One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: payne1000
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 ... 1323 next>>
Jun 18, 2015 08:16:15   #
emarine wrote:
I don't know about the different flavors of Jew's, I thought that they all started out together at first... So Lewis Black is a socialist .... what about it... I cant find him funny because of his political beliefs? You like you label everyone... Fine, he's a funny socialist and you are a propaganda putz... I like this game... see I can be a condescending prick too... :thumbup:


If you don't know the difference between Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews, how can you think you are qualified to debate the Israel/Palestinian crisis?
Go to
Jun 17, 2015 19:47:55   #
emarine wrote:
Now if the Nazis did one thing right it was record keeping, research how profitable the transfer agreement was in reality , Hitler got his funds by taking them, then review the history of Palestine , seems the Jews had the right to be there also... I think Islamic extremism will be the reason for the next big war , I'm glad Israel is still our ally.. Israel has had the ability to totally wipe out its enemy's, but has the humanity to try for peace , can you say the same for Islam... Jews can even be funny at times ....

If you're going to waist time on Youtube watch the right Black..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HNrjmfzNBE ..... putz
Now if the Nazis did one thing right it was record... (show quote)


Why did the Ashkenazi Jews have a right to be in Palestine? They had no heritage there. Sephardic Jews had heritage in Palestine. Ashkenazi Zionist Jews treat the Sephardics as second-class citizens In Israel.

Lewis Black is a socialist. Do you admire Socialists?
http://www.thenation.com/blog/179373/lewis-black-why-hes-socialist-and-creationists-get-cosmos-parody-they-deserve#
Go to
Jun 17, 2015 19:37:36   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Unfuckingbelievable. Those 30 floors weighed in the neighborhood of 160,000 tons, do you really think they would have defied the laws of physics and fallen over like a cut down tree? You acknowledged that gravitational force is straight down, so how in the hell could such a massive weigh, 280 feet on a side, simply topple over? You gotta be nuckin' futs.

The bone fragments found on the Deutsche Bank Building (the Marriot and others) were the remains of those in both the aircraft and the buildings killed when the planes crashed into the buildings. I mean, good grief, body parts were found 10 blocks from the site.

Moreover, during my career as a skydiver, on three occasions I have seen the results of a human body impacting the earth at free fall speeds. It ain't pretty. It takes a skydiver around 10 seconds (or 1000 feet of fall) from exit to reach terminal velocity. Some of the people jumping from the towers fell close to that before impact. And they were hitting very hard surfaces. (There are photos available of some of the remains of these impacts).

Regarding your attempt to prove your argument with the history of skyscraper on fire never collapsing, obviously you have ignored completely the fact (which I posted in detail elsewhere) that the Twin Towers were a unique architectural design--a revolutionary design called a "tube within a tube". They were the tallest buildings in the world at the time they were built. The outer steel lattice work was specifically engineered to resist the horizontal forces of wind, whereas the internal support columns held the buildings against the vertical force of gravity.

Do you have any idea whatsoever of the volume of work and materials that are required to prepare just a 20 story high-rise building for controlled demolition? For a building the size, weight and height of the WTC towers such a project would have been enormous? How in the world could that have been accomplished with not a single person becoming suspicious? How could that have been done in an entirely covert operation? Impossible.

Man, it is unfuckingbelievable how disconnected from reality you "troofers" can be.
Unfuckingbelievable. Those 30 floors weighed in th... (show quote)


WTC7 wasn't a "tube within a tube," and it wasn't hit by an airliner. It fell like a classic controlled demolition.

Larry Silverstein controlled access to all three towers. There were lockdowns at night for alleged construction repairs prior to 9/11.


Go to
Jun 17, 2015 19:31:40   #
PoppaGringo wrote:
It appears pain1000 is very upset since no one is buying his malarkey. :lol: :lol: :lol:


This is a hasbarat thread.

Hasbarats are my mortal enemies.
Go to
Jun 17, 2015 17:43:05   #
emarine wrote:
Hey putz... you're pegging my BS meter again.... Palestine had no economy when 60k Jews arrived, Nothing but small farms and lots of sand with some goats, So what did the Jews talk the goat hoarders into buying VW's from Hitler in trade for what? camels, Palestine barely had electricity at the time, Water was a major problem but these peasants saved the Germany and funded the war machine... get real fool... Now hear this putz... weather the Jews were gassed, shot, hung, or starved to death while engaged in slave labor, its all mass murder ASSHOLE! I can't believe no one has kicked your ass yet....
Hey putz... you're pegging my BS meter again.... P... (show quote)


Go to the 7 minute mark on this video for an explanation of how the Transfer Agreement financial transactions worked. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uE2hsaHAEX0

60 million people died in WWII, mostly because Zionists coveted Palestine and were willing to do anything to get Palestine. Why should Jews get more sympathy than any of the other people who died because of the war?

In order to keep Palestine, Zionists are now attempting to drag the world into WWIII.
Go to
Jun 17, 2015 17:24:11   #
DamnYANKEE wrote:
DISGUSTING PIECE of LIB/DEM MAGGOT SHIT


Zionists do have a way with words


Go to
Jun 17, 2015 17:21:51   #
wuzblynd wrote:
Good one!! :thumbup:


Still blynd.
Go to
Jun 17, 2015 16:54:22   #
Ve'hoe wrote:
Like I said,,, how many buildings have you actually blow up???


You are full of shiite.... hadji


Is that your rebuttal?
Can you refute anything I posted?
Go to
Jun 17, 2015 16:51:25   #
America Only wrote:
YOU SICK PUNK! Take your camel driving, snot eating rear end and get the hell off this website. You are nothing more than a Pedophile Muslim and we all know how much a real coward you and the rest of your rapist pig sucking gang is all about.


It might shock readers if you just once made a rebuttal to my posts rather than acting like an ignorant red neck every time.
Go to
Jun 17, 2015 16:48:46   #
emarine wrote:
No, how about you explain exactly what economic value moving Jews to Palestine had in the 1930's to Hitler.. were the Nazis short of goats and camel's ? You have clearly stated that the Jews from Palestine were responsible for WW2... back it up putz


I've explained the motives behind the Transfer Agreement many times.
You either have a very short memory or very poor reading comprehension.
One more time . . . Hitler moved the 60,000 Zionists to Palestine in 1933 to break the worldwide Jewish boycott on German goods. The Zionists acted as scabs on the boycott. They sold German goods in the Middle East which succeeded in breaking the boycott allowing the Third Reich to recover financially. Worldwide Jewish organizations allowed the Transfer Agreement Zionists to break the boycott which had enraged all Germans and caused them to have great animosity toward German Jews.
World Zionism basically threw the non-Zionist German Jews under the bus in order to get a foothold in Palestine.

I never said the Jews from Palestine caused WWII. It was the worldwide Zionist organizations which created the turmoil in Germany which allowed Hitler to gain power and eventually bring about WWII.
Go to
Jun 17, 2015 16:27:54   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Gosh, where the hell did the fire go? Damned thing was burning for an hour then it just magically disappeared. WTF? It is impossible to believe that a commercial aircraft loaded with a 10,000 gallons of JetA and flying into the building at 400+ mph could have started a fire. In all those videos of the event, I could have sworn that I saw huge fireballs blowing through those towers, but maybe I just have a vivid imagination. Probably been watching too many movies. Maybe the attack on 9/11 was only a remake of "The Towering Inferno" and "Ladder 49" combined into one fantastic screenplay.

Oh yeah, and then while we watched those imaginary fires burning on many upper floors of the WTC towers, a 160,000 tons of building collapsing suddenly snapped us back to reality. Yep, there were no fires, we were just dreaming.

Too bad we can't ask the 200+ people who splattered on the streets and roofs of nearby buildings what forced them to jump to their deaths. Maybe it was just the cool wind coming off the harbor that blew them out through those big holes in the buildings.

AA Flight 11

UA Flight 175

AA Flight 77

UA Flight 93
Gosh, where the hell did the fire go? Damned thing... (show quote)


The photo you posted shows the top 30 floors of the South Tower tilting severely to one side. If explosives hadn't disintegrated those floors and the floors underneath, they would have fallen off to one side as they had started to do.

What the videos show about the burning fuel is that most of it burned up in the air outside the Towers not inside the towers.

You mention the people who jumped to their deaths but you fail to mention the bone fragments found on top of the 40-story Deutsche Bank Building which was hundreds of feet from the closest tower. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/06/nyregion/06remains.html
Gravitational force is straight down. What would it take to turn human bodies into bone fragments? Not fire, but powerful explosives, which hurled the fragments hundreds of feet outward as the towers fell at almost free-fall speed. What is the only force which has caused steel-framed skyscrapers to fall in the hundred-year history of skyscrapers?
You guessed it . . . controlled demolition. No steel-framed skyscraper in history has fallen from fire damage. None did on 9/11 either.

This skyscraper in Spain burned for 20 hours. It remained standing.


This building burned for less than an hour. It fell at near free-fall speed. Does that look like fire or does that look like explosions?

Go to
Jun 17, 2015 08:44:56   #
Ve'hoe wrote:
I have blown up buildings in my military service,,,, do you REALLY not know where the "fire" is?


It is right there.....


You've blown up buildings in your military service?

You didn't inform us you served in the IDF.

Or was it in the Zionist terror groups such as Irgun?

King David Hotel, 1946. Bombed by Irgun.92 died.

Go to
Jun 17, 2015 08:38:10   #
Ve'hoe wrote:
I have blown up buildings in my military service,,,, do you REALLY not know where the "fire" is?


It is right there.....


Did you know the north tower caught fire in 1975 on the eleventh floor and burned for 3 hours (twice as long as on 9/11). The fire burned through six floors and firefighters described it "like fighting a blowtorch."
When the fire was extinguished there was no damage to the steel structure.
The tower stood for another quarter century until it was taken down with explosives.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_1975_fire.html


Go to
Jun 17, 2015 08:32:33   #
W8_4_It wrote:
Geez, I didn't cherry pick anything. It is the RSS (remote sensing system) - the satellite data which is global and more homogeneous. It came from here. http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html

You can get that from a lot of places.

Actually I think the planet is generally warming. Generally. It has been since the last age except for the little ice age from the 1500's to 1850. I am glad it is warming generally and not cooling. The little ice age was a terrible time with famines and starvation.

Temperature goes up and down and pauses. The global warming scientists try to explain this away. They forgot to take in account solar activity and clouds. The heat is hiding in the ocean etc. They like to concentrate on what validates their theory. If it doesn't validate the theory they throw out the data or fudge it.

They also weighted higher temperature buoys more and added temperature to the buoys so it was in line with the data from ships even though ships produce heat (from the engines etc.) You would think they would adjust the ship temperature down but they did not. They adjusted the buoy temps upward.

A while back they also threw out the tree ring data because it did not show as much warming (those lying trees!).

See here for some information. http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/04/noaa-fiddles-with-climate-data-to-erase-the-15-year-global-warming-hiatus/

I do not believe climate change is man made and we can do anything about it, that's all.

As to why the government would lie, why did they lie about Obamacare?

There is a lot of money sitting on the table with this cap and trade scheme which is really a tax. The government never met a tax it did not love.

We are on the same page about not trusting government. We just mistrust them about different things.
Geez, I didn't cherry pick anything. It is the RS... (show quote)


The editor of the site you linked says sea levels may rise two meters by the end of the century caused by "climate change."

"This is much more than the 59cm maximum sea level rise forecast by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in its Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) published in 2007. This new projection is based on the assumption of a rise in average global surface temperatures of 4C by 2100.The research is published in a paper in the latest edition of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society.

The reason that these estimates are so much higher than those in the AR4 report is because the AR4 projections did not include any significant ice mass loss in either Antarctica or Greenland, according to lead researcher Robert Nicholls, of the University of Southampton in the UK. "Essentially they did not have enough information to make an estimate about ice mass loss so they did not include any impact," Nicholls told Reporting Climate Science.Com.

"This paper makes the point that if we have large temperature rises then sea levels could rise significantly. We are not predicting the worst case scenario but it is at least possible. And in the worst case many millions will be forced to move. And in the best case a lot of money and effort will need to be expended on adaptation," said Nicholls."


It appears you did cherry pick from the site only what might support your view.

http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-may-cause-2m-sea-level-rise-this-century-say-experts.html
Go to
Jun 17, 2015 08:19:33   #
dennisimoto wrote:
W8_4_it, you're trying to carry on a debate with a person who actually believes that the World Trade Center towers were brought down by "controlled demolition." Might as well be talking into an empty 55gal. drum.


Dennis, study the photo below and tell readers where the fire is that brought that tower down.


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 ... 1323 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.