Is U.S. preparing for martial law?
JMHO wrote:
What drugs are you on?
How do you explain the Norad lies Sen Dayton pointed out?
How do you explain the military stand down on 9/11?
payne1000 wrote:
How do you explain the Norad lies Sen Dayton pointed out?
How do you explain the military stand down on 9/11?
I wasn't aware the was a 'military stand down' on 9/11. Can you elaborate?
PoppaGringo wrote:
I wasn't aware the was a 'military stand down' on 9/11. Can you elaborate?
Most likely you aren't aware that 3 steel-framed skyscrapers fell at near free-fall sped into their own footprints on that day while the military was standing down.
In the hundred year history of steel-framed skyscrapers, none has ever fallen from fire damage, yet three fell on 9/11 caused by what our government claims was fire damage.
All three towers exhibited many characteristics of controlled demolition yet the 9/11 Commission decided not to investigate for controlled demolition.
Were they afraid of what they might uncover?
Donald Rumsfeld and General Richard Myers were the top military men in charge on 9/11. During the almost hour and a half that the hijacked planes were in the air, neither Rumsfeld nor Myers sent interceptors after the hijacked planes as is standard procedure. I'd call that a stand down, wouldn't you?
payne1000 wrote:
Most likely you aren't aware that 3 steel-framed skyscrapers fell at near free-fall sped into their own footprints on that day while the military was standing down.
In the hundred year history of steel-framed skyscrapers, none has ever fallen from fire damage, yet three fell on 9/11 caused by what our government claims was fire damage.
All three towers exhibited many characteristics of controlled demolition yet the 9/11 Commission decided not to investigate for controlled demolition.
Were they afraid of what they might uncover?
Donald Rumsfeld and General Richard Myers were the top military men in charge on 9/11. During the almost hour and a half that the hijacked planes were in the air, neither Rumsfeld nor Myers sent interceptors after the hijacked planes as is standard procedure. I'd call that a stand down, wouldn't you?
Most likely you aren't aware that 3 steel-framed s... (
show quote)
Are you saying that three steel-framed skyscrapers fell because the Military was standing down, which they weren't by the way. The Military was under no orders to 'stand down'. Where did you get that malarky, from some far left print media? You are evidently the only one with that 'knowledge'. I was under the impression they 'fell down' because they were hit by jet airplanes.
payne1000 wrote:
Jade Helm 2015 is a military operation being carried out within the U.S. having military personnel disguised as U.S. civilians in designated areas.
An Army colonel attempting to explain the reason for this to a room full of protestors at a Bastrop County, TX, Commissioners Court said the disguised personnel would be learning how to infiltrate a community by learning the subtle differences in clothing, etc, of different areas within the U.S.
This answer doesn't make sense in any way. If a military person dresses in civilian clothes in a foreign country, they immediately become designated as a spy. How would learning the differences in clothing or personal habits in the U.S. be of value in foreign countries?
So the training the military is doing under Jade Helm is only of value if it is used in the U.S. in a martial law situation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYaJJV095vcJade Helm 2015 is a military operation being carri... (
show quote)
what wud happen if all my friends and i dress up in civilian clothes and go to texas and grab a lot of people and leave across state line. rob, rape, kill, and cut off their heads.. who wud get the blame? texas will be wide open for isis and lay the blame on **.. they shudnt wear civilian clothes cos anyone cud mastermind that sh*t very easy.
Jeffhunter wrote:
I think theres a nigger in the woodpile.
I wouldn't be surprised it the 'woodpile' was between your ears.
PoppaGringo wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised it the 'woodpile' was between your ears.
I wouldn't be surprised if the nigger was you.
Jeffhunter wrote:
I think theres a nigger in the woodpile.
How does that correlate to three skyscrapers being destroyed by airplanes?
PoppaGringo wrote:
How does that correlate to three skyscrapers being destroyed by airplanes?
The "nigger" was the conspirators who staged the whole thing. I think it was the Mossad.
Jeffhunter wrote:
The "nigger" was the conspirators who staged the whole thing. I think it was the Mossad.
So when did the Mossad become Islamists?
PoppaGringo wrote:
So when did the Mossad become Islamists?
Is that as reasonable as nineteen Saudis get blamed so we invade Iraq?
Jeffhunter wrote:
Is that as reasonable as nineteen Saudis get blamed so we invade Iraq?
I don't know. Suppose you tell me.
PoppaGringo wrote:
I don't know. Suppose you tell me.
The answer is no Poppy, the answer is no.
Workinman wrote:
Yeah me too was traveling by thumb in the 70's...even though I'm good I always keep an eye open. :shock:
:wink: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
PoppaGringo wrote:
Are you saying that three steel-framed skyscrapers fell because the Military was standing down, which they weren't by the way. The Military was under no orders to 'stand down'. Where did you get that malarky, from some far left print media? You are evidently the only one with that 'knowledge'. I was under the impression they 'fell down' because they were hit by jet airplanes.
Yes, that's what I'm saying.
Lt. Col Bob Bowman, flew a 100 missions in Vietnam. He says if normal military interception procedures had been followed on 9/11 that none of the buildings would have been hit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMYzwf01Z7IAre you aware that only 2 of the towers were hit by airplanes? Why did WTC7 fall in the classic style of a controlled demolition?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.