One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out topic: What so many do not know....
Posts for: Loki
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 ... 2590 next>>
May 19, 2014 15:57:34   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
How many times did Clinton ignore or pass on opportunities to get bin Laden?


It is not the number of vacation days. The president is always in touch, vacation or not. It is the outrageous cost to the taxpayers. Since when is sending Michelle Obama on ski trips and Spanish vacations official business? Not to mention two daughters hideously expensive vacations for spring break. More "official business?" Millions of taxpayer dollars on junkets and vacations for his family that have absolutely nothing to do with US business. THAT is the problem. An official state trip to Europe is official business. Spring break in the Bahamas, Mexico and Sun Valley for teenagers on the taxpayer dime is not.
Go to
May 19, 2014 15:48:47   #
Btfkr wrote:
You mean the ante christ followers?


Anti. "Ante" is a prefix denoting before. If you are going to make fun of someone else's grammar, make sure your own is in order, or else obtain the services of a professional such as myself, known for value and fair pricing, to perform the desired denigration.
Go to
May 19, 2014 15:40:18   #
She Wolf wrote:
:thumbup:

I believe it was Ben Franklin who said: "The country that gives up freedom for security has neither."

After 9/11 we gave up our rights for a false sense of security. Both parties came together to take our rights. Like scared little rabbits we gave them up.


Ben Franklin made that statement on more than one occasion, and not exactly the same words. What he said in one was "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to obtain a little Temporary Safety deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." As I said, this statement varied slightly on other occasions that he used it.
Go to
May 19, 2014 15:14:49   #
robert66 wrote:
I just looked at it. The race of his father is listed as African. The race of his mother is listed as Caucasian. Since I can't seem to figure how to put a web address on here I'll tell you that I googled Obama birth certificate. The first one at the top of the page has a PDF download. This is what I looked at.


Apparently my reply did not post. You are correct. I do not know why I typed "African-American," but there is still the fact that other black fathers were listed as "negro." It says race, not nationality. The space for nationality is already filled in. Did you notice the "stamp" in the lower right hand corner. This is a rubberstamp, not typewritten; certifying that the document is a true copy of "txe" .... C'mon, a misspell on a STAMP? To be fair, you should have also read the listing immediately below the one you checked.
Go to
May 19, 2014 14:40:28   #
robert66 wrote:
I just looked at it. The race of his father is listed as African. The race of his mother is listed as Caucasian. Since I can't seem to figure how to put a web address on here I'll tell you that I googled Obama birth certificate. The first one at the top of the page has a PDF download. This is what I looked at.


Scuse me. I don't know why I listed "African American," Still, all the other black fathers were listed as Negro. It says race, not nationality of father. Did you notice the stamp at the lower right hand corner that certifies that "this is a true copy of txe ... Come on, a misspelling on the STAMP? This was not typed, this was a rubberstamp. Misspelled. Show me some more from that time with the same misspelling.
Go to
May 19, 2014 14:07:07   #
Deniseras wrote:
I was expecting a lively debate about the wing nuts but instead I see donkey show in Tijuana what's that about

Sometimes the subject deviates off topic. Sometimes it wanders all over creation. Lo siento. Partly my bad.
Go to
May 19, 2014 13:36:29   #
Cherokee38 wrote:
Interesting you bring up Atlanta. Those involved in that scandal were not: Asian, Hispanic, or white. Want to guess who was involved?? The same people who cry about poor schools and they need to attend better schools, etc. To get what they want requires some effort and study on their part regardless which schools they attend. I am tired of the complaints yet almost all of them are carrying I phones and I don't believe they are considered a necessity of life.


My point. Left at local level, it probably would not have been caught. Too much mutual butt covering going on.
Go to
May 19, 2014 13:14:20   #
robert66 wrote:
Here's the ghetto lowdown. When every crackpot was on the "Obama was not born in the US " conspiracy the president felt compelled to have his birth certificate shown on the news , internet . In the face of a "fact" ( the birth certificate) the crackpots just said, that's fake. Then it came to light that there was also a birth announcement in a newspaper in Hawaii showing date of birth. This is an archive production from 1963. Then the crackpots said this was also somehow a manipulated fake. This is what I mean by "proven to you is useless". I am generalizing with that statement , predicting that no matter what " proof" or "fact" is shown it will have a 99% percent chance of still being claimed as false and a conspiracy. One correction here, when I wrote "was" on the Obama was not born in the US sentence I mistakenly used the word was, it should have been , "is".
Here's the ghetto lowdown. When every crackpot was... (show quote)


The copy of his birth certificate I saw listed his race as "African-American." Just goes to show how unique our boy is: All the other black babies were listed as "Negro." There was no such thing as "African-American" at that time.
Go to
May 19, 2014 12:51:24   #
DASHY wrote:
NEW RULE: This forum rejects all contenders for the fifth grade debating team.


You gonna tell Bo, or do you want me to?
Go to
May 18, 2014 23:22:58   #
Btfkr wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


The problem of illegals is rapidly becoming major, and not just from Mexican dope dealers. It is incredibly easy for a terrorist to waltz across our sieve like border. Do you think that the cartels wouldn't give them a hand for a price?
Go to
May 18, 2014 20:13:16   #
Billhuggins wrote:
In general, I do not respond to liars.

Yet you respond to Glaucon. I suppose we could be charitable and consider him honestly mistaken, since he occasionally makes a good point. Could be an accident, I suppose.
Go to
Check out topic: I Support..
May 18, 2014 20:10:36   #
robert66 wrote:
This coming from a moron that believes every bullshit story that comes down the pipe. You probably can't help it, being senile and all.


I suppose they will still deny it after convictions are obtained and sentences handed down
Go to
May 18, 2014 19:58:04   #
clarkwv wrote:
How about the American Indians the government killed?


They trusted the Government.
In all fairness, accusing the white Europeans of stealing the Indians land is not always accurate. A good many tribes, among them the Iroquois confederacy, the Lakota and Cheyenne, the Navajo, the Apaches and the Yaquis, obtained their land the same way they lost it: By force of arms. The reason so many Pawnees and Crow fought on the side of the whites is that they had a score to settle with the Lakota, the Cheyenne, and to a lesser degree, the Arikara, The "Lakota hunting ground" was originally property of the Crow and Pawnee tribes, until they were driven from it. The Anasazi of SW Colorado were wiped out, probably by the Navajo. Moving on down south, Cortez did not conquer the Aztecs with 400 conquistadores, he had plenty of help from tribes that the Aztecs had conquered and enslaved, and demanded tribute and sacrificial victims from. Ditto for the Incas and Pizzarro in Peru and Ecuador. There were some tribes that got a royal shafting. There were others who were treated about like they treated other tribes. As I said in another post, excepting the Arctic and Antarctic regions, there probably isn't a square mile of land on Earth that hasn't been conquered from someone by someone else.

That said, the US government has perpetrated some shameful massacres. Sand Creek and Wounded Knee come to mind, and although not massacres, per se, the Trail of Tears, the persecution of the Modocs, and the treatment of Chief Joseph and the Nez Perces were criminal. By the same token, the Iroquois, and the Lakota, especially, don't have a lot of room to talk about mistreatement. People tend to forget some things. The terrible treatment of some tribes tends to make people forget the terrible treatment some of the other tribes gave to other Indians.
Go to
May 18, 2014 19:23:00   #
tdsrnest wrote:
I may be a jerk but uninformed I don't think so. Oh ya let's see listen to Fox. Hillary brain damage Fox News Karl Rove now that was the truth. Hillary in the hospital 30 days Fox News now that was the truth. Boka Harom Hillary should have put him on the terrorist watch list check it out Nov 2013 now that was the truth. This is just a few last week. But I can come with more documented lies that Fox has thrown out there. Listen to Fox yup if I was a jerk I would listen to Fox.
I may be a jerk but uninformed I don't think so. O... (show quote)


If?
Go to
May 18, 2014 19:10:31   #
Brian Devon wrote:
*********

Insolence??? There's a word you don't hear every day. It's right up there with impudent, cheeky, and sassy.

My stars!

:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Not to mention arrogant, condescending, self-righteous, cynical, myopic, hypocritical prick. Now that I think about it, you probably do hear those every day, or would if you lived anywhere but LaLa Land.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 ... 2590 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.