If a sportsman or other person(s) does something exceptional, how long should the President wait before inviting that person(s) to the White House to highlight the achievement? I ask because:
https://sports.yahoo.com/donald-trump-invites-simon-pagenaud-to-white-house-immediately-after-indy-500-win-211521645.htmlHeadline: Donald Trump invites Simon Pagenaud to White House immediately after Indy 500 win.
The opening line reads "It didn’t take very long for Simon Pagenaud to get his White House invitation from President Donald Trump."
Then they go on to criticize the President's invitation criteria: "Was it one of the best races in the history of auto racing as Trump is hyperbolically contending? No."
"[H]yperbolically contending". Exaggerating the win. Mmm-hmm.
And then there's the mandatory claim to favoritism: "The invite for Pagenaud comes after his teammate Will Power did not get one after he won the 2018 Indianapolis 500."
Well, that seals it. Clearly he should be impeached for inviting one sportsman over another. Go for it, Goobers.
Former Georgia Congressman and CNN contributor Jack Kingston told Mediaite: "Most of us got squeezed out involuntarily. I was there for 2 years and was certainly willing to continue. It was clear to me in the end that the Republicans they prefer are anti-Trump Republicans."
Oh Dear. CNN hates Trump Republicans and now they're 'going under'.
"News of CNN's increasing decline in the media industry comes as Mediaite released a report late on Friday about a number of former CNN employees that said that network openly hates conservatives."
Perhaps this will serve as notice to the rest of the 'alphabet soup' media that being politically active in their reporting is going to hut them in the long run.
Maybe.
"Flood noted that TVNewser, a media reporting website founded by CNN propagandist Brian Stelter, magically got confirmation on Friday — right before the weekend when the news cycle usually dies — that CNN was, in fact, laying off a lot of its employees."
"Right before the weekend when the news cycle usually dies". Mmm-hmm.
archie bunker wrote:
It's Tuesday. He's drunk, and ranting.
So the only change is in the day of the week.
karpenter wrote:
Astounding, Ain' It ?
When Wrong Repeatedly
Normal People Step Back And Re-Assess
You're on the wrong topic to be using the word 'normal'. There's nothing normal about it, they're twisted and warped beyond anything recognizably normal. They can't even recognize when a law is in play, and don't bother referencing morality, they have none.
Yes, astounding might be apropos as would mind-numbing, dumbfounding and outrageous.
karpenter wrote:
When Dem's Lose Their Majority
What Will They Do, What Will They Do....
Skulk off back into the shadows where they came from and hopefully climb back under whatever rock they slithered out from in the first place. If we never hear a peep from them again I'll be happy with that. There are a few though, who won't accept the sanity of their rejection and will attempt some subterfuge or other similar to the 'Collusion Delusion'. I would have no qualms about executing them in summary fashion and sticking their heads on pikes for their co-conspirators to see on a daily basis. That should bring them into line nicely.
Airfart one wrote:
US voters vote for Trump because Trump loves Putin and Putin and Trump are dictators till the 2020 election. If Trump gets re-elected this country and our democracy will be 100% destroyed.
Yeah, because his plans to destroy everything 'America' failed so spectacularly the first time, he needs a 'do-over'.
Airfarceone wrote:
his base buys into his lies and distortions as to what’s in the Muellar report. Because Trump supporters refuse to read the report.
Everyone I know has read it. Clearly you haven't. Here. Have a copy:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955379-Redacted-Mueller-Report.html#document/Airfail one wrote:
So these people support Trump because there so deep rooted in racism there can be no other answer.
So, uh, they hate each other? I don't understand.
Airfucked one wrote:
Our democracy and rule of law is on trial in the 2020 election. Don’t let these racist people control this election. Don’t let Fox News use Russian propaganda. Stop spreading conspiracy theories that originate in the Kremlin.
Maybe you should heed your own advice there, big guy. You're so far off the beaten track we'd need a pack of hounds to pick up your trail. Better double up on the meds and call the psychiatrist again in the morning. He'll be expecting you.
JoyV wrote:
I think I'll stop here.
Barely scratched the surface.
woodguru wrote:
There was an article recently on DML (right lean) about a guy on a college campus that has a jewish presence who is parading swastikas and anti jewish hate rhetoric like advocating burning jews. The college says they can't prohibit this without interfering with his freedom of speech.
Yet another good reason to get government out of the education business. Government is rightly limited in those circumstances, it's unfortunate, but there it is.
woodguru wrote:
Seems to me the guy is way over the line of what can be considered hate and inciting violence.
There's nothing wrong with your senses. One thing does stand out though; he didn't 'actually' attack anyone, correct? Of course not, because that's not how cowards work. They stir up the rabble then point to the target of their ire and yell their command. I don't imagine he garnered much of a following during his rant.
woodguru wrote:
Common sense needs to prevail here, someone will obviously get hurt with crap like that.
Possibly, but not likely. This guy made a fool of himself then went on his way. Had he been on private property, there would never have been an issue, he would simply have been evicted and life would continue on as if he never existed. Had there been a few hot-headed Jews in attendance, he might have found himself on the receiving end of a lesson in public decor. Instead, people laughed as they passed and nobody was any the worse for the experience.
That's how it's supposed to work. Common sense did prevail and nobody 'got hurt'. Congratulations to all those forced to witness this embarrassing spectacle, they acted with dignity and restraint.
proud republican wrote:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/alabama-democratic-lawmaker-says-retarded-trump-son-is-a-good-argument-for-abortion?fbclid=IwAR1v_8_cDVaHUpQBv4ZmAz4-8YAcqHbREWlZ4OLRZfCl71bCvQG4E2ZzSPo
Margaret Sanger's argument for eugenics, that's all it is. He took a really stupid idea and aimed it at the President's son. Complete idiot. Planned Parenthood must be so proud.
Airforceone wrote:
Where did Obama use executive privilege give me some examples if you would please.
Did Obama ever defy congressional subpoenas did Obama refuse to turn over requested documents, did Obama ever use the courts to prevent administration officials from testifying.
You know as well as anyone how that Kenyan, mulatto usurper used every trick in the Saul Alinsky play-manual every chance 'it' got. You want examples? Go Google it, you got fingers just like the rest of us. The list is long and exhausting to read.
Now bugger off, Dickweed.
kemmer wrote:
Fortunately for the country, Pelosi is head over heels smarter than Trump. She's just waiting for Trump to hang himself, which he undoubted will eventually. He has as much business being president as one of his undocumented Mar-a-Lago housekeepers.
Still brain dead I see...