One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Zemirah
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 530 next>>
Mar 21, 2024 21:00:59   #
manning5me wrote:
Quite so, Zemirah! Buffalo Bill to Barnum & Bailey is a good start. But they were all riding pink-dressed donkeys with painted nails in the finale...


Of course they were.

Without a proper shout out to their LGBTQ++ supporters, by properly attired and toe nail painted donkey Queens, the day's unconstitutional persecution/prosecution of America's only viable presidential candidate could not have been adjourned for the day.
Go to
Mar 21, 2024 11:58:44   #
Excellent summary, manning!

Also, an astute observation of Donald John Trump's collective of opponents, as they are literally twisting themselves into pretzels in their limitless and frenzied multi-attempts to destroy this All-American blue-collared billionaire's appeal to normal, natural, unrefined Yankee-Doodle-Dandy Americans... which is not going to happen, -

because we get it!

Middle of the road Americans get his over the top dialogue and his sense of humor.

This Donald John Trump is a man we would choose as a reliable ally and trustworthy companion if in a foxhole on a wartime setting... and that is not too far off when used to describe this nation's present predicament.

It is in their continual pursuit of fulfilling every liberal progressive's ancient dream of becoming "as God," - as well as their own personal jealousy of Trump that has allowed the former president's enemies to so overestimate themselves as to create within this nation's routinely scheduled year of presidential campaigning, the unprecedented frenzied atmosphere of a Buffalo Bill Cody wild west rodeo show, operating within a Barnum and Bailey three ring circus, within our nation's courtrooms.

Personally, manning, I applaud "his pettiness, and bull-in-the-china-shop attitude" - the Good Lord knows we American citizens need a good jolt of something to awaken us from our trance-like doldrums [a period of stagnation, and slothful listlessness] as our nation is teetering on the edge of an ever sharpening precipice!
manning5me wrote:
Trump's candidacy for president is an overwhelming issue, primarily because of the opposition's strategies to stop him. No candidate in recent history has had such a virulent campaign against him. Two impeachments, four indictments, and a ton of media and other insults. Trump's every word and phrase is carefully examined, taken out of context and used against him, and usually twisted, even as a majority of his listeners fully understand when he is kidding around, which he is prone to do.

The question is, how come he is still the leading opposition candidate for the 2024 election, and all of the sins heaped upon him seem to be either ignored or forgiven by what today appears to be a significant majority of potential voters?

The first answer is that most voters are willing to give Trump a pass on his pettiness, and bull-in-the-china-shop attitude, because of the real progress he made in his previous term in so many areas affecting the American people, and the excellent results he had in foreign affairs. Then too, MAGA as a slogan means a lot to many patriotic Americans, and not the least of reasons that the Biden and PMs have not promoted causes for the unity of the nation and its future, but only divisive policies. “The left abhors patriotism” is the message, and that sparks great resentment, along with trying to label conservatives to be terrorists. Really! Trump will fight this.

The second answer is the strong aversion to voting Biden into office for a second term. The public sees Biden as a demented old man that is not making his own decisions, but has one or more unknown
puppet masters or PMs that are the real decision-makers.

The decisions they have made with respect to leftist ideologies have sent the nation into a dichotomy of those who like their ideology and those who are totally against it, and it seems that the nays turn out to be in the majority. Thus, many voters are simply scared of the direction Biden and PMs are taking us, but believe Trump will set the right course.

But then, there are the other problems presented by Biden and his PMs. We have the woke people, the champions of political correctness, devotees of biasing our children in favor of socialism, critical race theory taught in lower schools, the trans movement that tries to influence children to convert without involving the parents, attempting to force straight people to use the preferred pronoun of trans persons, exposing children to LGBTQ persons in full drag in schools, and committing cancel culture on individuals of opposite thinking, plus the pro abortion policy that violates the Christian Decalogue. Just to name a few of the unacceptable practices and policies on the left.

Then we have Biden and PMs avidly searching for many, many places to dump 100s of millions of dollars or more, that have not been budgeted (where IS the budget?) into programs or nations seemingly at his own discretion, and promising more. The total of $14 trillion has been tagged as Biden's contribution to the debt so far, thus raising the debt total to well into the $40 trillions. There is no plan by this administration to begin paying off this enormous debt, and we are now paying $1 trillion in interest per year to the debt-holders. In short, he and his PMs are spending us much further into poverty. The question arises as to whether all this added money has been accounted for and spent wisely. So far, few answers are available.

A truly major problem with Biden and his PMs is the Open Border situation. Most Americans violently object to allowing some poorly known multiple millions of illegal aliens to come into the country, be checked out by the Border Patrol and then be released and allowed to be bussed to usually a sanctuary city of their choice! From then on their locations are not known, their motivations are not known, their capabilities are not known, and their intentions are not known. Doesn't anyone see the problem here? They most often ignore their court hearing summons that is supposed to consider their desire to immigrate here.
Any fool can see the problem with all of this, and it is clearly the Biden and PMs policy that fosters it.

From all the reporting, Biden and his wayward son have had some very lucrative relationships with the Chinese government, and with the Ukraine government. The appearance of impropriety has been developed by successive revelations from outside sources and from Biden himself (Fire the Uktaine prosecutor now, or else no five billion dollars!). Many are left with the belief that China has Biden where they want him. Not good!

Then we come to the armed services. The effort to turn servicemen Woke is ludicrous. Soldiers, sailors and airmen train all of their careers to be courageous fighting men that focus on their duties and their fundamental loyalties that can be simply expressed for most as: Loyalty to God, Country, Family, and Service. Their strong immediate loyalty is to their comrades, upon whom they rely, especially in combat.

Webster defines Woke in its second definition as:
“ 2 disapproving: politically liberal or progressive (as in matters of racial and social justice) especially in a way that is considered unreasonable or extreme.”
The national conservatives view today's liberals as woke cultural warriors who pose an existential threat to the nation and its traditions.
That Biden and PMs want to convert our fighting men into woke cultural warriors is to seriously reduce their effectiveness as soldiers. To cashier men that refuse to adopt wokeness is to lose good fighting men. We will need many such well-trained and experienced men real soon now. One should ask why woke here! A bad policy.

A final problem addressed here with the Biden and PMs candidacy is the left's ultimate desire to gut the Constitution, because it is a straight-jacket to their real desires for change in America. To what, may be asked? Some form of socialism, of course, which in its ultimate version is communism, and the slide from one to the other is well known, and eventually into totalitarianism. Americans do not want any part of this. As the nominal leader of the democratic party, with its total bent to the left, this is a huge problem for Biden, and should be a greater problem for patriotic democratic voters.

We thus have the prospect of a Trump win in the election and in the Electoral College, and four years more in the White House.
Trump's candidacy for president is an overwhelming... (show quote)


Go to
Mar 21, 2024 07:57:01   #
She should have sat down in shame, and permanently remained silent after declaring herself unable to define what a woman was at her confirmation!

Oldsailor65 wrote:
Ketanji Jackson comments got 'even worse' after fretting over 'hamstringing'

Her demands include blind faith in government officials' 'perspective'
https://www.wnd.com/2024/03/ketanji-jackson-comments-got-even-worse-fretting-hamstringing/?utm_source=wnd-news-alerts.beehiiv.com&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=breaking-news-alert-3-20-2024-1

Ketanji Jackson, Joe Biden's only appointment, so far, to the U.S. Supreme Court, was the butt of a multitude of jokes and guffaws this week because she fretted about the First Amendment "hamstringing" the federal government's attempts to censor speech and thought.

After all, the purpose of the First Amendment was to control the federal government's attempts to censor speech and thought.

Her blunder came in Supreme Court arguments in a case in which people censored by social media companies – at the behest of the Biden administration – during COVID and more challenged the scheme on First Amendment grounds.

The evidence shows that Biden's bureaucrats worked hard to coerce social media companies to suppress, even banish, that speech and those thoughts that conflicted with Biden's agenda.

Jackson fretted, "My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the federal government in significant ways in the most important time periods."

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND's Email News Alerts!

Is Ketanji Jackson among the worst justices ever on the U.S. Supreme Court?
100% (115 Votes)
0% (0 Votes)

Now a report from Margot Cleveland at The Federalist points out that wasn't even the worst of Jackson's blunders.

The report noted "even worse" was what she said shortly after.

"So can you help me? Because I’m really — I’m really worried about that because you’ve got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government’s perspective," Jackson told Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin Aguiñaga. Why couldn’t the government communicate with social media companies then? Jackson queried.

The report noted free-speech advocates "rightfully" blasted Jackson for her hamstring complaint, since her statement "laid bare the fundamental disdain she and other politically liberal justices hold for the classically liberal freedoms our Constitution protects."

Aguiñaga had responded that the government could communicate with tech companies but in doing so, must abide by the First Amendment.

"Lost in this exchange, however, was the horror of Justice Jackson’s premise — that the government outreaches would depend on federal officials' 'perspective' of 'threatening circumstances,'" the report said.

"Five years ago, that proposition might not have seemed so shocking because Americans hadn’t yet lived through the dual outrage of near-universal capitulation to the government’s requests for censorship and the wrongheadedness of the federal government’s 'perspective' of 'threatening circumstances.' Absent that lived experience, it might have been possible to imagine the government would only solicit Big Tech’s cooperation when truly faced with 'threatening circumstances,' or that the social media companies would refuse to remove third parties’ posts, absent a sincere danger," the report said.

But it explained the case's court record shows "the government’s 'perspective' of 'threatening circumstances' can be both dangerously wrong and politically motivated."

The report pointed to the evidence:

The federal government viewed anything prompting “vaccine hesitancy” as threatening public health. It also maintained that masking and school closures were necessary to protect Americans against Covid. These “perspectives” of “threatening circumstances” flowing from the pandemic led the government to demand that social media companies block users and posts discussing adverse effects of Covid shots or arguing against masking and school closures. But the government was wrong about all of it, and those censored were right. Had the government not successfully silenced such speech, Americans would have been better armed with facts to make important health and public policy decisions.

Then there were the political motives behind the government's insistence media corporations block information about the New York Post's reporting on Biden family scandals uncovered in a laptop abandoned by Hunter Biden.

"Once again, the banned speech was true, and Americans were prevented from learning vital information before the election due to the government’s efforts to persuade Big Tech to block supposed 'hack or leak' material. (Turns out, the Hunter Biden laptop was no such material.)," The report said.

Jackson went even further astray from the Constitution, the report explained, when she insisted "we have a test" for the First Amendment, and it's not whether there's "abridgment" of speech.

Yet that's exactly what the amendment requires, the report notes.

Her earlier comment was, "My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the federal government in significant ways in the most important time periods. … And so I guess some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country, and you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information."

Fox and Friends Weekends co-host Will Cain confirmed, "Hamstringing the government is THE POINT of the First Amendment!"

And California state Rep. Bill Essayli, in the report, confirmed, "That’s literally the point of the Bill of Rights. The government’s powers derive from, and are subservient to, the rights of the People."

Ketanji Jackson has proven to not be very intelligent....I'll bet she had one hell ov a time learning to spell...Ketanji Jackson ....so much for "DEI".
She might make a passable Walmart greater.
Ketanji Jackson comments got 'even worse' after fr... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 21, 2024 07:51:23   #
The video is excellent, Parky

For those who do not watch videos, the printed word is still priceless for detail:

Communism and Marxism: Different, Yet the Same ~ Deceptive, godless Atheistic Violent Tyranny

19th-century Atheist, German philosopher Karl Marx, the founder and primary theorist of Marxism, viewed religion as "the soul of soulless conditions" or the "opium of the masses."

Communism and Marxism are often conflated, but there is a basic difference between the two ideologies. Karl Marx developed the theory of Marxism, which focuses on his self perceived, imagined class struggle to lead to social change, while the existence of any form of Supernaturalism or Deity is not acknowledged to be even a possibility...

The stated utopic goal of Marxism is the creation of a materialistic society in which everyone receives equal material wealth.

Communism was developed by Vladimir Lenin, based upon Karl Marx's Marxist theory, in order to implement it.

The key professed difference between communism and Marxism is that communists believe in using violence to achieve their goals, while Marxists claim that they do not. Both ideologies, however, have been used historically, as a justification for committing terrible atrocities, even as they deny that their philosophies are inherently evil.

Learning about these godless theories that so oppose and threaten a free society in advance equips a nation's citizenry, especially its youth, to understand world events as they recognize these man-made philosophical ideologies at play, and to make better informed personal and political decisions whenever confronted by them.

According to Marx, religion in this world of exploitation is only the people's expression of distress, as well as their protest against their real distress. IOW, according to Marx, religion continues to survive because of oppressive social conditions. Marx theorized that when this oppressive and exploitative condition is destroyed, religion will become unnecessary, as he simultaneously, saw religion as a form of protest by the working classes against their poor economic conditions and their "alienation."

Denys Turner, a Marx and historical theology scholar, classified Marx's views as "Post-Theism," a philosophical position that the worshiping of God, or any deities, although it will eventually be obsolete, is a temporarily necessary stage in human spiritual development as all humanity is freed from any need to worship.

In the Marxist-Leninist interpretation, all modern religions and churches are considered as "organs of proletarian/elitist reaction" serving to achieve the purpose of "the exploitation and the stupefaction of the working class." A number of Marxist-Leninist governments in the 20th century such as the Soviet Union after Vladimir Lenin and the People's Republic of China under Mao Zedong, implemented rules outlawing religion and introducing state atheism.

Chronic unsettled confusion obscures the existing differences between Communism and Marxism. At times, the two terms are used interchangeably, and at others are treated as completely different ideologies. Any differences now existing between the two concepts have evolved over time.

Marxism as an economic and social system based upon the political and economic theories of Karl Marx, has formed the foundation of existing communist societies around the world.

It was founded by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in the 19th century. "Marxism" teaches that capitalism is a mode of production where the capitalists/ bourgeoisie continually exploit the proletariat/workers.

Marxism is considered one of the most important theories in history, having reshaped our understanding of capitalism, socialism, and communism, as it has been used to justify revolutions and uprisings around the world. It's use has also created some of history's most oppressive regimes.

Communism is a political and economic system based on the ideas fomented by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in seeking the mechanism whereby they might create a "classless society."

Communism is a system in which the government owns the means of production, there is no private property, and, it is claimed, in which everyone receives a pay amount from their Communist masters that is "according to their individual needs."

Communism is the final stage of socialism. It is a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs... as determined by those Communist elites who have risen to ruling positions of power. It's claim is to be a society that is free from all exploitation, oppression, and class distinction.

The Differences between Communism and Marxism

Definition: Marxism is an economic and political theory, while Communism is the governmental vehicular form used to implement Marxism upon the people.
Date: Marxism, as a theory, was created in the 1840s; Communism was then actualized with the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, capturing the Russian government.
Focus: Marxism's focus is on propagandizing the working classes into believing they have a perpetual struggle against the elite/upper class, while Communism's focus is upon creating a classless society.
Achievement: Marxism is achieved through a violent revolution, while Communism can be achieved either by peaceful revolution, or through violence - whichever is required.
Belief: Marxism believes in the existence of a class struggle while Communism does not.
Application: Marxism is applied in a country once it has become a Socialist state, while Communism has no intermediary, and is applied from the beginning.
Dependency: Marxism is dependent on economic conditions while Communism is not.
Claimed Goals: The goal of Marxism is to create a classless society while the goal of Communism is to create a stateless, classless society - which then inevitably devolves into a Communist ruled state with Communist top leadership as the elite class.
Ownership: Marxism believes in "public" ownership of the means of production - with the Marxist leaders assuming control, and in charge, ostensibly "on behave of the public," while Communism believes in "collective ownership" of the means of production, through a collective of Communist party elites and manufacturing/production elites, again on behave of an invisible powerless "public."
Dictatorship: Marxism believes in a dictatorship of the proletariat while Communism does not believe in any form of dictatorship, although fully functioning as one.
Human nature: Marxism believes in the existence of a proletariat while Communists [as do Progressives] believe in the perfectibility of humans, which came straight from the hiss of the serpent in the Garden, "you shall be as God" (and the dream has never died).
Freedom: Marxism upholds the principle of freedom, although never producing it, while Communism makes no such claim.
Equality: Marxism claims to uphold the principle of equality while Communism does not bother.
Democracy: Marxism purports belief in a democratic state while Communism does not believe in democracy.
Internationalism: Marxism believes in the principle of internationalism while Communism does not, although, in reality, both seek world domination.
Science: Marxism upholds the "scientific method" while Communism makes no such claim.
Religion: Marxism is atheistic while Communism can assume the persona of either atheism or theism.
Human nature: Marxism believes in the existence of a proletariat while Communism claims not to believe in any form of class, although unavoidably creating one through their leader's inevitable powerful preeminence in any society they control.

Parky60 wrote:
Curtis Bowers, award-winning creator of the documentaries Agenda: Grinding America Down and Agenda 2: Masters of Deceit, defines the meaning of Marxism, explains why Marxists and Communists are really the same, and covers important questions. What are their strategies? Are they all marching to the same drumbeat? Who laid out their agenda? What endgame are they pursuing? Are we as committed to the truth, as they are to a lie? We must begin with the vital history and ideology of Marxism if we are to expose the enemy that is grinding America Down from within.

https://rumble.com/embed/v4e3i2l/?pub=4
(56:52) – 45:30 played at 1.25x speed

To contact Liberty Pastors, go to: https://libertypastors.fairviewbaptistedmond.org
Curtis Bowers, award-winning creator of the docume... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 20, 2024 02:33:58   #
"Do as I say, NOT as I do" never has worked, NM.

Professing Christians have been trying it for 2,000 years; the Jewish people tried it for 2,000 years before that.

Forty years ago, in a setting of upperly mobile housewives nestling down for their weekly Bible study, the priorities were similarly eskewed.

No interest in the meanings of Biblical phrases, verses or chapters, but a lot of conversation regarding their newest appliance (the color was Avocado) at that time, or gold drapes for the living room picture window, or the latest trending film.

This generation must do what every generation has done...

That is to personally build a relationship with Jesus Christ through faith in His death, crucifixion and resurrection.

For many, that's too simplistic.

The Bible says "Work out your own salvation with trembling and fear."

This generation is in the most perilous times any generation has been since the first century.

We Are Told to be courageous and to stand fast, no backtracking and no surrender.
Go to
Mar 20, 2024 01:33:17   #
There are millions of Evangelicals.

Evangelicals derives from the Biblical Greek word, "evaugelion" meaning "the good news" or the "Gospel."

Remove this from Christianity, you have nothing.

The Evangelical faith is the good news, the Gospel of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ and Him crucified.

Those who believe themselves to be in trouble, spiritually, likely are. (Romans 1:17; Habakkuk 2:4; Galatians 3:11)

God gave each of us a conscience.

NotMAGA wrote:
An interesting article written by Russell Moore, former head of the public-policy wing of the Southern Baptist Convention, who left the denomination two years ago after decades of membership and service.

"The American Evangelical Church Is in Crisis. There’s Only One Way Out.
Evangelicals can have revival or nostalgia—but not both."

"As The Guardian noted in an editorial after the 2016 presidential election,
“In the end, a market-driven religion gives rise to a market-driven approach to truth, and this development ultimately eviscerated conservative Christianity in the US and left it the possession of hypocrites and hucksters."

"In a country exhausted by the quest to make America great again, perhaps what we need is to make evangelicalism born again.

And, in the end, that’s not a strategy. It’s a prayer."

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/07/christian-evangelical-church-division-politics/674810/
An interesting article written by Russell Moore, f... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 20, 2024 00:48:47   #
Whatever God's people thought for three or four minutes is really irrelevant in the historical scheme of things.

God promised regularity in the seasons. He also promised special signs in the heavens that would bring wonderment to mankind. (Genesis 1:14; Psalm 65:5 )

There are more pertinent verses, those are the ones that comes to mind at the minute.

It's doubtful that many, if any, could have reached a sufficient state of panic in that brief timespan to do themselves or others any permanent damage.

After all, they were momentarily
stumbling around in the dark!

Being in on the ground floor of this first time phenomenon was an honor.

After this, it would be but another eclipse.
Go to
Mar 11, 2024 03:33:12   #
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://uspoliticaldaily.com/john-kennedys-epic-takedown-of-so-called-bidenomics-will-leave-you-rolling-in-laughter/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=tln_2084493900&utm_term=&utm_content=


Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana, in spite of his name, is truly an original, both witty and wise!

He is one of the very few national politicians who actually could both entertain and educate in a one-man-show.
Go to
Mar 6, 2024 05:20:55   #
God forbid, indeed!

ACP45 wrote:
But God forbid, if my party calls, and says that the country needs me to run..... well, what can I say?
Go to
Feb 24, 2024 01:51:07   #
It is not definitively known,though often investigated, where exactly this quote originated, but no authoritative source has ever been found linking it to Gandhi.

The same supposed words of Gandhi have been repeated three times in your posted quote above, but in the opening phrase, "[I] like your Christ, but not your Christianity." - the "I" was omitted, inadvertently making the copied supposed statement incomplete...

I re-added it [in brackets] to accurately portray it as it appears online.

Below is an article that appeared in the Harvard University newspaper, "The Harvard Crimson" in 1927, suggesting that the quote was a paraphrase from Oxford's Dr. Jesse Herman Holmes (1864-1942), a Quaker philosophy professor at Swarthmore College at Oxford, 1900-1937.

https://findingaids.library.upenn.edu/records/swarthmore_SFHL.RG5.064

Dr. Holmes was the president of the National Federation of Religious Liberals and an active member of the Socialist party, as well as an active participant in AFSC relief after World War I, traveling to oversee work in reconstruction throughout Europe:

"I like your Christ, but not your Christianity." In these words of Mahatma Gandhi, Dr. J.H. Holmes summed up the Indian leader's view of Christianity in a recent interview with a CRIMSON reporter. Dr. Holmes, professor of Philosophy at Swarthmore College and a member of the Society of Friends [a.k.a., Quakers], has just completed a tour around the world, during which he spent some time in India. He had several opportunities of conversing with Gandhi. He was present at the meeting of the All-Indian Congress and had the honor of being the only westerner ever allowed to speak from their platform."

Technology and science news site, Gizmodo: https://archive.vn/nv7CE
included this quote among other famous quotes often attributed to Gandhi, which have no evidential documentation that they were ever actually said by him.

Gizmodo traced the quote to a statement made by Indian philosopher Bara Dada, brother of Rabindranath Tagore.
The full quote from Dada is from the mid-1920s: "Jesus is ideal and wonderful, but you Christians, you are not like him."
=======================================
No, we Christians are not yet like Him; we are, however, forgiven through the grace of God, and we have His blessed promise as our assurance that we will become like Him!

1st John 3:1-3:
"Behold what manner of love the Father has given to us, that we should be called children of God. And that is what we are! The reason the world does not know us is that it did not know Him.

Beloved, we are now children of God, and what we will be has not yet been revealed. We know that when Christ appears, we will be like Him, for we will see Him as He is.

And everyone who has this hope in Him purifies himself, just as Christ is pure."

[quote=TJKMO]“I like your Christ, but not your Christianity."

In these words of Mahatma Gandhi, Dr. J.H. Holmes summed up the Indian leader's view of Christianity in a recent interview with a CRIMSON reporter.

Dr. Holmes, professor of Philosophy at Swarthmore College and a member of the Society of Friends, has just completed a tour around the world, during which he spent some time in India. He had several opportunities of conversing with Gandhi. He was present at the meeting of the All-Indian Congress and had the honor of being the only westerner ever allowed to speak from their platform.

Continuing in Gandhi's words, Dr. Holmes said, "I believe in the teachings of Christ, but you on the other side of the world do not, I read the Bible faithfully and see little in Christendom that those who profess faith pretend to see.

"The Christians above all others are seeking after wealth. Their aim is to be rich at the expense of their neighbors. They come among aliens to exploit them for their own good and cheat them to do so. Their prosperity is far more essential to them than the life, liberty, and happiness of others.”

"The Christians are the most warlike people."

"[I] like your Christ, but not your Christianity." In these words of Mahatma Gandhi, Dr. J.H. Holmes summed up the Indian leader's view of Christianity in a recent interview with a CRIMSON reporter. Dr. Holmes, professor of Philosophy at Swarthmore College and a member of the Society of Friends, has just completed a tour around the world, during which he spent some time in India. He had several opportunities of conversing with Gandhi. He was present at the meeting of the All-Indian Congress and had the honor of being the only westerner ever allowed to speak from their platform.

Continuing in Gandhi's words, Dr. Holmes said, "I believe in the teachings of Christ, but you on the other side of the world do not, I read the Bible faithfully and see little in Christendom that those who profess faith pretend to see.

"The Christians above all others are seeking after wealth. Their aim is to be rich at the expense of their neighbors. They come among aliens to exploit them for their own good and cheat them to do so. Their prosperity is far more essential to them than the life, liberty, and happiness of others.

"The Christians are the most warlike people.

"[I] like your Christ, but not your Christianity." In these words of Mahatma Gandhi, Dr. J.H. Holmes summed up the Indian leader's view of Christianity in a recent interview with a CRIMSON reporter. Dr. Holmes, professor of Philosophy at Swarthmore College and a member of the Society of Friends, has just completed a tour around the world, during which he spent some time in India. He had several opportunities of conversing with Gandhi. He was present at the meeting of the All-Indian Congress and had the honor of being the only westerner ever allowed to speak from their platform.

Continuing in Gandhi's words, Dr. Holmes said, "I believe in the teachings of Christ, but you on the other side of the world do not, I read the Bible faithfully and see little in Christendom that those who profess faith pretend to see.

"The Christians above all others are seeking after wealth. Their aim is to be rich at the expense of their neighbors. They come among aliens to exploit them for their own good and cheat them to do so. Their prosperity is far more essential to them than the life, liberty, and happiness of others.

"The Christians are the most warlike people.[/quote]
Go to
Feb 21, 2024 05:45:45   #
Marty 2020 wrote:
Jesus was most active in matters of love and mercy, grace and forgiveness. But He also had a strong sense of duty and responsibility to protect the place of worship. He whipped and held accountable, the thieves and money changers in the temple.
We need to remember this as we consider the response to Hamas.

God does not change, Marty.

Start where God started: Hamas is accountable, here on earth, to the lawful courts of justice administered by the duly authorized governments instituted by God through Moses, in the Covenant symbolized by the Rainbow He set in the heavens.

"So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them." (Genesis 1:27)

Genesis 9:5-6 Capital Punishment within the Covenant of the Rainbow:

"And surely I will require the life of any man or beast by whose hand your lifeblood is shed. I will demand an accounting from anyone who takes the life of his fellow man: Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man his blood will be shed; for in His own image God has made mankind."


God's Covenant is reaffirmed in the New Testament:

"For governmental authority is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, because it does not carry the sword without cause. They are God's servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the one who does wrong." (Romans 13:4)

As Christians, we follow our risen Lord in administering mercy, love and the gospel of Jesus Christ to the hurting and vulnerable whenever possible, as does Franklin Graham and Samaritan's Purse.

Concurrently, those responsible for administering the laws of Justice must apprehend and punish criminals, murderers... and all the lawless.

One does not contradict the other, our God can walk and chew gum simultaneously.
Go to
Feb 19, 2024 21:28:30   #
JFlorio wrote:
Makes more sense to get rid of the Democrats.


That is the only solution that does make sense!!

If our nation's most devout, patriotic and courageous citizens will, behind closed doors, prayerfully devise a workable plan to accomplish that ...and I hope it is already in progress.

Exodus 18:21
"Moreover, look for able men from all the people, men who fear God, who are trustworthy and hate a bribe, and place such men over the people as chiefs of thousands, of hundreds, of fifties, and of tens."

Where are these leaders?
Go to
Feb 11, 2024 03:34:09   #
AuntiE wrote:
Franklin Graham, Samaritan’s Purse Replace Israeli Ambulances Destroyed by Hamas Terrorists
Franklin Graham (Samaritan's Purse)

The evangelical Christian organization Samaritan’s Purse has donated fourteen ambulances to the Magen David Adom, Israel’s equivalent of the Red Cross, to replace those that were destroyed by Hamas terrorists in the October 7 attack on Israel.

Samaritan’s Purse President Franklin Graham traveled to the Holy Land to dedicate the ambulances in a special ceremony Tuesday.

The 14 Magen David Adom ambulances donated by Samaritan’s Purse to replace those destroyed by Hamas in the October 7 terror attack (Samaritan’s Purse)

As described in a statement by the Samaritan’s Purse organization:

“We don’t always understand why these things happen—why tragedy happens. But we have faith in God and know that He loves us,” Graham said, addressing the families of four fallen medical personnel. “We pray that these ambulances will bring comfort to the people of Israel, knowing that someone can respond to any crisis, so we thank God and we thank God for this organization.”

All 14 ambulances dedicated today were provided by Samaritan’s Purse and dedicated in memory of the fallen. Samaritan’s Purse will also be providing seven additional ambulances, with armor plating, to Magen David Adom.

“Some may ask, why are we doing this?” Graham said. “I’m an evangelical Christian who loves Israel. I believe the Bible teaches that Israel is God’s people. There have been many battles that Israel has had to fight for its freedom.

“My father [Billy Graham] supported Israel. He believed the Bible. I believe the Bible, and I believe every word of the Bible. I don’t understand it all, but I believe it,” Graham said at the National Library in Jerusalem. “We give God the glory. The funds to pay for these ambulances came from Christian people. So, we dedicate these ambulances to God, to His glory, and we honor those who have lost their lives.”

In addition to ambulances provided to Magen David Adom, Graham also committed Samaritan’s Purse to providing new ambulance stations in communities that are most at risk of targeted attacks.

“I would like to express my deep appreciation and thank first and foremost the president of the organization, Reverend Franklin Graham, for his keen ear for the needs of Magen David Adom and the people of Israel and his open heart to help in whatever is needed,” said Eli Bin, director general of Magen David Adom. “On this day, I would like to commend the memory of our fallen heroes and pray for the safety of the IDF soldiers, for the speedy recovery of the wounded, and for the immediate return of the abductees safe and sound to their families.”


Hamas deliberately targeted ambulances in the attack, often disabling them when they attacked Israeli communities so that no one would be able to evacuate the wounded. Breitbart News saw a disabled ambulance in a visit to Kibbutz Be’eri in October.

The evangelical Christian community has been a rock-solid source of support for Israel against Hamas, which is an Islamic fundamentalist terror organization that seeks to murder Jews and impose the Muslim faith throughout the world.

https://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/2024/01/25/franklin-graham-samaritans-purse-replace-israeli-ambulances-destroyed-by-hamas-terrorists/
b Franklin Graham, Samaritan’s Purse Replace Isra... (show quote)


Franklin Graham, and Samaritan's Purse, the organization he founded to honor and glorify Jesus Christ, are one of the most basic live streaming videos in the world today, of the sacrificial, uncompromising love commanded of His followers by Jesus Christ.

This is Christianity at its core.

James, the half brother of Jesus, said that faith, without the accompanying works resultant as the natural byproduct of that faith, is dead. (James 2:26)

If the world hears only our pious words, but no sacrificial action on our part, then Christianity is dismissed as a sounding brass or a clanging symbol of ineptitude.(1st Corinthians 13:1)
Go to
Jan 28, 2024 23:21:49   #
How far we have fallen as a nation and as a people from a day when neither the government representing it's citizens, nationally, statewide, countywide or by municipality would negotiate with any robber, kidnapper, murderer, terrorist or criminal at all, understanding it would be like blood in the water to a shark.
Go to
Jan 28, 2024 22:44:59   #
Marty, if you were ever turned loose with a real keyboard, William Shakespeare would surely tremble.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 530 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.