America 1 wrote:
PeterS & Kevyn really not worth replying to their nonsense posts.
Must stay awake nights making up crap to post.
The idea came from a Trump tweet a few weeks ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNSsM-JPKEw
2bltap wrote:
HMMMM? I Have To Agree With President Putin on This Policy
Me too. I guess we're both about to be tarred with the same brush for seeing something good come out of Russia.
proud republican wrote:
https://www.castanet.net/news/World/262606/Deadly-gas-line-explosion
I smell a rat. If this is an actual ongoing disaster, where is the media? ...Crickets... Why?
proud republican wrote:
Looks like spending our money is a BIPARTISAN thing..
You didn't know that already?
nwtk2007 wrote:
"This morning, I left my community of Baltimore -- a drug-infested area where a lot of the drugs we are talking about today have already taken the lives of so many children," he said. "The same children that I watched 14 or 15 years ago as they grew up, now walking around like zombies."
That's not a racist observation.
woodguru wrote:
That would be Michele Obama, and why not...she would have a consultant that was the best president we have had in a long time
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/455702-michael-moore-urges-michelle-obama-to-run-against-trump
Oh! Yes! Please! I'd absolutely LOVE to watch her try and justify her ideas about how her Kenyan mulatto usurping communist husband made us all SOOOOO
hopeful again! Donald Trump would eat her up, right there on the debate stage, and send her home with her tail between her legs.
teabag09 wrote:
You mean like having to provide a genuine birth certificate? That's why it's best to nip this in the bud now. Mike
Lesson learned, just not by the ones who make the laws...
bahmer wrote:
This could turn into a food fight the liberal states require Trump to release his tax returns then the conservative states require the candidates to do something that the democrats believe is unfair and then back and forth it goes into utter chaos.
Lawn chair, Check.
Beer in the cooler, Check.
Ribs on the grill, Check.
Okay, I'm ready!
bahmer wrote:
Now that the Supreme Court has a more conservative bend to it
That should not matter, but sadly, it does. Politics has no place in a court of law, but try telling that to these so-called 'progressive' judges who regularly legislate from the bench.
teabag09 wrote:
I don't recall anyone asking for their returns. Mike
Asked or not, they did release them. As the result of a scandal, of course...
"In 1994, Bill and Hillary Clinton released years of their tax returns to satisfy persistent questions about the Whitewater Development Corporation, a failed real estate venture that some claimed involved illegal dealings by the Clintons. (The couple was never prosecuted, and three separate inquiries would find no evidence they had done anything illegal.) Though their former partner in the deal had earlier claimed the Clintons lost no more than $13,500 in the Whitewater venture, suggesting they were trading some kind of political favors for a relatively risk-free investment, the couple’s tax returns from 1978 and 1979 showed they actually put enough money into Whitewater in order to claim $22,000 in related deductions."
6 Times Presidential Tax Returns Made Us Go Hmmm…
proud republican wrote:
Not good at this..Is this a good news or bad???
That depends. If you're heavily invested in stocks, it's a good thing. If you're a homeowner with an adjustable rate mortgage, again, good news. If you have your assets invested in bank derivatives, you just took a pay cut. If you're a President looking to balance the books or at least make it look better than it did, you're in luck. This is the problem inherent in a central banking system.
Normally, the price of money (interest rates) are a function of supply and demand. Unfortunately, we have a system where a group of bank Presidents meet four or five times a year and ignore market forces to put the price of money where they want it to be, by a majority vote. If they get it right (not likely), all well and good. If they get it wrong (most of the time), all kinds of interesting surprises await the unwary investor or businessman.
This is the basis of what is known in economic circles as the 'business' or 'boom / bust' cycle. Artificially low interest rates spur ill advised investments that become obvious when rates are raised, causing investors to pull back from the bad investment, thus causing stock market crashes, business downturns, unemployment and bankruptcies. Once the bad investments have been purged from the market, the cycle starts all over again. This cycle generally takes between four and six years to complete, but the current economic climate has been sustained specifically because the Federal Reserve has kept interest rates at or close to zero for over a decade.
Only after President Trump was elected did they begin their inevitable creep back up, slowing investment and deterring entrepreneurial activity, and still we see the results of a lack of government intervention in economic affairs. Imagine what would be the result if our currency was based on an honest money system where interest rates were discovered by market forces instead of the picking of winners and losers currently engaged in by our central banking cabal.
proud republican wrote:
What do you guys think???..Will these teens get American justice in Italy??
No. They will get Italian justice in Italy, just as they would get American justice in America.
When in Rome...