.
Go to
Apr 7, 2024 12:48:26   #
NotMAGA wrote:
Pretty sure he was forced to revoke the Title 42 closure after danger from widespread pandemic infection was past.

Title 42 expulsions /closure:
Start date: March 2020
End date: May 11, 2023
Total number: more than 2.8 million

Presidents don't have authority over the border unless there is assumed great widespread danger to the American public. Congress is the branch that must regulate immigration and border crossings.

DJ was able to close the border due to the pandemic.
Pretty sure he was forced to revoke the Title 42 c... (show quote)


That pandemic in 2017/2018/2019...which one would that be. Nonsense that presidents have no control over the border. Gestapo Joe/Democrat-Communist Party have been clear about their open border policy/agenda...just as Trump/Republican Party are clear about theirs and it is no where near the same. So what if Title 42 expired. Gestapo Joe/Democrat-Communists in Congress did not push for another policy to help keep illegals out. As one Border Patrol Agent said on camera..."Biden is not spending $billions of American tax-payer dollars to keep illegals out...Biden is spending $billions of dollars to make processing illegals easier". Sounds like Gestapo Joe is pretty well involved in "border policy/invasion"
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 986 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.