One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Morgan
Page: <<prev 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 732 next>>
Jun 15, 2019 07:59:37   #
MR Mister wrote:
The 10 Most Destructive Americans of My Life.

America has undergone enormous change during the nearly eight decades of my life. Today, America is a bitterly divided, poorly educated and morally fragile society with so-called mainstream politicians pushing cynical identity politics, socialism, and open borders.


The president of the United States is threatened with impeachment because the other side doesn't like him. The once reasonably unbiased American media has evolved into a hysterical left-wing mob. How could the stable and reasonably cohesive America of the 1950s have reached this point in just one lifetime? Who are the main culprits?


Here's my list of the 10 most destructive Americans of the last 40 years.


10) Mark Felt Deputy director of the FBI, aka "Deep Throat" during the Watergate scandal. This was the first public instance of a senior FBI officially directly interfering in America's political affairs. Forerunner of James Comey, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and Andrew McCabe.


9) Bill Ayers - Represents the deep and ongoing leftist ideological damage to our education system. An unrepentant American terrorist who evaded punishment, he devoted his career to radicalizing American education and pushing leftist causes. Ghost wrote Obama's book, "Dreams of My Father."


8) Teddy Kennedy Most folks remember Teddy as the guy who left Mary Jo Kopechne to die in his car at Chappaquiddick. The real damage came after he avoided punishment for her death and became a major Democrat force in the US Senate, pushing through transformative liberal policies in health care and education. The real damage was the 1965 Hart-Cellar immigration bill he pushed hard for that changed the quota system to increase the flow of third world people without skills into the US and essentially ended large-scale immigration from Europe.


7) Walter Cronkite Cronkite was a much-beloved network anchor who began the politicization of America's news media with his infamous broadcast from Vietnam that described the Tet Offensive as a major victory for the Communists and significantly turned the gullible American public against the Vietnam War. In fact, the Tet offensive was a military disaster for the NVA and Viet Cong, later admitted by North Vietnamese military leaders. Decades later Cronkite admitted he got the story wrong. But it was too late. The damage was done.


6) Bill and Hillary Clinton - It's difficult to separate Team Clinton. Bill's presidency was largely benign as he was a relative fiscal conservative who rode the remaining benefits of the Reagan era. But his sexual exploits badly stained the Oval Office and negatively affected America's perception of the presidency. In exchange for financial support, he facilitated the transfer of sensitive military technology to the Chinese. Hillary, a Saul Alinsky acolyte, is one of the most vicious politicians of my lifetime, covering up Bill's sexual assaults by harassing and insulting the exploited women and peddling influence around the globe in exchange for funds for the corrupt Clinton Foundation. She signed off on the sale of 20% of the US uranium reserve to the Russians after Bill received a $500,000 speaking fee in Moscow and the foundation (which supported the Clinton's regal lifestyle) received hundreds of millions of dollars from those who benefited from the deal. Between them, they killed any honor that might have existed in the dark halls of DC.


5) Valerie Jarrett - The Rasputin of the Obama administration. A Red Diaper baby, her father, maternal grandfather and father-in-law (Vernon Jarrett who was a close friend and ally of Obama mentor Frank Marshall Davis) were hardcore Communists under investigation by the U.S. government. She has been in Obama's ear for his entire political career pushing a strong anti-American, Islamist, anti-Israeli, socialist/communist, cling-to-power agenda.


4) Jimmy Carter - Carter ignited modern-day radical Islam by abandoning the Shah and paving the way for Ayatollah Khomeini to take power in Tehran. Iran subsequently became the main state sponsor and promoter of international Islamic terrorism. When Islamists took over our embassy in Tehran, Carter was too weak to effectively respond thus strengthening the rule of the radical Islamic mullahs.


3) Lyndon Johnson Johnson turned the Vietnam conflict into a major war for America. It could have ended early if he had listened to the generals instead of automaker Robert McNamara. The ultimate result was: 1) 58,000 American military deaths and collaterally tens of thousands of American lives damaged, and 2) a war that badly divided America and created left-wing groups that evaded the draft and eventually gained control of our education system. Even worse, his so-called War on Poverty led to the destruction of American black families with a significant escalation of welfare and policies designed to keep poor families dependent on the government (and voting Democrat) for their well-being. He deliberately created a racial holocaust that is still burning today. A strong case could be made for putting him at the top of this list.


2) Barack Hussein Obama - Obama set up America for a final defeat and stealth conversion from a free market society to socialism/communism. As we get deeper into the Trump presidency, we learn more each day about how Obama politicized and compromised key government agencies, most prominently the FBI, the CIA, and the IRS, thus thoroughly shaking the public's confidence in the federal government to be fair and unbiased in its activities. He significantly set back race and other relations between Americans by stoking black grievances and pushing radical identity politics. Obama's open support for the Iranian mullahs and his apologetic "lead from behind" foreign policy seriously weakened America abroad. His blatant attempt to interfere in Israel's election trying to unseat Netanyahu is one of the most shameful things ever done by an American president.


1) John Kerry Some readers will likely say Kerry does not deserve to be number one on this list. I have him here because I regard him as the most despicable American who ever lived. After his three faked Purple Hearts during his cowardly service in Vietnam, he was able to leave the US Navy early. As a reserve naval officer and in clear violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, he traveled to Paris and met privately with the NVA and the Viet Cong. He returned to the United States parroting the Soviet party line about the war and testified before Congress comparing American soldiers to the hordes of Genghis Khan. It was a clear case of treason, giving aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war. We got a second bite of the bitter Kerry apple when as Obama's secretary of state, he fell into bed with the Iranian ("Death to America") mullahs giving them the ultimate green light to develop nuclear weapons along with billions of dollars that further supported their terrorist activities. Only the heroic Swiftboat Vets saved us from a Manchurian Candidate Kerry presidency. Ultimately we got Obama.


John Brennan a Muslim, Obama's CIA director who once voted for Communist Gus Hall for president. A key member of the Deep State who severely politicized the CIA. Called President Trump treasonous for meeting with the president of Russia.


Jane Fonda movie actress who made the infamous trip to Vietnam during the war in support of the Communists. She represents hard-left Hollywood that has done so much damage to our culture.



Jimmy Hendrix and Janice Joplin Both revered entertainers helped usher in the prevailing drug culture and Joplin suffered the consequences. Karma's a bitch.


Robert Johnson /BET Helped popularize ho's, bitches and pimps while making millions on great hits such as"Jigga my Nigga", "Big Pimpin'", "Niggas in Paris" and "Strictly 4 My N.I.G.G.A.Z." Many scholars within the African American community maintain that BET perpetuates and justifies racism by adopting the stereotypes held about African Americans, affecting the psyche of young viewers through the bombardment of negative images of African Americans. Who can disagree?



Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr./The New York Times Once the gold standard of American journalism, the paper always had a liberal tilt and occasionally made bad mistakes. As the years have gone along, the paper has slid further and further left and today is virtually the primary propaganda arm of the increasingly radical Democrat Party. Still retains influence in Washington and New York.


George Soros Jewish former Nazi collaborator in his native Hungary who as a self-made billionaire has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into left-wing groups and causes. The damage he has caused is difficult to measure, but it's certainly large. He has funded much of the effort to kill the Trump presidency.


Frank Marshall Davis - Anti-white, black Bolshevik, card-carrying Soviet agent. Probable birth father and admitted primary mentor of young Barak Hussein Obama.
The 10 Most Destructive Americans of My Life. br ... (show quote)


What is amazing is your slant on things.Tell me, how long has the Us been selling arms? But you want to point out democratic presidents, how very one sided of you...

Under the first year of the Trump administration, sales of bombs and missiles dominated.

That year, the U.S. sold Saudi Arabia $298 million worth of Paveway laser-guided missiles, $98 million in ammunition for various types of firearms and $95 million worth of programmable bomb systems. A recent attack on a school bus in Yemen that killed dozens of children was carried out with a bomb the U.S. sold to Saudi Arabia, CNN has reported.

Just this year, the State Department has approved sales to Saudi Arabia of $670 million worth of BGM-71 TOWs, a type of anti-tank missile, $1.3 billion worth of medium self-propelled Howitzers and at least $600 million in "maintenance support services."
Go to
Jun 14, 2019 10:45:44   #
Crayons wrote:
I disagree...Quoting Barry Goldwater""Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue""

Wake up Miss Emily, Criminal Luciferian LGBT Leftist's today have been emboldened to dismember & kill children


Miss Emily is correct, what you state is a bold face lie.
Go to
Jun 14, 2019 10:29:45   #
[quote=lindajoy]It amazing.. From the article~~

“Obama’s Justice Department in many of the cases handled the appellate process and ultimately defended the actions to the Supreme Court. But that’s commonplace, experts we spoke with said.

Goodlatte spokeswoman Jessica Collins contended that doesn't make the chairman's statement untrue. "Regardless of who started the policies that were overturned by the courts unanimously during the Obama administration, President Obama decided to continue those policies which were struck down," she said.

You really think obamas justice dept . Just decides to continue a losing case anyway?? Ok then~~And Collins statement has no merit?? Please take note of the dates on these cases, moldy~~ I’ll stand on my posts in lieu of Politifacts assertions..

Thank you tho..

You could argue, of course, that a simple won-loss rate doesn’t tell the whole story. After all, Obama’s solicitors general have faced a bench occupied by a majority of Republican appointees. (As did Clinton’s, but that didn’t stop him from pipping his Republican successor.) But the news gets even worse when you look at unanimous losses.



This term, the federal government argued an incredible 10 cases without gaining a single vote, not even that of one of President Obama’s own nominees, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. That brings his total to 44 unanimous losses. For comparison, George W. Bush suffered 30 unanimous losses, while Bill Clinton withstood 31. In other words, Obama has lost unanimously 50 percent more than his two immediate predecessors.

These cases have been in such disparate areas as criminal procedure, religious liberty, property rights, immigration, securities regulation, tax law, and the separation of powers. Here are some recent unanimous headline-grabbers.

In Hosanna-Tabor Church v. EEOC (2012), the government sued a church school that fired a teacher for violating one of its religious tenets. The court ruled that punishing a church for not retaining an unwanted teacher violates the First Amendment.

In United States v. Jones (2012), the government claimed the power to attach a GPS device to a suspected drug dealer’s car and monitor his movements without a warrant. While the justices had differing opinions on why this violated the Fourth Amendment, all agreed that it did.

In Sackett v. EPA (2012), the government denied property owners the right to contest an order to stop building their house. The court ruled that access to courts is the least the government can provide in response to “the strong-arming of regulated parties.”

While the conventional wisdom about Arizona v. United States (2012) is that the high court smacked down a perniciously anti-immigrant state, Arizona actually won unanimously on its most controversial “show me your papers” provision. Not one justice accepted the theory that mere enforcement priorities trump state laws.

In Horne v. Department of Agriculture (2013), the government claimed raisin farmers weren’t entitled to judicial review of a byzantine New Deal-era program that confiscated crops in an attempt to regulate prices. The Supreme Court again allowed plaintiffs their day in court—and two years later ruled for them 8-1 on the merits.

In Riley v. California (2014), the Supreme Court ruled that the government needs to get a warrant if it wants to search the digital information stored on arrestees’ cell phones.

In Noel Canning v. National Labor Relations Board (2014), the court invalidated President Obama’s National Labor Relations Board appointments essentially because the Senate had not declared a recess when he made them.

Just last week, in McDonnell v. United States(2016), the court reversed the conviction of a former Virginia governor because meetings with constituents who seek the favor of elected officials are not the kinds of “official acts” that can be prosecuted under public-corruption statutes...

https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/obama-has-lost-supreme-court-more-any-modern-president

All filed in the second term, all lost..doesn’t real

I find this one interesting, why would they be against verification of their papers?

While the conventional wisdom about Arizona v. United States (2012) is that the high court smacked down a perniciously anti-immigrant state, Arizona actually won unanimously on its most controversial “show me your papers” provision. Not one justice accepted the theory that mere enforcement priorities trump state laws. matter tho~~



I find this one interesting, why would they be against verification of their immigration papers?
Go to
Jun 14, 2019 05:46:19   #
nwtk2007 wrote:
Who would you think WE is? Man, people.


I am specifically asking you, who you mean, so we are on the same page.
Go to
Jun 14, 2019 05:45:14   #
JFlorio wrote:
You do know in the Hebrew and Greek definitions used in Bible translation judge has a bit of a different meaning. I’m no Biblical scholar but have had this conversation with my pastor who is.


Yes, perceptions and definitions have been created to be endless from scholars on down. To have the Bible be considered to be under only by scholars I find to be oxymoronic, rather defeats the purpose don't you think.
Go to
Jun 14, 2019 05:40:43   #
Rose42 wrote:
Did you get that first sentence from James 4:12? Do you know what it means? It doesn’t mean we are never to confront sin.

In the next chapter it states - “My brethren, if any among you strays from the truth and one turns him back, let him know that he who turns a sinner from the error of his way will save his soul from death and will cover a multitude of sins.”
James 5:19-20

There are many verses about judging but they don’t mean what you seem to think.


And you think you are the authority of what they mean, let me guess, you and your perception and how it's defined is the correct one, correct? hahah but of course. Well, we'll save that for another day Rose. This is just what I said before as adjusting to suit your means.
Go to
Jun 13, 2019 22:45:34   #
moldyoldy wrote:
They can’t admit it now


and they never will
Go to
Jun 13, 2019 22:32:42   #
Rose42 wrote:
You seem to be mistaking me for a Trump supporter and I sure wouldn’t look to any president to be a good example of morality for children. Can’t think of a single one.

The bar lowers with each administration. I’m sure it’ll be lowered next time too.


Only dishonest to how you feel.

Do you live in a dreamworld of perfection, which is not what I'm talking about. Yes, I can think of good presidents, Washington, Jefferson my personal favorite, Madison, Monroe, Lincoln, Roosevelt, JFK and Obama to name a few. Yes, they had flaws and faults, they were not perfect but their integrity and servitude was genuine for the betterment of the country and yes, they were good examples of morality. Not this foul mouth president, who has no moral compass or who comprehends the meaning of a time and place for his bad language.
Go to
Jun 13, 2019 22:05:38   #
nwtk2007 wrote:
We should judge, but not sentence, is a better way of putting it. We do not determine punishment, but judge, yes.


Our courts determine punishment all the time, innocent people have been known to die for it. Who is we?
Go to
Jun 13, 2019 22:00:08   #
nwtk2007 wrote:
We should judge, but not sentence, is a better way of putting it. We do not determine punishment, but judge, yes.




There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the One who is able to save and to destroy; but who are you who judge your neighbor?

There are many about not judging.
Go to
Jun 13, 2019 21:47:07   #
Liberty Tree wrote:
God did not create them to be that way. It is their choice.


Sorry, that is simply your denial and disbelief. Do you really think you chose to be a heterosexual?
Go to
Jun 13, 2019 21:42:19   #
moldyoldy wrote:
There was a time when you could get your butt beat three times before you got home. Sounds like something the right would like.


Corporal punishment, heck yeah, they'd be all in.
Go to
Jun 13, 2019 21:38:24   #
Rose42 wrote:
Children should be learning morality from their parents not anyone in government. If you want to believe a president should be an example of morality then you should also be looking at state governments who condone killing hundreds of thousands of unborn children for convenience.

Trump is no paragon of virtue but neither is the pro death crowd which Obama belongs to.


Interesting, this generalized analogy for people who believe in freedom of choice. Let me reiterate, if you believe in one's right of freedom of choice, than, you must believe in abortion, that about sum it up?

In one hand the right talks about the swamp while holding the bar for the president so low it is completely undignified, making excuses for him all of the time, things such as, "oh all politicians lie, he's a businessman, I don't care how he gets it done just as long as he does", as if all these poor excuses justifies his deplorability, especially in the highest seat of the country, possibly the world. He holds this position in the most undignified manner ever witnessed, and yet it is still acceptable to the right, and this says more about them than anything else.
Go to
Jun 13, 2019 17:17:32   #
That's hilarious Moldy and so true.
Go to
Jun 13, 2019 16:50:18   #
Rose42 wrote:
We are to be discerning and recognize sin. If someone were a closet homosexual and pointed out the act of homosexuality is a sin that would be hypocritical. That is what the passage means - don’t judge hypocritically


This is why I don't buy into religion, there's always some passage to suit someones hypocritical needs to justify their actions or sentiments, and I'm not talking about Florio. It appears his comment went right by you.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 732 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.