If I were worth a pinch of spit at technology, I have a message I was sent with fifteen photos of him with his feet on more pieces of furniture th/e/an can be thought about. Apparently his feet do not know what a floor is for. Although I was unable to load the fifteen pictures, the message below is very applicable with regard to your posting.

*The problem with public housing is that the residents are not the owners.*
*The people who live in the house did not earn the house, but were
merely loaned the property by the actual owners, the taxpayers.
Because of this, the residents do not have the "pride of ownership"
that comes with the hard work necessary to become owners.
In fact, quite the opposite happens. The residents resent their benefactors,
because the very house is a constant reminder that they themselves
have not earned the right to live in the house. They neither appreciate the
value of the property nor understand the need to maintain or respect it in
any way.

The result is the same, whether one is talking about either a studio
apartment or a magnificent mansion full of priceless antiques. If the people who live there do not feel they've earned the privilege of occupancy, they will make this obvious through their actions.