Posts for: Rivers
Nov 1, 2016 10:31:39 #
(Main)
moldyoldy wrote:
How long are you willing to wait for this breaking news?
If it comes, it will be within a day or two. Have patience.
Nov 1, 2016 10:28:17 #
(Main)
IT’S RIGGED—
In a letter to Congressional leaders earlier today the DOJ writes that it “will continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible” in the investigation of the over 650,000 emails found on Anthony Weiner’s home computer.
The letter was signed by Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/rigged-podesta-doj-pal-peter-kadzik-heading-investigation-hillary-crimes-mentioned-20-times-wikileaks/
Of course the DOJ assigned a Clinton crony to oversee the new email investigation:
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/11/01/course-doj-assigned-clinton-crony-oversee-new-email-investigation/?utm_source=hadaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl
In a letter to Congressional leaders earlier today the DOJ writes that it “will continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible” in the investigation of the over 650,000 emails found on Anthony Weiner’s home computer.
The letter was signed by Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/rigged-podesta-doj-pal-peter-kadzik-heading-investigation-hillary-crimes-mentioned-20-times-wikileaks/
Of course the DOJ assigned a Clinton crony to oversee the new email investigation:
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/11/01/course-doj-assigned-clinton-crony-oversee-new-email-investigation/?utm_source=hadaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl
Nov 1, 2016 09:28:06 #
(Main)
What scandals might the American people find themselves dealing with in Hillary Clinton’s Administration if she slides into the presidential home plate, trailing a cloud of controversy?
Let us be honest about who suffers from presidential misbehavior—it’s the American people who pay the price, including the literal price of the expensive investigations. The odds of justice actually catching up with Hillary Clinton dwindle to almost zero if she gains the White House. She might have to sacrifice an aide here and there, but if the political system of 1998 couldn’t remove her husband from office for blatant perjury, it’s hard to imagine what could possibly bring The First Woman President down in the even more corrupt and confused political system of 2017.
That being said, here are a few lingering legal headaches Clinton could face:
1. Perjury: Why not start with a blast from the Clinton past? Hillary Clinton signed documents testifying that she turned over all work-related emails to the State Department, on orders from a federal judge, under penalty of perjury. We already have indisputable proof she violated this sworn statement… thousands of times.
The cloud of false statements under oath surrounding Hillary Clinton is thousands of times thicker than the one around Bill. Democrats seem to have found a hidden clause in the Constitution that says Clintons can never be prosecuted for perjury, but Madame Secretary is really stress-testing that particular privilege of Clintonhood. One would think the federal judiciary had some interest in establishing that sworn documents must be taken seriously.
2. Obstruction of Justice: Bill Clinton’s primary motive for committing perjury was to obstruct justice—it was the second count in his impeachment. (The justice he was obstructing was a sexual harassment suit from Paula Jones, at a time when liberals insisted sexual harassment was the most overlooked, under-prosecuted crime in the legal code.)
Hillary’s thousands of perjury counts are also related to the obstruction of justice. She held back documents she didn’t want Congress to see. She subverted the Freedom of Information Act, which is a law, not a lovely suggestion.
Most media timelines of the Clinton email scandal are either incomplete or deliberately obtuse, because they almost never accurately relate how her secret server was discovered. For example, these timelines from USA Today, CNN, and ABC News all get it wrong.
Sharyl Attkisson, who was a participant in the story, has an accurate timeline that makes the important point Clinton-friendly media outlets don’t want to talk about: we know about the secret server because the State Department was sued for failing to respond to FOIA requests. The State Department’s official story is that they were surprised to discover Clinton was withholding thousands of documents on her private computer.
That’s straight-up obstruction of justice, in cases involving multiple federal courts, as surely as Bill Clinton’s impeachable offense of obstructing the Paula Jones suit. Clinton may become untouchable if the American people allow her into the White House, but the lawsuits don’t evaporate, and neither do the angry judges.
3. Bribery: After the FBI set off a headline earthquake by re-opening the Clinton email investigation, we learned that several other FBI investigations of Clintonworld have been quietly in progress for some time. One of those investigations is digging into bribery allegations against the Clinton Foundation. The FBI agents working on these cases were reportedly very angry that top Bureau and Justice Department officials were pressuring them to drop their investigations.
The most attention-grabbing of these suspicions concerns an FBI official, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whose wife received an inexplicably huge political donation from Clinton bagman Terry McAuliffe, currently the governor of Virginia. The timing of this donation was so convenient that even the Left side of the blogosphere has produced some uneasy speculation that McCabe probably should have recused himself from all things Clinton-related.
Well, he didn’t recuse himself, and the conflicts of interest are so apparent that the lack of a chiseled-in-stone quid pro quo might not be enough to kill this case off. After all, corrupt officials aren’t usually dumb enough to write down their quid pro quo agreements, or repeat them into microphones. The McCabe controversy already has longer legs than most observers expected, when the news first broke.
4. Pay for Play: There has also been recent confirmation that the FBI has investigated influence-peddling allegations against the Clinton Foundation, which was so obviously used for that purpose that it’s funny to watch Clinton apologists insist nothing can be proven in a court of law. Some of the most vigorous infighting within the Bureau reportedly concerns whether pay-for-play investigations should move forward.
WikiLeaks has exposed emails from Clinton insiders that openly discuss how the Foundation was part of a network that steered millions of dollars to “Bill Clinton Inc.” Even longtime members of the Clinton syndicate professed themselves troubled by these operations. They were also unhappy with arrangements like Hillary Clinton’s agreement to speak in Morocco after a $12 million donation to the Clinton Global Initiative.
It’s entirely possible that more documentation about these suspicious Clinton Foundation dealings will come to light after the election, especially if some of the people Clinton took money from grow upset with her. It’s downright dangerous to have a President with so many strings attached.
5. Illegal Use of a Nonprofit Organization: There are many laws governing the management of charitable organizations, generally intended to prevent them from becoming money-laundering operations, ripoff operations, and vehicles for political influence peddling. The Clinton Foundation and its galaxy of related operations may eventually find itself answering some questions about compliance with those laws, assuming the IRS decides to stop focusing its efforts on hassling mom-and-pop pro-life groups and kitchen-table Tea Party outfits. If the Foundation is ever held to account for any other impropriety, charges of abusing a nonprofit should be part of the legal package as well.
6. Racketeering: Former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy has recently observed that Hillary Clinton’s abuse of the State Department looks an awful lot like a “racketeering enterprise,” which could trigger the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1971, more widely known as RICO. McCarthy explained:
Under RICO, an “enterprise” can be any association of people, informal or formal, illegitimate or legitimate – it could be a Mafia family, an ostensibly charitable foundation, or a department of government. It is a racketeering enterprise if its affairs are conducted through “a pattern of racketeering activity.” A “pattern” means merely two or more violations of federal or state law; these violations constitute “racketeering activity” if they are included among the extensive list of felonies laid out in the statute.
7. Fraud: Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel has been building a case that the “Clinton Charity Network,” as he calls the complete system of Clinton operations, has committed “charity fraud of epic proportions.” In part, he refers to discrepancies between donor accounts and the Clinton Foundation’s books.
Others have pointed out how the Clinton Health Access Initiative has essentially ignored New York state law for years, without a peep from Attorney General Eric Schneiderman (who just happens to be part of the Clinton campaign’s “leadership council.”) There are some interesting differences between the paperwork CHAI submitted to the IRS and what it submitted to the state of New York, which has more specific requirements about identifying foreign donors.
In addition to getting a free pass on perjury, the Clintons are traditionally allowed to violate tax laws without penalty, eventually refiling paperwork when “errors” are discovered years after the fact. Another round of whoops-my-bad, no-harm-no-foul “refiling” during a Hillary Clinton presidency would be embarrassing, especially if she’s busy trying to ratchet up taxes on everyone else.
Let us be honest about who suffers from presidential misbehavior—it’s the American people who pay the price, including the literal price of the expensive investigations. The odds of justice actually catching up with Hillary Clinton dwindle to almost zero if she gains the White House. She might have to sacrifice an aide here and there, but if the political system of 1998 couldn’t remove her husband from office for blatant perjury, it’s hard to imagine what could possibly bring The First Woman President down in the even more corrupt and confused political system of 2017.
That being said, here are a few lingering legal headaches Clinton could face:
1. Perjury: Why not start with a blast from the Clinton past? Hillary Clinton signed documents testifying that she turned over all work-related emails to the State Department, on orders from a federal judge, under penalty of perjury. We already have indisputable proof she violated this sworn statement… thousands of times.
The cloud of false statements under oath surrounding Hillary Clinton is thousands of times thicker than the one around Bill. Democrats seem to have found a hidden clause in the Constitution that says Clintons can never be prosecuted for perjury, but Madame Secretary is really stress-testing that particular privilege of Clintonhood. One would think the federal judiciary had some interest in establishing that sworn documents must be taken seriously.
2. Obstruction of Justice: Bill Clinton’s primary motive for committing perjury was to obstruct justice—it was the second count in his impeachment. (The justice he was obstructing was a sexual harassment suit from Paula Jones, at a time when liberals insisted sexual harassment was the most overlooked, under-prosecuted crime in the legal code.)
Hillary’s thousands of perjury counts are also related to the obstruction of justice. She held back documents she didn’t want Congress to see. She subverted the Freedom of Information Act, which is a law, not a lovely suggestion.
Most media timelines of the Clinton email scandal are either incomplete or deliberately obtuse, because they almost never accurately relate how her secret server was discovered. For example, these timelines from USA Today, CNN, and ABC News all get it wrong.
Sharyl Attkisson, who was a participant in the story, has an accurate timeline that makes the important point Clinton-friendly media outlets don’t want to talk about: we know about the secret server because the State Department was sued for failing to respond to FOIA requests. The State Department’s official story is that they were surprised to discover Clinton was withholding thousands of documents on her private computer.
That’s straight-up obstruction of justice, in cases involving multiple federal courts, as surely as Bill Clinton’s impeachable offense of obstructing the Paula Jones suit. Clinton may become untouchable if the American people allow her into the White House, but the lawsuits don’t evaporate, and neither do the angry judges.
3. Bribery: After the FBI set off a headline earthquake by re-opening the Clinton email investigation, we learned that several other FBI investigations of Clintonworld have been quietly in progress for some time. One of those investigations is digging into bribery allegations against the Clinton Foundation. The FBI agents working on these cases were reportedly very angry that top Bureau and Justice Department officials were pressuring them to drop their investigations.
The most attention-grabbing of these suspicions concerns an FBI official, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whose wife received an inexplicably huge political donation from Clinton bagman Terry McAuliffe, currently the governor of Virginia. The timing of this donation was so convenient that even the Left side of the blogosphere has produced some uneasy speculation that McCabe probably should have recused himself from all things Clinton-related.
Well, he didn’t recuse himself, and the conflicts of interest are so apparent that the lack of a chiseled-in-stone quid pro quo might not be enough to kill this case off. After all, corrupt officials aren’t usually dumb enough to write down their quid pro quo agreements, or repeat them into microphones. The McCabe controversy already has longer legs than most observers expected, when the news first broke.
4. Pay for Play: There has also been recent confirmation that the FBI has investigated influence-peddling allegations against the Clinton Foundation, which was so obviously used for that purpose that it’s funny to watch Clinton apologists insist nothing can be proven in a court of law. Some of the most vigorous infighting within the Bureau reportedly concerns whether pay-for-play investigations should move forward.
WikiLeaks has exposed emails from Clinton insiders that openly discuss how the Foundation was part of a network that steered millions of dollars to “Bill Clinton Inc.” Even longtime members of the Clinton syndicate professed themselves troubled by these operations. They were also unhappy with arrangements like Hillary Clinton’s agreement to speak in Morocco after a $12 million donation to the Clinton Global Initiative.
It’s entirely possible that more documentation about these suspicious Clinton Foundation dealings will come to light after the election, especially if some of the people Clinton took money from grow upset with her. It’s downright dangerous to have a President with so many strings attached.
5. Illegal Use of a Nonprofit Organization: There are many laws governing the management of charitable organizations, generally intended to prevent them from becoming money-laundering operations, ripoff operations, and vehicles for political influence peddling. The Clinton Foundation and its galaxy of related operations may eventually find itself answering some questions about compliance with those laws, assuming the IRS decides to stop focusing its efforts on hassling mom-and-pop pro-life groups and kitchen-table Tea Party outfits. If the Foundation is ever held to account for any other impropriety, charges of abusing a nonprofit should be part of the legal package as well.
6. Racketeering: Former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy has recently observed that Hillary Clinton’s abuse of the State Department looks an awful lot like a “racketeering enterprise,” which could trigger the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1971, more widely known as RICO. McCarthy explained:
Under RICO, an “enterprise” can be any association of people, informal or formal, illegitimate or legitimate – it could be a Mafia family, an ostensibly charitable foundation, or a department of government. It is a racketeering enterprise if its affairs are conducted through “a pattern of racketeering activity.” A “pattern” means merely two or more violations of federal or state law; these violations constitute “racketeering activity” if they are included among the extensive list of felonies laid out in the statute.
7. Fraud: Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel has been building a case that the “Clinton Charity Network,” as he calls the complete system of Clinton operations, has committed “charity fraud of epic proportions.” In part, he refers to discrepancies between donor accounts and the Clinton Foundation’s books.
Others have pointed out how the Clinton Health Access Initiative has essentially ignored New York state law for years, without a peep from Attorney General Eric Schneiderman (who just happens to be part of the Clinton campaign’s “leadership council.”) There are some interesting differences between the paperwork CHAI submitted to the IRS and what it submitted to the state of New York, which has more specific requirements about identifying foreign donors.
In addition to getting a free pass on perjury, the Clintons are traditionally allowed to violate tax laws without penalty, eventually refiling paperwork when “errors” are discovered years after the fact. Another round of whoops-my-bad, no-harm-no-foul “refiling” during a Hillary Clinton presidency would be embarrassing, especially if she’s busy trying to ratchet up taxes on everyone else.
Nov 1, 2016 09:23:55 #
(Main)
moldyoldy wrote:
Alex jones the king of conspiracy, nice try.
Prove it wrong.
Nov 1, 2016 08:32:58 #
(Main)
Kim Dotcom: Clinton in "serious trouble" with new info about to leak.
Internet security expert Kim Dotcom says that Hillary Clinton is in “serious trouble,” with new information set to leak that some speculate could be a Wikileaks release of Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 deleted emails.
“There’s unpublished material, yet to come out. Clinton is in serious trouble,” the Megaupload founder tweeted last night.
http://www.infowars.com/is-wikileaks-about-to-release-hillarys-33000-deleted-emails/
Internet security expert Kim Dotcom says that Hillary Clinton is in “serious trouble,” with new information set to leak that some speculate could be a Wikileaks release of Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 deleted emails.
“There’s unpublished material, yet to come out. Clinton is in serious trouble,” the Megaupload founder tweeted last night.
http://www.infowars.com/is-wikileaks-about-to-release-hillarys-33000-deleted-emails/
Nov 1, 2016 07:59:47 #
(Main)
Morgan wrote:
No need to, either does Pa., should we go three fo... (show quote)
Like I said, you're full of crap. Yeah, I'm having fun exposing your idiocy.
Nov 1, 2016 07:58:19 #
(Main)
UncleJesse wrote:
The Old Definition of Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
The New Definition of Insanity: Investigating Hillary Clinton over and over again and expecting different results...
And if you don't like the results, discredit the facts and label anyone who agrees with the facts as naïve, dumb, brainwashed or biased (at least until a new investigation can be created).
The New Definition of Insanity: Investigating Hillary Clinton over and over again and expecting different results...
And if you don't like the results, discredit the facts and label anyone who agrees with the facts as naïve, dumb, brainwashed or biased (at least until a new investigation can be created).
Amazing how you Democrats love your corrupt and lying candidates. The bigger the liar, and the more corrupt, the more you like them. Hillary is the most scandal ridden candidate to ever run for office. Whitewater, cattlegate, travelgate, filegate, emailgate, ClintonFoundationgate, scandal after scandal, and just a taste of what a Hillary presidency would be like. As, for your comments about the facts, you don't have a clue about the real facts. Remember, a judge doesn't issue a warrant without seeing some evidence or probable cause.
Oct 31, 2016 16:35:17 #
(Main)
Voice of Reason wrote:
Question for all the leftists here:
Should James Comey be beheaded, drawn-and-quartered, or just shot in the head?
Should James Comey be beheaded, drawn-and-quartered, or just shot in the head?
Should the same happen to Hillary? After all she brought it on herself.
Oct 31, 2016 16:32:35 #
(Main)
KiraSeer2016 wrote:
What brought you here, Rivers?
I was referred to the site by an old military buddy.
Oct 31, 2016 16:29:56 #
(Main)
PeterS wrote:
It's the same principle as someone supporting Trump. Explain that one and I will try to explain Hillary...
Hillary is corrupt, untrustworthy, dishonest, unstable, and a liar. Trump is not corrupt, nor is he a liar. The Hillary campaign, and the complicit biased left-wing media continually try and paint trump as a liar, but never prove it (with real facts). They also try and paint him as unstable, when it is Hillary who has the hot temper and is unstable. She isn't even in good health! The corrupt media just work on the old adage 'if you repeat a lie enough times, the weak minded types will start to believe it.'
Oct 31, 2016 15:20:50 #
(Main)
tdsrnest wrote:
That goes for a Congressman, senator, and Damm sur... (show quote)
What? They haven't proven that Russia hacked these emails! You only have accusations from LYING Democrats, and a LYING president. I for one will never vote for a Democrat, because one has to support corruption and lying to support a Democrat.
Oct 31, 2016 12:56:04 #
(Main)
Morgan wrote:
No I just went to the official voting site for NY and nothing there about a re-vote of early voters, you know why, they don't have early voting, they have absentee voting, this also told to me an attorney and law professor in NY. I believe that was a slam dunk. Unless you prove otherwise.
Well, take it up with these sites. Go call them bogus.
http://www.snopes.com/changing-early-votes/
http://heavy.com/news/2016/10/early-voting-results-can-you-change-your-early-vote-absentee-void-revote-hillary-clinton-donald-trump/
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/wow-fbis-hillary-announcement-searches-change-early-vote-skyrocket/
Oct 31, 2016 10:52:31 #
(Main)
Morgan wrote:
Prove any of this...it's bogus
Bogus? Prove it is bogus! There is NOTHING bogus about that post.
Oct 31, 2016 09:53:28 #
(Main)
Cool Breeze wrote:
Don't get it twisted! Conservatives opening their pie holes about E-mail. What about Trump's relationship with Putin? Stroke for Stroke! http://www.politicususa.com/2016/10/30/bombshell-fbi-explosive-information-donald-trumps-coordination-putin.html
You do know that Reid is just a political hack who lies a lot? And, has enriched himself in shady real estate deals while in office at the expense of the taxpayer? Reid is as corrupt as Clinton. I would take anything that Reid says with a grain of salt.
Oct 31, 2016 09:31:14 #
(Main)
reconreb wrote:
Welcome Rivers , thanks for the info .. I happen to think that Trump would win before the crap hit the fan . Gonna be one hell of a week .
It is very interesting that the current occupant of the White house is campaigning for the candidate under FBI investigation .
It is very interesting that the current occupant of the White house is campaigning for the candidate under FBI investigation .
The Democrats protect their own, no matter how corrupt or how big a liar.