AuntiE wrote:
My "ilk"? I asked relevant questions concerning your doctorate, which you have yet to answer. So far, it is you, not our "ilk", using ghetto language. Your inability to communicate in well written style calls into question your true educational background, work background and family standards of societal communication.
**yeah right...like some of you people deserve anything more with the vile racist schit some of you say...think whatever you like...
my dissertation was about technology transfer...I took a ten -part model consisting of 5 formal and five informal behaviors...I performed correlational statisticsto see to what degree each variable contributed to technology transfer success, which is defined as a match being found between a technology provider and a technology user . I also performed a Kruskal Wallace H to test if there was significant difference in success based on the technology type using 18 categories provided by my sample of approximately 300+ ferederal research labs. I then used descriptive statistics to discuss various aspects of my sample population. My literature review covered about 500 sources to discuss the origin of the field of study, significant paradigm shifts that occurred and where my study fit in it all. I had an assumptions section that dscribed what was not included that may skew the resuls....it represented a merger of my engineering background with public administration and organizational management in an R&D environment. I hope someone on OPP think i'm that eloquent of a liar...haha.......