alex
Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
oldroy wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Very well said with all the proper words included.
so after all this back and forth lets go to the south-west to the lands that mexico claims we stole from them, they first stole it from the Indians before they lost it to us the same way they got it but we also included a cash payment and our military was in Mexico City so we could have owned all of Mexico
oldroy
Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
alex wrote:
so after all this back and forth lets go to the south-west to the lands that mexico claims we stole from them, they first stole it from the Indians before they lost it to us the same way they got it but we also included a cash payment and our military was in Mexico City so we could have owned all of Mexico
Hell, they want Texas back and it was Texans who won their independence. Then one day Texas joined the US and yes we did pay them what then was a handsome sum for that last little piece of ground. They want all of Arizona and New Mexico back although they sold part of it.
oldroy wrote:
Hell, they want Texas back and it was Texans who won their independence. Then one day Texas joined the US and yes we did pay them what then was a handsome sum for that last little piece of ground. They want all of Arizona and New Mexico back although they sold part of it.
We did not pay them for Texas, it was an independent republic when it joined the US.
oldroy
Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
banjojack wrote:
We did not pay them for Texas, it was an independent republic when it joined the US.
Didn't I say that Texas won its independence in a war and then joined the US about 9 years later? That is what I meant.
alex
Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
oldroy wrote:
Didn't I say that Texas won its independence in a war and then joined the US about 9 years later? That is what I meant.
true but when we settled the mex- am war we did pay a sum of money to mex
alex wrote:
true but when we settled the mex- am war we did pay a sum of money to mex
We paid for NM, AZ CA and CO.
Yes, I do have a son - I think the breakdown is 1/8 th Cherokee for him. It gets confusing after awhile. I am not saying that the people did right back then by taking away land/whatever. What I am saying is that we/I have done nothing wrong to them today. If I meet anyone of them today (and I have) I only have respect for them as I try to do for anyone else. The same applies to any black/Mexican/chinaman/etc. But, we/I today have done nothing against these people and should not be punished for whatever happened 80/100/200 years ago. I only wish the best to every single individual out there. There have been countless number of wars, but I personally did not start them and truly pray that someday they might go away.
But, again, I did not do anything to them and some are even my own past relatives. Was Moses punished because Adam/Eve ate of the fruit of the garden? Why must the people of today be punished for whatever the pilgrims did?
[quote quizzal] Why must the people of today be punished for whatever the pilgrims did?[/quote]
Because that is what the obamatards decreed.
msbets wrote:
Wow.........you want to know about the free healthcare for the Ogalla Sioux on the Pine Ridge and Rosebud reservation, in South Dakota........ ovomitcare will be much like what they have, most have to travel miles to get healthcare, they took their way of life, threw them on a patch of land not worth a damn, gave them white mans food which made them sick, took their GUNS AND BOWS,couldn't hunt for fresh meat, welfare gave them rotten beef.........IF YOU WANT TO SEE HOW ENTITLEMENTS WORK, go to South Dakota and take a look around the Pine Ridge and Rosebud, soon if we don't stop the rabid dog, the rest of the Nation will look exactly like them and believe me it's NOT pretty!!!
Wow.........you want to know about the free health... (
show quote)
I am having trouble understanding which way you are leaning on this issue. First you say they have it made, and then you say they have it crappy.
Tell me one thing, Wasn't there a war between the indians and the U.S. ? When we were trying to get away from the British, didn't the British hire the Indians to fight with us? How are they different than any other conquered enemy.
Do you remember the war with Mexico? When the war is over, you are either a prisoner, a refugee, or dead. We have given the American Indian the privelige of living in the U. S. without any of the burdens of it. Let us do them a favor, and take special status away from them, let them join as citizens-(just like any other immigrant) and take their chances like everyone else. Let them pay taxes too.
Why aren't they blending in like everybody else?
Why are we keeping them as pets? They are not pets, they are viable human beings. Join the fray we are all in.
Old_Gringo wrote:
Because that is what the obamatards decreed.
I will disagree here. What happened is the US Government entered into various contracts with various indigenous people with the intent to defraud them. The damaged parties are pursuing remedies as provided by law, as much as possible. Why is this different, legally, from reparations for slavery? Because slavery was legal. Deliberate, intentional fraud was not. I do not believe all tribes are entitled to reparations, compensations, or whatever you wish to call them, but some tribes most certainly are.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.