One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: kenjay
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 403 next>>
Jan 25, 2017 23:00:44   #
DJRich wrote:
Fuh Q, sillylittlepinkwilly, and the F**k Off

Hey pussyboy shove it.
Go to
Jan 25, 2017 22:59:56   #
DJRich wrote:
So ALL 50 state attorney generals have reported that there was NO voter fraud in their states.

And trump won, but his tender little man ego persists in trying to prove the unprovable.

And his moronic supporters will believe his idiotic alternative facts


You Pa faggots still crying because you lost you whiney ass pussyboy.
Go to
Jan 25, 2017 22:57:48   #
DJRich wrote:
No matter what lies the tweeter in chief posts, his trained monkeys' like spicer and conway will simply state that they are "alternative facts".

Most people call those "facts" by the proper name of LIES.

Still spewing bullshit eh blodmann. Man you liberal faggots are stupid.
Go to
Jan 25, 2017 22:55:39   #
DJRich wrote:
But the tweeter in chief will spend millions of dollars to prove that he lost the popular vote.

What a moron!!!!


Yes you are bitch but then you always have bee arschloch.
Go to
Jan 25, 2017 22:16:07   #
Boomer.Consumer wrote:
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I was indeed talkin' to bilordinary.

Still new to navigating this somewhat directionless website. Not surprising, come to think of it.

You get lost pretty easy do you smarts?
Go to
Jan 25, 2017 22:14:57   #
susanblange wrote:
I'm just wondering how soon he will be impeached or assassinated.

Ask they secret service twat.
Go to
Jan 25, 2017 22:13:34   #
Boomer.Consumer wrote:
You should be using a privy to take a dump, not to dump your unthinking, knee-jerk reactionary excretions. You asked for specifics. Please try to respond to specifics with specifics.

Still waiting for yours jerk off.
Go to
Jan 25, 2017 22:10:09   #
Boomer.Consumer wrote:
...If you don't care, why do you bother to respond?

If D.J. was "dully" elected, it's because his followers identify so strongly with the dullness of his intellect.

You and your brethren seem to take sustenance from each other's clichés. Just remember that there are 3 million MORE Americans, who are not members of the body politic who agree with you, who disagree with you. I can withstand your frivolous vitriol ad aeternam (...you could look it up) because the more vitriolic your response, the more confident I am that I have nettled your uncritical constitutional conservatism. Truth will always heal. Lies will fester forever. Shakespeare said that. You could look it up.
...If you don't care, why do you bother to respond... (show quote)

Prove it dumb ass.
Go to
Jan 25, 2017 22:07:20   #
Boomer.Consumer wrote:
Thank you so much. Forgive me for not checking with you beforehand to find out if it was all right to have an opinion.

Your opinion like your asshole stinks goodbye whiney ass little troll.
Go to
Jan 25, 2017 22:05:59   #
Boomer.Consumer wrote:
...what kind of right-wing swamp have I stumbled into here?

The kind that will say don't let the door hit you where the good lord split you blodmann.
Go to
Jan 25, 2017 22:03:24   #
Boomer.Consumer wrote:
It's time to call a spade a spade. Enough of the "post-truth era," "alternative facts," and "falsehoods vs. lies." The only word for what we are experiencing at the hands of our new president is PROPAGANDA. The autocratic D.J. Trump believes that anything he says is true at any given moment even if he contradicts himself retrospectively or will contradict himself prospectively. He is the 21st-century incarnation of Adolf Hitler, and his own Nazi salute is the thumbs-up. True to form, he misleads us by using the wrong finger. I wish I could attribute the following to the person who deserves the credit for saying it -- I wish I had! -- "George Washington said 'I cannot tell a lie.' Richard Nixon said 'I cannot tell the truth.' Donald Trump says 'I can't tell the difference.'"
It's time to call a spade a spade. Enough of the &... (show quote)

Yes I believe you boomy you can't tell the difference but most scum sucking liberals can't. You have plenty of company arschloch.
Go to
Jan 25, 2017 19:44:37   #
L8erToots wrote:
First off, I deleted this original comment because I realized it didn't have anything to do with the article. Secondly, I am pro-choice 100% and always have been, so you don't have to lecture me on all the far-right tactics...I get it. I'm not talking about facts vs emotion on the ISSUE of abortion or a woman's right to control her body, I'm talking about taxpayer money paying for abortions. That's all. Because the right knows we legally have the right to choose, so they get all worked up over having to pay for them...which they never have had to and never will have to. Nip it in the bud is all I'm saying.
The biggest problem with Liberals is that they just can't take constructive criticism, even if it would help their cause. The FACT is taxpayer money doesn't pay for abortions in the US. That's a FACT and give them PROOF (the Bill Obama signed). However, taxpayer money might in foreign countries if the Mexico City policy isn't in effect.
First off, I deleted this original comment because... (show quote)

You blodmann are full of shit taxpayers have funded abortions. We do not have the right to kill unborn babies arschloch.
Go to
Jan 25, 2017 19:41:48   #
PeterS wrote:
So if I need to show facts that prior to RvW women were having abortions and dying from them? That was the entire argument behind RvW. As for eliminating any government funding that still won't eliminate abortions. Women who don't want to have babies won't have them. As for emotions I have yet to use the picture of an aborted fetus as an argument against abortions. Talk to us about being emotional when the right stops using emotion as a principle argument. A woman having the right to do with her body as she chooses isn't an emotional argument but as about as factual and straight forward as you can get. Granting rights to a fetus that isn't even viable though and shedding tears because SCOUTS won't grant them the rights, is more then a bit emotional--you guys come close to hysteria. SCOTUS says the right to life doesn't exist for a fetus until it becomes viable--and even then is it doesn't pose a health risk for the mother. That's the Rule of Law and I see no reason to get emotional about it. Do you?
So if I need to show facts that prior to RvW women... (show quote)

You are correct arschloch women do have the right to choose. Once they choose to spread their legs they must deal with the consequences of their actions they do not have the right right to choose to harm the babies body. And why do you care faggot?
Go to
Jan 25, 2017 19:34:55   #
L8erToots wrote:
The Mexico City policy has gone back and forth after every election since the policy was made; Democrat presidents recind it and Republicans reinstate it - why should Trump do any different (although I wish he would). This is a subject I'd like to debate more because on the one hand it's "our money, our rules" and on the other it's coercing other countries to accept only one side our country's opinion, and only women suffer (not by having abortions denied to them but women in other countries need education about birth control and family options as much, if not more, than the women and youth in our country did and do). Tough call and is probably why it's still around and bounces back and forth.
The Mexico City policy has gone back and forth aft... (show quote)

Liberals believe abortion is birth control.
Go to
Jan 25, 2017 19:33:33   #
PeterS wrote:
So if you take away the funding for abortions that women will stop having them? The insanity is on your side not mine bubba. All you've accomplished was to kill more women not save babies. So tell me, is that something a sane person does? Don't bother to explain....

Save children sure that is what sane people do. Petersucker what do negroid faggots do sell the baby parts of murdered children?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 403 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.