Posts for: payne1000
Oct 21, 2015 08:40:02 #
(Main)
emarine wrote:
This is all the proof necessary to prove you lie... no ka boom... putz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKx0Ebd3clQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKx0Ebd3clQ
No ka boom because the video has no sound. Sound is not needed because as with all the videos, the explosions can be seen clearly. watch the top of the building on your video. It starts to lean to the left as the first explosions happen. Then as the explosions move down the tower taking out all support, the leaning section starts to fall straight down.
Oct 21, 2015 08:34:42 #
(Main)
emarine wrote:
Your Clueless ...Face it fella.. this link has your name on it....
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/9-11_conspiracy_theories
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/9-11_conspiracy_theories
This link exposes the conspiracy theory you are defending . . .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98
Oct 20, 2015 21:42:40 #
(Main)
Blade_Runner wrote:
You're still at it with these skulls full of mush, I see. The only explosion I can detect in all this is the one that blew Payne's brains out.
emarine needs factual info to back up his lies. Your imbecilic insults are useless in his defense.
Oct 20, 2015 21:23:49 #
(Main)
emarine wrote:
Grasp this ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKx0Ebd3clQ
Slow motion high definition proof you guys are full of shit.... if you need to invent crap go back to school
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKx0Ebd3clQ
Slow motion high definition proof you guys are full of shit.... if you need to invent crap go back to school
Your video is proof you are full of shit.
You only have to watch the first 10 seconds to see that when the explosions start to detonate the upper section starts to list to the left. If the lower part of the building had not been exploded below it, that entire top section would have toppled off to the side.
Top of the tower starts to fall to one side. Explosions destroy the resistance that caused that list.
Remnants of the outer perimeter wall. This is what was showing in the video instead of the central core.
Oct 20, 2015 16:01:10 #
(Main)
emarine wrote:
it appears there is a lot you cant grasp here...
I never could grasp ignorance and/or deceit.
Oct 19, 2015 20:21:09 #
(Main)
emarine wrote:
Impossible... not so... each floor had a live load... (show quote)
Your explanation isn't rocket science or any kind of science. The undamaged lower floors of the towers could not be crushed by the same weight they had held up for over half a century. The North Tower only had about 20 floors above where the airliner hit. The 240 perimeter vertical steel columns were designed to support five times the weight they actually held up. The 47 massive vertical steel columns in the center core were designed to hold up three times the weight they actually supported. Those lower floors could have had 100 floors drop on them and they would not collapse. The floors dropped on them would just stop and fall off to the side.
Oct 19, 2015 18:43:11 #
(Main)
JMHO wrote:
No, as usual it was your normal bullshit response...nothing new.
We probably don't agree on anything except maybe that Hillary is a lying bitch who should be in prison with her lying husband for the rest of their miserable lives.
Oct 19, 2015 17:24:22 #
Oct 19, 2015 17:00:20 #
(Main)
JMHO wrote:
I am a Tea Party Member, and you don't know what you're talking about. Try this, for a starter...it is pretty accurate.
http://www.beaufortobserver.net/Articles-c-2011-07-29-254740.112112-The-Tea-PartyIts-origins-and-what-it-stands-for.html
http://www.beaufortobserver.net/Articles-c-2011-07-29-254740.112112-The-Tea-PartyIts-origins-and-what-it-stands-for.html
Okay, now I get it. Tea Partiers are religious fundamentalists who most likely want to kill all Arabs and Muslims while avoiding paying any taxes to support the infrastructure of America or the wars they support.
Oct 19, 2015 16:29:54 #
(Main)
JMHO wrote:
You were doing fine until this absolute stupid comment.
Vehoe refuses to define the tea party. Maybe you can tell readers what the tea party stands for?
Oct 19, 2015 16:06:58 #
(Main)
Ve'hoe wrote:
No,,,, the tea party is not.........and you?????
How do you define the tea party?
Oct 19, 2015 15:39:42 #
(Main)
Ve'hoe wrote:
the tea party is attempting to remedy that,,,, it is not yet a leg of the republican party platform
The tea party is a bunch of fat old right-wingers who don't think the republican party is far enough right.
Oct 19, 2015 15:08:12 #
(Main)
Ve'hoe wrote:
Lying is a leg of the Democrat platform.....
Lying is the main character trait of both parties.
Oct 19, 2015 14:57:55 #
(Main)
Gener wrote:
The official story is "we were playing war ga... (show quote)
The war games were designed to confuse the FAA controllers. There were so many unidentified aircraft in the air it was very difficult for the alleged hijacked planes to be tracked. General Richard Myers and General Eberhardt at Norad claimed the war games actually helped on 9/11 by having so many planes in the air and at a heightened readiness. Do they think we are idiots? What difference did having the planes in the air and at a heightened readiness make if they did nothing?
Oct 19, 2015 14:49:18 #
(Main)
America Only wrote:
You are not accurate at all. There is plenty of concrete all throughout the rubble. No explosive devices had been used on the twin towers! You discount the facts rapidly with wild conjecture.
Anyone who can see will note there are no large pieces of concrete in any of the debris photos. There were 110 floors of 4" thick concrete. What happened to all that concrete?
Watch this video to see what happened to it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUDoGuLpirc