Ghost.

I am applying for your Supreme Allied Commander position.

I believe our military is for killing people and breaking their stuff. We would do that with extreme efficiency and shock and awe big time. Our boys and girls in uniform would not be sent over there to win their hearts and minds. I would trust that you would send some liberal social workers over there for that, or not. WE don't need their hearts and minds. Our job would be done with maximum force possible and we would not leave until the fight is taken completely out of our enemy. Wars would last only a few weeks. After other radicals see what we have done in the first 2 or 3 of these short wars they would think twice before engaging us again.

I would secure our Southern boarder tighter than a bulls ass in fly time. I would set up a mile wide kill zone all along the boarder any unauthorized people in the zone would be blown to bits. Each person coming into this country legally would be checked and rechecked to make sure no illegal substances were being smuggled in.

After a 30 day warning, our troops would assist in illegal round up and hold them in camps for 10 years of hard labor, making small rocks out of big rocks.

Now for your guns.

The second amendment to the constitution shall rule supreme... Period.

To wit:

All U.S. citizens may purchase any hand held firearm (including full automatic) without any legal test to purchase or own...

All U.S. citizens can own any surplus military arms or armament offered for sale to the public. This includes aircraft, watercraft, etc.

Owning or possessing any of the above implies responsibility both criminal and civil. Just like driving any vehicle on the road. Product and liability insurance will be a requirement.

Absolutely no permanent records of purchase, sale, or ownership may be held by the government for longer than ten days. (period)

One exception: Unless a citizen has been convicted of a felony involving the use of a firearm. and that restriction will be limited to fifteen years without any further convictions.

Here are the first three things I would change... On the first day of my rule I would start off protecting our children, starting where they spend most of their time.

#1: Do away with Michale Obama's new meal plans for our schools. Go back to the stuff kids want to eat.
Apparently, you only fed your kids cheeseburgers, french fries and twinkies every day. My kids get a packed lunch and they get fresh vegetables in their lunch every day. Their friends actually beg them to trade for their french fries. What exactly can you point out is wrong with Michelle's menu selections?
#2: Bring back the playground recess and work off that fat, not starve it off.
Which Michelle also encouraged....WTF. Guess you were too busy watching FOX, eating cheetos and playing with pee pee to notice?
#3: Put the pledge to our flag and morning prayers to God back in the school.
Where do live?, F%^&king Russia. My kids say the pledge of allegiance....have you asked you school district why they don't?

All these changes would be required the next day, if the counties wanted even one more dime of our tax money.

Hey, I did not promise that I would play nice or be politically correct.
...you always deliver misinformation, but never promise that...

:P :P

If my actions as Supreme Commander only incites the muslims more, That means we didn't do it right the first time. Just like what's going on now.

I wouldn't take going to war lightly, (war is hell) but if I was called to act, there would be hell to pay by anyone that is considered our enemy. Do you remember the road leading out of Kuwait in the final days of the first Iraq war? That was swift and deadly as it should be. Even if they were incited, they would not have the means to do anything about it.

Oh yeah, Iran wouldn't have any nukes or capability to have them within 2 weeks max. They would be given the opportunity to begin to remove and disable within 2 weeks or we would remove their nuke facilities with massive shock and awe.

And Somali Pirates and their boats would be shredded with .50 cal machine guns. The first couple times WE would leave one survivor to go back home to tell his buddies how fast they were blown to bits. After that all bets are off.

Really?
Social media has proven to be the most effective way for students to bring attention to their new “healthy” school lunches.

“A Skiatook school came under fire after a picture of two small breadsticks, marinara sauce, milk and an apple was posted on Facebook,” News On 6 reports.

The school defended itself by saying that’s what the student chose to take.

“Chicken nuggets, with broccoli, beans and milk,” student Promise Fleming says. “It was awful.”

Another student, A’mika Ware, tells the news station, “It’s not fully cooked and it makes my stomach hurt.”

Those students aren’t alone. Others have been taking to Twitter to show their lunches, with one even including the hashtag “#ThanksObama.”

So, once again... Go eat tree bark.

Whatever you say. My daughter and most of her friends will not eat the school lunches because , they're the same shitty lunches they have served for the last twenty years. This district will not try the new lunches , which many of the kids would welcome , because we live in a " We hate the president and everything about him" county. It does not seem like a good idea to not try to get kids eat healthier. I don't know about you but I remember my children when they were in their high chair with me putting a spoon of veggies in their mouth whether they liked it or not. This protesting better lunches is more about hating the president than anything about the lunches themselves.