Smedley_buzkill wrote:
Esto no es algo que esperar, sino algo que temer.
¿Temor? ¿Por qué temer a alguien que no puede usar el baño correctamente?
Lástima tal vez.
F.D.R. wrote:
I just applied for a government grant to study the effect of short shorts on middle aged men.
I'd be happy to aid you in your quest...
ACP45 wrote:
Great clip Emily. The only problem is that "lying" is endemic in Washington, and if everyone who lied was fired, there would be no one left from either party. Do you agree?
And the world would still turn, and the flowers would still grow. A ghost town in Washington DC would most definitely not be the end of the world, but the beginning of a better one.
PeterS wrote:
This is what a hero looks like...
Yes, and it is a diabolical shame that nobody was there to stop that maniac before he killed and maimed all those students. That will no longer be the case in Florida:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-guns-florida-idUSKCN1S74GZ
The Great State of Florida became the 15th State to legalize the protection of students in the school setting last week. The other 14 are Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Missouri, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Washington.
Only 35 to go and this madness will be eradicated.
lindajoy wrote:
This thread is~~
Glad you're having so much fun...
Bcon wrote:
The only treasonous history is trashing the history of the Obama years. Yes, your idol was and is a treasonous criminal. If things go as they seem to be heading, he, along with his other treasonous partners, will be where they belong. In Prison.
...On death row, awaiting the final curtain.
kemmer wrote:
That dangerously unstable halfwit is trashing 250 years of presidential history.
You're a bit late on that one. The 'dangerously unstable halfwit' was chased out of the White House in January 2017. Since then it's been getting better every day.
kemmer wrote:
After 2020, he'll only be a terrible memory and/or the butt of jokes for at least a couple decades.
Keep dreaming, snowflake. Our President is going to be there until 2025, when he steps down and President Nikki Haley is sworn in as our first female President.
Welcome to the Age of American Greatness... Again.
byronglimish wrote:
Related? You might be on to something there.
Products of the same bot farm.
Lonewolf wrote:
https://themoscowproject.org/reports/putins-payout-10-ways-trump-has-supported-putins-foreign-policy-agenda/
. Putin’s Goal: Weaken and divide the transatlantic alliance.
• Putin’s Payout: Trump undermines US relationships with European allies and calls
the US’s commitment to NATO into question.
2. Putin’s Goal: Degrade the European Union and foster pro-Russian political movements.
• Putin’s Payout: Trump attacks the EU and actively supports anti-EU, Kremlin-backed
parties.
3. Putin’s Goal: Disrupt American leadership and dominance of the global economic order.
• Putin’s Payout: Trump is eagerly pushing for an all-out trade war with Europe
4. Putin’s Goal: Build global resentment and distrust towards the US and stoke anti-American
sentiment.
• Putin’s Payout: America’s closest allies are explicitly suspicious and distrusting of
the US because of Trump’s rhetoric and actions.
5. Putin’s Goal: Relieve economic and domestic political pressure from US sanctions on Russia.
• Putin’s Payout: Trump tries to roll back, impede, and blunt the impact of sanctions
at every step.
6. Putin’s Goal: Legitimize his regime in the eyes of the world.
• Putin’s Payout: Trump repeatedly praises and defends Putin, lending the credibility
of the US presidency to Putin’s standing.
7. Putin’s Goal: Revive Russia’s status as a great power and gain international recognition for its
illegal seizure of Crimea.
• Putin’s Payout: Trump publicly says that Crimea is part of Russia and calls for Russia
to be welcomed back into the international community with no concessions.
8. Putin’s Goal: Continue to sow discord in Western democracies and avoid repercussions for
interfering in American and European elections.
• Putin’s Payout: Trump dismisses Russian interference and has done nothing to
prevent future interference, putting him at odds with his own intelligence
community.
9. Putin’s Goal: Soften America’s adversarial stance toward Russia.
• Putin’s Payout: Trump is shifting the Republican Party’s generations-long hawkish
views on Russia.
10. Putin’s Goal: Destabilize the US from within.
• Putin’s Payout: Trump attacks US institutions while driving divisive politics and
eroding democratic norms.
11. Putin’s goal: Advance the Kremlin’s narrative to shape global perceptions.
• Putin’s payout: Trump has repeatedly, and inexplicably, parroted Kremlin talking
points across a range of global issues.
12. Putin’s goal: Undermine international norms and democratic values abroad.
• Putin’s payout: Trump has repeatedly failed to respond to human rights violations
or support democracy abroad, creating a more permissive environment for
autocrats to crack
https://themoscowproject.org/reports/putins-payout... (
show quote)
The Moscow Project. Yeah. I imagine they know a lot about 'Putin's goals'. Take a look behind the curtain:
"The Moscow Project is an initiative of the Center for American Progress Action Fund"
And who are the Center for American Progress Action Fund? Well...
"The Center for American Progress is a progressive public policy research and advocacy organization."
Motto: Progressive ideas for a strong, just, and free America.
Founder: John Podesta
John Podesta. Remember him? He served as White House Chief of Staff to President Bill Clinton from October 20, 1998 until January 20, 2001 and then as Counselor to President Barack Obama from January 1, 2014 until February 13, 2015.
Now let me see, am I going to take anything this lying, conniving, commie infiltrator says about anything on face value? If he told me the grass was green I'd look out the window just to make sure.
PeterS wrote:
You can tell he's a conservative because most of the white elderly in Texas are going to be fellow conservatives. Only a con will try to keep a fellow con from voting.
You been punk'd. Get over it.
EmilyD wrote:
...Even though they know they were asking Barr to break the law and commit a crime by commanding that he release the full unredacted Mueller report. And even though an amendment was proposed to change the wording of the subpoena to exclude article 6(e) (grand jury testimony that is not allowed to be public) from the report. What a circus. All this is is an attempt on their part to delay Barr from investigating them. But it's not prohibiting Barr from continuing on doing his job...so nothing is gained by yet another waste of time and taxpayers dollars by doing this.
...Even though they know they were asking Barr to ... (
show quote)
I like the sound of their screams as they see their ultimate goals ripped from their reality. It helps me to sleep soundly at night. The more outraged they become, the more they unmask themselves for all to see. I hear Nancy Pelosi almost gave birth when someone suggested that The Donald get another two years added on to his presidency as reparations for the two plus years they spent trying to ruin him.
I can just see it now...
ACP45 wrote:
In addition, it is being reported that on Wednesday the Iranians will announce that they are taking steps to restart their nuclear program…"
A nuclear program that was never really stopped. Experience dictates that there is only one way to deal with the mullahs in Iran, and that's with an aggressive stance and from a position of strength. Anything less is seen as weakness and will not be taken seriously. There's a new sheriff in town, and it's about time the theocrats in Iran understood that their old tricks are no longer going to work.
If they do pick a fight, it will be a short and bloody one, for sure.
Kevyn wrote:
Actually it is common journalistic practice for reporters to use sources they trust while not naming them if the information they provide would cause them harassment within their organization. As an example a staff member giving information of wrongdoing at city hall could be fired if named in an article, this in no way diminishes the validity of the information. USA Today is owned by Ganette which has always been a right wing oriented publisher, the investigative work the story is about comes from The Wall Street Journal also with a very conservative editorial bent. The Journal is highly regarded for their integrity amongst political conservatives. How would either of these sources be unacceptable to you?
Actually it is common journalistic practice for re... (
show quote)
"...citing unnamed officials." That's how. If there was anything true about this story, the "unnamed officials" would have both names and quotable soundbites to go with their story. They don't, most likely because they don't even exist. Is that 'right' enough for you?
kemmer wrote:
It's highly amusing the lengths Trump's minions will go to discount or ignore what's in plain sight about that huge fraud we unfortunately have as a president.
What's even more amusing is seeing the tortuous lengths you will go to in ignoring the monumental progress being made on many diverse fronts toward making America great again, mainly attributable to the wonderful man we are lucky enough to call our President. And yours, too, whether you like it or not.