Nope, I will just enjoy showing this entire forum what a mental defective arsehole you are homo hemorrhoid payne.

Hmmmmmmmm "southern Christian redneck" Lan oh mercy, ya'll must be one dem Obammy liberals... or do all you homo suckular humanists sound that cute?

Einstein also said this ya ignorant fool...

No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled with such life."

-Albert Einstien

Ooooooooooooooooops huh?

Commie, liberal girl...

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You fell for another internet hoax.

Between its February 10, 2014 launch and July 14, The Intercept had posted 258 pages of NSA documents leaked by Snowden and numerous articles based on those leaks, but hadn't said a word about Israel's national intelligence arm, the Mossad, grooming ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as chief stinger for the Hornet's Nest. In the 30-day run-up to July 6, when the story first surfaced, The Intercept published just four articles, none of which mentioned Mossad or al-Baghdadi. "Hornet's Nest" occurred twice on The Intercept's website, in comments posted by reader Kelly on July 21 and July 29—weeks after the hoax began—both in the context of Hamas being ill-advised to stir the metaphorical Israeli hornet's nest causing the "entire swarm" to attack; her comment had nothing to do with a secret U.S., British and Israeli op involving ISIS. It's also significant that in rebuttal to Time, IRNA neglects to include a single hyperlink to The Intercept or any of "several other news outlets" that IRNA claims "also published The Intercept story." As we shall see, this omission of links to sources is de rigueur for articles spreading the hoax.

http://snowdenhoax.blogspot.co.uk/

And the link you gave, is a blog of a conspiracy theorist.

To answer your first question:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/the-un-says-7-in-10-palestinians-killed-in-gaza-were-civilians-israel-disagrees/2014/08/29/44edc598-2faa-11e4-9b9
In its most recent count, the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs reports that 2,104 Palestinians were killed in Gaza, including 1,462 civilians, among them 495 children and 253 women. Those U.N. numbers would mean that 69 percent of the total killed were civilians. The Israelis claim the figure is more like 50%. Given the Palestinian penchant for hiding out among civilians, either is likely, but neither is close to your figure of 3500.

From the Oslo Accords (Sept. 1993) until September 2000 - nearly 300 Israelis were killed in attacks.

During the Palestinian Al-Aqsa Intifada (Sept. 2000 - Dec. 2005) another 1,100 Israelis were killed.

Since December 2005, Palestinian terrorist attacks have claimed at least another 154 Israeli lives.

In response to questions that appeared on several Internet sites as to why the Islamic State wasn’t fighting Israel instead of killing Muslims in Iraq and Syria, the organization responded on its Twitter account: “We haven’t given orders to kill the Israelis and the Jews. The war against the nearer enemy, those who rebel against the faith, is more important. Allah commands us in the Koran to fight the hypocrites, because they are much more dangerous than those who are fundamentally heretics.” As proof, the organization cited the first caliph, Abu Bakr, who began by fighting those who rebelled against the faith, as well as Saladin, who fought the Shi’ites in Egypt before conquering Jerusalem. http://www.haaretz.com/news/world/.premium-1.605097

But the primary reason, when they attack Israel, and it will happen, they will be killed. They will be first warned that their actions will result in direct military action, they will receive no pity, and should they continue then they will reap what they sow. It will be over quickly and people like you will complain that they are hurting the poor defenseless ISIS.... But, as a muslim that is to be expected.