One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: payne1000
Page: <<prev 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... 1323 next>>
Nov 25, 2017 15:15:40   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Show us where and explain how the photo was "retouched". And, give us the real name of the retoucher so he or she won't remain anonymous and lose all credibility.

.


If the retouched photo had been taken minutes after the North Tower fell, that would be slightly after 10 am. At 10 am the sun is still on the East side of the building. The West side of WTC7 is shown in both photos. So the photos were both taken in the afternoon. You can thank Emarine for pointing this out.
The retouched photo shows black smoke stains on the building which are in the same locations on both photos. The lighting on the building is much the same on both photos so they were both taken in the afternoon. If the smoke had stopped pouring out of the windows on the West side, that would mean the fires were going out before the tower collapsed.
The smoke above where the smoke is pouring out got there because smoke from heat rises. There were no fires above the two black-stained windows on the West side.




Go to
Nov 25, 2017 14:55:18   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
So, what is the difference between a floor and a floor slab? Seems to me that, in a home for example, the floor joists upon which floor boards are nailed constitute a floor. In the WTC towers, the trusses upon which the concrete slab was poured constitutes THE FLOOR. Without the joists or the trusses to hold the boards or concrete slabs in place, we wouldn't have a FLOOR.


When you press a number in the elevator of an office tower, you are going to a "floor." You are not going to a floor slab. The floor you are visiting includes all the walls, the ceiling and all the contents.
If you want to be understood, please use the proper terminology--which is "floor slab".
Go to
Nov 25, 2017 14:49:35   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Because the floor supports were not exposed to fire and heat. The fire burned in part of one office and up through utility chutes. Fire spread through the tower to the 9th and 14th floors by igniting the insulation of telephone cables in a utility shaft that ran vertically between floors. Areas at the furthest extent of the fire were extinguished almost immediately and the original fire was put out in a few hours. Most of the damage was concentrated on the 11th floor, fueled by cabinets filled with paper, alcohol-based fluid for office machines, and other office equipment. Fireproofing protected the steel and there was no structural damage to the tower. In addition to damage caused by the fire on the 9th – 14th floors, water from the extinguishing of the fires damaged a few floors below. At that time, the World Trade Center had no fire sprinkler systems.

Since the fire was in the lower floors of the tower, firefighters were able to get to it quickly, they had ample water supply and equipment to fight it, so the building was never in any real danger.
Because the floor supports were not exposed to fir... (show quote)


So why did it burn for twice as long as it did on 9/11?
Why do I always have to ask you for a source?
Doesn't the list of answers in your shill manual provide sources?
Go to
Nov 25, 2017 14:41:48   #
payne1000 wrote:
The smoke was coming from the East face of WTC7 on floors 16, 17 and 21. In the retouched image, that smoke has been retouched out.


For once you got something right.
The photos were obviously taken in the afternoon rather than the morning when the sun would have been on the East side.
The time of day the photos were taken has no bearing on what the photos show, however.
The smoke pouring out of the windows on the sunlit side have been retouched out in the photo with the fake damage.
The photo which has not been retouched shows no appreciable damage from the 18th floor down.


Go to
Nov 25, 2017 14:15:21   #
byronglimish wrote:
Crystal clear hatred..


Go to
Nov 25, 2017 14:14:04   #
S. Maturin wrote:
Thanks for serving as a pristine example of someone blinded by hatred and prejudice.


Go to
Nov 25, 2017 13:46:50   #
Super Dave wrote:
You keep saying you're not anti-Jewish, only anti-Zionist..

Your Antisemitism keeps breaking through...

(Quick - go to your Goebbels website and come up with something clever)


Go to
Nov 25, 2017 13:44:49   #
S. Maturin wrote:
You should be thrown into jail for using the revered American flag as you do. Wrapping yourself in that symbol of liberty and freedom will not cover your over-powering stench.


My American flag avatar is a symbol of what America should be.
Those of you who swear allegiance to Israel instead are what's helping to prevent America from being the country it should be.

.

You're welcome to use this as your avatar.

Go to
Nov 25, 2017 12:44:53   #
S. Maturin wrote:
The use of "experts" by the radical progressives like you is entertaining.

History records the advancing ice age of the 1960s as predicted by the then "experts".

"Expert" Algore got all his predictions of ruination, flooding, city-devouring terrorized mobs, all dead-nuts correct, right? Uh, huh.

Your "experts" predicted a Hillary Clinton crowning event for January 2009. And now, you drag some dithering old 'perfesser' up from the depths to tell us all something as valuable.

Give it a rest, will you? You are looking positively silly.
The use of "experts" by the radical prog... (show quote)


None of the experts you mention are my experts.
Al Gore's prediction of flooding is backed up by Hurricane Harvey, Hurricane Sandy and Hurricane Katrina, however.
Maybe he was just lucky.
Go to
Nov 25, 2017 12:40:24   #
archie bunker wrote:
I find you entertaining in a weird sort of way.


Again you prove me correct.
Go to
Nov 25, 2017 12:39:15   #
byronglimish wrote:
Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes.. Proverbs 26:5...this verse wasn't recorded specifically for you, but is very relevant...


You've obviously been reading Jewish propaganda.
Don't feel bad. Many have been taken in by that boring pack of lies.
Go to
Nov 25, 2017 12:16:18   #
emarine wrote:
maybe its you argument that needs some retouching & apologizing...the damage to WTC7 is in the south face or front side behind the smoke ... you know the side facing the WTC towers that just collapsed from air craft impact damage, heat & gravity... Sherlock


The smoke was coming from the East face of WTC7 on floors 16, 17 and 21. In the retouched image, that smoke has been retouched out.




Go to
Nov 25, 2017 12:12:03   #
emarine wrote:
I believe the simple truth here is that both Blade & I can differentiate between a floor & floor slab & a wall which is not part of the floor no matter how hard you twist it... walls are vertical & floors are horizontal whether slab or not... WTF larry you have no argument here...grow up old man ... you're destroying the name larry payne's credibility once again...


Arguing about the meaning of words is a straw man argument you use because you can't argue successfully against the real science of the tower collapses. BR even resorts to posting photos of WTC7 which have had damage added by retouching.
Here's the real science of 9/11:


Go to
Nov 25, 2017 10:40:35   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Why would all 300 connections have to fail at the same time before a floor would collapse?


You need to apologize to readers for posting an obviously retouched image of WTC7.




Go to
Nov 25, 2017 10:36:18   #
archie bunker wrote:
Nobody listens to you anyway.


Everyone here listens to me and replies to me.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... 1323 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.