One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Hogback
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 26 next>>
Dec 24, 2017 23:58:47   #
DJRich wrote:
Indeed, trump is terrified of North Korea, scared spitless about the potential of Iranian nukes, and is demanding that congress enables him to build more nukes.

So what will trump do about his buddy pooty building up the russian arsenal?

Will trump have the guts to tell pooty to cease and desist? And what will trump do when pooty says NO! ?

Or what if pooty decides to give weapons or technology to his good buddy Assad?



http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/russia-expands-nuclear-warheads/2017/12/17/id/832209/
Indeed, trump is terrified of North Korea, scared ... (show quote)


How many nukes does a country need? How many stock piles is enough? How many times can you kill a person? Having a bunch of nukes after awhile is no longer a deterrent it becomes an expense.
Go to
Dec 24, 2017 23:52:24   #
proud republican wrote:
What????????????? Who lives until 70???????......
What????????????? img src="https://static.onepoli... (show quote)


You start drawing at 62 or something like that, but if everybody died before they were eligible then there is no problem. I'm 66 but I never put my faith and confidence in the govt. social system.
Go to
Dec 24, 2017 18:49:41   #
Pennylynn wrote:
Why is it that people seem to think that our President is solely responsible for our budget? And where was this complaint when other presidents vacationed in their favorite spots for the holiday? Seems to me that we have had at least one president who spent millions vacationing in Hawaii, another in Texas and still others who spent their time in Europe. So, all of a sudden...
some people have their panties in a bunch? And seniors on SS.... no one spoke out when one president robbed the SS fund to shove an unconstitutional tax down the throats of Americans.



Why is it that people seem to think that our Presi... (show quote)


Why is it in the greatest nation in the world with the largest economy, Somebody lives until they are 70 and is only depending on their social security to live on? Life is full of decisions. Just because the nation is so accommodating is no reason to plan for it. Social Security was only meant to be a supplement. But if you really think about it social security is actually in constitutional.
Go to
Dec 21, 2017 14:57:16   #
alabuck wrote:
President Trump was so excited about passing his 1st major piece of legislation, Wednesday, that he blurted out that the GOPTP had misrepresented the entire bill, handing Democrats some potentially troublesome talking points for the 2018 midterm elections.

Speaking at the White House just before the House prepared to sign off on the tax-cuts bill one last time, Trumpet reveled extensively in his win before turning things over to V.P. Pence, to continually heap praise upon him for a few minutes more. It was a thoroughly unique spectacle, even as victory dances and Trump Cabinet meetings go.

But, along the way, Trumpet basically admitted that the GOP's talking points on the bill weren't exactly honest in 2 major ways. While talking about the corporate tax rate being cut from 35 percent to 21 percent, Trumpet said, “That's probably the biggest factor in our plan.”

The problem? Republicans have been selling this legislation as a middle-class tax cut, first and foremost. A sampling:

* “The entire purpose of this is to lower middle class taxes.” — House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.)
* “Primarily, and priority number one, is middle-class Americans.” — White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders
* “The theme behind this bill is to get middle-class tax relief for most people in the middle class.” — Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Fox News on Tuesday

And, polls show Republicans have bought into this, with around 6 in 10 believing the bill favored the middle class over the wealthy — despite the biggest portions of the cuts going to the wealthy and the corporate cuts being permanent (unlike the personal tax cuts). Is it possible they think corporate tax cuts will spur the economy and eventually benefit the middle class first? Sure. But wary of it looking like a giveaway to the wealthy and to corporations, Republicans have avoided even this kind of “trickle-down” argument. They've been arguing that the middle-class tax cuts are what this bill was all about, and Trumpet just said that's not actually the main feature.

Trumpet's 2nd admission was about the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate being repealed in the bill. Apparently, eager to argue that this constituted his having cut taxes AND slain Obamacare in one fell swoop (after Congress came up short on Obamacare this year), he argued that repealing the individual mandate was basically the same as repealing Obamacare. BUT, he said, he told Republicans not to talk about that. Trumpet said he told allies to, "... be quiet with the fake news media because I don't want them talking too much about it."

“Now that it's approved, I can say that,” Trumpet continued. So, now Democrats have clips of the president talking about how this was really more about the corporate tax cuts all along and saying he just undid Obamacare — both of which weren't part of the argument the GOPTPers always presented when arguing for the bill. They also happen to be pretty good talking points, with the latter being something Democrats can credibly use to force Republicans into ownership of whatever happens with the American health-care system from now on.

So stupid of Trumpet to say. Obamacare is still the law of the land, but now Democrats have a sound bite to use against the GOP for a system they still hate. Stupid, so, so stupid. Trump's desire to claim dual victories and strategic dominance appear to have gotten the better of him ... again.
President Trump was so excited about passing his 1... (show quote)


Well the Dems had 8 long, long, arduous years and did nothing except tax American companies out of business and now you don't like what Trump does. You had better get used to it because YOU LOST!!!
Go to
Dec 21, 2017 14:54:11   #
Glaucon wrote:
The president is about to "give us" a tax cut for Christmas . To pay for it, he has had to add ANOTHER one and a half TRILLION to our national credit card that some future generations will pay or America will go bankrupt faster than Trump University or one of Trump's hotels. At last, the wealthy are getting a break and some may trickle down to we common people, I think we should all send our president a thank you note and the liberals need to quit bitching .


That's rich! Obama actually doubled our debt and gave the money away to make the US a third world country and now you are crying about 1 and a half trillion in debt. He sent billions strapped down to pallets to Iran to jump start their nuclear program and you fake a concern over 1& 1/2 billion to prime the pump. Do you care that he corrupted the FBI, CIA, Justice Dept, IRS and Congress? He bad mouthed America all over the world. He lost the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and his Sec of State was selling favors from the State Department. That doesn't bother you at all? I'm glad he left before he finished destroying America and I'm sooo glad Hillary did not get elected because if she was in office we would never know all of the crooked illegal stuff Obama and Hillary did.
Go to
Nov 13, 2017 23:19:33   #
E wrote:
Thanks for posting. It is always interesting when facts get in the way of bull s...


I find it very interesting when people (liberals) just respond with bull s--- without any facts at all. What did I post that was wrong? Bull s--- can't stand up to FACTS!!
Go to
Nov 13, 2017 22:53:20   #
Nuclearian wrote:
Liberals from Hollywood to the top of the Democratic Party have been accused of groping, sexual harassment, and rape. Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore has been accused of improper sexual conduct with a teenager in a suspiciously-timed liberal media hit piece. Not only does Bill Maher think that these things are more or less equal, he believes liberals deserve the moral high ground. According to the smarmy leftist weasel, liberals put their rapists in jail while conservatives elect them to office.

On Friday’s Real Time, Maher was of course all over the Roy Moore story because it is a faint blip on the radar screen that is otherwise filled with liberal rape allegations.

“But you know, I have to say, I’ve got to defend my tribe here a little bit, liberals versus conservatives. Because certainly sexual harassment is absolutely the one thing we see now is totally truly bipartisan, maybe the last thing that is. But no liberal defended Harvey Weinstein or Kevin Spacey, who might be going to jail,” said Maher.

Is he kidding? Not only did liberals cover up the sex crimes of these two Hollywood heavy weights, they’ve gone out of their way to excuse and minimize the scope of their assaults. The liberal media has been trying to blame President Trump for the liberal Hollywood sexual assault epidemic.

Slate magazine ran a piece defending Spacey’s pedophilia where they literally said what did was not so bad. Democratic US Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson blamed Weinstein’s victims for being sluts and whores. So yeah, liberals have definitely defended these two liberal rapists.

What Maher is referring to is that many Republicans have said that if the allegations against Moore are true he should step down, but that he shouldn’t be convicted of this without any credible evidence. Weinstein, Spacey, and hundreds of other Hollywood scumbags have pretty much admitted to the things they are accused of. Roy Moore has vehemently denied he did anything wrong.

“Louis C.K., we hear this week, did horrific things. Compare that to Trump and Roy Moore. We arrest our alleged rapists. They elect them. I mean, there’s a pig in the White House,” said Maher.

Really? Liberals arrest their rapists? Is Bill Clinton in jail? How about his wife the womens advocate Hillary? Ted Kennedy (the lion of the senate) straight up murdered a woman and he never went to jail, but did have a long political career. Also, I don’t know if Maher noticed, but Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacey, Charlie Sheen, Richard Dreyfus, Louis CK, Brett Ratner, George Takei, and every other liberal Hollywood pervert have not been arrested or charged with anything.

Somehow, Maher managed to squeeze even more bullshit in his statement by implying that President Trump is on the same level as the entertainment industry sneeze bags. The only thing Trump is guilty of is bragging about consensual activity with unnamed non-specific women. The rest of these pervs raped and assaulted real women with names and proof. So I guess Trump is a sex offender wanna be.

Not only is Maher lying when he says liberals arrest their own for sexual assault, he’s doing exactly what he accuses conservatives of doing. He’s excusing and dismissing the rapes and assaults by his fellow liberals by trying to make it seem like conservatives have the same issues, which they don’t.

It doesn’t take a psychologist to recognize Maher is covering up his own demons here. I’ll bet within a week, allegations will come out that Maher did all kinds of horrible things to women and suddenly he won’t be all that interested in arresting perverts.
Liberals from Hollywood to the top of the Democrat... (show quote)



Here's a short list for starters;
Information compiled from the Washington Post, “Congressional Sex Scandals in History,” and other sources.

10. Sen. Daniel Inouye. The 82-year-old Hawaii Democrat was accused in the 1990s by numerous women of
sexual harassment. Democrats cast doubt on the allegations and the Senate Ethics Committee dropped its investigation.

9. Former Rep. Gus Savage. The Illinois Democrat was accused of fondling a Peace Corps volunteer in 1989
while on a trip to Africa. The House Ethics Committee decided against disciplinary action in 1990.

8. Rep. Barney Frank. The outspoken Massachusetts Democrat hired a male prostitute who ran a prostitution service from Frank’s residence in the 1980s. Only two Democrats in the House of Representatives voted to censure him in 1990.

7. Former Sen. Brock Adams. The late Washington Democrat was forced to stop campaigning after numerous accusations of drugging, assault and rape, the first surfacing in 1988.

6. Former Rep. Fred Richmond. This New York Democrat was arrested in 1978 for soliciting sex from a 16-year-old. He remained in Congress and won re-election—before eventually resigning in 1982 after pleading guilty to tax evasion and drug possession.

5. Former Rep. John Young. The late Texas Democrat increased the salary of a staffer after she gave in to his sexual advances. The congressman won re-election in 1976 but lost two years later.

4. Former Rep. Wayne Hays. The late Ohio Democrat hired an unqualified secretary reportedly for sexual acts. Although he resigned from Congress, the Democratic House leadership stalled in removing him from the Administration Committee in 1976.

3. Former Rep. Gerry Studds. He was censured for sexual relationship with underage male page in 1983. Massachusetts voters returned him to office for six more terms.

2. Former Rep. Mel Reynolds. The Illinois Democrat was convicted of 12 counts of sexual assault with a 16-year-old. President Bill Clinton pardoned him before leaving office.

1. Sen. Teddy Kennedy. The liberal Massachusetts senator testified in defense of nephew accused of rape, invoking his family history to win over the jury in 1991.

Pelosi voted three times to make a convicted page sexual predator, former Congressman Gerry Studds (D-Mass.), chair of a congressional committee. In 1990, Pelosi voted against censuring Barney Frank for having his live-in boyfriend run a prostitution ring from Frank's apartment.
Pelosi raised no objections when Clinton pardoned Democrat Congressman Mel Reynolds (Ill.) who had been convicted of felonies for having had sex with a 16-year-old campaign worker. The historic Nancy Pelosi is an authentic representative of San Francisco liberal values and hardly has the record to lecture anyone on cleaning up the Congress.
Go to
Nov 12, 2017 21:58:26   #
Straight shooter wrote:
Does it bother anyone to see our president kissing up, groveling to and bending over and grabbing his ankles for Putin, a dictator and ex KBG agent? Let's us have some respect for America.


Doesn't it bother you when Obama bowed to King King Abdullah? He bowed very low. In fact, Obama put every other country over America.
Go to
Nov 10, 2017 19:39:28   #
Kevyn wrote:
For those of you who continue to support trump if he is convicted of crimes against our nation will you continue to support him? What level of evidence will you require to be convinced of his guilt?


What level of evidence do you guys have for impeachment? You guys were talking impeachment ever since he won the election and now we're a year into his administration and no impeachment yet!
Go to
Oct 30, 2017 20:02:14   #
DJRich wrote:
For 8 years, the only thing that came out of most republican politicians, candidates, rightwing media and financial "experts" on fox, is that the debt is crushing the economy, and future generations will be near poverty as they struggle to pay on the interest on the current debt.

Now trump has convinced them that the debt, and the deficit, really doesn't matter when tax cuts are what they really want.

Makes perfect conservative economic sense, can't pay your debt now without borrowing, so reduce your income and borrow even more.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/gop-obama-debt_us_59f393a8e4b077d8dfc9adff?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
For 8 years, the only thing that came out of most ... (show quote)


What people fail to understand is, that by allowing people to keep more of their money they will spend it or invest it thus paying more taxes on the goods and services. If the super rich are allowed to keep more of their money they will invest it thus creating more jobs which will, in turn, create more employed taxpayers! More taxpayers mean more revenue. Whenever it has been tried in the past it brought in more cash to the national treasury. It was tried in recent memory by Reagan, Kenedy and now I hope by Trump. Every time the Democrats tried to stop it in order to play to their special interest groups.

If the Democrats are so worried about the US debt then why do they want open borders which are also draining our resources?
Go to
Oct 27, 2017 21:04:43   #
It must be lonely at the top! I kinda think none of these guys voted for him either!
Go to
Oct 27, 2017 20:05:57   #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Trump's personal ratings have deteriorated and his job rating has sunk to a new low! Down to 38% approval rating!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fox-news-poll-storms-erode-trumps-ratings/ar-AAu3hCl?li=BBnb7Kz

https://andersonrobbins.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/102517_complete_topline_trumpjob_healthcare_taxes.pdf


This is the same pollster who said beyond any doubt that Hillary would win by a landslide!
Go to
Oct 22, 2017 23:49:12   #
iFrank wrote:
I wonder why other POTUS's didn't do this long ago,what were they hiding. Were they compensated for not declassifying the JFK documents. Go Trump, thats the "Ol pepper" leave no stone unturned.


Trump said back in the campaign that his supporters are avid readers of the "National Enquirer" so I guess they will love it!
Go to
Oct 20, 2017 23:53:17   #
proud republican wrote:
Remember this name,,,,She is a shame of Democratic party.....Politisizing the death of an American soldier just to make a point of how much she hates our President!!


She looks like a rodeo clown!
Go to
Oct 20, 2017 23:52:16   #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Very few of Americans believe Trump's tenure will be positive! His actions alone speak louder than words!

http://maristpoll.marist.edu/1019-president-trump-legacy-may-be-as-one-of-the-worst-u-s-presidents/


Where did the 40% figure come from? Are these the same people who said Hillary would win by a landslide?
Where's the crime? Usually, after there is a crime then the investigation ensues. How about Muller's role in the Russia uranium debacle?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 26 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.