JFlorio wrote:
You must be an awful embarrassement for her. Glad she can afford to put you in a nice nursing home. Go take your meds.
You still don't get it at all. Making things up just does not work!
That is particularly true when fabricating gratuitious insults. The insults are always just projection and tell everyone about YOU!
We know enough about you already. Nobody needs to hear more.
JFlorio wrote:
Good thing. Probably helps you out of jams using mental illness as a defense.
Another or your misguided "if it is true" statements that only a complete fool, such as you are, would even begin to rely on. Bogus false facts that you can't parse are what makes your comments here such hilarious jokes.
I'll tell you one thing... my kid runs an organization with a $3 billion budget and she does have the kind of integrity and credibility that you lack. As much as anything that is because she doesn't ever make statements like "if it is true" rather than find out if it is true.
JFlorio wrote:
Great comeback. Your six year old give you that one ?
I have great grand children that old.
But yes the 50+ year old daughter gives me good advice. I'm not going to identify her, but she frequently makes national news and does have a law degree.
lindajoy wrote:
Trolls don’t care about being sure of anything...arch...
You just described yourself!
cold iron wrote:
Snopes.com? The commie run George Soros web site. That is your claim to fame? lol
You are a real hoot. There must be a commie under your bed. Or 205 of the, Joe.
JFlorio wrote:
I didn't sucker anyone Mr. I can't comprehend anything. I said if accurate, once again. I will try and verify. Obviously you didn't either if your only source was snopes.
You
ARE the sucker.
If you don't believe Snopes just track down the sources and see how accuate they are! I've done that on several occasions over the past 20-25 years and have never once found an error. David Mikkelson has integrity. You don't.
JFlorio wrote:
Exactly why I said If accurate. then you go to Snopes, a partisan rag for your proof. What a fool.
Snopes.com is not a partisan rag and does have the correct information as well as verifiable sources. You made no attempt at all to verify anything. You suckered up again, as always.
JFlorio wrote:
... The same lib's who scoff when Clinton associates die in record numbers are the same ones that shout to the high heavens any rumor they hear about Trump and proclaim it gospel.
Right! Those libs have the common sense that you lack! They verify stories before spreading them.
You get caught with your pants down and egg on your face, while those libs gain a reputation for being reliable sources of valid information.
vernon01 wrote:
When are the people going to wise up and put those low life's away?
What, put suckers like you and cold iron away for maliciously spreading known false trash? Six months in jail for each of you?
One more fantasy.
Snopes.com tells the real story. Klaus Eberwein was never connected to the Clintons in any way and was not scheduled to testify about them in any way.
You have been suckered again, because it is so easy.
slatten49 wrote:
https://newmoderate.com/2010/08/28//do-moderates-need-an-ideology/
No. Absolutely not! Ideology is the exact problem that right wing conservative politics presents today.
The article does get some things correct, such as that government needs to represent the people governed.
But that really does miss the point. Represent the people in or for what?
What everyone (liberals and moderates and conservatives) should focus on are solutions to problems.
Ideologies make problems and never solve them. Labeling things as socialist, capitalism, free enterprise, communist or whatever is not beneficial. It helps people avoid actually having to understand or even think. But it does not provide useful solutions.
What we need are ideology vacant solutions.
Interestingly, when we look at history we see that at any given time the currently functional solutions were always labeled as progressive and liberal when originally proposed and adopted. Conservative literally means slowing down or halting progress for at least a period of time.
kankune wrote:
So what! He said f52 instead of f53. It's sickening how you people love to jump down someone's throat for a mistake. I suppose you think it's a mistake that Obama warned the Iranians of our plans that got our service men killed. You're really messed up in the head troll....
Oh, now there is an "f53" too!
archie bunker wrote:
You should be worried about what he's doing while you're off chasing the ball he pretended to throw.
So in fact you are just as confused as Trump!
F-52 indeed.
oldroy wrote:
Where did you say you work for Walmart? You did claim to be an employee, didn't you? Be careful about opening up since there is a chance that they will find out about you and create another opening.
Another dolt who makes things up!