Massive Amounts of Evidence Will Be Presented’ on Jan. 6: Trump

BY JACK PHILLIPS January 1, 2021 Updated: January 1, 2021 biggersmaller Print

President Donald Trump announced that evidence of alleged election fraud will be presented on Jan. 6 during the Joint Session of Congress.

“Massive amounts of evidence will be presented on the 6th. We won, BIG!” Trump wrote on Twitter.

It comes as Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and about 40 House GOP lawmakers have announced they would challenge the Electoral College votes during the Jan. 6 Joint Session of Congress due to alleged fraud and irregularities during the Nov. 3 election. The challenge could lead to several hours of debate during the session.

The challenge is supported by Trump, who, in recent weeks, has met with House lawmakers, including its chief sponsor Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), at the White House.

Trump’s adviser, Jason Miller, told Newsmax earlier in the week that the team is aiming to present more evidence.

“We will have a chance in front of the American people, next week to present these cases, all these evidences of fraud,” Miller said, pointing to a lawsuit filed by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) against Vice President Mike Pence earlier this week to prevent him from confirming Joe Biden’s electoral victory. Pence’s lawyers with the Department of Justice later said Pence isn’t the person who should face a lawsuit, arguing that Gohmert should have sued Congress.

If Hawley and the other lawmakers challenge a state’s Electoral College votes, Trump’s campaign will make their presentation. The challenge requires a senator and a representative to carry out.

Miller pointed to law changes regarding mail-in ballots in Wisconsin and other states, “suitcases of ballots” in Georgia being wheeled out late at night on Nov. 3 in Atlanta’s State Farm Center, and officials in Michigan and Arizona allegedly blocking them from inspecting voting systems. State election officials in those states have denied claims from the Trump team and third-parties about voter fraud and irregularities.

“These are the specific types of evidence we want to present to the American people on the national stage and not allow local politicians to sweep it under the rug,” Miller said on the program.

Miller and Trump did not elaborate on how they would present that information to Congress, or whether they will be able to do so.

The president, in making his announcement for Jan. 6, retweeted Hawley’s post where he said that millions of Americans are “concerned about election integrity” and “deserve to be heard.”

“Somebody has to stand up. 74 million Americans are not going to be told their voices don’t matter,” Hawley also stated.

Trump has also suggested that his supporters attend rallies and events on Jan. 6, including one in Washington D.C. at 11 a.m.

==================
Shameless SC who would not look into these. A gross violations of the peoples' constitutional rights. A gross violations of protecting the integrity of the election. A gross violations of the duties they are required to serve. A gross denial of the rights of the constitutional rights of the American people.

I hope VP Pence who is in charged on Jan 6th will act according to the laws of the constitution vested on him. The frauds were overwhelming, and there is no doubt it went beyond the claimed number of Biden's stolen victory.

Anybody in Congress who continue denying these violations has no duty to continue its duty to be in Congress. This is the most important part of our history cause this resolution if not followed accordingly, will result to the demise of our constitutional-republic.

Go back and find my Topics and posts that Pence is a deep deep state operative and he will betray Trump at the 11th hour.

Those are my precise words in The Topic and the posts

So strange how things come full circle eh?


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


December 26, 2020
It's for Mike Pence to Judge whether a Presidential Election Was Held at All
By: Ted Noel

On January 6, a joint session of Congress will open with Vice President Pence presiding as president of the Senate. His power will be plenary and unappealable. You heard that right. As president of the Senate, every objection comes directly to him, and he can rule any objection "out of order" or "denied." His task will be to fulfill his oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and to ensure that the laws be faithfully executed. This is a high standard of performance, and V.P. Pence will have two choices. He can roll over on "certified" electors, or he can uphold the law.

Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution gives state legislatures "plenary authority" as enunciated in Bush v. Gore. This is key, since the counting of votes is discussed in Article II, the 12th Amendment, and 3 USC 15. To this we must add the history of counting and objections recounted by Alexander Macris (here and here). Put bluntly, it's as clear as mud. Add to that the fact that the contested states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, New Mexico, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin have sent dueling slates of electors to D.C. This means that the V.P. has to decide how he will handle the situation when two sealed envelopes are handed to him from any of those states.

Macris points out that in 1800, even with constitutional deficiencies in Georgia, Thomas Jefferson blithely counted defective electoral votes from Georgia, effectively voting himself into the presidency. This demonstrates that the president of the Senate is the final authority on any motions or objections during the vote-counting. There is no appeal. That doesn't mean there won't be any outrage. Whatever Pence does, people will be angry. But what does the law demand?

Seven contested states clearly violated their own laws. Rather than list the facts, which have been detailed in multiple articles, we must consider the following:

An election is a process of counting votes for candidates. Only valid, lawful votes may be counted. A valid lawful vote is:

Cast by an eligible, properly registered elector as prescribed by laws enacted by the state Legislature.

Cast in a timely manner, as prescribed by laws enacted by the state Legislature.

Cast in a proper form as prescribed by laws enacted by the state Legislature.
Any process that does not follow these rules is not an election. Anything that proceeds from it cannot be regarded as having any lawful import.

Most commentators suggest that a process of collecting pieces of paper with marks on them is an election regardless of errors, omissions, and even deliberate malfeasance. This is a mistake. Imagine a golf tournament where every bad shot by one player gets a do-over, but the competing player has to follow USGA rules in detail. One player gets to drop freely out of hazards, but the other has to tackle every embedded ball as it lies. The result is a travesty.

The same thing applies to elections. If there are a handful of improper votes, we can suggest that there was in fact an election, perhaps tainted, but the election wasn't materially harmed. But when the people charged with managing the election decide to ignore the law, whatever process they supervise is not the process defined by the law. Therefore, it is not an election.

This leaves V.P. Pence with a dilemma. He is a gentleman who regards our governmental traditions with a degree of reverence, so he will be reluctant to take any bold action. But as an honorable man, faced with massive illegality, he must act to protect the law. Consider how things might go down as the two closed envelopes from Georgia are handed to the V.P. Rather than opening them, he says:

In my hand are envelopes purporting to contain electoral votes from Georgia. They are competing for consideration, so it is essential that I consider the law that governs this. That law, according to the Legislature of Georgia and Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution is the Georgia statute that includes procedures for signature-matching on absentee ballots, a requirement that all absentee ballots be first requested by a legitimate voter, and that election monitors be meaningfully present at all times while votes were counted.

The Georgia secretary of state, who is not empowered by the U.S. Constitution to make changes to election law, entered into a Consent Decree that gutted these protections enacted by the Georgia Legislature. The processes that he prescribed and were ultimately followed were manifestly contrary to that law. Further, the State of Georgia, in unprecedented concert with other states, suspended counting of ballots in the middle of the night, covering its conspiracy with a false claim of a "water main break." We now know from surveillance video that many thousands of "ballots" were counted unlawfully in the absence of legally required observers.

Finally, the State of Georgia, under the authority of secretary of state Brad Raffensperger, a non-legislative actor, used fatally flawed Dominion voting machines that have been demonstrated to be unreliable. In testing, the error rate of Dominion machines has exceeded 60%, far in excess of legal limits. They are designed to facilitate fraud without creating the legally required paper trail. This alone is far more than enough to swing an election.

Since the state of Georgia has failed to follow the election law established by its legislature under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, it has not conducted a presidential election. Therefore, no "presidential electors" were appointed in Georgia. Further, "electors" "certified" by non-legislative actors pursuant to this process are in fact not "presidential electors." The competing slate of "electors" is similarly deficient, having not been elected through a presidential election.

Therefore, the chair rules that Georgia has not transmitted the votes of any presidential electors to this body. Georgia presents zero votes for Donald Trump and zero votes for Joseph Biden.

The central point is that the VP, as the presiding officer and final authority, has the unquestionable authority to declare that the states in question have not conducted presidential elections. There will be wailing and gnashing of teeth, but no one has the authority to override his decision.

The statement says nothing about who might or might not have "won" the contested states. Rather, by not following their own laws, as enacted by their own legislatures, they have violated Article II, Section 1. Thus, they have not conducted an election, and their results are void.

If the votes of all seven contested states are registered as zero, President Trump will have 232 votes, and Joe Biden will have 222. The 12th Amendment says, "[T]he votes shall then be counted[.] ... The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President[.]"

In plain language, Donald Trump will be re-elected, since he has a majority of the actual electoral votes. There will be no need to involve the House of Representatives to resolve a contingent election.

Richard Nixon chose not to contest the 1960 election because he felt that winning that way would lead to an ungovernable country. If V.P. Pence does this, that same argument might be made. But is the country governable even now? Blue states such as California, Oregon, Washington, New York, New Jersey, and Michigan are already operating in an openly lawless manner with their "emergency" "COVID-related" restrictions. Their denial of the civil rights of law-abiding citizens is horrific. Their refusal to do basic policing and law enforcement is a recipe for open war. How much worse would things be if the V.P. lived up to his oath and upheld the law?

Ted Noel posts on multiple sites as DoctorTed and @vidzette.

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/12/its_for_mike_pence_to_judge_whether_a_presidential_election_was_held_at_all.html#ixzz6hypfnM00
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

You're right, it's not rocket science or secret cabal, you just have to know how to read, read everything and interpret it. You need to read the following: "in the way its legislature provides." When the legislature casts a vote against the state executive, it is a sign that the provisions of the legislature have not been followed.
The Executive has certified elections that have been protested for fraud.
Thus, when the Vice President receives two certifications from the same state, he can determine that neither of the two is accepted. As long as it receives the support of a representative and a senator, it is very possible that the votes of the 7 states in question will not be accepted and the vote will go to the House and Senate.

Watching low intellect republicans fight with each other is great amusement, especially when idiots like gohmert and pence go at it.

They are to be commended, because their silliness and stupidity will damage the conservative and republican brands, and the campaigns for 2022 mid terms are already underway.

Throw the bums out, and that means all conservatives and most republicans



https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/531823-gop-lawmakers-sue-pence-in-bid-to-overturn-biden-win

Given the importance of the Trump election lawsuits, why do they seem to be filled with basic legal errors and even simple spelling and typographical mistakes? Is the Trump legal team unable to afford to use Microsoft spelling/grammar-checker?
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/03/sidney-powell-trump-election-lawsuit-442472

John Nurse
·
December 20
Keen observer of American culture and politics for 40 years.
There is a pretty simple answer to that.

Before the election, and for a short time afterwards, the Trump campaign was represented by highly regarded “white shoe" law firms such as Jones Day, Snell & Wilmer, and Porter Wright Morris & Arthur. I can assure you their documents would have been of the highest quality.

By November 13, all these firms had removed themselves from the Trump campaign, concerned that the increasingly crazy demands of the campaign would damage their reputations.

They were replaced by Trump's Elite Strike Force;


Rudy Giuliani: trafficker in Russian disinformation conspiracy theories.

Sidney Powell: trafficker in Q-Anon conspiracy theories.

Joe DiGenova and Victoria Toensing: Fox News lawyers to indicted Ukrainian oligarch Dmytro Firtash.

Jenna Ellis: Fox News lawyer and former traffic court attorney.

They were assisted by the likes of:

L. Lin Wood, celebrity defense lawyer and armed revolt proponent.

John Eastman, who famously claimed that Kamala Harris could not be Vice President because her parents were immigrants.

So this was the rag-tag band of conspiracy theorists and devoted Trumpists, selected for their religious zeal rather than any real legal competence.

Their documents were cobbled together from a disparate array of conspiracy theories and pseudo statistics flowing in from an army of MAGA fanatics.

With star witnesses like the always lovely and polished Melissa Carrone:


… it's no wonder the judges could barely stop laughing long enough to kick the strike force out of court.