Investigate, harass and obstruct. Resist! Resist! Resist!

Democrats refuse to understand that their Great White Hope, Bob Mueller submitted a fair and balanced report on his activities while fishing for something, anything, to give them as a foil with which to attack President Trump.

According to Rudy Giuliani, the president's attorney:

"We're going to fight everything; we already gave them every document and witness we have, why do we have to do it again?"

When is enough, enough?

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-says-hell-supreme-court-dems-try-impeach-125805005--politics.html

As it should be. Imagine if you were required by some government agency to list the extent of your freedoms, and whatever is not on the list is not yours to claim as a freedom. So you start making your list, and after some time you're up to, oh, a hundred or so specific freedoms. You hand it to your government controller and he puts it in your 'file', pursuant to approvals, of course. Six months later you receive a short letter in the mail advising you of which 'freedoms' you have had approved from your list. Are you actually 'free'?

Now, imagine you institute a government, reserving everything not specifically listed as a power of government to yourself. How long would that list need to be in order to institute an effective government for the purposes you desire it to undertake? A couple of pages, perhaps?

'Freedom from' is far easier to define that 'freedom to'. 'Freedom from' is a list of prohibitions against encroaching on that freedom. 'Freedom to' is a list of approved activities not defaulted to the category of 'denied'. In the former, freedom is positive by default, in the latter it is negative by default. Which would you prefer?

"You cannot build character and courage by taking away a man's initiative and independence."
- Abraham Lincoln

I wonder, after the last 2-1/2 years or so, if he knew what was coming, would he do it again? I wouldn't, it's not worth it, not for all the sainthood in the universe, which he richly deserves, if you ask me.

I think she was asking about the Mueller report, not the Steele dossier.

There, I fixed it for you.

It's called 'revisionism'. Makes me sick how they try to hide the truth. Tell them that the Nazi system of eugenics was based on Sanger's writing and you will be attacked, virulently. Just like anything else, there are certain people who will attach undue significance to the use of ideas or information, tarnishing the originator who has no control over the people who misuse and abuse these thoughts.

I imagine Margaret Sanger would not have approved of the Nazis using her ideas the way they did, but then, like I said, I wasn't there.

She has a fairly common story. She started out with the best of intentions but lost sight of her moral compass along the way and ended up advocating for sterilization of potential mothers and murder of the unborn. Her legacy lives on to this day and there are many who refuse to look and see the truth. For shame.

I have no idea, I wasn't there. As usual, you accuse where there is no crime. I do know that without her input, there would have been no eugenics and no Planned Parenthood killing millions of babies every year. Black babies, to be precise. But, yeah, no racism here, move on people...

"The last thing Democrats want is President Trump taking a victory lap on his biggest issue complete with a high-profile photo op just weeks before voters head to the polls."

And there's nothing they can do to stop it!

"Democrats want to portray Trump as a failure on his signature issue." And they will, right up to the last second. Truth and facts be damned, President Trump will be portrayed as a failure because that's all they got.

https://renewedright.com/the-u-s-military-just-smacked-nancy-pelosi-with-her-worst-nightmare/

"[N]ot only will Trump be able to claim victory on the signature promise of his campaign, but he will have the physical and photographic evidence to do so."

Not quite, but there are signs of improvement:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/frustration-grows-among-migrants-mexico-support-fades-040120537.html

"MAPASTEPEC, Mexico (AP) — Madison Mendoza, her feet aching and her face burned by the sun, wept as she said she had nothing to feed her 2-year-old son who she'd brought with her on the long trek toward the United States."

Over 1000 miles, actually. Her reason for undertaking this marathon trip?

She "fled Honduras with almost no money because she feared for her life after receiving threats from the father of her son." Saying "I thought that with the baby, people would help me on road."

In other words, she made some bad decisions, got involved with the wrong guy, had a baby out of wedlock, and now she's looking for handouts. Instead:

"Members of the caravan in October received food and shelter from town governments, churches and passers-by. Drivers of trucks stopped to give them a lift. Little of that is happening this time. And local officials who once gave them temporary permits to work in Mexico, now seem to snare them in red tape. Truckers and drivers have been told they will be fined if caught transporting migrants without proper documentation."

Even with half of the Federal government opposing his every move, President Trump still finds ways to keep his promise to secure the southern border.

Now, if he can just figure out what's triggering these spontaneous patterns, he could put a stop to it completely.

Sic him, Padre!

Why does that sound so familiar? Hmm......

By the way, our President was under attack even before he was inaugurated, something the 'other one' didn't have to deal with, even though there was plenty of meat on that bone.

So that's how they do it!

No, it is not true. In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which later became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. After World War I, Sanger increasingly appealed to the societal need to limit births by those least able to afford children. The origin of eugenics. The Nazis simply took Sanger's thoughts and made them into a 'reality'. Without eugenics, the holocaust would likely never have happened. Without Margaret Sanger, there would likely never have been a thing called eugenics. Josef Mengele was engrossed in the theory of eugenics, hence his fascination with biological twins.

While Planned Parenthood is indeed founded on the doctrine of eugenics, they didn't get it from the Nazis, quite the opposite.