One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: zonkedout1
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 17 next>>
Nov 2, 2013 20:37:00   #
AuntiE wrote:
Let me see if I can translate your inability to write a coherent sentence.

You "ra"=s read it "cuz"=s because you are a glutton for punishment. I am still trying to determine what "sctive verbs" are. You are "criticizing because you aren't personable" has what the bloody hades to do with the article? Basically, your answer is it has no value because you (who wrote one of the worst grammatically/spelled comments of late) find fault with my presentation.

Please oh please.....GET OVER YOURSELF.....NOW :!:
Let me see if I can translate your inability to wr... (show quote)


I apologize for not being able to afford a new keyboard and make a politician's promise to buy a a new one. I still don't disagree with the body of your work.
Go to
Nov 2, 2013 18:28:14   #
Not untrue. You lost everybody in the first paragaraph. I ra it it cuz I'm a glutton for punishment. Add some sctive verbs. Make a person feel like they're inside the opinion. I'm only criticizing because you aren't personable and you put a lot of work into this.
Go to
Nov 2, 2013 18:14:22   #
There's a difference between having balls and not being a female. ( i.e. Feinstein has bigger balls than McCain could ever hope for).
Go to
Oct 28, 2013 23:43:39   #
Nuclearian wrote:
I DO get to decide who is loyal Americans by those who SUPPORT the Constitution as it was INTENDED (Tea Baggers), as opposed to those who despice it (liberals/communists).


While I support TEA party ideals as a basic platform of reduced government and spending which should contribute to more constitutional behavior because reduced funding should lead to reduced Statism, TEA party member don't seem inexorably vested in the Bill of Rights. Some members are, but the primary gripe does seem to be unsustainability of wasteful spending. To look to at more Constitution based ideals, those crazy libertarians or maybe the Constitution party.
Go to
Oct 28, 2013 22:51:04   #
*applause* for straight up for answering questions and conjecture in a point by point style. I never have the patience. Well said, sir, well said.
Go to
Oct 28, 2013 22:48:19   #
What starts with wonderful programs like eugenics, and comes with such great words like, "for the common good." always ends with Nazis or FEMA camps.
Go to
Oct 27, 2013 23:06:15   #
bluejacket wrote:
there is a saying that generally goes like this -for evil to succeed good men have to do nothing
also in an oppressive society , the oppressor is damaged as much as the oppressed as the oppressed lose rights the oppressor gains unjustified power that corrupts the application of that power and social degradation ensues


There's a like button here somewhere. *click*

What profit is it to a man who gains the whole world, should he lose his soul?
Go to
Oct 27, 2013 21:37:36   #
bluejacket wrote:
a person who is hungry for power will use any method and any symbolism to achieve his or her aims ,and the bible and the flag would be fair game for that kind of person


True. From any stance. Liberty, Equality, Prosperity, depending on your views. All of their symbols are fair game. It's our job to detect BS when words and actions aren't sympatico.
Go to
Oct 27, 2013 21:28:17   #
bluejacket wrote:
the only reason I mentioned the Flag and the Bible is that they are two of the most potent symbols in our society


I'm not attacking here, but I don't believe that. I believe you mentioned them because you view them as conservative symbols that are antithetical to progressive views. While I'm not a big believer in symbols, I believe that allowing people their original rights (in this case expression and religion) are necessary for a liberty driven society. Trying to remove these things ( not trying to say you are) would be tantamount to becoming the thing we fear.
Go to
Oct 27, 2013 21:10:23   #
bluejacket wrote:
totalitarianism in the United States , will not come from any outside ideology but will come to us homegrown and it will come with the bible wrapped in our flag


Don't fool yourself. Both parties have elitist members who get off on acquisition of money and power, while marching toward and authoritarian regime.
Go to
Oct 27, 2013 01:05:03   #
lpnmajor wrote:
their money is green though


Actually, some is, but most is in the red and pink shades.
Go to
Oct 26, 2013 23:56:05   #
bmac32 wrote:
When why do they reffer to China as Red China? China has been a communist country since 1949.


There's the PRC (People's Republic of China) which is China. And the ROC (Republic of China), commonly referred to as Taiwan. The term Red China, describing the communist country, just never fell out of favor.
Go to
Oct 26, 2013 13:49:25   #
If anyone thinks the Brits (in 18th c.) were more oppressive than our government is now is sorely mistaken. Lines have been crossed...
Go to
Oct 26, 2013 10:46:54   #
Glenn Danzig recently sad the same thing. He didn't elaborate on it as well as you. Very impressive post. Thank you for sharing.
Go to
Oct 26, 2013 10:37:21   #
It's about control. As Darpa's slogan says 'Scientia est Potentia'. Secular Knowledge is Power. The market manipulation in Brazil shows that this information doesn't exist in an anti-terror vacuum. Just because it has been going on forever does not mean that it is right that it continue The moral instability of Washington is good enough reason to discontinue these practices and are also why they won't be discontinued.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 17 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.