truth is only what one "believes" or accepts to be true
You hard sell your opinions and beliefs as truth making you an extremist... providing "opinions" as history and fact as proof

noun: truth

the quality or state of being true.
"he had to accept the truth of her accusation"


synonyms: veracity, truthfulness, verity, sincerity, candor, honesty; More
accuracy, correctness, validity, factuality, authenticity


"he doubted the truth of her statement"

antonyms: dishonesty, falseness

•that which is true or in accordance with fact or reality.
noun: the truth

"tell me the truth"


synonyms: what actually happened, the case, so; More
the gospel (truth), the honest truth


"it's the truth, I swear"


•fact(s), reality, real life, actuality

"truth is stranger than fiction"

antonyms: lies, fiction

•a fact or belief that is accepted as true.
plural noun: truths

"the emergence of scientific truths"


synonyms: fact, verity, certainty, certitude


noun: belief; plural noun: beliefs

1.
an acceptance that a statement is true or that something exists.
"his belief in the value of hard work"

•something one accepts as true or real; a firmly held opinion or conviction.
"contrary to popular belief, Aramaic is a living language"


synonyms: opinion, view, conviction, judgment, thinking, way of thinking, idea, impression, theory, conclusion, notion
"it's my belief that age is irrelevant"

•a religious conviction.
"Christian beliefs"

synonyms: ideology, principle, ethic, tenet, canon; More
doctrine, teaching, dogma, article of faith, creed, credo

"traditional beliefs"

2.

trust, faith, or confidence in someone or something.
"a belief in democratic politics"


synonyms: faith, trust, reliance, confidence, credence
"belief in the value of hard work"

ex·trem·ist


/ikˈstrēməst/


noun

noun: extremist; plural noun: extremists

a person who holds extreme or fanatical political or religious views, especially one who resorts to or advocates extreme action.
"political extremists"


synonyms: fanatic, radical, zealot, fundamentalist, hard-liner, militant, activist; informalultra
"with little to gain from moderation, the extremists rule the day

If you already completely understood this then.... you are a extreme putz...

You assassinate your own character in the way your argue and try to use "gotcha" traps as I illustrated in the previous post.

As to your claim that I refuse to expose lies, there are two parts to the answer. One lies in the fact that I am a known poster with a history of the other blog, so my claim had credibility with the other posters. I have no history on this blog, so my claims would be meaningless. The other lies in the fact that you twist words, trying to make another (me in this case) sound like they are saying something that they are not.

I'm sure that no one on this forum has the history to see this, but you undoubtedly understand that the way you construct your argument in your last paragraph is evidence of this claim.

In a word BS!! A couple of days ago, the entire case study of 911 was declassified and made available for everyone to see. http://www.cia.gov/news-information/press-releases-statements/2015-press-releases-statements/cia-releases-declassified-documents-related-to-9-11-attacks.html and http://www.foia.cia.gov/collection/declassified-documents-related-911-attacks

911 WAS A PRODUCT OF MUSLIMS and celebrated by MUSLIMS..... And you, being muslim will defend the murders they committed on 911 in anyway you can.

I have explained earlier, I have a memory that is not like most people, I am both blessed and cursed with remembering every last thing I read. When I prepared the document, I had prepared several versions and in anger and haste I actually presented the wrong document. This version was a working document and a rough draft (as indeed you complained was choppy and uneven in content) which I had intended only to provide me an overall guidance and my final version, although containing the same information, did have a list at the end of the document with a list of my sources. When I went back to reread my submitted comment after your comment, I saw my errors and provided you with additional web sites containing the rest of the references that I used to prepare my comment. I am unconcerned about this mistake on my part, I am not perfect and often use my memory for help in preparing comments. At the end of the day, I am very human and mistakenly submitted the wrong version as a comment.

I am less concerned for this error than pleased that I gave quality information with supportive evidence. If I were you, I would concern myself less with me providing references than with the content of the document and presenting a rebuttal of said content. You see, what was written is the truth and it is, as you demonstrated, not just my opinion pulled from my love for my people. It is a shared opinion of many.

Your complaint is duly noted and in the future I will be very careful to check each of my sentences to ensure I have not accidently included a sentence or paragraph that is very similar to someone else's published work. Even with this, I will still from time to time make mistakes. But, as OPP is not a site to submit academic papers for degree purposes, I feel confident that the content of the work should be debated and not necessarily where each sentence originated.

I am concerned with my reputation, but I feel sure that others will understand that mistakes can happen. Indeed, in another thread you questioned how I could have a response to you so quickly and I explained that I keep working files.

Now talking about rebuttals. Do prepare a rebuttal for the information I presented. That is prove the content unsubstantiated and without historical fact.

That is an interesting presentation; it demonstrates the ugly side of war that has been with us forever. It is truly sad that anyone was forced to leave their homes. Imagine how grisly the scene when Muslims entered the holy land for the first time. They didn't push the Israelites form their homes, they slaughtered them, just as they slaughtered their way through Mesopotamia. Granted, the Arabs need a homeland, everyone does. But the Arabs and Muslims have dozens of homelands. Why can't the Jewish community have just one homeland -- just one?

Forget about your anti-Semitic propaganda. Forget about your imaginary Zionist conspiracy. The Jews just want one crummy homeland. Why is that some much to ask?

Yes,,, well,,, I must apologize,,, when someone knows so much more than you do it is completely unfair to take advantage of their ignorance...

The first US president to deal with islamic terrorists, was George Washington,, and the Barbary Corsairs....

http://gwpapers.virginia.edu/history/topics/gw-and-the-barbary-coast-pirates/

I am sorry your education isnt up to this task,,, bye bye now, low-info person... I dont consider it a coupe to best a fool.... its too easy and there are too many liberals around,,,,,,

So as far as the US is concerned, Islam was at work and preying upon our nation, even before it was on its feet,,,,, their aggression is nothing new.... and certainly not the "US's" fault.....

payne1000, Where do you get this stuff about 9/11? The truth is that the towers were brought down by jihadist terrorism. Your hatred of Israel is so overwhelming that it makes all your so called points completely unbelievable. I don't understand why you deny " Muslims" brought down the towers". I recognize that it was not all Muslims. The evidence is so one compelling that it can not be denied. I saw the airplane crash into the world trade center hundreds of times on film. The perpetrators openly admit the act, including Osama. Consider this evidence that you are a fanatic, and a liar!