One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Who are the communists in our government?
Page <<first <prev 6 of 10 next> last>>
Aug 25, 2013 22:49:56   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Lou wrote:
You're full of it Carolyn . Go get your head screwed on straight .


Lou, is there a chance that you have never seen this first page of the Socialist Party? I guess so. I also googled for DSA and find too much agreement. Call me one of your choice names, after reading this link.

http://socialistparty-usa.net/

Reply
Aug 25, 2013 23:16:51   #
Lou Loc: Florida
 
oldroy wrote:
Lou, is there a chance that you have never seen this first page of the Socialist Party? I guess so. I also googled for DSA and find too much agreement. Call me one of your choice names, after reading this link.

http://socialistparty-usa.net/


oldroy , google Democratic Socialists of America , look at their members list / google Progressive Caucus , look at their members list .
The socialist party , has got nothing to do with either . And I challenge you to find the name of one US Representative or Senator on any list of the DSA OR Socialist party .
Carolyn's original claim was that these "socialists were members of congress . She LIED or got duped , when I posted the Links , and then POSTED the lists found at each , Carolyn then CHOSE TO LIE .
Case closed . Wanna believe her ? Go ahead , that's your problem .

Reply
Aug 25, 2013 23:28:33   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Lou wrote:
oldroy , google Democratic Socialists of America , look at their members list / google Progressive Caucus , look at their members list .
The socialist party , has got nothing to do with either . And I challenge you to find the name of one US Representative or Senator on any list of the DSA OR Socialist party .
Carolyn's original claim was that these "socialists were members of congress . She LIED or got duped , when I posted the Links , and then POSTED the lists found at each , Carolyn then CHOSE TO LIE .
Case closed . Wanna believe her ? Go ahead , that's your problem .
oldroy , google Democratic Socialists of America ,... (show quote)


Sorry, Lou, I just don't understand you. I googled for Dem Congressmen on the Socialist and Democrat Socialist lists and found that the Socialist party claims70 of them and the list. Now one of you leaners said tonight that there is no Socialist party in the US any longer and this doesn't agree with whoever it was. Also, the Dem Socialists claim 58 of those people. I won't bother with the Progressive Caucus since we know that too many of them are on the Socialist list.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13696

Reply
 
 
Aug 25, 2013 23:31:33   #
Lou Loc: Florida
 
oldroy wrote:
Sorry, Lou, I just don't understand you. I googled for Dem Congressmen on the Socialist and Democrat Socialist lists and found that the Socialist party claims70 of them and the list. Now one of you leaners said tonight that there is no Socialist party in the US any longer and this doesn't agree with whoever it was. Also, the Dem Socialists claim 58 of those people. I won't bother with the Progressive Caucus since we know that too many of them are on the Socialist list.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13696
Sorry, Lou, I just don't understand you. I google... (show quote)


Sorry oldroy , you are incapable . Funny google must operate different for you huh oldroy . I google DSA I get to see their home page / I google Progressive Caucus , I get the same , you have some problems old man .


You wont bother with progressive caucus because THAT is where the list of 58 US Representaives and 1 Senator can be found . The list you'll find on DSA does not include ANY .

You have a penchant for lying when proven wrong old roy . just like Carolyn .

Reply
Aug 25, 2013 23:37:18   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Lou wrote:
Sorry oldroy , you are incapable . Funny google must operate different for you huh oldroy . I google DSA I get to see their home page / I google Progressive Caucus , I get the same , you have some problems old man .


You pay so little attention to my posts. I said I had googled Dem Socialist party and Socialist Party and even said that I didn't take the trouble to google Progressive Caucus knowing they would be the same people as on the Socialist Party. I will check it out tomorrow.

Reply
Aug 25, 2013 23:54:30   #
Lou Loc: Florida
 
oldroy wrote:
You pay so little attention to my posts. I said I had googled Dem Socialist party and Socialist Party and even said that I didn't take the trouble to google Progressive Caucus knowing they would be the same people as on the Socialist Party. I will check it out tomorrow.


You're so full of shit old man it's coming out your ears . Oh you'll "check it tomorrow " ???

You embarrass yourself you old poophead .

Reply
Aug 25, 2013 23:59:05   #
carolyn
 
oldroy wrote:
Sorry, Lou, I just don't understand you. I googled for Dem Congressmen on the Socialist and Democrat Socialist lists and found that the Socialist party claims70 of them and the list. Now one of you leaners said tonight that there is no Socialist party in the US any longer and this doesn't agree with whoever it was. Also, the Dem Socialists claim 58 of those people. I won't bother with the Progressive Caucus since we know that too many of them are on the Socialist list.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13696
Sorry, Lou, I just don't understand you. I google... (show quote)


oldroy, forget about Googling. Just go into search and you will find what you seek. I stopped Googling after I first got my computer because a friend who is a computer whiz showed me where I could get more up-to-date information from search than I ever could from any other source. But if you want to find information from more than one source, you have to get off search and get back on for each line of information you want to look up.

I first went on search to find out the list of Progressive Caucus. Then I clicked off search, clicked back on, and typed in DSA members and received the lists for the DSA members in Congress. That is what I have been trying to tell LULU, but it seems to bounce off his thick skull. He would rather think he has an excuse to call me a liar than check this out as I did.

Reply
 
 
Aug 26, 2013 00:03:25   #
Lou Loc: Florida
 
carolyn wrote:
oldroy, forget about Googling. Just go into search and you will find what you seek. I stopped Googling after I first got my computer because a friend who is a computer whiz showed me where I could get more up-to-date information from search than I ever could from any other source. But if you want to find information from more than one source, you have to get off search and get back on for each line of information you want to look up.

I first went on search to find out the list of Progressive Caucus. Then I clicked off search, clicked back on, and typed in DSA members and received the lists for the DSA members in Congress. That is what I have been trying to tell LULU, but it seems to bounce off his thick skull. He would rather think he has an excuse to call me a liar than check this out as I did.
oldroy, forget about Googling. Just go into search... (show quote)


There are no DSA members I Congress you little bald faced liar , I posted the member list right from the DSA homepage , no one single name on that list is a member of Congress . Do you lie like this to your friends and family ?

Did your parents teach you to lie like this ?

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 00:24:45   #
carolyn
 
Lou wrote:
There are no DSA members I Congress you little bald faced liar , I posted the member list right from the DSA homepage , no one single name on that list is a member of Congress . Do you lie like this to your friends and family ?

Did your parents teach you to lie like this ?


You are a lost cause, Di--head! Just go to he-- and stay put!

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 00:31:17   #
Lou Loc: Florida
 
carolyn wrote:
You are a lost cause, Di--head! Just go to he-- and stay put!


Your just a pathological liar .

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 12:24:39   #
Yankee Clipper
 
[quote=72BADGER]We only need one party, I'm not to keen on a single party system, because it would soon abuse the Constitution and the citizens alike. While I am a Constitutional conservative, I distrust the right just as much as the left. Power always corrupts.The American Party, only one rule, follow the original Constitution, I support that idea, but most sheeple could not stand the country being run as it was intended to be with very little government intrusion. How many times do you hear, "There should be a law...", because someone doesn't like what someone else is doing even if it is Constitutionally legal. Too many do gooders for our own good. Look at all the bleeding heart liberal sophist that are invading this site. Most offer no solutions other than more government intrusion on their way to a Marxist untopia which will never happen. What they will get will be an elititst communist untopian government of slavery and missery. (I also)support the original Constituion and its original intent and would defend it and would reverse harmful laws made over the last 150 years.
Require extensive mental testing and drug testing for all that hold office from small town Gov. thru the White House.I could also support that requirement and I would suggest that to be used for any and all employment, can't pass the test, no job, turn criminal rather than change your ways, a neck tie party. /quote]

Reply
 
 
Aug 26, 2013 14:00:59   #
72BADGER Loc: Texas
 
[quote=Yankee Clipper]
72BADGER wrote:
We only need one party, I'm not to keen on a single party system, because it would soon abuse the Constitution and the citizens alike. While I am a Constitutional conservative, I distrust the right just as much as the left. Power always corrupts.The American Party, only one rule, follow the original Constitution, I support that idea, but most sheeple could not stand the country being run as it was intended to be with very little government intrusion. How many times do you hear, "There should be a law...", because someone doesn't like what someone else is doing even if it is Constitutionally legal. Too many do gooders for our own good. Look at all the bleeding heart liberal sophist that are invading this site. Most offer no solutions other than more government intrusion on their way to a Marxist untopia which will never happen. What they will get will be an elititst communist untopian government of slavery and missery. (I also)support the original Constituion and its original intent and would defend it and would reverse harmful laws made over the last 150 years.
Require extensive mental testing and drug testing for all that hold office from small town Gov. thru the White House.I could also support that requirement and I would suggest that to be used for any and all employment, can't pass the test, no job, turn criminal rather than change your ways, a neck tie party. /quote]
We only need one party, b color=brown I'm not to... (show quote)


More than one party opens the door back up for dirty dealing. I feel a regular psyche test/ truth and drug test would keep them in line. Besides their only function would be to uphold the Constitution, not change it. There would be no more backroom payoffs because individual Reps. would be powerless alone. Open up free enterprise, explore new resources, eliminate most of the clutter in Wash., stay out of other countries business, go back to our early principles of leave us alone, we'll leave you alone. Stop paying agriculture not to grow and start them growing. many things to be done that would keep us self sufficient. Protect our borders, keep our citizens free and allow anything that doesn't harm another. Free isn't free if you can't do it, but again, it can't be something that harms others. Run a still or grow weed, nobody elses business. Our Forefathers did both, didn't hurt them. Too much to cover, but it would be better than this.

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 14:07:01   #
Yankee Clipper
 
72BADGER wrote:
More than one party opens the door back up for dirty dealing. I feel a regular psyche test/ truth and drug test would keep them in line. Besides their only function would be to uphold the Constitution, not change it. There would be no more backroom payoffs because individual Reps. would be powerless alone. Open up free enterprise, explore new resources, eliminate most of the clutter in Wash., stay out of other countries business, go back to our early principles of leave us alone, we'll leave you alone. Stop paying agriculture not to grow and start them growing. many things to be done that would keep us self sufficient. Protect our borders, keep our citizens free and allow anything that doesn't harm another. Free isn't free if you can't do it, but again, it can't be something that harms others. Run a still or grow weed, nobody elses business. Our Forefathers did both, didn't hurt them. Too much to cover, but it would be better than this.
More than one party opens the door back up for dir... (show quote)


I guess we agree on the bigger part anyway and the Constitution.

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 14:07:01   #
Yankee Clipper
 
72BADGER wrote:
More than one party opens the door back up for dirty dealing. I feel a regular psyche test/ truth and drug test would keep them in line. Besides their only function would be to uphold the Constitution, not change it. There would be no more backroom payoffs because individual Reps. would be powerless alone. Open up free enterprise, explore new resources, eliminate most of the clutter in Wash., stay out of other countries business, go back to our early principles of leave us alone, we'll leave you alone. Stop paying agriculture not to grow and start them growing. many things to be done that would keep us self sufficient. Protect our borders, keep our citizens free and allow anything that doesn't harm another. Free isn't free if you can't do it, but again, it can't be something that harms others. Run a still or grow weed, nobody elses business. Our Forefathers did both, didn't hurt them. Too much to cover, but it would be better than this.
More than one party opens the door back up for dir... (show quote)


I guess we agree on the bigger part anyway and the Constitution.

Reply
Aug 26, 2013 14:15:46   #
72BADGER Loc: Texas
 
72BADGER wrote:
More than one party opens the door back up for dirty dealing. I feel a regular psyche test/ truth and drug test would keep them in line. Besides their only function would be to uphold the Constitution, not change it. There would be no more backroom payoffs because individual Reps. would be powerless alone. Open up free enterprise, explore new resources, eliminate most of the clutter in Wash., stay out of other countries business, go back to our early principles of leave us alone, we'll leave you alone. Stop paying agriculture not to grow and start them growing. many things to be done that would keep us self sufficient. Protect our borders, keep our citizens free and allow anything that doesn't harm another. Free isn't free if you can't do it, but again, it can't be something that harms others. Run a still or grow weed, nobody elses business. Our Forefathers did both, didn't hurt them. Too much to cover, but it would be better than this.
More than one party opens the door back up for dir... (show quote)

By the way, there would be NO coddling of whiners. STHU is my response to that. Not in the babysitting business.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.