One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Poll results, DO NOT DEFUND OBAMACARE
Page <<first <prev 14 of 32 next> last>>
Sep 25, 2013 19:24:41   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
DennisDee wrote:
I also recall Obama mocking Romney in the debates for saying Russia was our biggest geopolitical foe. Looks like Mitt knows more about foreign affairs.


Obama is good at one thing only. Campaingning while appealing to peoples' basest emotions. Greed, envy and hatred.

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 19:26:25   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
vernon wrote:
spoken like a tried and true communist.its going to be great when we are all the same poor and hungry ,but we will be able to look upon the hill and see all the rich politicans living in great wealth.


Yup.

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 19:29:43   #
VladimirPee
 
In my town the ERs are filled with illegals who don't pay. Obamacare won't solve this

Floyd Brown wrote:
I have a son in law who is a doctor with a practice for an emergency room @ a hospital. He has to treat all who use the emergency room. At this time many use the emergency room & don't pay. So with Obamacare in place all should be able to pay. So it would seem that he shouldn't be any worse off if not better.

Reply
 
 
Sep 25, 2013 19:45:26   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
DennisDee wrote:
In my town the ERs are filled with illegals who don't pay. Obamacare won't solve this


That is a cause for concern. I say the leaders we have choose to seek making messes out of any thing they put their hands on.

When Congress tries to solve one problem they make at least one more.

These laws seem to satisfy those that say whats in it for me or nothing in it is for me so I won't support it.

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 19:58:25   #
Homestead
 
Molly wrote:
Dennis.. did you check your states exchanges and see what they offered yet? I am still waiting to see if you have because I am curious to see what you will find. And if you find something cheaper... most companies still allow you to use your flex spending it is just a p.i.a because you must provide receipts for all of it.
Floyd.. I have been screaming for years that a bill needs to be just a bill.. with none of the fluff. I feel this is the one major thing wrong with government at this point and that we would see some things fixed if they addressed this.
Here are a few ways the cost of health care are addressed. First, the exchanges. Companies competing for your business. There are so many in my state I found myself wading through many different offers. None of them were my exact plan I have (and I work for a huge state wide health care provider and work in a major hospital). My insurance isn't changing and I will stick with mine because it is comfortable and easy and its very competitive as they strive to make where I work a place where people want to work and stay. But there were plenty of offers. I helped my brother go through his stuff and he found many great offers that were lower than he expected. If you haven't bothered to check your states exchanges than I don't really think you can speak on how terrible it is for you. There is a huge range in price and in what each plan offers. Before you complain, go look and then let me know. The 80/20 rule means they cannot spend more than 20% of what you pay on their costs. Meaning 80% must go to your care and many people have received checks back from insurance companies. This was a great addition to the law, this is also why many states have seen a drop in premiums. Also, if more people are insured, the price of health care will go down. Right now you are charged for your own care and you also cover part of the bill for those who don't pay. I do understand how insurance works. And not all pre existing conditions require constant care. Here is an example for you. I have to have brain surgery because I was recently diagnosed with a chiari malformation. I was born with this but for many people it doesn't manifest until you hit middle age (yay for me right?). So we had our 17 year old checked and she will have to likely go through all of this as well... but since we had her tested it will now be considered pre existing. However, she is currently very healthy and will remain so for many years.. Lord willing. So you can assume all the fat lazy people milking the system are the ones getting money.. but I have been busting my butt since I was 15 and I now find myself in a position I never expected where I will need some of these benefits. This is all so easy in theory, way more personal when it starts affecting you. There are some financial benefits to this bill, and it does serve many deserving Americans. Possibly even you Dennis.. it won't hurt you to go look :)
Dennis.. did you check your states exchanges and s... (show quote)


Before you get all, "gushy," about having coverage, maybe you ought to listen to someone that has to use it!

How Obamacare is Hurting My Family with Chronically Ill Kids
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbHd5qTHktA


Here's Herman Cain's take on Obama Care:

ObamaCare's redistribution of health and death
Published by: Herman Cain


The way ObamaCare works is disturbingly similar to the tax code. That is not good.

Most people and businesses clearly understand, now, how ObamaCare redistributes the cost of health insurance and the cost of health care. It does it with a plethora of rules, taxes and penalties.

But little attention has been given to how these same rules, penalties and taxes also redistribute health, sickness and death. Maybe it is because it's a sensitive subject, or maybe it might cause the PC police to declare a full attack on anyone who would use such provocative narrative. That's what happened, after all, when Sarah Palin was crucified by the mainstream media for correctly identifying "death panels" in ObamaCare.

Well, bring it on, PC police! The truth shall set some people free!

When the "death panel" (also known as the Independent Payment Advisory Board, or IPAB) decides whether you are allowed a procedure or not, they are deciding whether your chance of survival is worth the cost in their opinion. If they say no then you die sooner than maybe later.

When the cost of insuring the uninsurable is spread across everybody that buys insurance, rather than a dedicated subsidized pool, somebody's coverage is going to be denied or delayed because they are forced to buy less expensive insurance coverage if they cannot afford to pay more for their insurance. Just like minor car accident claims, people might ignore minor ailments to keep their rates from going up.

In my own personal case, a minor ailment wich I thought was acidity from coffee turned out to be stage four cancer. Because I was able to get diagnosed and treated on my timetable instead of the government's, and at the expense of my insurance coverage and my out of pocket expenses, my 30 percent chance of survival turned into now seven years of being cancer-free!

When someone is notified that their Medicare insurance will no longer cover certain medications, such as the cost of their insulin medication, that person is forced to choose between paying their bills or staying alive.

Many doctors have announced that they can no longer afford to take new Medicare patients because of cuts in Medicare payments to doctors. These patients can't just find another doctor who will take Medicare patients because chances are that they can't take anymore either. As a result, some people will not get medical assistance until their condition is an emergency from waiting too long, or until they are on their death bed.

Rural communities will be especially negatively impacted by a shortage of doctors who will see Medicare patients, because rural communities tend to have more Medicare-eligible patients. A majority of Medicare payments means most of a doctor's revenue is coming from Medicare payments made by Uncle Sam, which is not sufficient to sustain a financially viable medical practice.

As a result, doctors will relocate to more lucrative areas and people living in rural areas will have to travel farther to get medical care, or they will not be able to get treatment at all. Thus, illnesses will advance more quickly, thus reducing survival rates.

The U.S. tax code redistributes wealth and income, and one does not have to be rich to be subjected to our archaic, punitive and complex system. The more you make, the more they (the bureaucrats) take from you using the force of law. That's why we must change the law by replacing the tax code.

ObamaCare works in much the same way. It confiscates the entire cost structure and dynamics of our health care and health insurance system, as well as life and death decisions that should be made by individuals and their family members. ObamaCare also commandeers decisions that should be made by doctors, by denying payment for certain diagnostic procedures deemed unnecessary by, again, government bureaucrats.

Sticker shock causes people to wake up to the truth about the cost of ObamaCare, which is nothing like the promises made by its advocates. They can buy less insurance coverage with the same dollars, as most people will be forced to do, or pay more for the same coverage, or be forced to buy more coverage with more dollars to meet minimum requirements of ObamaCare.

But when people are denied or wait too long for a medical treatment due to rules, taxes and penalties, the medical condition can't be quickly reversed or cured after waiting on a bureaucrat to say yes or no.

If the government says yes, a person's chances of survival are already reduced. If they say no, well, you just might die sooner rather than later.

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 20:14:54   #
vernon
 
Alicia wrote:
Thank you, Molly. It's refreshing to meet a person who can see things clearly and is not wrapped up in only their own negative situation. Instances have been reported of people whose own lives or those of their family members have been saved thus far.

As the cost of a medical education is horrendous, most doctors are attempting to make up for their expenditures and are looking out for money instead of their patients.

Also, our medical training system is putting out more "cookbook doctors." These are doctors? who listen to your symptoms and look in their cookbooks to find a prescription. There are not many doctors who take the time to think about the patients' individual problems anymore.

I'm a senior citizen and can count the "good" doctors I've come across on one hand. Sad comment, isn't it.

I did research on Costa Rica because I would like to retire there. Education in that country is free - yes FREE - right through university. They have socialized healthcare and it seems to be working out quite well. Those who wished to get into medicine did it because of their love for helping people. As a matter of fact, citizens of other countries have taken to getting medical procedures there because of the reputation. Costa Rica is a Socialist Democracy and the people seem to be very happy with it.

I blame the insurance companies for the rising costs in medicine.
It was they who put a "cap" on how much a doctor should charge for anything (tests, procedures, etc.). Of course, those in the medical profession are naturally going to charge the highest prices they are allowed.
Thank you, Molly. It's refreshing to meet a perso... (show quote)


so you want to start slavery all over .a student in med school has to look toward 8to 12 yrs of school then internship for 4 yrs plus looking atleast 1iml in tuiton now you want to work them for nothing

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 20:31:49   #
Mikki Loc: Ohio
 
Homestead-Very good article and such a sad video. Disgraceful when a family takes care of sick kids for years and now has to deal with all of this. Obamacare came out first with the goodies to pull people in such as keeping a kid on your insurance until 26 and covering preexisting conditions. Sounds good doesn't it? In January the bad will begin to happen, if it hasn't already as it has to this family. Prices will go up so no one can afford insurance after this begins. That is what Obama wants because he can then go to a nationalized health care run strictly by the govt. Don't know how true it is, but I just read that Romneycare in Mass. has gone from a 30 day wait to a 50 day wait to see a doctor. If anyone lives in that state it would be good to hear from you. The main difference between Romneycare and Obamacare is that the people in Mass. wanted it. There is a total of 20 new taxes in Obamacare. The IRS was just given 500 million dollars to enforce it. They can't run the IRS right so how can they run health insurance for millions of people?

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 20:36:15   #
vernon
 
rickdri wrote:
Please explain to me why Obamacare is the first step to better healthcare. We were told by Obama we could keep our doctors and insurance if we wanted to. That was a lie. We were told it would cost less. Not true. If you have a doctor that you trust and have been with for years, you can not keep him if he's not a part of the new insurance exchange. Now you have to either pay more to see him or change to a new policy without him/her. How does this make healthcare better? I just read another article about how Obama wants to use a civil war law to force the regulation of the countries tax preparers. Another huge influx of IRS agents to regulate these people. They want these people to take tests yearly to make sure they can do taxes. Why don't IRS agents have to be tested. They are wrong many times when figuring your taxes. They tried to force me to pay an extra $4000.00 in taxes. I fought them and proved they were wrong. My point being, why does anyone want the IRS to have anything to do with healthcare? When will government stop taking over everything? Why do liberals want government to run their lives?
Please explain to me why Obamacare is the first st... (show quote)


i hear all these horror stories about their ins but i have to tell about mine. the company pays for my coverage which is 5 $ for primary doc and 20$ for a specialist im currently getting epedoural shots in my back about every 3 mos and its just a 20 $ charge so i cant complian.

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 20:48:34   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
weneedrubio wrote:
Molly, like all liberals, assumes we are illiterate rubes who can't read. I've read over half of the bill and there are so many things in it that no one knows about it will make your head spin. It goes way past medical issues into your everyday life and basically requires you to share every bit of information down to your everyday habits, who your friends are, where you go to church, what books you read, guns, children, schools, hobbies, food you eat, travel, on and on. It is also obviously set up to fail by, among other things, bankrupting the insurance companies, forcing doctors to become employees of the hospitals and subsequently the gov't. I come from a large family of doctors who voted for Obama, now they are considering retirement or other professions and can't believe what is happening. The gov't is the problem, it is the reason healthcare costs skyrocketed to begin with and this is just more of it.
Molly, like all liberals, assumes we are illiterat... (show quote)


You have hit just what I think the whole thing was aimed at from the beginning. Now many people, especially unions are seeing what it is doing to us.

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 20:51:19   #
Homestead
 
Mikki wrote:
Homestead-Very good article and such a sad video. Disgraceful when a family takes care of sick kids for years and now has to deal with all of this. Obamacare came out first with the goodies to pull people in such as keeping a kid on your insurance until 26 and covering preexisting conditions. Sounds good doesn't it? In January the bad will begin to happen, if it hasn't already as it has to this family. Prices will go up so no one can afford insurance after this begins. That is what Obama wants because he can then go to a nationalized health care run strictly by the govt. Don't know how true it is, but I just read that Romneycare in Mass. has gone from a 30 day wait to a 50 day wait to see a doctor. If anyone lives in that state it would be good to hear from you. The main difference between Romneycare and Obamacare is that the people in Mass. wanted it. There is a total of 20 new taxes in Obamacare. The IRS was just given 500 million dollars to enforce it. They can't run the IRS right so how can they run health insurance for millions of people?
Homestead-Very good article and such a sad video. ... (show quote)



Romney Care, is actually Hilary Care, which became ObamaCare.
What Romney Care is doing to the state of Massachusetts is bankrupting it.
To track down how it's doing it becomes very convoluted.
They play with the numbers and hide the expenses. I've only seen a couple of people who have tried to map it out, but, they lost me. Hannity remarked on it once, but I never heard him talk about it again.

One of the things that's burying the expense is the explosion of give away programs. The expenses of the state keep climbing and so do the taxes which is hammering the economy. A lot of people have just given up and left, but, the freeloaders don't leave, if fact we have more moving in to get the handouts. In the meantime we have an Obama-bot for a governor.

Nothing good is happening in Massachusetts, but, I don't think we will get to the bottom of it until the bottom drops out.

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 21:05:34   #
Homestead
 
vernon wrote:
i hear all these horror stories about their ins but i have to tell about mine. the company pays for my coverage which is 5 $ for primary doc and 20$ for a specialist im currently getting epedoural shots in my back about every 3 mos and its just a 20 $ charge so i cant complian.


You will, because, in Obama care there was, "the employer mandate," which is not going to be implemented until after the 2014 elections.
What does that have to do with you?.........Here's a little taste from Rush.


By Rush Limbaugh:
Regime Postpones Obamacare Employer Mandate Until After the 2014 Elections
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/07/03/regime_postpones_obamacare_employer_mandate_until_after_the_2014_elections
RUSH: Besides kicking the Obamacare negatives past the midterm elections, there's something else going on here, folks. The individual mandate survives. So while your employer, the place you work will not be mandated to provide you health insurance, you're still gonna be required to have it. Your employer, by the way, can use this year to cancel. If your employer wants to, your employer can say, "Sayonara." They can get out of this now. That's right.

Businesses can now kick everybody out of their plans and not pay a penalty, which will then force all of you to the Obama exchanges, which is what Obama wants ultimately anyway because the exchanges are the government. So this is a twofer for Obama. He's not gonna run the risk of having the implementation of this bill be harmful to the Democrats before the election, and it actually speeds up his ultimate dream -- that being the government being sole provider, single payer, single source, of everybody for health care.

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 21:36:39   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
Homestead wrote:
You will, because, in Obama care there was, "the employer mandate," which is not going to be implemented until after the 2014 elections.
What does that have to do with you?.........Here's a little taste from Rush.


By Rush Limbaugh:
Regime Postpones Obamacare Employer Mandate Until After the 2014 Elections
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/07/03/regime_postpones_obamacare_employer_mandate_until_after_the_2014_elections
RUSH: Besides kicking the Obamacare negatives past the midterm elections, there's something else going on here, folks. The individual mandate survives. So while your employer, the place you work will not be mandated to provide you health insurance, you're still gonna be required to have it. Your employer, by the way, can use this year to cancel. If your employer wants to, your employer can say, "Sayonara." They can get out of this now. That's right.

Businesses can now kick everybody out of their plans and not pay a penalty, which will then force all of you to the Obama exchanges, which is what Obama wants ultimately anyway because the exchanges are the government. So this is a twofer for Obama. He's not gonna run the risk of having the implementation of this bill be harmful to the Democrats before the election, and it actually speeds up his ultimate dream -- that being the government being sole provider, single payer, single source, of everybody for health care.
You will, because, in Obama care there was, "... (show quote)


Geez...I just assumed that was blatantly obvious to everybody.

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 21:42:33   #
VladimirPee
 
Vernon

I went through 5 years of hell with my brother. He was diabetic. By age 55 he lost an eye. Then the circulation in his feet and 3 toes removed. By age 57 they took his leg below the knee. Then his kidneys went and he was on dialysis. Then the toes on the other foot. Eventually his heart started to weaken and at age 60 he passed. All total he spend 3 years of his last 5 in a hospital bed or rehab center. I am sure it added up to millions of dollars. Never once did his private insurance company refuse treatment or try to kick him off. Never had one problem.

vernon wrote:
i hear all these horror stories about their ins but i have to tell about mine. the company pays for my coverage which is 5 $ for primary doc and 20$ for a specialist im currently getting epedoural shots in my back about every 3 mos and its just a 20 $ charge so i cant complian.

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 22:45:36   #
donc711 Loc: North East Kansas
 
What's changed? Oh we have drones, high tech field glasses for our boots on the ground guys. Missiles of various kinds, and so on and so on. So tell me why do we have servicemen coming home in boxes, coming home permanently handicapped from loss of limbs and mental trauma? War has advanced to such a stage we don't have to draft anyone. We have people standing in line to enlist. But plenty of enlistees are looking for a paycheck a place to live and something to eat. Obama has created lots of work almost all part time low paying.

We get by with fewer boots on the ground because we are not in a fight to win. We haven't been since Korea. Want a rundown on our war history. I was in during the Korean police action. Oh our boots on the ground have better battle gear Bullet resistant vests. IED resistant vehicles but still get shoot up and blown up. War sure has changed. if you believe that then sign up and visit foreign countries at government expense. It's so romantic.

Alicia wrote:
[they are defunding Medicare or did you not read that part? They are also doing a good job of defunding the military too.]


They are not defunding Medicare but using some of that money to pay for the health care of others - including the senior population who will also be covered.

Perhaps you don't recall the presidential debates preceding the last election where President Obama stated that methods of war have changed and we DO NOT need as large a military force. Romney had no answer to that as he, like most of the Repubs were not aware of the changes that have come about in that area since the '50s. Their thinking on almost everything remains locked in that era. One would think that nothing has changed in all this time.

If we want this country to continue to exist we must be thinking of all the changes, in every area, that have come about since the '50s. We simply cannot grow unless we keep up with the times and look toward the future.

Global politics has also changed radically and, in order to maintain this country, we simply must keep up with it. We can not go back to the isolationism that once existed. If you want to put the blame on somebody, look to the large corporations who have sold us out by exporting our jobs. This, primarily, caused the demise of our isolationist era.

Please do some individual thinking and stop following the old minds who would like everything to go back in time. The idea is ridiculous! This is a new world. By that I mean that every day the old world (as we knew it yesterday) dies and each day begins a new world. Wake up!!!
they are defunding Medicare or did you not read t... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 22:52:35   #
VladimirPee
 
You still need a certain number of ships to cover the high seas. One high tech ship in the Pacific does not replace 2 older ships if one is in the Atlantic and One in the Pacific. Romney let Obama off on that comment


donc711 wrote:
What's changed? Oh we have drones, high tech field glasses for our boots on the ground guys. Missiles of various kinds, and so on and so on. So tell me why do we have servicemen coming home in boxes, coming home permanently handicapped from loss of limbs and mental trauma? War has advanced to such a stage we don't have to draft anyone. We have people standing in line to enlist. But plenty of enlistees are looking for a paycheck a place to live and something to eat. Obama has created lots of work almost all part time low paying.

We get by with fewer boots on the ground because we are not in a fight to win. We haven't been since Korea. Want a rundown on our war history. I was in during the Korean police action. Oh our boots on the ground have better battle gear Bullet resistant vests. IED resistant vehicles but still get shoot up and blown up. War sure has changed. if you believe that then sign up and visit foreign countries at government expense. It's so romantic.
What's changed? Oh we have drones, high tech field... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 14 of 32 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.