One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out topic: What so many do not know....
Main
Israel is the Real Terrorist State
Page <<first <prev 13 of 30 next> last>>
May 28, 2015 12:30:36   #
payne1000
 
Pennylynn wrote:
The sources, BBC, Aljazeera (a pro-Palestine source), the NSA, Washington Post and Times, New York Times, Money Magazine, Harretz, The Times of Israel, Almonitor (aka, PALESTINE PULSE) and books: Israeli-Arab Negotiations: Background, Conflicts, and U.S. Policy HAMAS Through a Constructivist Lens. Now where do you get your information? YouTube and from Texxe Marrs?


I was asking you to supply links to where you got your cut and pastes.

Or was all that Zionist propaganda supplied by your Hasbarat comrades?

Reply
May 28, 2015 12:36:34   #
hnealc
 
Pennylynn wrote:
The sources, BBC, Aljazeera (a pro-Palestine source), the NSA, Washington Post and Times, New York Times, Money Magazine, Harretz, The Times of Israel, Almonitor (aka, PALESTINE PULSE) and books: Israeli-Arab Negotiations: Background, Conflicts, and U.S. Policy HAMAS Through a Constructivist Lens. Now where do you get your information? YouTube and from Texxe Marrs?


Why do you even bother with that guy?

Look at his pen name, PAIN!!!!

Could have been 'torment' 'more better'!!! :lol:

Reply
May 28, 2015 12:39:00   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
I am not sure why. I guess it is amusing to see if he can ever post anything that is not biased. Or if he will ever respond to a question. So far, his score card is zero.




hnealc wrote:
Why do you even bother with that guy?

Look at his pen name, PAIN!!!!

Could have been 'torment' 'more better'!!! :lol:


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :wink: :wink: :wink:

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2015 12:40:36   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
And as I told you, LOOK them up. Use your own sources. Regardless of what I provide you will say they are unworthy and demand another. Therefore, I am finished with providing you sources. Do some work for a change.

payne1000 wrote:
I was asking you to supply links to where you got your cut and pastes.

Or was all that Zionist propaganda supplied by your Hasbarat comrades?

Reply
May 28, 2015 13:27:27   #
payne1000
 
Pennylynn wrote:
I am not sure why. I guess it is amusing to see if he can ever post anything that is not biased. Or if he will ever respond to a question. So far, his score card is zero.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :wink: :wink: :wink:




Do you not recognize the bias in your posts?

Do you know the meaning of "hypocrite"?

Reply
May 28, 2015 13:41:04   #
payne1000
 
Pennylynn wrote:
The sources, BBC, Aljazeera (a pro-Palestine source), the NSA, Washington Post and Times, New York Times, Money Magazine, Harretz, The Times of Israel, Almonitor (aka, PALESTINE PULSE) and books: Israeli-Arab Negotiations: Background, Conflicts, and U.S. Policy HAMAS Through a Constructivist Lens. Now where do you get your information? YouTube and from Texxe Marrs?


Readers should note that your reply to my post was made 22 minutes later.

You list 10 sources in addition to books. How could you research 10 sources plus books in 22 minutes and assemble that many words?

The only explanation is . . . what you posted was already put together.

I'm guessing it is supplied to you by the vast Zionist propaganda machine.

Reply
May 28, 2015 13:41:18   #
CarolSeer2016
 
asphaltman wrote:
Idk, im just sharing, I need some feedback on this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noln8nx43Sk


I've often wondered if Ovomit was behind that bombing. He is incapable of confrontation, and is more likely to "confront from behind". Eliminating top Iranian scientists would be more to his taste than having to meet in person with top Iranians.

I have always called BHO "the accident man", starting years ago with certain people of whom I had knowledge.

Reply
May 28, 2015 14:21:55   #
asphaltman
 
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
I've often wondered if Ovomit was behind that bombing. He is incapable of confrontation, and is more likely to "confront from behind". Eliminating top Iranian scientists would be more to his taste than having to meet in person with top Iranians.

I have always called BHO "the accident man", starting years ago with certain people of whom I had knowledge.


IDK Carol, i wish i hadnt posted this. I love Israel and wanted to find out where all this came from. I was suddenly boo'd at.. I dont research like yal do. I wanted to delete it but cant.. And idk enough to defend Israel, so im trying to stay out of it even thou i posted it. I wish i hadnt posted it.

Reply
May 28, 2015 14:26:25   #
CarolSeer2016
 
asphaltman wrote:
IDK Carol, i wish i hadnt posted this. I love Israel and wanted to find out where all this came from. I was suddenly boo'd at.. I dont research like yal do. I wanted to delete it but cant.. And idk enough to defend Israel, so im trying to stay out of it even thou i posted it. I wish i hadnt posted it.


I got that from your post, asphaltman. It's why I made the comment I did. Israel had nothing to do with it. Israel is too damn smart to do something behind the backs of America and Iran.

It's purely an Ovomit modus operandi.

Reply
May 28, 2015 14:27:38   #
CarolSeer2016
 
Pennylynn wrote:
And as I told you, LOOK them up. Use your own sources. Regardless of what I provide you will say they are unworthy and demand another. Therefore, I am finished with providing you sources. Do some work for a change.


Pennylynn, I'm trying to get posters to read my new thread: Educating Nomiki. I'd like your comments, but I can wait till Saturday.

Reply
May 28, 2015 15:13:22   #
asphaltman
 
CarolSeer2016 wrote:
I got that from your post, asphaltman. It's why I made the comment I did. Israel had nothing to do with it. Israel is too damn smart to do something behind the backs of America and Iran.

It's purely an Ovomit modus operandi.


i kno, but i dont have the knowledge to fight the trolls on here. I wish i had the schooling they had, i cud fight them with words.. All i have is common horse sense. I will learn tho, not to post something i cant back up

Reply
Check out topic: Quality service!
May 28, 2015 16:28:23   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Because I have done the research before and kept the information. That is what reasonable people do rather than having to redo work, they work smarter and not harder. So, I have files where I put information away for future use. Like what is happening in the Middle East, what is going on with our environment, lies told, promises made..... and a host of other things such as your postings and comments.

My system has 22 Terabits so it is not likely I will run out of room. If you look at the books and resources, you will see that it is not just one sided. That is not right and does no one a good service. Truth is facts; numbers and statistics, it is not a one sided tale. If I can find at least four separate and reliable sources, if the four match then I accept the data. All other information is put into another category with a cross reference and search criteria so I can easily find it again, if the situation ever comes up.

I read as many as 5 books each week. And while reading I use sticky notes that I attached to pages with a brief reference. Once a week I take the books and I add the data to my database with book reference and page number. Each book is assigned a alpha character, for example books on boy wonder start with an "O" and then the year it was written and a shortcut for contents. So my shelf will have an "O95Kenya" So, this book is about Obama written in 1995 about his father the Kenyan.

Should I need the paper I developed on boy wonder and his book, I simply do a search in my system with the reference 095Kenya, It will bring up all documents I wrote that pertains to Obama in 1995 and his father.

Do you have an issue with how I manage my records? My library has over 9,000 reference books, all uniquely names and highlighted as I read them. How do you manage your library? I find my method helpful and allows quick access.

payne1000 wrote:
Readers should note that your reply to my post was made 22 minutes later.

You list 10 sources in addition to books. How could you research 10 sources plus books in 22 minutes and assemble that many words?

The only explanation is . . . what you posted was already put together.

I'm guessing it is supplied to you by the vast Zionist propaganda machine.

Reply
May 28, 2015 17:00:38   #
payne1000
 
Pennylynn wrote:
Because I have done the research before and kept the information. That is what reasonable people do rather than having to redo work, they work smarter and not harder. So, I have files where I put information away for future use. Like what is happening in the Middle East, what is going on with our environment, lies told, promises made..... and a host of other things such as your postings and comments.

My system has 22 Terabits so it is not likely I will run out of room. If you look at the books and resources, you will see that it is not just one sided. That is not right and does no one a good service. Truth is facts; numbers and statistics, it is not a one sided tale. If I can find at least four separate and reliable sources, if the four match then I accept the data. All other information is put into another category with a cross reference and search criteria so I can easily find it again, if the situation ever comes up.

I read as many as 5 books each week. And while reading I use sticky notes that I attached to pages with a brief reference. Once a week I take the books and I add the data to my database with book reference and page number. Each book is assigned a alpha character, for example books on boy wonder start with an "O" and then the year it was written and a shortcut for contents. So my shelf will have an "O95Kenya" So, this book is about Obama written in 1995 about his father the Kenyan.

Should I need the paper I developed on boy wonder and his book, I simply do a search in my system with the reference 095Kenya, It will bring up all documents I wrote that pertains to Obama in 1995 and his father.

Do you have an issue with how I manage my records? My library has over 9,000 reference books, all uniquely names and highlighted as I read them. How do you manage your library? I find my method helpful and allows quick access.
Because I have done the research before and kept t... (show quote)


Your attempt to appear technically sophisticated doesn't ring true when you use terabit instead of terabyte.
If your system has 22 terabytes, that would equal roughly 22,000 gigabytes. A storage system that large would most likely belong to a political organization. I'm guessing you're working for Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA).
The part about accuracy in reporting is totally false. CAMERA is a Zionist propaganda network.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=CAMERA

Your method of using four different but matching sources to determine what is correct will not give you the truth. You have to consider the authors of those sources and what their agenda is. You also have to consider whether what they say makes sense. Otherwise, you are only soaking up more propaganda.

Reply
May 28, 2015 17:40:18   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
A product of autocorrect and Dragon. I did not double-check my product before I hit send. Big deal. And yes, I indeed say my system has 22 terabytes. I am a computer engineer. And I have a system this large to manage the files and records of my businesses, my master thesis, my work in anthropology, my old programming files, and my library. As if you are entitled to an explanation. Big deal. What does that have to do with anything? And you point about the size of my system has nothing to do with how I could and can provide data quickly nor does it have anything to do with the propaganda you have been spreading.

So shall we return to the subject at hand because quite honestly your attempts to attack me on a personal level will not result in you succeeding to either make me angry or pull me down to your level.

So, there are a few subjects on this thread, one is about Israel being the real terrorist state, according to the original poster. Then you went off onto conspiracy theories about the Jews talking over the world, and finally morphed into your personal attacks on me. Aside from your need to show your superiority complex and drag me to your level, I am very willing to resume discussions on the original topic or your lame brained ideas about world domination. Your choice.

payne1000 wrote:
Your attempt to appear technically sophisticated doesn't ring true when you use terabit instead of terabyte.
If your system has 22 terabytes, that would equal roughly 22,000 gigabytes. A storage system that large would most likely belong to a political organization. I'm guessing you're working for Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA).
The part about accuracy in reporting is totally false. CAMERA is a Zionist propaganda network.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=CAMERA

Your method of using four different but matching sources to determine what is correct will not give you the truth. You have to consider the authors of those sources and what their agenda is. You also have to consider whether what they say makes sense. Otherwise, you are only soaking up more propaganda.
Your attempt to appear technically sophisticated d... (show quote)

Reply
May 28, 2015 18:19:13   #
payne1000
 
Pennylynn wrote:
A product of autocorrect and Dragon. I did not double-check my product before I hit send. Big deal. And yes, I indeed say my system has 22 terabytes. I am a computer engineer. And I have a system this large to manage the files and records of my businesses, my master thesis, my work in anthropology, my old programming files, and my library. As if you are entitled to an explanation. Big deal. What does that have to do with anything? And you point about the size of my system has nothing to do with how I could and can provide data quickly nor does it have anything to do with the propaganda you have been spreading.

So shall we return to the subject at hand because quite honestly your attempts to attack me on a personal level will not result in you succeeding to either make me angry or pull me down to your level.

So, there are a few subjects on this thread, one is about Israel being the real terrorist state, according to the original poster. Then you went off onto conspiracy theories about the Jews talking over the world, and finally morphed into your personal attacks on me. Aside from your need to show your superiority complex and drag me to your level, I am very willing to resume discussions on the original topic or your lame brained ideas about world domination. Your choice.
A product of autocorrect and Dragon. I did not do... (show quote)


I wouldn't want to think that you are a liar, Pennylynn, but your explanation that auto-correct and Dragon came up with "terrabit" doesn't pass the smell test. Auto-correct and Dragon only supply real words.

The dictionary does not recognize "terrabit."

If you're going to talk about personal attacks, you might go back to page 8 of this thread and see who started the personal attacks in our exchanges. You started off your first reply to me by accusing me of being a Muslim. What a fraud and hypocrite you are.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 13 of 30 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.