The problem you got is that the modern Liberalism is not Liberal any more.

The progressive Liberals are socialists and communists. They've switched the definitions of the words.

The original Liberals were our forefathers who believed that the common man could rule himself.

The he didn't need an aristocracy, nobles or professional politicians making decisions for the common man.

That's why our forefathers fought for a limited government.

Socialism believes in an all powerful government where the state is sovereign.

Our Democratic-Constitutional-Republic, is based on the principle that it is the individual that is sovereign.

All power of the state, originates from the citizen.

That is not the position of the modern day liberal.

If Trump got, "Punked," then why is it Kim that's offering to restart the talks, after Trump put an end to them..............................?

The purpose of the Census is for representation.

Illegal aliens are not citizens and they have no right to be represented.

They are dealt with by the laws passed by duly elected representatives, voted into office by the citizens.

They have their own country and that's who represents them.

So it's worse than I thought.

It's not just his ignorance, but, like a disease he passed it on to the next generation.

And even worse than that, he's proud of it.

The only two major promises he hasn't kept yet, is getting rid of ObamaCare and completing the border wall.

For that he needs congress and so far we've given him a terrible congress to work with.

But! The 2018 elections are coming up and it will be up to us to give him the congress he needs.

First throw out all the Democrats!

Second, throw out all the RINOs.

Then work with what's left.

If the politicians still don't get it, repeat steps 1 and 2 in 2020!

You strike me as the kind of guy that has no idea of what's going on around him.

ROTTEN TO THE CORE: Here’s The Best Video Explaining Common Core
http://victoriajackson.com/10763/best-video-explaining-common-core#b89vbd7x1A1IUlU5.99

Brilliant anti-Common Core Speech by Dr. Duke Pesta
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Si-kx5-MKSE

Communism survivor: Common Core looks scary familiar
http://www.wnd.com/2014/12/communism-survivor-common-core-looks-scary-familiar/#FqDSegT5eJx7yVQG.99

Common Core: How We Got Here and Where We Are Headed
http://www.heritage.org/events/2014/11/common-core

Top Ten Things Parents Hate About Common Core
http://thefederalist.com/2014/09/24/top-ten-things-parents-hate-about-common-core/

Yes, what exists is an undermining and ignoring of our Constitution.

The solution is not, to continue to undermine and ignore the Constitution.

Corporate/Government collusion = Socialism!

Would a rose by any other name still smell as sweet?

And you believe her?

Just what about Hillary is Capitalistic?

Bernie was popular with the Democrats, because Hillary was such a piss poor candidate.
They only had two choices.

Never-the-less, it's the businessman that won over both of them!

You describe socialism, then call it something else. It's still socialism and carries all the ills of it.

Capitalism requires a limited government and a limited government can't collude with big business, it isn't big enough to choose winners and losers..

Under capitalism the individual has a right to make their own contract with whom they choose to do so.

You don't listen worth a crap....Do you?

First off a private entity is deliberately creating a shortfall of doctors, for the expressed purpose of keeping their salaries much higher than they would be otherwise.

Doctors don't compete for patients, because there aren’t enough doctors. Add more doctors and they would have to compete with each other.

This kind of control is socialist, NOT, Capitalist.

Each state won't allow insurance policies to be bought across state lines. Thereby stopping any competition from across the country. Every citizen is a captive audience of their state, subject to the mercy of the few insurance companies in their state and insurance companies generally have no mercy. But the citizen, by law, cannot seek relief from any other insurance company outside their state. Even if they find a better one.
This allows insurance companies to make much more profit than they would have and a percentage of that profit is used to fund political campaigns, to elect those people that will carry out the insurance companies demands and protect their interests.

This collaboration between government and special interest is a function of socialism, NOT Capitalism!

Big Parma is another monster that works with government protecting the outrageous prices they charge.

An example is when people figured out that they could by cheaper drugs across the border in both Mexico and Canada, there was no law against it.

This caused American Pharma a problem, as they can't charge outrageous prices if the average American citizen has a cheaper source of supply.

So the government claimed that Canadian drugs were inferior to American drugs and for safety reasons outlawed buying and bringing in foreign drugs across the border, even for your own personal use.

So Canadian health care is superior to America health care, but, Canadian drugs, which their own people use, is so inferior to American drugs and the American people, that they have to be outlawed.

This is socialism, Not Capitalism!

US eases its restrictions on prescription drugs from Canada
The US government has eased restrictions on its citizens importing prescribed drugs from outside the country, after intensive lobbying by patients' groups demanding access to lower cost prescription drugs from Canada.

Although it is still illegal generally to import drugs from Canada or any other country into the United States, US consumers who buy small quantities of prescription drugs in person, through the internet or by mail order, for their personal use will no longer have to worry about their drugs being seized at the border.
http://www.bmj.com/content/333/7573/824.4

As to the MRI's, why don't you look up how many of those machines Canada has.

Then look up the number of those machines that are in the United Sates.

If you only have a few machines, then you don't have that much to pay off. But, since you only have a few machines, there will be long lines and wait periods to use them.

On the other hand, if you have a lot of machines, then that's a lot to have to pay for, but, there won't be as many people waiting to use them and the wait periods will be much shorter.

And while your at it, notice that the number of machines and hospitals were ordered and paid for during the time America was still mostly Capitalist.

As the country goes socialist, those kinds of perks and options will fall away.

That's what the death panels are for!

To decide who gets to stand in line and who gets to go home and take the pills till they're gone.

What's driving up America's health care are the things you don't deal with and have no clue about.

Socialized medicine would only cast those problems in concrete and from there they'd expand into infinity.

Number one:
A private entity, the American Medical Association, (AMA) controls how many doctors licenses that are awarded every year. In 2012, they only issued twelve new Dr. licenses, nation wide, and that did not cover the number of doctors that retired that year.
They deliberately keep the number of doctors available, below the level of need as a way to keep the doctors salaries above what they should be. Any time there's a shortage of anything, what happens to prices?
They say that that's to protect the investment of their members, because their education is so expensive and they have to pay off that debt.
They don't say a word about the doctors who also paid for their education and did their intern-ship, but, are denied the right to get their doctors licenses. So how do they pay off their debt?

Number Two:
The secret to Capitalism is competition. Adam Smith talked about the invisible hand of competition...NOT the invisible hand of profit!
In our Constitution we have a commerce clause that was designed to not let states withhold commerce from other states. Yet every state has forbidden insurance policies from being sold across state lines. Thereby holding every state's citizens as a captive consumer in their own state.


Commerce Clause, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution

The Commerce Clause refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress the power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes.”

The Constitution enumerates certain powers for the federal government. The Tenth Amendment provides that any powers that are not delegated to Congress by the Constitution are reserved for the states. Congress has often used the Commerce Clause to justify exercising legislative power over the activities of states and their citizens, leading to significant and ongoing controversy regarding the balance of power between the federal government and the states.

The Commerce Clause has historically been viewed as both a grant of congressional authority and as a restriction on the regulatory authority of the States. The “dormant” Commerce Clause refers to the prohibition, implicit in the Commerce Clause, against states passing legislation that discriminates against or excessively burdens interstate commerce. Of particular importance here, is the prevention of protectionist state policies that favor state citizens or businesses at the expense of non-citizens conducting business within that state. In West Lynn Creamery, for example, the Supreme Court found that a Massachusetts state tax on milk products, in conjunction with a subsidy program for in-state dairy farmers, functionally violated the dormant commerce clause as it impeded interstate commercial activity by discriminating against non-Massachusetts citizens.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/commerce_clause


And last, but not least, Companies and corporations are using are patent laws in a complete opposite manner in which they were designed.
The purpose of the patent laws was to increase the availability of products to the public, while protecting the inventors.

So what has big pharma done?
They invent a medicine and put it on the market. This medicine saves lives. Then what?
They claim that they spent too much on research and have too charge thousands of dollars for one pill.
People can't afford it, so the company takes it off the market.

People start dying, the company refuses to make it, profit margins aren’t high enough.

Yet they refuse to release the formula to another company that is willing to make it with the lower profit margin, while paying a royalty to the original company so they can recoup their losses.

So the company claims that it can't afford to make some money on it's investment, but, can afford to eat the entire cost of their very costly research. How is that? How is it that you can afford to lose everything, but, can't afford to get it back, however slowly.

Isn't it better to get something, rather than nothing?

But, that doesn't happen, does it. No! What happens is that they convince the government to subsidize their costly research.

So the companies get rewarded for extravagance, because the more money they waste, the more subsidizing they'll get. Why would they change?

Your socialized medicine does not address any of the reasons that our health care is getting out of control.

It actually embraces and casts them in stone, forever perpetrating the ills forever.
As costs and profits sky-rocket, people will be denied what they need.

Why do you think that all socialized medicine have death panels in one form or another. They don't call them death panels, but, their functions are always the same.

If the panels are always going to say yes, then why do you need them.

You wouldn't!

You create these panels so that you can say, no!

The only thing left is the excuses you use, which is the other purpose of the death panels.

You didn't read the article, did you?

You're a pretty heartless guy to make light of what happened.

It really doesn't matter how many people die, as long as their story doesn't contradict your predrawn conclusions.


SAD: Dying Teen’s Final Wish Exposes PURE EVIL of Socialized Medicine
Laura was diagnosed with Leukemia when she was just 13 years old. She had been fighting the cancer for five years when she finally succumbed to the illness.

However, Laura didn’t need to die. Doctors applied for Laura to undergo an operation that would save her life. One of the top-doctors in Canada offered to perform a live-saving stem-cell transfer.

The doctor told Laura that there were over 30 bone-marrow matches and that she would be able to live, once the country approved her operation – but they never did.

For seven months Laura was forced to undergo aggressive chemo therapy while sitting on a wait list. She eventually died despite having a willing surgeon and many matches – because the socialized system did not allocate enough money for the procedure.

Laura made a vow to prevent any other Canadian from suffering the same fate as her. And she made a video in her dying breath to call for help. Now, Laura’s mother is taking on the teens dying wish, to fight for a better healthcare system.

Thousands of Canadians die each year while on wait lists, and the time spent on a wait list has recently doubled from six months to twelve. To accommodate the lack of resources the government has been paying for patients to receive treatment in America.

The problem of long waits is occurring all across Canada for essential and non-essential surgeries. Socialized medicine has completely failed in Canada. Service has diminished as once-friendly doctors are overburdened by government imposed quotas, and rage inducing wait lists.
http://www.teaparty.org/sad-dying-teens-final-wish-exposes-pure-evil-socialized-medicine-234009/


You see, she didn't need to leave Canada. Everything was put in place to save her. All Canada had to do was say "Go."

Their own Canadian doctor volunteered to do it.
The other option was for Canada to pay American health care medical facilities to handle what Canada couldn't.

So the failed Canadian Health care system works, only if it is subsidized by the American system that does work. But, what happens when idiots like you turn America into Canada?

But, she and her parents listened to people like you that said everything was going to be OK. Just believe in government, do as the government says and everything will be all-right.

So as she waited to get permission to take care of herself...........................She died!

Not because Canada said no, but, because Canada never said OK and never told her that it wouldn't say OK, so she waited......................................


Now if she'd listen to people like me, I'd of told her to get the hell out of there and go to the United States of America where a person has a right to take care of themselves, without the governments permission, but, they'd have to do it quick, because people like you are trying to take that right away from everyone.

And they'd better be quiet about it, because if Canada thought that her getting cured in America would show up the Canadian health care system as a fraud and much less than it claimed to be, Canada might then pull a "UK-Charlie Gard " on them and not let them leave, not for forever, just till she died, so they could say, oops, Oh well, it wouldn't have helped anyway.

Who would question them............................You?

Not hardly.

I realize that you're not very knowledgeable about these things, so I'll try to enlighten you.

The courts have ruled that law officers can lie to those they are interviewing.

This causes a problem for anyone being interviewed because of what they call a perjury trap.

For instance, the instant you are asked, if you've stopped beating your wife, you're done.

There is no answer to that that does not make you guilty by any answer you give.

If you say, "Yes," then by you're own admission, you are guilty of beating your wife.
You can only stop an activity, if you were doing it in the past.

If you say, "no" then you are admitting that you are beating your wife, because you refuse to stop.

If you hesitate or refuse to answer the question, then your obstructing justice, which is a crime in itself.

Taking the 5th, means that any answers you give, are given through your lawyer, who is well aware of the traps that are laid out for you and has the legal means to keep the law honest.

I you don't think that the above is a reality, then I suggest that any time in the future, any time anyone accuses you of something, you just just refuse a lawyer and throw any your 5th amendments rights and just run off at the mouth and see what happens to you.

Just trust the law, that it will be totally and completely honest.

Go ahead, do it!