One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: payne1000
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 ... 1323 next>>
May 28, 2015 17:00:38   #
Pennylynn wrote:
Because I have done the research before and kept the information. That is what reasonable people do rather than having to redo work, they work smarter and not harder. So, I have files where I put information away for future use. Like what is happening in the Middle East, what is going on with our environment, lies told, promises made..... and a host of other things such as your postings and comments.

My system has 22 Terabits so it is not likely I will run out of room. If you look at the books and resources, you will see that it is not just one sided. That is not right and does no one a good service. Truth is facts; numbers and statistics, it is not a one sided tale. If I can find at least four separate and reliable sources, if the four match then I accept the data. All other information is put into another category with a cross reference and search criteria so I can easily find it again, if the situation ever comes up.

I read as many as 5 books each week. And while reading I use sticky notes that I attached to pages with a brief reference. Once a week I take the books and I add the data to my database with book reference and page number. Each book is assigned a alpha character, for example books on boy wonder start with an "O" and then the year it was written and a shortcut for contents. So my shelf will have an "O95Kenya" So, this book is about Obama written in 1995 about his father the Kenyan.

Should I need the paper I developed on boy wonder and his book, I simply do a search in my system with the reference 095Kenya, It will bring up all documents I wrote that pertains to Obama in 1995 and his father.

Do you have an issue with how I manage my records? My library has over 9,000 reference books, all uniquely names and highlighted as I read them. How do you manage your library? I find my method helpful and allows quick access.
Because I have done the research before and kept t... (show quote)


Your attempt to appear technically sophisticated doesn't ring true when you use terabit instead of terabyte.
If your system has 22 terabytes, that would equal roughly 22,000 gigabytes. A storage system that large would most likely belong to a political organization. I'm guessing you're working for Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA).
The part about accuracy in reporting is totally false. CAMERA is a Zionist propaganda network.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=CAMERA

Your method of using four different but matching sources to determine what is correct will not give you the truth. You have to consider the authors of those sources and what their agenda is. You also have to consider whether what they say makes sense. Otherwise, you are only soaking up more propaganda.
Go to
May 28, 2015 15:40:18   #
PoppaGringo wrote:
The President is the final authority on who will receive arms from the U.S., not Congress.


I doubt what you say is true, but even if it were, of the $3 billion in arms the U.S. gives Israel annually, I suspect Israel sells a lot of the arms to anyone who has the funds to pay for them.
The U.S. and Israel have been partners in illegal arms sales for half a century.

Ari Ben-Menashe was a high-level member of Israel's intelligence.
He wrote an expose of Israel/U.S. arms sales in 1992.
http://www.amazon.com/Profits-War-Inside-U-S-Israeli-Network/dp/1879823012


Go to
May 28, 2015 13:46:16   #
Char4Dew wrote:
NO I am not a hypocrite. I tell the truth you are poison, you are a hate monger.
You are evil... that is the truth.

And you are more than likely ugly, small, and you either had your equipment removed or you are a rapist. You are a shitposter.


Go to
May 28, 2015 13:41:04   #
Pennylynn wrote:
The sources, BBC, Aljazeera (a pro-Palestine source), the NSA, Washington Post and Times, New York Times, Money Magazine, Harretz, The Times of Israel, Almonitor (aka, PALESTINE PULSE) and books: Israeli-Arab Negotiations: Background, Conflicts, and U.S. Policy HAMAS Through a Constructivist Lens. Now where do you get your information? YouTube and from Texxe Marrs?


Readers should note that your reply to my post was made 22 minutes later.

You list 10 sources in addition to books. How could you research 10 sources plus books in 22 minutes and assemble that many words?

The only explanation is . . . what you posted was already put together.

I'm guessing it is supplied to you by the vast Zionist propaganda machine.
Go to
May 28, 2015 13:27:27   #
Pennylynn wrote:
I am not sure why. I guess it is amusing to see if he can ever post anything that is not biased. Or if he will ever respond to a question. So far, his score card is zero.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :wink: :wink: :wink:




Do you not recognize the bias in your posts?

Do you know the meaning of "hypocrite"?
Go to
May 28, 2015 13:25:14   #
Char4Dew wrote:
You are poison
poison is for the dead.


More hate from a supreme hypocrite.
Go to
May 28, 2015 12:30:36   #
Pennylynn wrote:
The sources, BBC, Aljazeera (a pro-Palestine source), the NSA, Washington Post and Times, New York Times, Money Magazine, Harretz, The Times of Israel, Almonitor (aka, PALESTINE PULSE) and books: Israeli-Arab Negotiations: Background, Conflicts, and U.S. Policy HAMAS Through a Constructivist Lens. Now where do you get your information? YouTube and from Texxe Marrs?


I was asking you to supply links to where you got your cut and pastes.

Or was all that Zionist propaganda supplied by your Hasbarat comrades?
Go to
May 28, 2015 12:27:43   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


They're not all Jewish though... more later.


I said "predominately."

Do you argue with that assessment?
Go to
May 28, 2015 12:26:38   #
Char4Dew wrote:
No........ I am saying that haters belong someplace else.
6 feet under would not be bad place.


You are wishing me dead.

I don't wish you were dead.

Who is the real hater here?
Go to
May 28, 2015 12:12:30   #
Char4Dew wrote:
I am leaving the forum because too much Anti Jews here.
It was advertized on an Israeli news site. This place is not what it should be.
All the anti-Semites should be bard.


Go to
May 28, 2015 12:11:33   #
Sounds like you have to be pretty high tech to be a Hasbara troll.
Go to
May 28, 2015 12:09:27   #
Char4Dew wrote:
I am leaving the forum because too much Anti Jews here.
It was advertized on an Israeli news site. This place is not what it should be.
All the anti-Semites should be bard.


But you Hasbarats should have the monopoly on OPP. Isn't that what you're saying?
Go to
May 28, 2015 12:00:03   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I agree with you that the Banksters are designing both sides of the conflict...

That I have never disagreed with, you and I both know who the Enemy truly is...


Pitting 2 sides against each other yet again to consolidate and stay in power for another generation to come.

We stand at the abyss looking in...


Do you also agree that the Banksters are and always have been predominately Jewish/Zionist? That's why they are referred to as the "money handlers" throughout history.
http://www.jewishhistory.org/the-rothschilds/
Go to
May 28, 2015 11:49:37   #
hnealc wrote:
Don't think I asked you.


This forum is open for all to comment when they please.
If you want private conversations, the PM feature was designed for that purpose.
Go to
May 28, 2015 11:47:47   #
Pennylynn wrote:
In that case everyone should ignore the photos that you post. To respond,


2002 457
2003 213
2004 124
2005 53
2006 29
2007 13
2008 36
2009 6
2010 10


Pennylynn, you fail to supply your sources. Is that because your sources are Zionists?

Here's my sources:
http://mondoweiss.net/2014/07/rocket-deaths-israel
http://mondoweiss.net/2015/01/independent-investigation-deliberate
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 ... 1323 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.