If the Muslims are getting into public office, just how do you think they are going to be indited?
That's kind of the reason they are running for office, so that they can block that from happening.

This is how they infiltrate and over throw countries.

Its been a while, maybe you should refresh your memory on the three stages of Jihad.

Three Stages of Jihad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_468896&feature=iv&src_vid=-SoXs0_rHY&v=ERou_Q5l9Gw

You think Trump is going to be impeached..................meanwhile Democrats are lining up to run against him in 2020?

You seem to be out of touch with your party.

In the meantime American is not a Democracy. Our forefathers were quite specific in their contempt of Democracies, where they are as violent as they are short lived. Where they will praise Caesar one day and hang him the next.

What we have is a Democratic-Constitutional-Republic.

Learn your history!

We have to tell the truth about Islam. Islam has never succeeded where the truth is known about it.

Publius Huldah's videos, what can Americans do about Islam?
http://vimeo.com/63431881

Publius Huldah Explains Why Islamists Don’t Have the Right to Build Mosques, Proselytize Or Institute Sharia Law In America
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/04/publius-huldah-explains-why-islamists-dont-have-the-right-to-build-mosques-proselytize-or-institute-sharia-law-in-america/

Is Islam incompatible with U.S. Constitution?
Are the Quran and the U.S. Constitution compatible?
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that Congress shall make no law prohibiting the “free exercise” of religion, yet Mohammad said “Whoever changes his Islamic religion, kill him.” (Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 9, Book 84, No. 57).
The Quran also states in Sura 4:89 “Those who reject Islam must be killed. If they turn back (from Islam), take hold of them and kill them wherever you find them.”

The First Amendment states Congress shall not abridge “the freedom of speech,” yet Islamic law enforces dhimmi status on non-Muslims, prohibiting them from observing their religious practices publicly, raising their voices during prayer, ringing church bells or say anything considered “insulting to Islam.” Islamic law relegates non-Muslims to “dhimmi” status, where they are not to propagate their customs among Muslims and cannot display a cross, Christmas decorations, or the Star of David.

The First Amendment states Congress cannot take away “the right of the people to peaceably assemble,” yet Islamic law states non-Muslims cannot repair places of worship or build new ones, they must allow Muslims to participate in their private meetings, they cannot bring their dead near the graveyards of Muslims or mourn their dead loudly.

The First Amendment states Congress cannot take away the right of the people “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances,” yet Islamic law states non-Muslims are not to harbour any hostility towards the Islamic state or give comfort to those who disagree with Islamic government.

The Second Amendment states “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed,” yet Islamic law states non-Muslims cannot possess arms, swords or weapons of any kind.

The Third Amendment states one cannot be forced to “quarter” someone in their house, yet Islamic law states non-Muslims must entertain and feed for three days any Muslim who wants to stay in their home, and for a longer period if the Muslim falls ill, and they cannot prevent Muslim travellers from staying in their places of worship.

The Fourth Amendment guarantees “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures,” yet Islamic law states if a non-Muslim rides on a horse with a saddle and bridle, the horse can be taken away.

The Fifth Amendment states that “no person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime … without due process of law,” yet Mohammad said “No Muslim should be killed for killing a Kafir (infidel).” (Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 9, No. 50).

The Sixth Amendment guarantees a “public trial by an impartial jury” and the Seventh Amendment states “the right of trial by jury shall be preserved,” yet Islamic law does not give non-Muslims equal legal standing with Muslims, even prohibiting them from testifying in court against Muslims.

The Eighth Amendment states there shall be no “cruel and unusual punishments inflicted,” yet the Quran states: “Cut off the hands of thieves, whether they are male or female, as punishment for what they have done – a deterrent from Allah.” (Sura 5:38)
A woman who has been raped is also punished “with a hundred stripes.” (Sura 24:2)
Women can be beaten: “If you experience rebellion from the women, you shall first talk to them, then (you may use negative incentives like) deserting them in bed, then you may (as a last alternative) beat them” (Sura 4:34).
Honor killings of wives and daughters who have embarrassed their families have been reported by the United Nations in Muslim populations of Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Pakistan, Syria, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Yemen and increasing in Western nations.

The 13th Amendment states there shall be no “slavery or involuntary servitude,” yet the Quran accommodates slavery as Mohammad owned slaves.

The 14th Amendment guarantees citizens “equal protection of the laws,” yet the Quran does not consider Jews, Christians and other non-Muslims as equal to Muslims before the law. Referring to Jews as “the People of the Book,” Mohammad said: “They are those whom Allah has cursed; who have been under his wrath; some of whom were turned into apes and swine” (Sura 5:60, 7:166, 2:65).

The 15th Amendment guarantees “the right of the citizens … to vote shall not be denied … on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude,” yet strict interpretation of Islamic law does not allow voting, as democracy is considered people setting themselves in the place of Allah by making the laws.

The 16th Amendment has some similarities with Islamic law, as “Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes from whatever source derived.” Mohammad said “Fight those who believe not in Allah … until they pay the jizya [tax] with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” (Sura 9:29)

The 18th Amendment has some similarities with Islamic law, as “the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors … for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.”

The 19th Amendment allows women to vote, yet in strict Islamic countries women cannot vote.

The 21st Amendment allows for the sale of liquor, yet Islamic law states non-Muslims are not to sell or drink wine and liquor openly.

One would assume that to swear upon a book implies believing what is in that book. As Mohammad was not just a religious leader, but also a political-military leader, Sharia Islam is not just a religious system, but also a political-military system.
http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/is-islam-incompatible-with-u-s-constitution/?cat_orig=education&AID=7236

The one fighting the "FACTS" is you.

Doctored Data, Not U.S. Temperatures, Set a Record This Year
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/06/13/doctored-data-not-u-s-temperatures-set-a-record-this-year/#66edb90d6184

31,487 American scientists have signed this petition,
including 9,029 with PhDs
http://www.petitionproject.org/

The great global warming swindle - Full version
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELfQ7FI6Zoc

Major Researchers Caught Lying to Boost Obama Climate Rules; Liars Want to Use Fed’s RICO to Criminalize Truth
http://joemiller.us/2015/06/major-researchers-caught-lying-to-boost-obama-climate-rules-liars-want-to-use-feds-rico-to-criminalize-truth/?utm_source=JoeMiller.US+List&utm_campaign=6221c504f4-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_065b6c381c-6221c504f4-230980933

You're not very bright, are you?

Everyone that works, will get paid, the judge did them a favour.

If they refused to work, then once the shut-down was over, they wouldn't get any back-pay for work they didn't do.
They don't get paid right now, but, they will be paid in full later, unless they refused to work, then they wouldn't have any hours to be paid for.

In the meantime the people who have been killed by the illegal immigrants won't get paid now or later they're dead!

The parents who don't have kids any more will never get them back and the kids that no longer have parents won't get them back ether.

While Barack was president he put people out of work by the millions, for years, you Democrats weren't worried about them then, they had to deal with it, so these over-paid government workers can deal with it for a few weeks, before they get all their back-pay.

Keep dreaming......................whatever gets you through the night.

Can Liberals Survive the Apocalypse?
This is Funny!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSSFAGx3GNY

Yup, they're trying, but, it's not working.

They have to wait for CNN and MSABC to tell they what to think and say and give them their talking points.

Immigration, World Poverty and Gumballs - NumbersUSA.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE

Immigration Gumballs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FM1YU-Ni_84

"this Country was founded Sovereign and long before a plot of land called Israel was created or before those people came and colonized Manhattan"

This country was founded on it's "Western Heritage."

This is the history that came up through Ancient Athens, The Greeks and Rome.

Your not a very good historian or you'd know the contributions the Jews made to that Western Heritage over time, as the world began to except one God and that one God was the God of Abraham..

Their influence on the founding principles of this country was stamped into the history of the world, long before America was discovered, never mind settled.

You can start with John Lock and Vattel, just to name two recent influences that influenced the founding fathers.

But, it did work in 2012.
Rush Limbaugh pointed out that if the same number of people who voted against Obama in 2008, had shown up and voted against him again in 2012, Obama would never have been elected president in 2012.

The Democrats worked to convince Republicans that Obama was going to win and there was no use in trying to stop it.
It worked as that year a large segment of the voting republic stayed home.

The trouble you're having is that if you want the real America back, then what you want back is the Judo-christian heritage that this country is founded on.

But, you seem to hate the Jews, so you really don't want America back.

This country was founded on three philosophies:

God's Law
The revealed Laws of God
And Natural Law

And Natural law doesn’t come from religion, it comes from history.
There are certain rules that when a society follows them, there is success and prosperity and when violated, death, destruction and ruin.
Natural law can be witnessed in any society at any time in history.

Our fore-fathers revered Natural law because they said that it was proof of the divine hand of God in the affairs of men and therefore proof of his existence. And that would be proof of the existence of the God of Abraham.

That God that they revered, was the God of Abraham, Jesus' father.
The old testament came from the Torah, you know, the Jewish bible.
But, not the whole Torah, just the books they thought explained God and the coming of Christ.

The Jews are God's chosen people, but, you reject them, because there are bad people in the world and some of them are Jews.

But instead of focusing on the bad individuals, you slander an entire people.

The global bankers are evil and a lot of them are Jews, but they ain't doing anything for the Jewish people, except rape them right along with the rest of us.

That's like me being an American cold blooded killer and then saying that all Americans are like me, because I'm an American, that's just bullshit!

Sooooooo let me get this straight..........................

The hacking was done under Obama's administration, at a time when Hillary is getting paid millions to sell American Uranium to the Russians which Obama approved.

But, the smartest man in America, didn't know that the Russians were in fact helping Trump.

And the Russians were helping Trump:

because the Russians wanted Trump to bomb Assad, one of Russia’s key allies in the middle East, with a devastating cruise missile strike on a Syrian airfield in retaliation for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s sarin gas attack on civilians.

And the Russian's wanted Trump’s sanctions policy that has a 120-day grace period for the administration to evaluate if entities on its sanctions list have “substantially reduced” their business ties to Russian national security agencies. So that on multiple occasions Trump could then slap new sanctions on key Putin allies and other Kremlin-connected Russians.

Then when responding to Moscow’s demands that the U.S. pare down its diplomatic presence in Russia, the Department of State shut down Russia’s consulate general in San Francisco, a chancery annex in Washington, D.C., and a consular annex in New York City.
Because Russia, couldn't do it themselves, so Trump "helped them out," by shutting them down for them.. Boy what a pal.

Then Russia wanted Trump to shore up Poland’s defenses against Russia, which had deployed nuclear-capable Iskaner missiles on its Kaliningrad exclave between Lithuania and Poland and that on the heels of a deployment of Patriot missile batteries in Lithuania.
But wait! There's more:
Later in November, the Trump administration approved the sale of U.S. liquid natural gas to Poland, a deal that hurts Russian economic interests there.
I didn't know that Russia needed help hurting it's economic interests, I thought they were doing that pretty well on their own. But I guess that's why they supported Trump, so that he could help them screw themselves.........What a Pal!

Then for the first time since Russian forces moved into Ukraine in 2014, the U.S. agreed in December to supply Kiev with lethal defensive weapons to help deter the Russian-backed separatists.
Oh boy, I didn't know the Russians wanted that, I would of thought that that would be bad for their allies, but, it's a good thing that they helped Trump, because Trump made sure that the people Russia was against had the weapons needed to defend themselves against Russia. Such as, Javelin anti-tank missiles, a weapon long sought by the Ukrainian military to bolster its capability against Russian-made armoured vehicles.
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said Trump’s decision would make the conflict even more deadly and accused the U.S. of being an “accomplice in fueling the war.”
I guess he didn't get Putin memo that that's what Putin wanted, because that's why Putin supported Trump in the election.

Boy, what a pal Trump has been to Putin.
I'll bet Putin is just tickled pink that his plan worked out so well, right under the nose of the smartest man in the world, Barack Obama.