One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: PeterS
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2655 2656 2657 2658 2659 2660 2661 2662 2663 ... 2667 next>>
Jul 16, 2014 17:16:57   #
bdamage wrote:
Sorry Petie.....an atheist can NEVER understand.

Why can't an atheist understand international law? Is it written differently for a theist than atheist?
Go to
Jul 16, 2014 17:15:05   #
Hartbreaker wrote:
The right of conquest as the aggressor was dropped. The right of conquest for the attacked was not. The Jews have the right. And no they would not. The Right is not the same as a requirement. Any historian can tell you numerous times that the USA won a war and did not claim their territory for its own. Taking Europe would have been bad politics and would have been nothing but trouble.

And your own argument collapses on itself. "was dropped after WWII" not before. Meaning the victory was already obtained and any new rules would not even apply yet. So by your own argument, we could have taken Japan and Europe as the old rules still applied.
The right of conquest as the aggressor was dropped... (show quote)

The Right of Conquest is the right of a conqueror to territory taken by force of arms. It matters not if you are the aggressor or the one aggressed--international law applies equally the same. This is why the UN denied Israel the right to land they confiscated during their various wars. If you are going to cite international law you should at least understand the law you are citing and you clearly don't...
Go to
Jul 16, 2014 16:48:30   #
bdamage wrote:
A simple "yes" would've sufficed.

This is also the reason why you don't know squat about Israel.

What does religious orientation, or lack of, have to do with international law? The UN has ruled on Israel's land confiscation and ruled against them in every situation. One doesn't need to be religious to understand that...
Go to
Jul 16, 2014 15:56:10   #
bdamage wrote:
Are you an atheist?

What has that to do with the "Right of Conquest" and Israel’s confiscation of land? The UN is the only one who can apply International Law and they have ruled the territory and settlements to be illegal. People should read international law before citing it!
Go to
Jul 16, 2014 15:48:52   #
Hartbreaker wrote:
So does that make all the anti-Semitism of the left OK?

This is one thing that disgusts me is the attitude of extremists that justify their evil by pointing out to the evil of the other side.
How does pointiing our someone elses evil justify evil in ones self? You can find anything you want on the internet, evil or not--that was my point!
Go to
Jul 16, 2014 15:44:37   #
Hartbreaker wrote:
PeterS believes whatever the liberals tell him to believe.

I'm not a conservative. I don't need anyone to tell me what to believe...
Go to
Jul 16, 2014 15:43:05   #
Hartbreaker wrote:


So that land was taken by force but in a manner consistent with international law. In a war, International law does not allow for confiscation of land by the aggressor, but it does by the defender. Since in every case, the Muslims attacked, the Jews have legal right to confiscate the territory claimed. They have even given much of this land back, at the request of the UN when they had no legal need to do so.

The Right of Conquest was dropped after WWII and codified as part of the Nuremburg Principles--else Europe, Japan, and much of Asia would now be US territories. You really shouldn’t misrepresent history when representing history. The jews have no right to the territory they've taken and therein lies much of todays angnst...
Go to
Jul 16, 2014 15:28:50   #
Inyourface wrote:
The Israelis are using your tax dollars to slaughter women and children in the Gaza right now you moron.

You are talking to conservatives. Money for blood is always well spent. What angers conservatives is that we don't get the same dollar return as they do...
Go to
Jul 16, 2014 15:20:32   #
Hartbreaker wrote:
Look up "left anti-Semitism" and you will see there is a link. Liberals have been saying many anti-Jewish and Anti-Israel things. And they are a lot like the stuff Nazis said in the 1930's, that the Jews are destroying society by running all these big businesses and banks. It is the anti-corporation mentality being spread to anti-Semitism., the opposite directions as Nazism, but the same result.

Put in "right wing anti-semitism" and you will find links also. And believe me, the Nazi's put liberals in consentration camp too not because Nazi's shared the same ideology but because they didn't!
Go to
Jul 16, 2014 15:05:14   #
JMHO wrote:
Spoken like the colossal moron that you are. What a bunch of left-wing brain-dead bullcrap!!!!! God! You're ignorant! How in the hell do you get up in the morning and tie your shoes, you're so stupid! Moldy? Yeah, I'll say...spoiled to the core.

The Republicans always have to rebuild the military every time one of your communist buddies leaves office! Carter, Clinton, and Obama have, and are decimating the military...the Democrats always do, pal. Wake up...actually, I think you're too far gone to ever wake up...no grey matter left between the ears.
Spoken like the colossal moron that you are. What... (show quote)


You do realize it was the military that Clinton left Bush that he used to walk all over the Middle East. Yeah boy, us commies really decimated the military!
Go to
Jul 16, 2014 14:56:47   #
Caboose wrote:
I believe that Liberals hate our Military because our Military
poses a threat to them.


How does it threaten us?
Go to
Jul 16, 2014 14:55:39   #
JMHO wrote:
If you ever wonder what liberals think about our men and women who serve in the military, two recent incidents should be instructive in helping you understand their perverted thought process.

Read more http://eaglerising.com/7369/liberals-sure-hate-military/#wT3aUAVG5ESS4MVq.99

Sounds more like pacifists then liberals. The only killing for hire I'm against is Blackwater or other mercenaries. It’s not our militaries fault when a president put them in a position to murder instead of defending our country...
Go to
Jul 16, 2014 14:43:32   #
DennisDee wrote:
Tea Party supports Fiscal Sanity and Secure Borders. Democrats should never hold elected office.


You supported Bush and he had the highest YoY spending of any president since FDR nor did he do a damn thing to secure our borders. Teabaggers could give a crap about fiscal sanity and secure borders. They are terrified of democrats and that terror controls every action they make!
Go to
Jul 16, 2014 14:31:29   #
Wolf counselor wrote:
What is truly hard to understand is that while you claim Yeshua to be your Messiah you look to Obammy for leadership. And you are quick to defend him even though he has blasphemed both God and Yeshua.

Since neither god nor yeshua propose our laws, pass our laws, or enforces our laws why does it matter if Obama, or any president, blasphems against them? Hell, if he were to tap dance on the bible then whip out his willie and piss on it, it wouldn't make any difference how he was supposed to execute his office. That's what's important not how he treats our imaginary gods...
Go to
Jul 16, 2014 14:01:23   #
Steve700 wrote:


This Is Sooooooooooo Damn Pathetic. These poor people can't even defend themselves against these barbaric savages in whom the Quran has induced a Jew Hating Mental Illness, without the Godless moronic bastards of the world (mostly all people of the left) perceiving them as unjust agressors.


Neo-Nazi's never have nor ever will be aligned with the left. As for Israel--the Israelis tend to take the right of self defense to an extreme--which is probably why the right so loves when they start killing--they do it so well. Well enjoy the blood bath, it should keep you entertained for a while, but don't get so upset when others, including liberals, don't enjoy it to your extreme...
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2655 2656 2657 2658 2659 2660 2661 2662 2663 ... 2667 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.