Seth wrote:
The proof is and has been right in front of your face if you live in America and follow political events, which you obviously do to some extent, at least the left side of things.
Just telling me the proof is right in front of my face is not evidence. It's not even an explanation
Seth wrote:
I've had to repeat the same things over and over again here because either your ilk ignores then the first time around or they go in one eye and out of the other, and I'm simply not going to rehash the same things again because no matter what I say, you're going to deny it without even providing anything more than the usual denial.
Repeating something doesn't make it true. I'm not going to take your word for it just because you've said it over and over again.
Seth wrote:
You fragment a post and answer it paragraph by paragraph with nothing that actually says anything, then say you come here to learn things.
Oh, now your going to complain about the way I break a rant into separate issues so I can respond to them directly? This, right here, is a perfect example... In your last post you start with saying the proof is right in front of me, then you complain about how you have to repeat things. Then you complain about how I fragment posts which has nothing to do with the proof that's supposedly right in front of me. That's basically what a rant is Seth. A long string of disconnected issues.
Keep your post coherent and focused and I will be less inclined to fragment.
And BTW, I actually I learn a lot more when I come here than you probably think.
Seth wrote:
Right. If it isn't left, you simply deny it.
I rarely deny anything but there's a lot that I doubt. Not exactly the same thing. In my mind everything is a theory and how much of a theory I doubt or beleive comes down to the logic I understand and the evidence I see. Right and left has nothing to do with it. I lean left because overall, I like their solutions better not because I'm a loyalist.
Seth wrote:
There have been long lists of Trump's accomplishments posted here at least 50 times, yet your ilk ignores them, yet not once have I seen a list of Obama's positive accomplishments -- because there were none --
Easy to explain... Obama's accomplishments are well known. Otherwise, he wouldn't have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize after two years in office. So... we really don't have to prove anything. On the other hand, Trump isn't being recognized for much outside of his own rallies so his supporters are frantically running around with these lists of supposed accomplishments to try and convince people that he's worth something.
The lists that I have seen have been an aggregation of false claims, credit for things other people have done, wide sweeping generalizations, easy points and a list of actions that most people consider really bad ideas.
Seth wrote:
everything is about Trump, and it's always baseless innuendo, slander and name calling -- the orange this, the orange that, the fuhrer, the racist, the Nazi, etc, without an iota of proof to support any of it.
Dude, 'cmon... I've SEEN his orange face on live TV which is not something people can edit. And we know it's cosmetics because we've seen him without it too. So he kind of set himself up for that. And being the narcissist that he is, he is constantly putting himself at the center of attention, so that's on him too.
Yes, a lot of people say some nasty things about him. People said a lot of nasty things about Obama too. It's politics, deal with it.
Personally, I have stated numerous times in various topics across this site that it's NOT all about Trump... That Trump is actually a symptom of a bigger problem. It is also my opinion that Trump would not be where he is without a LOT of help. I seriously doubt his pampered a$$ could even change a tire, much less run a business without lawyers or a government without McConnell.
Seth wrote:
Just a few words taken intentionally out of context by the mainstream media, yet hearing the entire statement they're twisting one hears something entirely different.
Just another day in politics.
Seth wrote:
C'mon, let's hear some great accomplishments Biden and Obama managed, without any Trump this, Trump that.
Seriously? OK, here's just a few...
1. Healthcare reform... Whether you agree with it or not this is something progressives have been trying to do since the 80's but were always stymied by Republican resistance. And Obama didn't just sign the bill he was also involved in the design AND he corralled the bipartisan support needed to pass it into law. Say all you want about the ACA but the fact that Republicans are STILL trying to kill it after 70 attempts strongly indicates it's value to the American people.
Newsweek: GOP Aims To Kill Obamacare Yet Again After Failing 70 Times2. He presided over the economic recovery from the Great Recession, cutting the unemployment rate from 10% to 4.7% over six years.
3. The Iran deal: Obama's incredible ability to rally multilateral support got the U.S. the entire EU, Russia, China AND Iran to agree to a deal in which Iran promised to limit their nuclear program to peaceful energy production and allowed the other countries to monitor their program. Again, say what you want about that deal but the fact that even after the U.S. pulled out, the other countries are sticking with it, is a testament to the importance of what Obama did.
I'll just leave it there to avoid overloading the conversation with disconnected issues that call for fragmented responses. Oh, and notice I didn't have to mention Trump. (easy to do when focusing on real accomplishments)
Seth wrote:
Why, without mentioning Trump, would Biden be a good president?
That's a fair question. I can't predict the future but I would say his experience in the Senate AND in the White House is a good start. I also like that he listens to his advisors because I do believe experts are more reliable than "gut feelings" when it comes to decision making. Gut feelings are for gamblers and dictators not presidents.
I also think having a law degree is a worthy credential because government is about laws, not business.
I also like his choice for VP... Kamala Harris is relatively young and very sharp and I don't think she'll be a mere lapdog for the president, I think she will confront Biden when needed and she will temper his presidency into something stronger than either of them on their own. The fact that he chose her gives me more confidence in his ability to be a good president.
I also like Biden's reverence for the military. His son served and I think that makes it a little more real for him. I also like the caution reflected in his voting record on military resolutions going all the way back to the Gulf War. Honestly, I'm not surprised to read in the Military Times that Biden is the favored candidate among those in uniform.
I think his blue collar upbringing also brings him closer to middle-class Americans and I see that reflected in his speeches relating to the "little guy" and again in his voting record on matters that affect the middle-class.
When it comes to foreign policy, Biden's close association with Obama will go a long way as Obama is still highly respected by our allies.
So there's a few reasons why *I* think Biden will be a good president and I didn't have to mention Trump. That being said... I think we both know that Trump is a big reason why Biden is getting so much support. Many on the left would have preferred someone more... well, "left" ...and perhaps more radical. Biden is considered by most Democrats to be moderate ala Obama, with an ear for socialism but a lean on free-market economies.
I don't think he's going to change the world if that's what you're looking for. But I think he might calm things down after the last four years of insanity and restore some faith in American leadership.
So, will he be a GREAT president? Probably not. But will he be a good president? Yeah, I think so. Is he a better alternative to Trump? Well... I think you know my answer to THAT question.